Sustainable Transportation

Levitation Transportation

Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:43:47 GMT

Using levitating vehicles for transportation

photo credits: freepic.com/shutterstock

This article is a return to the topic of levitation for short-distance transportation. Since levitation is vibrational mass accumulation, is vibration levitation? No. There are several definitions to levitation: illusion, paranormal, levitation of saints, and physics. In physics, vibrational mass accumulation is from the heat of gases, sound waves, and magnetic reactions.

Are the spiritual dimension and levitation of saints, and paranormal; a neural manifestation of physics? Anything paranormal, of a spiritual nature, or dimensional conception, are instantly affiliated with pseudoscience. The anomalous evidences are often perceived as misinterpretations, misunderstandings, or abnormal variations of natural phenomena, beyond the scope of normal scientific understanding or explanation. Common examples include extrasensory perception (ESP), telekinesis, ghosts, poltergeists, reincarnation, and UFOs.

There is so little known about levitation, much of its field of understanding and study is held in the realm of fringe science. This is unaccountable scientific phenomena, similar in definition to a UFO. The literal definition of an Unidentified Flying Object is merely a flying apparatus that has no government class of identification; no registered FAA license number. Fringe science is the field of science that receives no authorized government funding, and is classified as pseudoscience. There are no political lobby groups representing the science practices that operate outside the prescribed institutional norms. This short diatribe is only to state that money for expanding nontraditional approaches to traditional scientific perspectives, are kept far from public view.

Commercial use for Levitation

How much research is being pursued for levitation in transportation? There is very little know research that investigates levitation as a viable method for transportation, other than magnetic levitation (maglev) train technology.

One of the few studies of levitation for transportation, specifically without maglev is this abstract from Mu, G., Zhao, J., Dong, H (2021). Smart Materials and Structures , a structural parameter study of dual transducers-type ultrasonic levitation-based transportation system.

Having a continuous mode of transportation, in the manufacturing and pharmaceutical industries, is desirable and this facilitated by the usage of dual transducer-type ultrasonic levitation-based transportation systems. It is well known that the structural and electrical parameters determine what can be transported continuously, but the relationships between these important parameters are still not clear. In this study, the vibrating plate length and the phase shift between the two transducers were investigated as both of these are key parameters for the transportation system, and affect the standing wave ratios (SWRs), the acoustic radiation forces, and consequently the way the transportation system operates. Through numerical analysis and experimental verification, it can be seen that when the sum or difference of the spatial phase difference (determined by the vibrating plate length) and the phase shift is equal to 180°×(1+2n) (where n is an integer), except for the spatial phase difference of 180°·m (where m is also an integer) and the SWRs approaches unity, all this implying that traveling waves (TWs) are dominantly excited on the vibrating plate. As a consequence, the TW-induced acoustic radiation force, which greatly exceeds the standing wave-induced force, causes the continuous transportation of the particle being moved in the sound field. This paper not only clarifies the requirements for generating this continuous transportation, but also provides valuable information on the practical design of such a transportation system.

The goal of this and three dozen other research projects is short height levitation for transferring goods on conveyer belts for manufacturing.

A paper on measuring the distance of how far a measured load can levitate. Or, ‘Nonlinear coupling between radial and axial vibrations during single-axis acoustic levitation in mid-air.’ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020740323000619

Another experiment using levitation is with an ultrasonic motor using the inverse piezoelectric effect of piezoelectric actuator and converting the energy of the voltage into mechanical energy in the form of ultrasonic vibration is driven by propulsion generated by flexural propagating waves. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141635924002149

Experimenting with sound fields for levitation: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9593674

Levitation innovation

The expansive website, LevitationTrransportTechnologies , is an assembly of technological concepts delving deep along the edge of fringe scientific discovery in levitating transportation. This is a truly brilliant compilation of ideas that include contemporary AI designs. The website is an example of new perspectives which will advance transportation to brand-new modes for transportation’s future.

Another of innovative performance in leading today’s technology is with InvoStation . This company is building a wingless flying electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle (eVTOL). Its remarkable design removes external wings and spinning blades. With its structural design and intense operational computerization, this raises current safety and flight technology to the advanced level of contemporary transportation.

Levitation for transportation

Relating levitation to transportation, Wikipedia hosts an article about Ion-propelled aircraft, which is different than levitation but, close enough for this writing. The article mentions T. Townsend Brown and the Biefeld-Brown Effect. Brown’s work with electrogravitics is foundational to the ability of manipulating gravity and levitation.

The Wikipedia article of Ionic air propulsion describes the technique of creating a flow of air through electric differentials , without any moving parts; also referred to as a "solid-state" drive. This technology is based on the principle of electrohydrodynamics.

There are currently 40 CATTCC articles regarding new methodologies for short distance transportation.

Simplicity is the author of nature. The simplest of transportation designs is the levitating platform of Viktor Grebennikov. His device was based on the Cavity Structures Effect . That article’s conclusion: The pursuit of Viktor Grebennikov’s work has a specific purpose. Its purpose is to create a levitating environment to enact a situation for atomic vibration. This vibration involves an interaction with Earth’s atmosphere or magnetosphere. The research thus far has clearly indicated this is not an aerodynamic principle; its lift is not a reaction of propulsion. The continuing pursuit is to develop a new mode of short distance transportation.

Conclusion

The conclusion to these previous studies is that levitation is an occurrence of molecular vibrations; a resonance of generally inaudible frequencies in a mass, producing a unified harmonic frequency.

Additionally, the study of levitation concludes that the word: antigravity, is a misnomer; a misunderstanding of what gravity is.

The social demand for transportation to evolve is imperative for it to match society’s technological advances.

Moon Colony Transportation and New Physics

Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:36:26 GMT

Moon Colony Transportation and Physics for New Transportation

photo credits: freepic/pixel labs

What kind of vehicle can be used for transportation on the moon? The initial size of a moon or Mars colony would be the size of a large building. Distances traveled in such a facility would be within walking distance but, with minimal gravity. The most appropriate device needed for any ground use transportation would be for building and material handling, with a forklift. Outside the living compound, exploration would necessitate a transportation vehicle. NASA’s moon rover and Mars rover are designed for this task.

As such facilities grow, what type of planetary surface transportation is needed? A vehicle using a combustible type of engine using chemical explosions as an energy source for propulsion has an extremely limited use. Vehicles with friction-based movement using an electric power source are unsustainable for long term use.

What sort of sustainable transportation device could be considered? Would Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform work on the moon? Is there enough electromagnetic content in the moon’s atmosphere to provide voltage? An atmosphere without enough voltage to power a strong magnetic field would be inadequate to power a vehicle. Since levitation is mass accumulation vibration, the moon has a lesser density atmosphere than Earth and is lacking the gaseous particles to accumulate large quantities of mass for vibrational effects.

Vibration reflects sound. Without an atmosphere there is no sound.

Here is an AI answer regarding a question of sound on the moon. “No, there is no sound on the Moon in the traditional sense because its atmosphere is so thin (a near-vacuum) that it lacks the medium required for sound waves to travel through the air. Unlike on Earth, where sound propagates via air molecules, sound cannot travel through the vacuum of space or the lunar exosphere, meaning astronauts cannot hear voices or explosions from a distance without equipment.

“However, sound can be transmitted through solid materials on the Moon's surface, such as the ground or spacesuits. For instance, astronauts on the Apollo missions could hear the vibrations of a hammer striking the lunar surface because the sound traveled through their boots and suits directly to their ears. Similarly, when spent rocket stages crashed into the Moon, they generated seismic vibrations that lasted for over an hour, causing the Moon to "ring like a bell" due to its dry, rigid interior, though these waves were detected by seismometers rather than heard by human ears in the air.”

Since sound is able to be transmitted through solid materials, does this provide enough mass vibration to accumulate levitation? Of course not, levitation is a floating action with an object in the air.

Rather than inventing a vehicle that eliminates use of the wheel for an extremely low number of users, creating an undiscovered short distance technology for a zero-atmosphere levitation vehicle based on concepts of gravity manipulation would be an inappropriate effort.

Where is the appropriate effort desperately needed for change in transportation?

Transportation demand to alleviate today’s traffic

One only needs to be on a slow crowded freeway to discover the crucial demand to improve transportation. In analyzing the problems with traffic, it has to be recognized that all urban growth is built upon an area’s primary source of transportation. Affecting the improvement to Western Civilization’s transportation, requires an accompanying change in its urban design.

Enabling sustainable urban design requires a brand-new mode of transportation: sustainable transportation. This involves replacing the unsustainability of Western Society’s automobile, as its primary source of transportation. There’s a market demand from today’s culture to replace its transportation system that began 125 years ago. Modern society calls for a convenient, fast, economic, and efficient mode of advanced transportation technology.

New transportation designs

Developing a design with a brand-new concept of transportation opens a new era for technology innovation. This technology search is a dive into deep physics with a relationship between the invisible motion of sound, gravity, and the flow of particles. This investigation encompasses more than transportation technology of short-distance or long-distance travel. It includes a relationship of a waves and particle mass. This probe into the edge of theoretical physics seeks to add perspective, rather than challenging the context of agreed opinion. The task is for new perceptions in physics in its relationship with transportation.

The dive into theoretical physics

Changing transportation from today’s use, obligates brand-new perspectives that are currently unknown. This can only be attained by searching the unknown. Today’s standard procedure for transportation is the pursuit to add technology onto what already exists. An example was adding a radio to a car’s interior to make the ride more pleasant. Existing transportation technology pursues propulsion, aerodynamic engineering, and computerized operation. This only promotes the fundamentals of 100- to 200-year-old technologies.

Foundational changes in transportation necessitate study into primary perceptions of physics at the fundamental levels.

This is a long segment. This answer takes a journey further into science , along the narrow path in theoretical physics to follow the motion of particle mass. The path leads to a ravine which questions the accuracy of scientific opinion, elucidates a variation of perspective, and explores fringes of the unknown.

Historical academicians

Many centuries ago, the scientific stance of Earth was confirmed as flat and the heavens rotated around it. In 500 BCE, Pythagoras proposed a spherical Earth based on philosophical and aesthetic reasoning rather than empirical evidence. By the 3rd century BCE, the educated scholars had established that a round Earth is a scientific fact, with Eratosthenes providing the first accurate empirical confirmation.

The point being: scholarly scientific opinion is susceptible of being a perception contrary to fact. This is to say: although unified opinion insists on scientific absolutes, it took the world’s greatest minds 200 years to agree that the Earth is round.

Today’s academia makes claim that particles and waves are dissimilar.

Differentiation of a wave and a particle

In his 1924 PhD thesis, French physicist Louis-Victor-Pierre-Raymond, 7th duc de Broglie , theorized the de Broglie wave.

His thesis postulated a wave nature of electrons which suggests that all matter has wave properties. His concept, known as the de Broglie hypothesis explains wave-particle duality, as both a particle and a wave. This theory addresses the core of quantum mechanics. De Broglie was awarded the 1929 Nobel Prize for Physics for his discoveries, yet, modern physics discounts this perspective.

In a related CATTCC article, Deep Dive into Quantum Physics , the work of John Worrell Keely (1827–1898) is mentioned. His work was in relation to wave flow. Extending this philosophic practice was the controversial work of Walter Russell (1871-1963). His work parallels the unified field theory, with light.

In studying theory of classical physics, the work of John Worrell Keely, regarding sympathetic streams in the ratio 3:6:9, are among investigation. His work is based on this principle: “Those whose relative frequencies are 3:9, are mutually attractive, while those having the relation of 6:9, are mutually repellant.” The website https://svpwiki.com/369 is an exploration of his findings.

In mathematical exploration of these relationships, is it a valid premise to use base three, six, or nine? Most likely base 9 to correspond with the path of particle mass in its full rotation.

In following that study is a theory stating that the balanced flow of particle mass is based on the fundamental shape of a rotating tetrahedron as motion.

In accordance to Einstein’s postulation that all mater is flowing at light speed: all elements flow. All molecular combinations flow. That is to say: all matter has frequency. When an ampere of electrical energy flows, everything within that wave path is subjected to light speed squared. Static electricity is a collection of potential energy that is undirected, its flow is an electromagnetic centrifugal reaction. This is what Keely refers to as a 6:9 frequency.

The central theme here is the exploration into the path of particle mass for the purpose of replicating its motion to allow an engagement of synchronization with a vehicle to flow in that same linear motion. This is in assumption to Einstein’s theory of relatively that all matter is traveling at light speed through the universe. Adding to this complexity is the fact that such a task implies a situation analogous to standing on a train with two trains traveling parallel with each other and both trains traveling at the same speed. The point of the analogy is a question in finding the launch point of how to jump from one train to the other train; the speed and direction have to match.

Einstein’s famous quote claims that energy (E) equals mass (M) times the speed of light (C) squared. With that being correct, matching the direction and pattern of flow of the constant (MC) would allow the manipulation with the flow and direction of energy. Enabling this motion with a vehicle would expand the context of nanoscience computation of quantum physics to lightspeed travel. The flow of energy has to match the flow of mass.

The flow of particle mass

As a postulation to the path of particle motion, the three-dimensional path of particle mass is described as an eight-pointed mobius. The Keely base 9 frequency (6:9) being the negative (electron motion) frequency, engages a momentum point; triggering movement of the inner (opposite) charge (proton). This action is the gravitational process to the linear motion of angular momentum of mass traveling at light speed.

This proposes shows that particles travel in wave motion. It also validates the CATTCC position: Gravity is a subatomic action; a process of motion. It is the angular momentum of a particle’s frequency pattern in the flow of mass. This is instrumental in CATTCC’s mission of researching new methodologies for transportation.

One key point of transportation interest is that Otis Carr used the Nikola Tesla’s influence of Utron as the square, circle, cone; for movement in a centripetal motion for his ship to spin. Along this principle, it recognizes that all matter moves in a unified motion. A molecule follows the same pattern. In this perspective.

Conclusion

Does all this clarify the differentiation between a wave and a particle? The answers are dependent upon one’s perspective.

To the academically trained and practicing physicists, the answers are based on mathematics and cyclotron bombardment to obliterate particle mass: while snapping pictures at the moment of disintegration.

Some philosophers of physics with empirical reasoning; conceptualize particle mass as waves traveling as frequency.

Changing Deep Space Flight

Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:35:27 GMT

New physics perspectives to advance deep-space-flight technology

photo credits: vecteezy.com / pixabay.com

The future of transportation will dramatically change from what it is today. Both short-distance and long-distance space travel require new physics perspectives with modern technological advances. Movement in short-distance transportation will consist of levitation via the utilization of atmospheric layers of electromagnetism and the accumulation of vibrational mass. Long-distance space flight will use the manipulation of gravity and spin momentum of magnetism.

Short-distance is molecular manipulation, long-distance is particle manipulation. The process of manipulating particles and molecules require alternative perspectives in understanding the tradition of physics.

Exploring particle physics

There’s a question that might be argued against supporting the current strategy in particle physics. This opposing question is whether the current particle physics strategy of bombarding atoms to observe their fragmentation is conducive for the manipulation of particle motion. The investigation of particle motion would greatly advance deep-space transportation. A strategy that seeks to understand fundamental forces of particle motion rather than their disintegration would serve the engineering challenges of ultra-fast speed necessary for deep-space exploration.

This differing perspective highlights the distinction between fundamental research (discovering what matter is made of) and applied technology (developing transportation systems). The typical argument maintains that atom smashing is akin to smashing glass jars to learn about glass, the proponents note that such experiments reveal quarks, gluons, and new states of matter that could eventually lead to unforeseen technological breakthroughs, even if the path is not immediate.

The topic of this article is a rationalization to focus attention towards the practicality of a new direction for deep-space travel. This direction of attraction with gravity, rather than propulsion; can be a source of motion. This approach explores the path of frequency flow with particle mass.

Is there a way to validate different perspectives that differ from the accepted opinion of theoretical physics? The issue of the accepted opinion, without a clear definition of what gravity is, holds question to the legitimacy of its opinion.

Discovering the path of particle mass would be necessary for its manipulation. Advancing deep-space travel exploration should be found by aligning a craft’s speed with that flow of mass.

Einstein’s theory of relativity made the claim of space-time as a constant motion. He postulated relativity as lightspeed motion. Thus, life as our perception is traveling at lightspeed. This perception is the realization that all matter is not static. It acknowledges mass times the speed of light (MC) as constant motion.

The ongoing direction of interest in the theoretical physics community and academia is its pursuit to collide and bombard particles with nuclear accelerators for the purpose of exploding particle apart with fission reactions. The intent is an exploration into particle makeup.

The contention in this article is making the point that, providing Einstein’s theory of relativity is correct: all particle mass is traveling at lightspeed. It is the postulation of this article, and many other CATTCC articles, that all particles follow a specific unified path. This leads to the assumption that all theories of color and flavor with particle mass, are merely a consequence and reaction to a particle’s collision bombardment; along its path at lightspeed.

As a longtime student of theoretical physics, yet, without access to produce conclusive evidence; this author’s supposition has grown as a perspective for 50 years. This perspective has drawn a theory towards a unified field that is consistent with all matter as frequency patterns; albeit extremely short-wave lengths and lightspeed type motion.

Relevance to this article only relates to functions of transportation and the manipulation of gravity.

Siting two paragraphs from Deep Dive into Quantum Physics :

When molecular structure is combined similar to the configuration of Otis Carr’s Utron , the balance in that structure is the 3:9 frequency. This pattern maintains the frequency of a large tetrahedron necessary for spin balance of momentum in transportation. This relates to the smallest shape of an element’s mass as a balance function of its path. Again, this perspective is aligned with the theory that the path of particle mass is its specific eight-pointed mobius pattern on a ribbon type linear course to follow its centripetal action at the speed of light.

Pursuing this perspective hosts a direction of questions to examine. Three paragraphs from: Theory for Fast Space Speed :

Applying theory to speed

The basis for mankind’s fastest space travel has been shown to be gravity. Current space travel technology displays that the most efficient consideration for space travel is gravitational attraction from a large planetary mass. Molecular density has a greater number of particles, this allows a larger amount of gravitational motion.

Another question: what gravitational influence does radiation of heat have to planetary bodies? The question arises from the ambient temperature of deep space. Gravity, as a function of particle motion, holds objects in orbit. Is heat an influence to gravity? The process of compression movement produces cold. This produces little to zero thermodynamic loss. Explosion technology produces massive thermodynamic loss.

In applying the tetrahedron shape to a space craft, its centripetal spin rotation a becomes a linear course direction of trajectory.

And a visualization for the pieces necessary to build a craft capable of extremely fast speed for space flight in the article; Adding to Possibilities :

Visualizing the build

Principle concepts to consider:

Tetrahedron

Magnetism

Toroidal field

Spin

Centripetal force

Vortex

Vacuum

Device to carry load

The article, Gravity Waves presents many valid points and also questions.

In the article, Gravity Surfboard , it gives this perspective:

The application of wave amplification could be applied to any material or group of molecules within a defined area. Was this the principle behind Tesla’s earthquake machine and could a similar application be effective? He built a device on the concept of spring tension. This reciprocating engine applied a constant force of steam to produce vibration. By perceiving this vibration with the term of frequency of light, the perspective for spring tension can be viewed as a light wave. Near the conclusion of describing his invention, he adds: “Another application of the invention is to move a conductor in a magnetic field for generating electric currents , and in these and similar uses it is obvious that these characteristics of the engine render it especially adapted for use in small sizes or units.”

Can the concept in application from Tesla’s machine be used as a source to generate an oscillation found in an electromagnetic switch? Could this be manipulated in a manner that would affect the subatomic flow of matter?

With the new theory of gravity being angular momentum of a twist in the linear path of particle mass at light speed, can a Tesla Reciprocating Engine accelerate or manipulate a gravitational wave to enable surfing that pattern of waves?

Such a device would employ the wave generator and a separate standing platform. The device would not look like nor would it operate like a traditional surfboard.

This leads to the Alcubierre drive. The concept of gravity waves indicates a similarity to the theory in 1994 by physicist Miguel Alcubierre. The Alcubierre Drive is a theoretical propulsion concept proposed by Miguel Alcubierre that suggests faster-than-light travel by contracting space in front of a spacecraft and expanding space behind it. While the mathematics of this warp bubble are consistent with Einstein's field equations, theorists opposing Alcubierre’s concept claim it requires negative energy or exotic matter, which has not been observed in nature, making its construction currently impossible.

A theoretical approach conceptualizing wave amplification of gravity waves and T. Townsend Brown’s Biefeld-Brown Effect brings a question of possible legitimacy to Alcubierre’s drive theory.

Conclusion

Does any of this discussion bring validation for attaining the necessity for ultra-fast speed of deep-space exploration? It presents concepts and asks questions that seek answers. These conversations are a must for expanding conventional physics to reach ultra-fast speeds that exceed lightspeed travel.

Deep Space Flight Sustainability

Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:03:25 GMT

Sustainability in deep-space exploration

photo credits: freepic/pintrest

For viable deep-space exploration, the near impossible challenge is reaching or exceeding lightspeed travel. Beyond this is are other gauntlets to face: fuel and ship operational controls. Addressing possible solutions for speed and fuel are found in theoretical physics with gravity manipulation. With the conceptual considerations of methodologies in ship designs, operational control becomes a question.

Design innovation

Another example of space flight innovation is the three-section design of Otis Carr’s ship. The two outer sections spin in opposite directions. As their spin increases, the momentum creates an independent inertial field. This can be visualized as similar to a gyroscope; a three-dimensional field with inner and outer spins and a gravitationally neutral third section.

Julio Gobbi explains it very well: With this physical expansion and contraction, is an electromagnetic field. Gravity enters the picture in the form of this relative rotation. When the relative rotation – inertial effective mass –, it's a matter of dimension. So that is the earth, say, is 8,000 miles in diameter, we know its fixed rotation is 1 in 24 hours. If we were 1 mile in diameter its rotation would be 8,000 in 24 hours. And by the same system, our 45-foot craft has a rotation of 580 rpm and when it reaches this rotation it is totally independent of its inertial attractive mass, in an electromagnetic field.

The capabilities from this type of technology are not particularly new. Viktor Schauberger allegedly built the Repulsin A and Repulsin B, between 1940 and 1945. T. Townsend Brown theorized electrogravitics and the Biefeld-Brown Effect in the early 1920s. John Searl allegedly built his “Levity Disc” based on the principles of his Searl Effect Generator which produces electricity without friction, with no noise, no vibration, and no heat. Otis Carr’s ship allegedly took its flight in the late 1950s.

Many other examples of provocative alternatives are listed in the Patent References article.

Beyond the challenge of reaching and exceeding lightspeed travel, ship control operations become another place for innovation.

In the rotational ellipsoid design of Otis Carr’s ship, the two opposing spinning inner and outer hulls present more impossible engineering hurdles for the ship’s operational control. Its spheroidal shape has three separate sections; the control section is neutral and acts as a floating axle for the spinning inner and outer hull sections that spin in the opposite direction to each other. Their combined action creates an independent inertia field.

The spinning of its inner and outer hulls creates a strong electromagnetic field that is impenetrable by electromagnetic control signals. Mechanical cable controls are impossible, optic sensors are also blocked by physical barriers.

Otis Carr claimed he became the protégé of Nikola Tesla in the late 1920s. This influence is seen as hypothetically possible by the operational control of neural oscillations with a neural switch. The direction Otis Carr pursued for neural control was transmitted by brain wave frequency, and received by the frequency of hue. The article Operational Control theorizes solutions;

Matching wave patterns

What is apparent in Otis Carr’s ship was the psychokinetic transmission to the color spectrum. It’s theorized that the hue pattern transmitted a focused and measurable signal, interpreted as a specific control switch to perform a task.

Colored light travels at different speeds. When this light travels at different speed, it creates a different wavelength, or angstrom value.

When the psychokinetic waves of a specific color are transmitted as thoughts, the oscillations can be interpreted by an optical sensor receiver at angstrom values that specific hue to activate particular switches.

The psychokinetic oscillations can be focused to transmit a specific color. Is this true? By focusing on the optical visualization (hue), the mind can concentrate on that visual input of any specific color. This automatic reaction is then generated as a neural oscillation of that visualization. As an example, a room filled with blue light sends the blue light to the neural optic center in the brain as blue light. This is simply a psychokinetic process of functionality.

More along this exploration of technology is found in the article: Toroidal Fields of Dreams .

Basics of deep-space flight

Long duration deep-space flight missions would also require vital elements for growing nutritional sustainability, also known as food. The main component holding these qualities is spelled DIRT. Dirt is also a vital component to supply electromagnetic fields with grounding.

From the article Long-Distance Flight and Space Colonies :

Aeronautics is intimately tied to propulsion technology. It’s dependent upon the pushing force necessary to force an object through the atmosphere. Traveling in space is a different science, its source of motion should be very different. For some space missions, it is. Those space missions using gravity as a source for motion are able to capture and maintain tremendously faster speeds. And yet, even those rocket launches display the horridly violent but exciting volatile explosions as the gas filled cylinders are ignited in an attempt to contain one degree of trajectory in the massive 360-degree energy release.

In a related article, Non-Earth Urban Growth : The pursuit of intelligence seeks education. Those who seek wisdom find their answer in simplicity. The complexity of all things is found with the movement in patterns of frequencies.

The field of theoretical physics holds many opinions regarding the makeup of matter. A large segment of debate argues magnetism. Electromagnetic fields are accepted as surrounding Earth. With this agreement of understanding, what is the ingredient necessary to hold a magnetic field? This answer can cause argument within the scientific community. However, even within that community they would conclude: ferrous material. The main component of dirt is ferrous material.

Dirt provides an environment that stimulates plant growth. Dirt is a necessary component an urban development. Plants provide nutrients to sustain life. As such, this is an absolute necessity for any long-term space flight environment where life is to be sustained.

Dirt is seen in modern urban land-use design as an unnecessary intrusion. When this same environmental mindset of eliminating dirt, is engineered as a priority to eliminate weight and compressing size constraints for any long-range space travel ; priorities need to be recalibrated.

Dirt provides nutrients and magnetic fields necessary for life. Nature with gardens are necessary. This applies to urban growth design and space travel.

An article from BigThink.com provides a provocative study by University of Rochester; professor of physics and astronomy Adam Frank. The U of R study is based on an “O’Neill Cylinder”, named for Gerard O’Neill.

These articles point out the often-overlooked simplicities of human life. In a related topic, yet unrelated to space flight, one of the primary needs in child development is dirt. Modern urban growth with its insistence to high density real estate development is the lack of dirt for children to play in. The mineral intake is essential for child development and human life.

For deep-space travel, human life has to be sustained. Even in space flight, every person requires the ability of privacy, even in the midst of the dead of silence in deep space. Conversely, the presence of sounds within the environment of the cabin’s atmosphere would also be psychologically needed. In contemplating this topic, long-distance space flight is similar to living aspects of urban growth.

To accommodate sustainability, building a deep-space vehicle necessitates a very large vehicle capable of sustaining a garden, gym, and other attributes which require a gravitational field environment. The saucer shaped spacecraft vehicles can accommodate larger ship designs, whereas the tiny capsules of rocket ships require giant fuel containers. Conventional use of today’s rocket technology is unsustainable, consumption based, and incapable of fast speed for deep-space exploration.

Conclusion

Deep-space exploration requires new perceptions of physics. innovations follow new perceptions of motion: linear gravitational movement of centripetal force. This is the opposite direction than propulsion-based centrifugal force of friction. Operational controls driven by thought waves. Other innovations include spheroidal ship designs with large sustainable living quarters to include the simplicity of dirt for plant growth.

Considerations in Lightspeed Space Travel

Sun, 22 Mar 2026 22:51:27 GMT

Seeking new considerations for space travel at lightspeed

photo credits: Popular Mechanics free image - Alcubierre Drive, Reddit

In the mid-teens of 2000s, there were three people with notoriety and enough money to actively advance significant changes in the transportation industry. The three companies racing towards space exploration were: Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin, and SpaceX. The race is over; Elon Musk won the race. Having crushed his competition, Musk has doubled down and furthered his dominance. The Boring Company has grown to prevail over all privately held transportation infrastructure with its inground metropolitan transportation networks, the most innovative automobile technology available, as well as tremendous success with rocket technology.

Since it’s imperative to introduce new technological advanced transportation concepts to keep pace with society’s technical advances, considering the costs for implementing changes in transportation; it’s too large for a single individual. The hundreds of $millions The Boring Company is investing into its Las Vegas project provides a small glimpse of the massive infrastructure changes necessary to make an impact on transportation and its urban growth.

In the sphere of deep space flight, the ability for practicality: mandates ultra-fast speeds.

The article Theory for Fast Space Speed poses a reminder of Viktor Schauberger’s philosophy: “understand nature and copy it” as the necessity for efficient energy to be able to attain ultra-fast speeds. In building an ultra-fast space travel vehicle, all energy forces exerted; have to be contained within the field of the vehicle. Any exertion of energy force, such as a chemical or nuclear action would require that energy release to have its action interpreted as centripetal. Such reaction could conceivably be directed into a linear type rotational pattern. Engineering a device to interpret the explosive 360-degree energy release into a rotational linear pattern requires a multi-dimensional perception.

And again in the article Building for Fast Space Travel , it makes the claim that designs for ultra-fast speed of space travel, have no allowance for friction. To design a proper vehicle to fly in space, there can be no conflict from friction. For a vehicle to travel near lightspeed, or reaching lightspeed, it requires a vehicle using complete energy efficiency. Where can this be found?

All of human effort with current rocket launch technology has attained 0.000037279123279345 lightspeed.

What will it take to reach a fast enough speed essential for space travel? It requires a different perspective when considering the question. The energy waste with chemical explosions for propulsion are a technological embarrassment. Current rocket launch technology’s approach is “bigger bombs”. An explosion releases its energy in 360 degrees. The trajectory of a rocket is 1 degree. Even people with low math skills are able to figure out that 360 minus 1 equals 359. Rocket scientists have captured more than one degree of energy release, nonetheless, it still means chemical explosions as a method of propulsion are extremely inefficient.

The inefficiency of rocket technology is far too slow to be practical. This leads some people to ask the question: what is the goal of exploring space?

Why travel into space?

So, to the subject of space travel, there is a question: why? What’s the purpose for exploring space? Many people argue that Earth needs to solve its social problems before spending money to travel into space. One of the valid retorts to that position; is to provide the opportunity to escape from the senseless, redundant and valueless arguments of constant bickering.

What’s needed for deep space flight? Extremely fast speed. An excellent article about deep space travel is the article: What Space Exploration Requires . How realistic is deep space travel with today’s capability in space travel? Here’s an excerpt from the article: NASA’s planetary telescope missions suggest that Kepler-69c (Discovered in 2013) is the closest planet with the possibility to maintain life. It’s a super-Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of a star like our sun. But it’s located about twenty-seven hundred light-years from Earth, in the constellation Cygnus. This, of course means that getting there traveling at light speed would take 2,700 years.

The fastest speed human technology has thus far attained is 0.000037279123279345 lightspeed. Multiplying 0.000037279123279345 per second, times 34,000,000 seconds per year, times 2700 years, the Parker Solar Probe could reach Kepler-69c in 636,533,574,170 years.

Yeah, that makes it impractical.

Here are a few more numbers from that article to consider: Reaching the closest habitual planet, according to NASA, is twenty-seven hundred light years from Earth. That’s 14,112,000,000,000,000 (fourteen quadrillion, one hundred twelve trillion) miles away.

Light travels at 186,000 one hundred eighty-six thousand miles per second. There are 31,536,000 seconds per year. Traveling at lightspeed is 5,865,696,000,000 (five trillion, eight hundred sixty-five billion, six hundred ninety-six million) miles per year (figures are approximate).

The trip to the closest habitable exoplanet (Kepler-69-c) would take 2,700 years to reach, traveling at the speed of light.

An optimist can look at this, ignore past scientific achievement and look at this as a challenge with a different perspective for a solution. That same article notices more numbers: Following Einstein’s famous mathematical statement in his Theory of Relativity: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. Multiplying the speed of light squared, without being multiplied by mass, is 34,596,000,000 (thirty-four billion, five-hundred ninety-six million) miles per second. Times 31,536,000 seconds per year, says that traveling at lightspeed squared, the miles traveled in a year is 1,091,019,456,000,000,000 (one quintillion, ninety-one quadrillion, nineteen trillion, four hundred fifty-six billion) miles per year.

Mathematically, this indicates that traveling at the speed of lightspeed squared, reaching the closest planet that could possibly maintain life, would be reached in about eight months.

Is this possible? This perspective approach validates deep space exploration. Quantifiable deep space travel becomes realistic at twice the speed of light. How can such speed be attained? To again repeat Viktor Schauberger’s philosophy: “understand nature and copy it.”

Today’s exploratory deep space travel is based on rocket launch technology. To visualize the subatomic action of explosion propulsion, it’s revealed as an extremely wasteful use of energy.

Schauberger explained; nature is centripetal. All explosions are a collision of centrifugal force. At the subatomic level, the action of a rocket launch is an explosion force releasing energy in 360 degrees but, a rocket’s trajectory is only one degree. Reaching light speed has to be 100% useful energy; flowing in synchronization with light movement.

How much research is required to eventually ask the question: are there alternative methods of space flight; other than explosion propulsion?

New theories in particle physics

Considering theories on the leading edge of fringe science can hold possible solutions for attaining what would otherwise impossible. Considering gravity as a potential source of motion for a space craft might hold value; since it has already been proven that attractive force far exceeds the limited speed of propulsion.

In A Study in Gravity , is a new theory which postulates a description of gravity. This article explains: The definition of its mechanics and how it works as a mathematical equation, was discovered with Isaac Newton’s gravitational laws that were established 400 years ago. These formulas are still the standard for the physics industry. It explains how gravity reacts. It doesn’t explain what it is.

The currently held belief of all matter; is every particle maintains elliptical orbits. The new theory identifies matter as Einstein’s theory claims; that all matter is moving at light speed. This speed nullifies a model of matter holding elliptical orbits. The new theory of gravity postulates that all matter, as moving at light speed is linear. This linear movement follows unified wave motions. It postulates a specific path of linear movement. Gravity is identified as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path.

This new theory of gravity identifies it as a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. It does not negate gravitational laws that dictate its action. In regard to the composition of subatomic matter and what is held by today’s physics, it is the procession of electromagnetic orbits. This new theory discounts orbital paths and defines them as linear.

This theory adds to T. Townsend Brown’s supposition of electrogravitics . What is electrogravitics? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component to subatomic electric fields. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.

This new theory of gravity makes the point that magnetism is also the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. With the introduction of electrogravitics as a primary function, rather than electromagnetics; as the subatomic process of its path, a question is raised to support its viablity: How can non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties? It is the scientific claim that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism. Because science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in sub-atomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous? This new theory of gravity, being a subatomic process of each particle’s linear path, also accounts for the support of electrogravitics instead of electromagnetics.

Conclusion

What does a new theory of gravity have to do with deep space travel? It provides a new perspective which interacts with universal motion. It provides a new perspective that opens consideration to lightspeed travel. It stimulates conversational concepts beyond Alcubierre Drive.

More Levitation Exploration

Tue, 17 Mar 2026 19:49:44 GMT

Looking into the future of transportation

photo credits: freepik

For the future of both short-distance and long-distance transportation, the application to its science is based on theoretical physics and the makeup of subatomic particle motion and quantum mechanics; rather than the physical laws in flight of aeronautic engineering. The constant state of particle motion provides the application of gravitational attraction for vehicle movement: rather than producing an energy force of propulsion to oppose it. This attractive motion was applied to the space mission on the Parker Solar Probe, the fastest speed ever reached by mankind.

Answers are discovered by asking questions. An important question in the exploration of levitation for short distance transportation: what is a polymer crystalline lattice activated by an ultraviolet beam? The frequency of ultraviolet spectrum is radiated from large land masses. This is a constant field of radiated spectrums. The question then becomes an investigation of which spectrums have an effect on crystalline lattices and measuring that effect to enable a strong magnetic or diamagnetic reaction. The question is a query for the possibility of finding a method for levitation. AI is able to mathematically replicate complex lattice structure with mechanical 3D printers. The purpose would be generating AI 3D printed polymer crystalline lattices with Grebennikov’s voids of Cavity Structural Effect (CSE) into atmospheric electromagnetic fields.

How do voids contribute to motion in electromagnetic fields of the troposphere? One of the levitation articles highlights a Richard Feynman’s lecture on the electric potential gradient in Earth’s atmosphere. Feynman points out: On an ordinary day over flat desert country, or over the sea, as one goes upward from the surface of the ground the electric potential increases by about 100 volts per meter. Thus, there is a vertical electric field E of 100 volts/m in the air. The sign of the field corresponds to a negative charge on the earth’s surface.

This validates potential in utilizing Earth’s magnificent volume of available electric and magnetic fields.

Spectrum of light

Where does light become a potential source for transportation motion? Inasmuch as Feynman describes the amount of electricity potential in Earth’s atmosphere, there is much more to the full spectrum of radiation than just light.

In the Light as a Method of Power article, theories of how light might be used with transportation: Light originates with a power source. As Einstein’s theory hypothesizes, our galaxy is traveling at the speed of light. This necessitates everything within this complex (the Milky Way galaxy) to move at this speed (light speed). Einstein’s famous equation states that energy travels much faster. His statement says that energy is equal to mass multiplied by the light speed squared. By removing the energy component, relativity is mass times light speed. This indicates that without light speed, mass by itself does not exist with relativity. This statement suggests that without the speed of light, the relativity of mass would be absolute zero. This speculates that the presents of ether in empty space could be the motion of light speed. It presents a philosophical statement that the word: “all” is inclusive but, not infinite.

What is light? Theoretically, it originates from within an energy source. Is light a product of centrifugal force? It’s an outward motion and travels in a straight line. Although, as light may be centrifugal force, it is certainly not to be interpreted that centrifugal force is to be expressed as light. Its beam is unaffected by Earth’s nor the Sun’s gravitational influence. It can also be theorized that the direction of light, patterns itself within the direction of the Milky Way galaxy; following a slight curve as the direction frequency of relativity. Its speed is an amplification (in relation of mass) to the direction of relativity.

Light is the expression of energy; a frequency flow. It’s an extremely short wave length movement which exceeds nature’s motion of speed in relativity.

The article: How to Gauge Time relates light with time and distance traveled: Relative to Einstein’s theory that relativity is our galaxy traveling at the speed of light, every moment represents a time stamp segment traveling at the speed of light. The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second. At that speed, each human thought would leave a trace, measurable by a time stamp: t231029:20:58::52:05:01:01:01:01:01:10 or whatever that minute thought took. Nonetheless, there is a time stamp for every action and even every thought. And, as Earth travels with the galaxy at light speed; every thought leaves a footprint as to the exact moment and place that it left its identifying footprint.

The intent of these statements is to invigorate conversation with affirming questions. Theories align thoughts to possibilities of conjecture that hold potential as circumstantially valid.

Levitation

There are nearly 3-dozen CATTCC articles regarding levitation. The article: Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation , draws this conclusion as an explanation for levitation: To the postulation for the question: what is levitation, it seems that levitation is an accumulation of vibration in mass.

Magnets exchange outer shell electrons, a vibration occurs.

Ions are in this same category of exchanging electrons.

Heat rising is the exchange of electrons extending beyond their normal shell layers. The process of incandescent light is a regulated measure of heat exchanged from a flow of electricity.

Additionally, levitation can be seen as thought transfer of neural oscillations into matter vibration.

Introduction question

How does this all lead to the question: what is a polymer crystalline lattice activated by an ultraviolet beam, and its relationship with the potential to levitation? The presentation of conversation is laid out to consider possibilities.

Grebennikov’s findings of the CSE should provoke a reactionary effect to particle mass within a electromagnetic field. His platform vehicle was equipped with “blinds” for controlling effectual flow.

Four articles

More About CSEs , describes Grebennikov’s platform design. The article’s conclusion was to find that: The pursuit of Viktor Grebennikov’s work has a specific purpose. Its purpose is to create a levitating environment to enact a situation for atomic vibration. This vibration involves an interaction with Earth’s atmosphere or magnetosphere. The research thus far has clearly indicated this is not an aerodynamic principle; its lift is not a reaction of propulsion.

Levitation: Solve for a+b , has more information about Grebennikov’s design and CSEs. This article is an examination of CSEs and provides a detailed analysis of Grebennikov’s levitating platform.

Bug Wings for Travel , shares information about Earth’s magnetic fields and CSEs.

One of the most interesting questions in this article: What part of a bug’s wing provides levitation? The analysis over many articles is the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). Quantum physics shows that CSEs are voids; pointed out in the article; Using air for levitation . It makes the point that a subatomic interpretation of a void registers as a negative charge. The summation is that Grebennikov’s discovery of the CSE when applied to his levitating platform, has the potential to act as a large negative field.

Extending CSE research , examines examining CSEs and particle wave reactions:

As a synopsis, in looking at Matter waves, comes this jewel: a hole has the opposite charge of an electron. Hence; the vibration of polarization. This is pertinent to CSEs. And now, taking all this information about levitation and building a transportation device.

Conclusion

Has the question: “What is a polymer crystalline lattice activated by an ultraviolet beam?”; been answered? Let’s change the question to: “How can a polymer crystalline lattice be activated by an ultraviolet beam?”

The answer begins by altering the parameters like a math equation. Activation of a latticed design reacting to an ultraviolet beam is to say that an ultraviolet beam represents an energy field of undefined spectra waves. The lattice is a resonance amplification by stacking layers of CSEs. The reaction of a void to Earth’s electromagnetic field allows a controllable vehicle device to manipulate guided direction within the field of accumulated vibrational mass.

Details of Ezekiel's Vision

Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:16:38 GMT

A more detail analysis of Ezekiel's vision

photo credits: unknown - tumblr

Are there other examples for building a levitating vehicle, other than Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform? This article is a more detailed examination into Ezekiel’s vision of the living machine with the wheel within a wheel than the previous ‘ What Ezekiel Saw ’ article.

In the Bible, Chapter One of Ezekiel, begins with his vision; the heavens opened. The word of Yahweh came to Ezekiel. A whirlwind came from the north, it was a cloud raging with great fire engulfing itself, a brightness radiated out of its midst with the color of amber from the fire within it. Ezekiel saw four living creatures looking like a man. Each with four faces, each with four wings. Their legs were straight and the soles of their feet like the feet of calves, sparkling like burnished bronze. Their hands were a like a man’s and under their wings. Their wings touched not. Each creature only went forward and did not turn as they moved; only forward. Each of the four had a man’s face in the front, the face of a lion on the right side, the face of an ox on the left side, and the face of an eagle. Their wings stretched upward, each had two wings pointing up, touching one another and two covered their bodies. Their movement was straight forward, wherever their spirit wanted to go; they did not turn, their movement was only forward.

Their appearance was as coals of bright burning torches with lightning from the fire with the living creatures back and forth as lightning flashes.

Whirling wheels

Next to each creature was a wheel that was on the ground. The working of the wheels was like the color beryl, with its workings as a wheel in the middle of the wheel. Towards any one direction they went, not turning. The rims were so high, they were awesome. Each of the four rims were encircled with eyes. Wherever the creatures went, the wheels went, for the spirit was in the wheels, together they moved.

Above the creatures, the firmament (the heavens) was as crystal in color. Their wings were stretched out towards one another above their heads and two covered their bodies. The noise of their wings was like water, like the voice of the Almighty when they went, a tumult; sounding as an army. When they stood still, they let down their wings.

Then came a voice from above the firmament, it was in appearance like a sapphire stone of a throne. On it the appearance of a man high about it. It shown a fire the color of amber all around it of his waist and up the brightness of fire surrounded a rainbow in a cloud and the glory of Yahweh. Ezekiel heard a voice and fell on his face.

The importance of relating this to transportation is about the wheels and the creatures’ capacity to control the wheel’s movement.

The Four Wheels

As context, from Chapter 1: ( 15 )When I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. ( 16 )The workmanship of the wheels looked like the gleam of beryl, and all four had the same likeness. Their workmanship looked like a wheel within a wheel. ( 17 )As they moved, they went in any of the four directions, without pivoting as they moved. ( 18 )Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around. ( 19 )So as the living creatures moved, the wheels moved beside them, and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose.

( 20 )Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels would rise alongside them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. ( 21 )When the creatures moved, the wheels moved; when the creatures stood still, the wheels stood still; and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels rose alongside them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.

(15) indicates they are separate. (16) The wheels are crafted and are a tool of the living creatures. The wheel within a wheel is the focal point of this article with the question: what provides lift? Is it the angel’s wings or a functionality of the spinning wheels? Is there an effectual magnetic relationship to the wheels that creates a levitating spin momentum to provide lift?

( 18 ) The eyes seem to indicate a sensor for visual perception of guidance. Also, it is the nature of a spoked wheel to create images as a wheel rapidly spins.

(21) From the context of the spirit of the living creatures being in the wheels, it is presumed that Ezekiel would relate today’s autonomous automobile technology as an automobile having a human spirit within them, carrying its passengers to their destination.

The specific attribute of significance to this article is in (21) with the movement of the wheels and that the wheels rose. Back to the question: how? What is the methodology that allowed the wheels to rise from the ground? The text only mentions the creature’s wings pointing upwards, it has no indication of wings flapping to create lift, similar to a bird.

Chapter 10 talks about the whirling wheels again. (2)…“ Go inside the wheelwork beneath the cherubim. Fill your hands with burning coals from among the cherubim and scatter them over the city. ”

Of this entire vision, how much is symbolic? Lifting coals is physically possible without protective covering or use of a shovel. Walking into the whirling wheel withing a wheel defines the wheels as very large. This all indicates there is much more to explain its functioning operational design. But Ezekiel’s vision wasn’t about the operational design of the craft. Then why mention it? Why not just the large creatures with wings? Wings give creatures the ability to fly without whirling wheels. There is something mysterious and significant about these hand-crafted vehicles.

In searching for additional perspectives is this link: Ezekiel’s prophecy of the wheel . It offers a very unexpected interpretation. One very interesting view, suggests that the whirling wheels encompass the creatures. As Ezekiel describes the whirling wheels as being beside the creatures, this perspective views the wheels more as transparent; being beside them and also below them.

This perspective is from a source whose theology is totally different from the standard Christian view of Ezekiel’s vision. Even though the link provides a different perspective of the whirling wheels, its theological interpretation of the vision is wildly different and surprisingly extreme. As Yoda (the philosopher puppet from Star Wars), would say; ‘the hatred is strong in that one.’ Although this CATTCC article is intended as a through scientific examination of the vehicle in Ezekiel’s vision, the intensity of contemptuous vitriol from that particular link; interpreting Ezekiel’s vision as validation to bomb people of a particular skin pigmentation, is a startling shock. Nonetheless, the perspective of the wheels as encompassing the creatures rather than separately next to them, is appreciated. The outlook of vitriol from the other perspective; from that religious sect: is dangerously revealing. As a comment regarding Biblical text; that religious sect seriously needs to study the New Testament.

The accumulative opinions regarding Ezekiel’s vision, ascribe the vision as a prophetic, symbolic, and theological revelation. That theological perspective of the whirling wheels nullifies any support for a view that Ezekiel witnessed literal advanced technology or physical machinery. Instead, the opinion from the theological community regarding Ezekiel’s profound vision; is meant to convey that Ezekiel’s dream has nothing to do with revealing a mysterious technology but, only about God’s nature and their varied interpretations of GOD’s sovereignty. This theological opinion is based on the text in nearly every Bible version: Ezekiel 1:1, …”the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God.” The theological perception suggests this was only a dream and the whirling wheels is only a representation of Ezekiel’s imagination; therefore, nothing of reality.

The basis of Ezekiel's vision of the whirling wheels is perceived as theological and remains without scientific study or theory. This presents the whirling wheels to be in the realm of the fringe science community for study.

Conclusion

This article, in CATTCC’s search for new transportation technology breakthroughs, is left with the opinion that the whirling wheels in Ezekiel’s vision remain a mystery. This article, however, does help to validate another of the CATTCC articles: ‘ Operational Control’ wherein it defines psychokinesis as a process that enables neural oscillation to interact with an electromagnetic or electrogravitics response for a flying vehicle’s operational control.

Transportation's Near Future

Fri, 06 Mar 2026 04:43:30 GMT

Finding the near future of transportation

photo credits: freepik moonscape, crp.trb.org

Writing as an imagineer: designing the future of transportation is an important task. What does the future of transportation require? Convenience, fast speed, energy efficiency, safety, low cost of vehicles and infrastructure. There are two directions of necessity for modern travel: short distance and long distance (which includes space travel).

Short distance – For transportation to attain pace with society’s technological advances, levitation is required to reach the goals of convenience, fast speeds, energy efficiency, safety, and low costs of vehicles and infrastructure.

Long distance – To reach the technology advances of modern society, long-distance space travel requires the ability to manipulate gravity.

How does the future of transportation transcend beyond what is available today? The foundation of present-day transportation is based upon the past. The future is similar to the present; both are comprised with growth and decay; it changes with discovery. Inasmuch as life begins, it ends as time passes. So it is with new ideas as well. Technological change is only available with the private sector; new ideas are irrelevant to politics. Government policies are rhetorical hyperbole; theological rules of tradition are nugatory. And yet, the government regulates transportation, which is at least partially responsible for transportation’s stagnation into the past.

Transportation’s current pursuit is restricted to onboarding other industry technologies into the existing vehicle and infrastructure technologies. This renders the foundational technology of the three modern modes of transportation unchanged. That’s completely different than innovations for new modes of transportation. This brings a question.

How does transportation advance?

The purpose of questions is to find answers. How can new methodologies for modes of transportation be found without looking ? The pursuit for new transportation innovations has to include venturing into a perception change in science. Nearly all of transportation’s current search is limited to propulsion-based movement. Yet, the result of non-traditional attraction-based motion space flight, have provided the fastest speeds ever accomplished by mankind; with the Parker Solar Probe.

The article, Directions for New Transportation , talks about the Parker Solar Probe: There are several aspects of conventional rocket technology that require new concepts to attaining adequate speeds for space travel to be practical. The most effective method for space travel is with the utilization of gravity. This has already been proven with several NASA missions. The most recent use of gravity is the Parker Solar Probe . It’s next loop using Venus’ gravity to accelerate the Parker Solar probe, will achieve a speed of 430,000 mile per hour.

The future to advance transportation technology, demands changing current methodologies. Discovery comes by engaging different perspectives. Some of the greatest scientific discoveries have been discovered by outsiders of the community of science academia. The best example is seen in today’s modern electricity-charged technology which is founded upon two rivals; Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison. Nikola Tesla attend college but, didn’t graduate with a degree. Thomas Edison never attended college.

Nikola Tesla worked independently and received 300 patents worldwide, 112 US patents. Edison hired others to work under his name and received 2,232 patents worldwide, 1,093 US patents.

Over the past 100 years, technology has soared with tremendous growth. Conversely, modern transportation has only three modes of technology: the 200-year-old train, 125-year-old automobile, and 100-year-old aeronautics with airplanes. The entire industry of traditional transportation is locked in the pushing-motion mindset of propulsion-based travel.

Does science forecast a change in the transportation industry? It’s currently only engaged with adaptation of other industry innovations onto the three existing modes of transportation. How much active research is currently employed for a brand-new mode of transportation using attractive motion instead of propulsion? Is there research study to understand and copy nature for transportation based on the spin momentum of Earth’s rotation that keeps it in orbit?

When?

The social process of changing technology is called disruptive technology. Politics might be a constraint, however, there is an additional factor of restrictive force pushing against new transportation technology. Prior to introducing a disruptive transportation change, changing social acceptance of its transportation necessitates infrastructure. This requires an enormous cost to implement its infrastructure.

Throughout the CATTCC articles, is a constant realization regarding transportation: ‘All urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation.’ This is a recognition that any new mode of transportation will require a corresponding shift in an area’s pattern for urban growth.

Analyzing the impacts that a brand-new mode of transportation would incur is found in the article, New Modes of Transportation Technologies :

Impacts of a brand-new mode of transportation

Is there a correlation to a brand-new mode of transportation and lower real estate prices? With an efficient use of energy, transportation costs would be greatly reduced. New modes of transportation use dedicated and grade separate traffic rights-of-ways with computerized algorithms for vehicle synchronization. This provides safer transportation within allocated transportation corridors. Vehicle insurance costs would spiral down; to the consumer. The economic outlay of replacing cars with floating vehicles would substantially lower citizens’ tax burden for infrastructure costs. Overall, a brand-new mode of transportation would greatly upset the automobile centric land-use dependence of cars. This, however, requires that replacing automobiles can be replaced with a more convenient, faster, more comfortable, less expensive, safer, and more efficient type of vehicle.

The paragraph might sound like an idealistic marketing scenario, and yet, there is a great accuracy to its claims.

As cities grow larger, transit-oriented land-use is an insistent demand for transportation: it’s in the name. Transit-oriented land-use is vertical growth which coincides with mass transit by its nature of concentrated building. Since automobile centric land-use design is the implementation of single-story buildings, its land-use demand for transportation, requires sprawl of roads, massive land consumption for freeways, parking-lots and horizonal sprawl development. The concentrated vertical development land-use design of transit-oriented land-use causes conflict for automobile traffic in transportation use.

Tunneling

The only option for transportation accessibility with mixed-use land-use of transportation and future metropolitan urban growth infrastructure is multi-level single lane tunneling. This restrictive option for mixed-use land-use is the most beneficial, with the least expensive Infrastructure costs of implementation. Information regarding tunneling is addressed in the: Tunneling Transit article. From The Boring Company website: Why Tunnels? To solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic, roads must go 3D, which means either flying cars or tunnels are needed. Unlike flying cars, tunnels are weatherproof, out of sight, and won’t fall on your head.

Tunnels minimize usage of valuable surface land and do not conflict with existing transportation systems. A large network of tunnels can alleviate congestion in any city; no matter how large a city grows, more levels of tunnels can be added.

Transportation’s Future

Beyond today’s adaptation to current transportation methods, the article, Researching Future Transportation , makes the point that transportation changes are imperative: Changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today. Changing tomorrow’s transportation can only be attained by searching to find alternatives for transportation motion. Stepping into the future and looking at its methods for transportation: it floats. This leads to an imperative necessity for researching gravity and the manipulation of its control.

What perception change in scientific advances can bring about transportation innovations towards developing new modes of transportation? Current scientific methodologies support the continuation of propulsion-based transportation technology for more power and thrust.

The article Discovering New Modes of Transportation examines hidden scientific areas regarding transportation. One of main topics discussed in the article is Electrogravitics, a relatively unexplored consideration in theoretical physics.

The gravitycentral.space article explains the question: what is electrogravitics? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics, it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. To study the potential use of levitation as a method for transportation motion, this path leads to finding practicalities with the makeup of matter in theoretical physics. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component of subatomic electric fields, rather than an electromagnetic reaction. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process, rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.

Since this perspective alters basic fundamentals of quantum physics, it explains why T. Townsend Brown and others have been discounted. Academia teaches the unanimous scientific opinion and pursues that perspective. Why pursue a perspective that academia ignores? There is validity to electrogravitics. The theory of electrogravitics coincides with Einstein’s theory of General Relativity. In the postulation that all mass within the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling at the speed of light, the statement holds that all mass is traveling in a unified direction, giving credence to the unified field theory that all mass is consistent in flow of direction. This gives merit to electrogravitics as a fundamental component as an action to mass.

A scientific concept of gravity being a subatomic process of matter, rather than a product of mass; presents a new perspective. This perspective presents new considerations in technology for advancing transportation. CATTCC’s claim in A Study in Gravity suggests that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. The article goes on to share that this does not negate gravitational laws that dictate its action. The claim further postulates that gravity is angular momentum of particle mass along the particle’s path of movement at light speed.

The manipulation of gravity is a vital aspect in the future of transportation. What will the technology be for the future of transportation ? It’s found with the manipulation of gravity. Why gravity? It’s nature’s motion. Following the philosophy of Viktor Schauberger, one of the greatest geniuses regarding efficient transportation; comprehend and copy nature. Gravity already provides the fastest speeds ever achieved by mankind but, the opinion of scientific academia still has no definitive answer as to what gravity is. Science allows new theories to arrive from outside popular speculation. Tesla, Edison, Schauberger, Carr, Searl, and others have provided answers for advancing transportation to its modern potential.

The destructive nature of centrifugal force; explosion energy for propulsion-based transportation is inefficient.

Maglev Development

Sun, 22 Feb 2026 20:30:27 GMT

An overview of current global maglev development

photo credits: China's CRRC4, Siemens' American Pioneer 220 - Brightline West

A quick overview for those unaware of what maglev refers to; maglev is a portmanteau (blending of words) of magnetic levitation.

Maglev is a form of transportation technology using magnetic forces to suspend, guide, and propel vehicles without physically contacting a track (guideway). The magnetic force eliminates rolling resistance and friction. The basic concept is very simple: like magnetic poles repel and opposite poles attract. This allows vehicles to float above a guideway. Maglev systems are primarily categorized into two types: electromagnetic suspension (EMS), which uses attractive forces between magnets on the train and the guideway, and electrodynamic suspension (EDS), which rely on repulsive forces generated by induced currents in conductive materials on the guideway.

Maglev advantages

The primary advantages of maglev transportation include higher top speeds, superior acceleration and deceleration, lower maintenance costs due to reduced wear, improved gradient handling, and significantly lower noise levels compared to conventional railways.

Maglev challenges

Maglev’s largest challenge is due to the technology shift from 200-year-old tradition of heavy-rail train technology and the cost of upgrading to new technology infrastructure.

In spite of the cost challenges, both China and Japan are increasing maglev development due to the technological advantages and significant speed increase.

Maglev development

Although passive maglev technology, utilizing the independence of small vehicle versatility to meet modern transportation demands with phenomenally lower infrastructure costs, China and Japan have chosen to serve their large metropolitan areas with maglev train technology.

China maglev

China’s maglev train technology surpasses global development. The fastest speed ever achieved by a train is 404 mph (650 km/h), recorded by a maglev prototype developed at China's National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) in June 2025. This surpasses the previous record of 375 mph (603 km/h), set by Japan’s JR Central L0 Series superconducting maglev on the Yamanashi test track in April 2015.

China launched its maglev journey in the 1980s, with key institutions like Southwest Jiaotong University and the China Academy of Railway Sciences leading research. The Shanghai Maglev Line, opened in 2004, was the world’s first commercial high-speed maglev, operating at 267 mph.

Japan maglev

Japan began serious research in the 1960s, focusing on both conventional and superconducting maglev systems. The ML series of test vehicles, including the MLU001 and MLX01, achieved speeds exceeding 310 mph. A major 42.8 km test track in Yamanashi Prefecture, completed in phases from 1995 to 2013, enabled the L0-series maglev to set a world record of 375 mph in 2015. Japan is now constructing a commercial Tokyo–Nagoya line, scheduled to open in 2027, with a top speed of 315 mph.

Japan’s SupraTrans is an advanced energy project utilizing flux pinning in high-temperature superconductors to provide self-stabilizing levitation without the need for active electronic control. These advancements show that maglev technology continues to evolve, with the potential to transform both long-distance and urban transportation networks in the future.

Germany maglev

Germany pioneered the concept in the 1920s, with Hermann Kemper patenting a maglev train design in 1934. Research intensified in the 1960s, leading to the development of the TransRapid system using Electromagnetic Suspension (EMS). By the 1980s, Germany had completed a 31.5 km test track in Emsland, achieving speeds over 250 mph with prototypes like TR07. The country also explored low-speed urban applications, including the M-Bahn system in Berlin.

Other maglev development

Global advancements include superconducting maglev systems using high-temperature superconductors (HTS), such as the MagLev-Cobra project in Brazil and research in the U.S. The SwissMetro concept proposes a high-speed EDS system in partially evacuated tunnels. Additionally, evacuated tube technology (ET3), proposed by Darell Oster and further developed by Shen Zhiyun, aims to enable ultra-high-speed travel by reducing air resistance.

Along with anticipation of the cost barriers, come private sector innovation, such as: Ironlev . This maglev technology company has developed a 'passive ferromagnetic levitation' system. It uses magnetic skids that suspend the vehicle by interacting directly with conventional railway tracks. The technology of adaptation to standard railroad significantly reduces fast speeds, however, it provides an excellent opportunity for streetcars in urban areas.

In maglev systems, propulsion is typically provided by a linear motor, and the power required for levitation is generally a small fraction of the total energy used. Since air resistance is the dominant factor of energy consumption at high speeds, two innovative solutions are smaller vehicles and air-evacuated tubes to operate in. ET3 has computer simulated its system technology which exceed 4,000 mph.

At present, maglev technology has the greatest potential as the most efficient form of available modern transportation. Where is it on the global scene of technological development? Currently, there are only seven operational maglev systems worldwide: four in China, two small passenger shuttle systems in South Korea, and one in Japan. The significant projects under construction include the Chūō Shinkansen in Japan, connecting Tokyo and Nagoya with future extensions to Osaka, and a line between Changsha and Liuyang in Hunan Province, China.

What is preventing the development and implementation of maglev technology

Throughout Europe, India, Australia, South America, and North America, the title of corporate kings in mass transit are Siemens and Alstom. Their political lobbying strength enables these two corporate leviathans to own passenger train and transit transportation dominance throughout the world. Between these two companies, they own and supply their technology of every large train and transit system in the world, except for China, Japan, and Russia.

Alstom has been In the US since the 1880s. In 2025 it underwent a major upgrade with the opening of a new state-of-the-art Plant 4 facility, further solidifying its role in U.S. rail manufacturing. Its new factory in Hornell, NY is 45 miles from its “rival” Siemens manufacturing plant in Horsehead, NY.

Alstom operates multiple manufacturing facilities in New York, with its primary passenger rail manufacturing site located in Hornell, New York. Its expansion reshores production from Brazil which establishes Alstom as the largest passenger train manufacture in the United States.

In addition to Hornell, Alstom has a manufacturing presence in Plattsburgh, New York, where it produces rail components and builds modern rail fleets, and in Kanona, New York, which serves as a center for vehicle refurbishment and modernization.

Siemens’ American Pioneer 220 is the name of the high-speed trainset being developed by Siemens Mobility for Brightline West, marking the first true high-speed rail production facility in North America. Designed as an American variant of the Siemens Velaro Novo platform, the trainset is engineered for a maximum speed of 220 mph (354 km/h) and will operate on the Las Vegas to Southern California route, expected to open in 2028.

The American Pioneer 220 trains are being manufactured at a new 300,000 sq ft facility in Horseheads, New York, with production beginning in 2026. The facility, a $60 million investment, will create around 300 skilled jobs, with union representation through the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM). The 10 seven-car trainsets will be built in compliance with the German owned company’s “Buy America” standards, with major components like traction systems and bogies produced in Sacramento, CA.

Brightline West selected Siemens as the preferred vendor in May 2024 after a competitive procurement process, with the contract including a 30-year maintenance agreement for the trainsets, to be performed at a maintenance facility in Sloan, Nevada. The American Pioneer 220 is designed for interoperability with the California High-Speed Rail system and represents a step into 1800’s U.S. rail infrastructure.

Conclusion

Trains were a wonderful component of Western civilization’s birth. The biggest challenge is how to overcome governments’ political procedure to implement the necessity of modern advanced transportation technology to satisfy the social demands for the technological advanced society.

Schauberger and Levitation continued

Mon, 09 Feb 2026 04:31:59 GMT

Levitation for transportation's future

photo credits: Imagefree AI, Viktor Grebennikov

This article continues the extremely vital search for transportation’s future. CATTCC research has asked many questions in its search. As of yesterday, that one answer providing the blueprint of a levitating vehicle for short-distance transportation solution, may have been noticed or remained elusive.

Following the convention of aeronautic designs, it constitutes a locked perception of propulsion-based movement. For a short-distance vehicle, CATTCC steadily looks into tradition’s forbidden concepts from the work of Viktor Schauberger, Viktor Grebennikov. Nikola Tesla, T. Townsend Brown and others; who committed academic heresy and were tossed to the lost realm of fringe science.

One of the issues that relegated Brown to that group, holds the same attributes that isolated Schauberger and his flying devices. Both proposed ideas antithetical to the aeronautic industry. They both proposed counterintuitive concepts of flight. Their designs were gravity based, rather than aeronautic. The concept of attraction opposes propulsion; indeed, gravity presents catastrophic potential. Every engineer is flabbergasted at the thought of anything other than propulsion-based flight. Brown, Schauberger, Tesla, Otis Carr, John Searl and others have all been relegated to the annals of quackery. Their commonality? Attraction-based flight.

Science certainly shows that gravity is vital to molecular existence of all matter. The genius of these men were their attempts to control and manipulate gravity. What secrets can be found in continuing their work?

Viktor Schauberger

Schauberger had many phenomenal perspectives. One of the most remarkable was his work prior to, and during World War II. An article about Viktor Schauberger in antigravitytechnology.net , includes this, regarding his discoid ship design:

Viktor Schauberger developed two experimental discoid motor designs, Repulsin A and Repulsin B, between 1940 and 1945 under forced collaboration with the Nazi regime during World War II. The Repulsin A model, constructed with copper components and a high-speed electric motor, had a diameter of 2.4 meters and was designed to utilize the Coanda effect and electro-dynamic principles to generate lift. Upon initial startup, the Repulsin A model rose violently, striking the laboratory ceiling and shattering into pieces, an incident that alarmed the SS and led to threats against Schauberger’s life, with suspicions of sabotage.

The Repulsin B model was developed as an improved version, incorporating a fixed upper membrane and a rotating lower membrane with 120 boomerang-shaped blades spaced 3 degrees apart around the rim. This design enhanced the implosion effect within the vortex chamber, generating stronger thrust than the centrifugal turbine used in Repulsin A. The mechanism relied on a suction screw-impeller that revolved from the outside toward the inside along a cycloid, spiral space curve, producing forces similar to those seen in twisters, cyclones, and typhoons through suction or implosion. The vortex chamber also acted as a high electrostatic generator due to air particles in high-speed motion serving as electrical charge transporters, resulting in ionization and a visible glow during operation.

Schauberger claimed that the combined effects of the Coanda effect and the electro-dynamic (diamagnetic) effect created what he termed the "implosion effect," which could generate lift and potentially power a craft with minimal external energy input. The Repulsin B was reportedly intended for use in a bio-submarine design, nicknamed the "Forelle" (Trout), due to its fish-like shape with a gaping mouth. Work on the Repulsin B continued through 1944 at the Technical College of Engineering in Rosenhügel, Vienna, but the project was ultimately abandoned as the SS shifted focus to other technologies, such as the Flugkreisel, a flying disc prototype.

After the war, the remaining Repulsin motors were confiscated by Allied forces, with some reports suggesting they were taken by the Russians and Americans. Despite pressure from the US and AVRO Canada to continue development, Schauberger refused to participate in military projects and instead dedicated his later life to peaceful applications of vortex technology, including water and air purification systems. The ultimate fate of the Repulsin prototypes remains uncertain, with speculative claims that some were transported to South America or submerged in Austrian lakes, though no verified evidence confirms these theories.

Nature

Nature has three top sources of fast speed. First is the falcon, its 200 mile per hour speed is not attained by propulsion. Secondly, the wind with its fastest ever recorded cyclone speed; over 250 miles per hour. Third is Earth’s gravitational pattern in its rotational orbit as it spins at 1,000 miles per hour in each 24-hour elliptical cycle.

In conjunction with CATTCC’s research of short-distance transportation, the most recent article: Viktor Schauberger’s philosophy held the statement: “comprehend and copy nature”.

In pursuing efficient energy use in relation to motion with nature, Schauberger said the following: “If water or air is rotated into a twisting form of oscillation known as 'colloidal', a buildup of energy results, which, with immense power, can cause levitation. This form of movement is able to carry with it its own means of power generation. This principle leads logically to its application in the design of the ideal airplane or submarine… requiring almost no motive power.”

The specific gravity of water is different than the atmosphere due to density of mass. This is obvious but, it does bring up a question regarding the compositional atomic structures when considering subatomic mass as electrogravitic rather than electromagnetic.

The intent of exploring the question is either a capture of energy or a capture of motion for transportation.

Conjecture of levitation

To attain enough ‘oscillation of accumulated vibration mass’ with a vehicle for levitation, applying ‘T. Townsend Brown’s: Biefeld-Brown Effect ’ could be used as an energy push that creates an accelerating force from a high-voltage capacitor.

Brown observed that asymmetric capacitors moved toward their positive electrode when charged, leading him to theorize a link between electricity and gravity. Though the effect is now widely attributed to ionic wind (electrohydrodynamics), there is a likelihood for this to be attributed to electrogravitics.

Brown’s work is more specific to long-distance transportation pursuit, rather than short-distance levitation. However, it could be relevant. Along with John Searl’s work , and Schauberger’s.

Theorizing a craft’s acceleration is secondary to its ability to levitate.

For centuries, it’s been mankind’s dream to jump into the air spread arms and fly. Stepping onto a levitating platform with handlebars would be the second-choice alternative.

There have been many questions asked to explain the how and why of the principles. Where are the answers?

The article Earth’s Electrostatic Charges , poses several questions. The brilliance of theoretical physics geniuses In the late 1800s throughout the early 1900s, led to the advances present in modern technology. Today’s transportation remains aligned with that era’s three primary technological advances as the only available modes of transportation: trains, cars and airplanes. This recognizes that all advances to modern transportation are adaptations from other industries.

The most astonishing step towards modernizing short distance transportation was allegedly accomplished by Viktor Grebennikov in the late 1980s. A discussion about why: is irrelevant. The only conversation of importance is the possible legitimacy in Grebennikov’s work. Did it actually work, and how can it be rebuilt?

Two detailed articles about Grebennikov are Chitin and Grits and Levitation, Solve for a + b . From the Chitin and Grits article: Victor Grebennikov is known to many as the discoverer of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). But very few people are familiar with his other discovery, the one that also borrows from Nature and its innermost secrets. He discovered “antigravitational” effects of the chitin shell of certain insects in 1988. The most impressive incidental phenomenon discovered was a partial invisibility and/or of distorted perception of material objects entering the zone of compensated gravity. Based on this discovery, he used bionic principles to design and build an “anti-gravitational” platform for hovering flights at the speeds of up to 25 km/min. This CSE has a physical reaction. Inasmuch as this CSE field has an effect on biological entities and a gravitational influence, so do crystallization patterns have an electromagnetic effect on electronics.

One of the first steps is to investigate chitin .

What is the molecular structure of chitin? The scientific definition of chitin: it is a linear homopolysaccharide composed of repeating units of N-acetylglucosamine (NAG), a derivative of glucose where the hydroxyl group at the C2 carbon is replaced with an N-acetyl group. These NAG units are linked together by β-(1→4) glycosidic bonds, forming long, unbranched chains. The chemical formula of chitin is (C₈H₁₃O₅N)ₙ.

Carbon: C
Hydrogen: H
Oxygen: O
Nitrogen: N

This structure is analogous to cellulose, but with one key difference: in cellulose, each glucose monomer has a hydroxyl group at C2, while in chitin, this group is replaced by an acetyl amine (N-acetyl) group. This substitution enables stronger intermolecular hydrogen bonding between adjacent chains, significantly increasing the structural strength and stability of chitin compared to cellulose.

Chitin exists in multiple crystalline polymorphic forms based on the arrangement of its polymer chains:

α-chitin: Antiparallel chain arrangement (common in crustaceans and insects).
β-chitin: Parallel chain arrangement (found in squid and some fungi).
γ-chitin: Alternating antiparallel and parallel chains (observed in fungi).

These structural variations influence properties like solubility, hydrophilicity, and mechanical strength. Chitin is insoluble in water and most solvents due to its dense hydrogen bonding network, but it can be dissolved in concentrated acids or specific solvent systems like NaOH/urea or DMA/LiCl. It is also the precursor to chitosan, formed by partial deacetylation of chitin.

It's the assumption that the chitin composition in the specific beetle Grebennikov selected is structured with multiple crystalline polymorphic formed patterns of CSEs.

Grebennikov’s design was the amplification of CSE structures.

Because levitation is the accumulation of vibrational mass, a resonance frequency occurs. According to Schauberger: When water or air is rotated into a twisting form of oscillation known as ‘colloidal’, a buildup of energy results, which, with immense power, can cause levitation.

By utilizing this principle, it is theoretically plausible for a specific arrangement of CSEs to be built to produce a reaction of frequency manipulation. Is it possible for the voids of CSEs to create this “colloidal” vacuuming spiral reaction with the electromagnetic structure in the troposphere? The energy flow would be regulated by “blinds” in the CSE configuration.

The troposphere is extremely active with electromagnetic influence. It contains 75–80% of the atmosphere's mass and nearly all water vapor, clouds, and weather.

This line of reasoning leads to presume that the function of Grebennikov’s levitating platform was a void field that didn’t levitate. Rather; it caused an electromagnetic reaction of “colloidal” levitation in the troposphere.

In the article: Levitation, Solve for a + b ,

Further, Zolotariov gives a formula for the locations of de Broglie wave maximums: D = 2L(N+1)2K, where L is the circumference of the tube, N is the harmonic number of the wave, and K is the number of the anti-node/maximum.

This article by Ville Piippola is by far the most informative source of mathematical evidence to support CSEs. In relation to the theory for the path of particle mass, this article pointing out the de Broglie waves is also very supportive. The thing to point out is what a de Broglie wave is. The relationship in the theory of de Broglie waves is consistent with the new gravity theory; being angular momentum in the linear path of particle mass traveling at light speed.

Further study to analyze a regulated void-field to act as a vacuum could be interesting, possibly relevant. Today’s propulsion-based transportation industry mindset, serves to produce the same results and prevents significant technological advances.

Schauberger’s suggestion: comprehend and copy nature, remains the gateway to transportation’s future innovations.

CA HSR update 2026

Sat, 24 Jan 2026 22:27:32 GMT

Update on California's High Speed Rail project

There are a lot of things happening with California’s High Speed Rail (CA HSR) project. The new High Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) CEO, Ian Choudri, hired in August 2024, is doing an exemplary job of reviving a dead horse. The project’s former 20-year status of “gravy train” as a consequence of being a politicized pork project subsidizing the pay-to-play elitism profiteering, has finally changed course with the passing of its former political champion. The political process always includes a large portion of hyperbole. Delusion is more often than not, the reality of political process. The question is, can Choudri recover from 18 years of that process.

A May 25 Planetizen article shares the same opinion as CATTCC. That exposé explains several of HSRA’s past mis-directions in planning. It’s also in support of Choudri’s plan to extend the current line and bring in private sector partnerships as the only possibility of its survival.

There are several aspects that are problematic for the CA HSRA. Although Choudri has done an exemplary job of bringing the dead horse back to life, it still isn't ready to ride. The horse isn't healthy and there's no money for a saddle. Worse than that, the HRS project needs a team of horses and there is no wagon.

Two of the tremendous sources of information for CA HSR project are the Fresno Bee, and the Sacramento Bee. However, the newspaper industry has been surpassed with internet information availability. Some news services, like The Bee, have succumbed to pay-to-read clickbait links, which are an impossibility to serve as on-line reference pieces. This Sacramento Bee link provides a one-time read; the article is from November 2025.

In the article, it quotes a significant aspect to Choudri’s suitability. His statement, in announcing the HSR forming a partnership was that he got a phone call. “These are folks in the industry who I’ve known for decades,” he said during a visit to Fresno. “I just picked up the phone like, ‘Hey, we got the funding commitment. What’s the plan?’”

The phone call Choudri was talking about what the HSRA has had in store for a while; expand the route to engage the private sector. Choudri recognizes the private sector is the only hope of the project’s viability.

The biggest part of building a business is who you’re working with and how much money there is to work with.

Timing for Choudri’s efforts are apropos in response to the US Department of Transportation’s July 2025 decision; which severed federal funding. That termination was due to CA’s inability to adhere to terms of federal support.

In August 2025, although CATTCC has no relationship to the project, after the Federal funds were terminated, CATTCC had a meeting with one of the CA Legislators. At that meeting, CATTCC presented CA’s 3 options for the HSR project:

1. Maintain the status quo.

2. State sells the project to private entity. This entails a possible public/private/partnership (PPP). This process extends the scope of the project and allows a private entity to take over the project using the politically accepted standard for train technology: Alstrom/Siemens (global leaders in transportation lobbying).

This scenario brings in Brightline West as the beneficiary to resurrect any sense of legitimacy to the CA project. Brightline West holds an invested interest to intersect its current LA to Las Vegas project into the CA HSR and CA’s forecasted lines. A zero-cost introductory agreement would enable that entity to finish the first (Bakersfield to Palmdale) segment and “promise” to build-out the remainder of the project under the same “no EIS” (Environmental Study) requirement process.

Selling (gifting) the CA HSR project to Brightline would greatly benefit Brightline West by increasing ridership of both systems. Furthermore, building-out the Palmdale to Gilroy segment of the CA HSR project would provide Brightline the economic motivation to continue a SF/Sacramento to LA route for the passenger capacity increase for connectivity to its current LA to Vegas segment.

3. Create PPP to build viable Statewide alternative transportation network. This scenario involves the non-political process of creativity. This would be utilizing the existing segmented HSR infrastructure and acquiring a modern transportation technology to be implemented within the corridor, then extending it throughout the State with existing allocated light-rail Rights-of-Ways (ROW), and beyond.

Several new technology transit systems exist for this scenario.

Choudri selected option 2. The process of political maneuvering to engage private sector participation is hidden taxation to clouded by large subsidies. It also maneuvers sharing tasks of compliance with other government agencies and bureaus to maintain bureaucratic overruns of management practices. By effectively partnering with a private entity, it removes the connotation of waste by ‘selling’ the project to a private entity. The process of engaging a public/private/partnership (PPP) where the State is able to leverage money spent is called an investment but, isn’t embarrassed if the project fails.

Of the project's three options, 1. do nothing 2. sell project to private entity 3. incorporate an advanced new technology transit system. This 3 ^rd approach would massively reduce infrastructure and maintenance costs, dramatically increase ridership, operate with greater energy efficiency, run at significantly faster speeds, provide access to urban use, be much more passenger friendly and much more convenient to the public.

While options one and two benefit a select few participants in the building process, both options are feckless as a solution to CA’s exponentially increasing transportation problems. The third option, indeed improves quality of life for Californians by integrating modern transportation technology to the advances of modern society; which serve to enhance transportation for the public.

In September, State legislators committed $1 billion per year, over a four-year term, from CA’s cap and trade. This allowed the HSRA, in November 2025, to announce its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the bidding process of installing rail track and catenary from the Merced to Bakersfield line.

In December 2025 the CA HSRA launched its RFQ (Request for Qualifications) to accept qualifications towards the upcoming RFP (Request for Proposals) to participate as CA HSR partners with the State.

Also in December, the HSRA released the LA to Anaheim EIR/EIS (Environmental Impact Study and Report).

Choudri, in his call for the HSR partnership with the private sector is seeking legislation to temporarily terminate the State’s earlier commitment to take the track into Merced. Instead, he’s asking legislators to extend the track to Gilroy and Palmdale. Doing so would greatly benefit the Brightline West cooperation to connect their Rancho Cucamonga to Las Vegas project.

Can Choudri make it work? Perhaps, and again, Choudri is doing an exemplary job for the CA HSR.

Innovation vs Conformity

Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:50:42 GMT

People like things to remain the same

photo credit: pexels and LasVegasLocally

People, as a general rule to societal behavior, like things to remain the same. Change requires a certain uncomfortable amount of emotional effort. Routine is a comfortable security. This is spoken as a generality.

Knowing this as a foundational principle, applies to transportation and urban growth. This doesn’t require a doctorate in human behavior from an Ivy League University. Basic social behavior is predictable by watching a mirror.

Innovation versus conformity. What’s this about? Urban growth is the process of building upon the foundation of society’s primary source for transportation. Over the past 100 years, society has changed. Over the past 50 years technology has changed society. Yet, transportation is identical to what it was 50 years ago.

Is it a terrible thing? Perhaps yes. Is it stifled growth? It seems so. Western civilization is dependent upon the automobile. Is it a tragedy? Everyone knows someone whose life was terminate in a car wreck. Why? Because cars are an obsolete 125-year-old technology. It doesn’t fit into today’s technologically advanced society. It’s a stubborn comfort of the past. Some of society’s most sought-after cars are high-end sports cars. A comparison of high-end sports cars of the 1960s and 1970s look identical in design to high-end sports cars of today.

Why are cars still the obsolete norm of technology? The government’s only source of income is from taxes, and it regulates the roads and transportation. Add to that: innovation is the enemy of bureaucracy. Managing people’s behavior is a normalized position of political power. Nothing changes. The sole function of bureaucracy is to enlarge itself. The example is seen in large companies and the government. Bureaucracy is a tiered system with low level slave type workers at the bottom of the tier layers. Rising from the bottom layer of work, where actual work is accomplished, is overseen by a near infinite number of management layers. Above the management layers are the controllers who, along with the bureaucratic corporate lobbyists: the manipulators; are the only beneficiaries of the system. The roles constantly change, as people within the system rise and fall.

Good innovators can build bureaucracies. Two examples are Blackrock and Tesla. Their financial strength rivals any government bureaucracy. Their goals are the same: to enlarge themselves.

Being cognizant of these things, and writing about it merely identifies the challenges of implementing change. Is there any relevance or particular strength in being aware of it? There might be wisdom gained in awareness. Yet, the most important thing that matters to every person is looking into their mirror which reflects a smile. Knowingly or not, every smile displays an attitude of gratitude.

This article has more than opining about the challenges of societal patterns. It sets up the question of how this affects today’s transportation. All urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. Over the past 100 years, the level of technological advance and towards a social achievement for the betterment of society has blossomed into a nightmarish transportation stagnation.

Today’s social term of modern-day philosophy is: fuckyouism. This is antithetical to any sense of conforming alliance, instead it’s indicative to greed. Or, at the very least, it represents a social attitudinal reaction from deception, discontentment, and the frustration of constantly being lied to.

Innovation is the only practical possibility for advancing transportation. Even though the function of advancing transportation is to implement a higher quality of life which includes greater independence and sustainable urban growth.

Change happens with opportunity. Society switches to something new when the offer becomes available for something better, more convenient, faster, or cheaper.

The general public will abandon cars as soon as something better, more convenient, faster, more comfortable, more efficient, less expensive, and safer is made available. A vehicle that floats and its movement is powered by a separate efficient energy source. Traveling without roads, operating in designated corridor networks for heavy traffic loads, require vehicles that allow independent driver/passenger start-point to destination capability. This is the technology that will change modern society’s transportation.

To anyone saying such a thing is futuristic fantasy; what is a mobile phone? The only piece awaiting discovery is the levitating vehicle. Western society has entered the second quarter of the 21 ^st Century. Technology will soon reach the transportation industry.

Planning the new mode of transportation

There’s a plethora of CATTCC articles written about new concepts in transportation. The need for transportation is in two areas: short-distance and long-distance travel.

The first area is short-distance travel. There are incremental steps to implement new technology change for short distance transit. Of the incremental steps , the soonest opportunities for innovation to transportation is with new technology transit systems.

The contention in mentioning autonomous automobiles as innovative: new computerized image sensoring is from satellite, data storage and the information industries. The automobile used as a mode of transportation is a 125-year-old technology.

The article: Exploration of Levitation provides a good explanation to CATTCC research as it seeks to discover a methodology of interacting with Earth’s electromagnetic structure to build a levitating device for transportation. Thus far, we see that Levitation is Molecular Vibration . The several articles highlighting Viktor Grebennikov’s theory for Cavity Structures Effect, such as: Levitation, Solve for A+B , that explore possibilities to design an apparatus that engages in a way for transportation to engage Earth’s magnetosphere.

Secondly is long-distance travel. The ultra-high speed for long-distance and space flight entails new perspectives beyond traditional concepts of propulsion. Innovation with fast Earth bound transportation are ET3 and hyperloop , which provide ground based travel.

There are many ways to find new transportation advances. CATTCC provides many concepts and ideas to explore, along with the necessity of building sustainable urban growth.

Change happens with innovation. Stagnation and atrophy happen without movement.

Fibonacci Sequence and Transportation

Thu, 15 Jan 2026 20:25:55 GMT

Finding a relationship to nature's efficient energy and transportation

photo credits: pexels, pinterest

Is there a transportation relationship between the Fibonacci sequence, nature, the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE), frequencies, the sound of a sea shell and levitation?

The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers, starting with 0 and 1. This sequence begins as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, and continues infinitely. Mathematically, it is defined recursively by the formula Fn=Fn−1+Fn−2, with base cases F0=0 and F1=1. The sequence appears throughout nature, various areas of mathematics, computer science, and has been generalized to include negative integers, real numbers, and complex numbers through extensions like Binet's formula (the formula which directly links the Fibonacci sequence to the golden ratio).

Exploring the connections

Answering the question for finding similarities of CSEs, waves, levitation, and the Fibonacci sequence, in relationships with nature, leads to more questions.

Aspects of looking at nature to find efficient ways for mobility point to Viktor Schauberger . He was one of the greatest geniuses of the 20 ^th Century regarding nature. Noted as by his philosophy: "Comprehend and Copy Nature", his genius was observing nature and implementing those ideas into water use and transportation.

Schauberger designed and built two airships. Although the ships had the ability to rise up into the air, their levitating capability was more of an applied force rather than slow and gentle levitation.

In pursuing efficient energy use in relation to motion with nature, Schauberger said the following: “ If water or air is rotated into a twisting form of oscillation known as ‘colloidal’, a buildup of energy results, which, with immense power, can cause levitation. This form of movement is able to carry with it its own means of power generation. This principle leads logically to its application in the design of the ideal airplane or submarine… requiring almost no motive power.”

During World War II, as an Austrian citizen and notable inventor, Victor Schauberger was interned to a Nazi concentration camp and forced to work on a flying disk project using his ideas. It’s not known if the project was completed or, if the saucers actually flew in Germany. Reports vary, and no confirmed documentation remains. It is rather convincingly coincidental, however, that our own (US) pilots reported "strange flying disks" over Germany just prior to the War's end.

Reportedly, there were two flying discs: the Repulsine A and Repulsine B, also referred to as Repulsator' and the other a 'Repulsine'.

These devices are significant to transportation’s future as well as their fundamental design aligning with nature. The website Antigravity Technology provides a couple of illustrations and basic technological concepts of the Repulsine. Here are four paragraphs from that website:

To the Left is a picture of an original prototype showing the major components of the "Repulsine, type B" engine. The air, being drawn in from the top slits, is set into a spiral vortex movement. Schauberger had claimed that once the devise was set in motion, the primary motor could be switched off and the forces at work would power the generator, which was housed in a central location inside the craft.

The Repulsine uses the same phenomena. Cold water, drawn through a base hole, is spun in between the two wavy impellers and cools the air inside the units’ shell. As this partial vacuum draws in the air, it is spun into a cyclone by intake fins. After the air is cooled and humidified, still spinning, it is then expelled from an upper turbine, which reacts with the exiting cyclone. This centrifugal air has so much angular momentum that it is able to leave the Repulsine, even against a strong internal vacuum. That is a direct analogy to the rocking tank implosion-based water pump, described above.

The hot, rising vapor, trapped in a snail-shaped chimney, is lighter than the surrounding dry air and adds to the suction on the Repulsine's top. The upper turbine, spun by the exiting cyclones' action, directly drives the internal wavy vaporizing discs, which atomize the cold intake water. The electric motor (used for starting purposes) only has one purpose, and that is to spin up the vaporizer so that it properly atomizes the cold water from the inlet hose. The power source is implosion of hot, dry, desert air.

Remember that the power source is the Thermal difference between cold ground water and hot, dry desert air, just as is done in the implosion tank-rocking water pump from Texas. There is no mystery here. This device does nothing but convert the energy present in the combination of cold ground water with hot dry atmosphere. That is how it actually works. In many ways, it is similar to Schauberger’s water turbine, which also uses a pulsed pressure reservoir. Keep in mind that without the cold-water input, the pulsating vacuum trapped inside the Repulsine soon diminishes and stops. There is a lot of mystery behind this device.

One of the world’s best informative authors for scientific analysis on the leading edge of transportation innovation, is, Julio C. Gobbi. He published an incredibly detailed analysis of Schauberger’s discoid aircraft, titled: Schauberger Technology . Schauberger’s approach was different than aeronautic engineering’s reliance on lift of centrifugal force for pushing an object through air with the resistance of friction. Schauberger developed a discoid aircraft with its production of atmospheric air vortexes.

Here are two paragraphs from his paper: With the understanding of natural processes and their application in the control of rotational movements of fluids inside tubes, Schauberger learned how to use the dynamics of natural movements for the development of several devices, among them, the discoid models called Repulsine. In these machines, the tube processes were transferred and configured as a centrifugal air chamber that alternatively brakes and pulls the air fluid which moves through it. These devices created air vortexes by rotating the chamber with high-speed electric motors (from 10,000 to 20,000 RPM), and were so powerful that the traction force of the air currents accelerated the entire machine upwards.

When the chamber rotated, considerable suction was created in the central inlet ducts of the chamber as a result of the centrifugal forces that dragged the fluid radially to the periphery. The aqueous or air fluid directed inward was sucked through the low-pressure chamber (made, says Schauberger, of inorganic silvered copper), where this flow was “pumped” by flow restrictors across the circumference (which could make up concentric rings), located inside the chamber in order to mold and momentarily exert pressure on the fluid flow. In addition to these centrifugal forces (axial to radial), the rotating forces are operating perpendicularly to the centrifugal forces, dragging the air fluid into the low-pressure chamber. Here occurs what Schauberger called a transition promoted by planetary movement together with a rhythmic change in suction and braking pressures. This alternating motion causes the dissociation process of oxygen and carbon from the air that flows through the chamber into two separate components.

Julio’s detailed explanation of Schauberger’s vortexes brings rise to the probable similarities of conjunction to Fibonacci sequence. There is speculation that the Fibonacci sequence could be applied mathematically with a toroidal form for the unified-field theory.

Sidenote

A very interesting story about Viktor Schauberger from a delisted website:

Once again, he was the victim of deceit and his ideas were usurped, for, in a later letter to his son Walter, he wrote that copies of the preliminary application had been fraudulently obtained by Prof. Ernst Heinkel, the famous aircraft designer, through a firm of patent attorneys, Lehmann-Harlens in Berlin. By mining the information contained in this document, Heinkel obtained insights into how a jet-engine could be produced, even though he misinterpreted its findings; his first prototype exploded due to his lack of proper understanding. With a certain absence of principle, he then sought Viktor's collaboration in the project. Although some initial discussion eventually took place, Viktor did not cooperate, having become aware of what Heinkel had done, and further contact between the two men ceased. Using his ill-gotten gains, however, Heinkel persevered with his research, which culminated in the construction of the first successful jet-plane, its first flight being on August 27th, 1939.

Although Heinkel never had the honesty to reveal the source of the ideas for his invention, keeping all the kudos for himself, this jet plane was nevertheless built as a direct result of Viktor's theories. Viktor Schauberger is therefore the real father of the present jet age. He even went as far as to state that in order to develop and build fast-flying, supersonic aircraft successfully, the bodily forms of deep-sea fish should be copied. Today's 'stealth bombers' very much emulate these forms. In 1939 Viktor's personal research virtually came to an end, all the materials he needed being appropriated for war production. In 1941, however, he was summoned by Air Marshal Ernst Udet to discuss the growing crisis of energy production and means of solving it. Premises were subsequently set up near Augsburg for research and development, all of which came to nothing partly due to the death of Udet and partly because it was bombed by the Allies in 1942.

The significance to adding this, is with the comment that Schauberger’s technology opposed propulsion and the entirety of Heinkel’s jet engine technology industry is founded on the inefficiency and misunderstanding its original intent of attractive movement, rather than forcing propulsion.

Conclusion

Viktor Schauberger was a man of gifted genius insight. He paved a path of an amazing perspective. It requires more and intense study. As for this article’s intent of finding correlations to the Fibonacci sequence, wave frequency, and CSE’s, the study and research continues.

Revisiting Short Distance Travel and Levitation

Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:46:44 GMT

Revisiting Short Distance Travel and Levitation

Photo credits: pxhere.com and Shanghai Transrapid (getty)

It’s the same question: how is levitation possible?

People have sought the magic of flying for thousands of years, from magic carpets to jumping in the air and flying like Superman. How is it possible to fly? What’s required to levitate?

This article is a continuation of the series on levitation from several months ago. In a previous article , CATTCC discovered that levitation is vibrational action at the molecular level . How much information has arisen since then?

Short distance travel continues as a technologically advanced societal urgency, in its demand for an immediate transportation solution.

CATTCC’s search continues for short-distance transportation alternatives. The criteria of our research: an operating vehicle that is energy efficient and sustainable, with a design utilizing attractive motion rather than propulsion.

The leading consideration in the search for a short-distance transportation alternative is levitation. From research thus far, one of the questions asked about levitation: is there a correlation between the voids of Cavities Structures Effect (CSE), gravity, and electromagnetism? Being more specific: what is the relationship of field actions between CSEs and electromagnetism or electricity. And secondly, CSEs and gravity.

There is an energy action between a highly charged electric field and an opposing field. There is a significant reaction between the independence of fields. What then, is the action between a positive or negative field and a void. Within that void is an absence of energy field. Does that absence within a surrounding field cause a reaction?

To this line of reasoning: what is the reaction of positively charged ionic action in the atmosphere; to a CSE? And even more specific: that reaction to a CSE with a ground plate? Can the accumulation of CSEs, placed above a ground plate, create enough molecular vibration to provide gravitational offset to levitate the craft and occupant? The answer is yes; there is a correlation. How it is a yes, that is the topic of this article.

Re-reading the section above, is a reminder to much of Nicola Tesla’s work with very high amounts of DC electric voltage. Static charge carries large amount of voltage, yet its current produces relatively small amounts of amperage. The question here is the consideration for a perspective to produce enough energy potential from atmospheric mass of positively charged ions in the atmosphere to provide a vehicle with levitating motion.

There are several previous articles about Viktor Grebennikov , going into detail the levitating craft he’d built.

Another consideration

There is also a question of how to access energy for accelerating a vehicle with the theory of the Milky Way galaxy traveling at light speed, which postulate the path of particle mass as a unified mass of frequencies; and a new theory of gravity. Light travels at an incredible speed of 669,600,000 miles per hour: 299,792,543,559.86 millimeters per second. There is a distance tie-in to the flow of one ampere with 6.2x10^18 electrons passing a point per second. Distance and speed correlate to wave frequency.

Can this number be transposed to electrogravitics and capture enough energy to provide travel? What is the equivalent of gravitational force? As the equivalent number is found, then multiply it times C for its force of power to attract. Then, for electrogravitics . Also explain what electrogravitics is.

Along this consideration, here is the same topic in the article Extending CSE Research :

The Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics, being half of wave–particle duality. All matter exhibits wave-like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave.

The concept that matter behaves like a wave was proposed by French physicist Louis de Broglie (/dəˈbrɔɪ/) in 1924, and so matter waves are also known as de Broglie waves.

The de Broglie wavelength is the wavelength, λ, associated with a particle with momentum p through the Planck constant, h.

Levitation

There are different viable ways for levitation. For an object to levitate with gases, it occurs during a transitional phase as gas molecules are heated, which cause the gas molecules to expand. The expansion of heat is centrifugal force which pushes electrons to outer orbital shells. This constant exertion distorts molecular structure and dissipates the molecule’s density, causing a lighter-than-air status. The dissipation of the elements’ density in molecular structure, enables a physical alteration to the lighter-than-air weight differentiation to atmospheric gases. This type of levitation is from mass accumulation of molecular vibration. It’s also gradual and describes the action of a hot air balloon.

A helium filled balloon or a dirigible, attains a levitating action because helium is lighter than atmospheric gases.

Ferrous elements are able to attain levitation within a magnetic field.

These actions are viable within the parameters of known laws of gravity.

The article, Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation , points out that magnetism is the exchange of a molecule’s outer shell electrons, inducing mass accumulation of molecular vibration.

Ions are in this same category of exchanging electrons. The process of an atom or molecule gaining or losing an electron is: ionization. When an atom loses one or more electrons, it becomes a positively charged ion, named a cation. An atom that gains an electron becomes negatively charged, and named anion.

The process of wandering electrons produces vibration of mass.

A step beyond ion vibration

In prescribing to the theory that gravity is inherent as a component in the path of particle mass, the term anti-gravity is antithetical to mass. This raises a question: can a methodology be found to manipulate the angular momentum on the path of particle mass?

This is a perspective change. manipulating a particle’s angular momentum could be considered as altering molecular frequency. As such it would alter the mass composition. The goal of the question is pursuing, or provoking, vibrational resonance in a manner that would allow, cause, or induce mass accumulation of molecular vibration.

The question addresses resonance pulse as a controlled manipulation. The pursuit of this manipulation would be without the necessity of ionization. This line of question is the consideration of manipulating a resonance pulse for a reaction at an exceptionally high-voltage. Or perhaps as light frequency measured in angstroms, as light variation.

The purpose of this question is to reach beyond atmospheric acoustics, for the purpose of levitating a vehicle with the energy of a wave motion.

The calculation of motion regarding light frequency motion is relative to the CSE and levitation; in relation to legitimacy of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, wherein the Milky Way galaxy is traveling at light speed (e=mc^2 with mc as a constant). The correlation being a similarity of the speed inside a train or moving object possessing the same physics characteristics as outside, plus being subjected to the added attributes of momentum. The correlation is that there is no fundamental change without centrifugal interaction.

Accessing the subatomic electrogravitics reaction to CSEs. Explain this theory and prove it. Kind of like explaining how Peter walked on water. CSEs are voids, absence of space without anything missing. This is a non-tangible aspect of something that is there. It’s similar to a vacuum without an evacuating component that forces evacuation. It’s the sound of a seashell.

Inasmuch as magnetic action is the molecular combination of electron structure, the CSE is a molecular action to gravitational positioning of molecular composition which causes a vibrational action for attractive motion (the opposite of propulsion). Again, it’s the sound of a seashell.

Building New Urban Growth

Tue, 23 Dec 2025 21:46:30 GMT

How to implement sustainable urban growth

In the eyes of some people, the word sustainability has become a bitter term of political tyranny. Confiscating a reasonable concern into an abusive political narrative is nothing less than a disappointing deception. And yet, one of the most important negative aspects to sustainability is seen in the sprawl of urban growth.

Many places in Western Society with tract-style housing and the increasing proliferation of apartments, are the designs which are only meant to serve as lucrative revenue streams. Once referred to as a family home, far too many houses have been replaced as crowded profit centers of housing developments and apartments. Meandering roads, open space and nature’s greenery has been scalped. The once picturesque scenes of serenity are now lined with the cold brutality of asphalt, curbs, gutters and zero lot-lines.

There are many people who enjoy the bustle of city life, the social noise of bars, restaurants, busy coffee shops, the busyness of clicking keyboards, and the excitement of coliseum sports and concert events. Others prefer the quiet serenity of nature’s voice.

Addressing sustainability, for viable areas in new urban growth, is with real estate development in transit-oriented designed neighborhoods. Building new urban growth along existing transportation corridors provides appropriate higher density with vertical residential and commercial growth. Transit oriented development using transportation with advanced transit technology for residents can provide the convenience of localized transit access. This type of higher density growth within existing transit corridors allows preservation for land-use of existing larger residential lot sizes, agriculture and nature.

The structure of human social development caters to an average person’s circle of personal relationships at about 100 people. This is used as the target standard for a comfortable neighborhood size within residential developments for less than 100 families. The other essential to a living environment is greenery, dirt, trees, and recreation. This same philosophy of social construct for sustainable transit-oriented developments with apartment dwellings encourages land area of dirt access for gardening and child entertainment. The larger the dwelling development, the more land access is needed for the psychological effects of privacy and grounding meditation. The importance of accessibility to open public area is for human development to the lives of those living in those development areas. The lives of a development’s residence are valid description of environmental equity. The social aspect of raising families in a sustainable environment is valid as justice. The negative impact to hundreds of residences is a reasonable concern that outweighs excessive profiteering to property developers or their shareholders.

With an advanced modern technology transit system, it encourages high density real estate development along transportation corridors and increases convenience. This adds sustainability aspects into expanding urban growth with the advantage of localized and regional transit.

Living spaces are meant to be pleasurable and personally profitable to those choosing them as homes. Accessibility to transportation convenience is to be a reward instead of a punishment at the expense of a real estate developer’s profitability.

Legislation

California’s legislation has been pursuing the removal of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for more than three decades. By enacting the use of the existing allocated light-rail ROWs with modern advanced transit technology systems, this type of innovative transit system development reaches into sustainable legislative parameters for urban growth. And it does so with full transportation benefits to all area residents. The fundamental duty of legislators and every level of government official above every task, is to improve quality of life; and this provides it without sacrifice.

The government has assigned itself control with responsibility for planning urban growth. California’s Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was signed into law by Governor Ronald Reagan in 1970. It requires an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) to produce an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for every government and large development project. The normal procedure for lead agencies regarding negative traffic impacts, is to merely stamp the EIR with an “infeasible” Mitigated Negative Declarations (MND) and the project is allowed to continue. This approach alleviates the necessity to conform to the strict requirements in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This is the government process to ignore and sidestep its own mandates.

Political hurdles

There is a conundrum in passing strict environmental legislation just to ignore it. This clarifies the government as the largest operational bureaucracy. It also exemplifies the only function of bureaucracy, which is to enlarge itself. Since the enemy of bureaucracy is innovation and government is risk averse, supporting development to implement new and advanced transit technology is impossible with government support.

Hence, six decades of empty allocated light-rail rights-of-ways and the furtherance to implement horridly and unnecessary antiquated rail projects. But, it’s the political process to embrace embedded lobbyist’s efforts.

Calendars signify entry past the quarter mark into the twenty-first century. How backwards is the USA in transportation? Space travel is an important function of transportation. NASA was established in 1958; its current annual budget is $25billion with a staff of 18,000 employees. This large bureaucratic agency stranded their astronauts on the Space Station for several month until a single man not related to any government agency, sent his own rocket to rescue them.

This is an example of why innovation is imperative for allowing advanced transit systems technology to be implemented as solutions for sustainable transportation into urban growth.

Replacing cars

Automobile centric land-use requires cars. Western Society’s land-use design is dysfunctional without them, nearly everyone is dependent upon cars for transportation, goods and services. One of the public fears is loss of their car. Talk about sustainability is unpopular because most people know that nothing about a car is sustainable. Compound that with talk about; if the existing allocated light-rail ROWs are actually used to implement New Technology Transit systems into those corridors.

The public market is fixated on cars, it’s a land-use issue of dependency from being an automobile centric land-use design. Cars can only be replaced when the market is presented with a vehicle that is faster, more comfortable, more convenient, less expensive and safer than a car. There’s currently nothing being developed to offer these items of interest, necessary to replace the car.

Conclusion

How is it possible to build sustainable urban growth? Changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today. https://www.cattcc.org/incremental-steps

Automobiles have been used as the primary source of transportation in Western Society about 100 years. Modern technology has changed culture. A tendency in human nature is to cling onto what they have but, social trends are as temporary as ocean waves. The preceding article: Incremental Steps was an outline of how to move towards sustainable transportation.

Although sustainability of urban growth is extremely important, it is only seen as a passing trend. A single human is totally insignificant on the global perspective, yet, the perspective to each individual; the global scale is irrelevant. Sustainability is an unaccountable moral responsibility. The cultural attitude holds no accountability of responsibility for the actions of other people. And a significant segment of society claims victimhood as their moral rights.

The deep aspects of human psychology are affected by urban growth. Sustainability of urban growth is environmental, economic, and social. The foundation to all urban growth is its primary source of transportation. With the automobile being wholly unsustainable, establishing an entire type of land-use upon an unsustainable source of transportation; is problematic.

Researching Future Transportation

Fri, 07 Nov 2025 04:55:14 GMT

Exploring potential technologies to serve as brand-new modes of transportation

photo credits, unspash, Lyncean Group

There are questions that science hasn’t asked. One of the biggest questions is in the field of transportation: it’s a statement. With all the technology changes over the past 100 years, there have been no new modes of transportation.

Rational for a brand-new mode of transportation

In Western Society, the automobile is the primary source of transportation. The society’s technological demands for short distance transportation have outgrown Western Society’s dependence on the automobile. The natural question to ask is: what can replace the car? Replacing the automobile as the primary source of transportation requires a transportation mechanism that’s more convenient for door-to-door service, faster, less expensive, more comfortable, safer, and easier to drive than a car. What technology can accomplish this? It doesn’t exist yet. There’s currently no vehicle technology available to satisfy these parameters, and worse: very little research to replace the car.

Replacing the car

What’s necessary to meet these qualifications? Answering that question requires a deep look at all of today’s modes of transportation. They all use propulsion. The relentless pursuit of propulsion technology as the only method for transportation motion, completely ignores the basic physics of what magnets do. Magnets repel and attract. How much energy does a magnet require to attract an opposite magnetic pole? This proposes the contemplation for using attraction as a possible means to compliment or replace propulsion. It also provides consideration for gravity as an attraction method, for transportation motion.

Changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today. Changing tomorrow’s transportation can only be attained by searching to find alternatives for transportation motion. Stepping into the future and looking at its methods for transportation: it floats. This leads to an imperative necessity for research gravity and its manipulation to control.

Levitation for transportation

Is there a way that levitation can be used for a vehicle to float freely in the air? There are several previous articles about possibilities in considering levitation for transportation.

Here are two new questions. What is the path of an ion? How, or can that path be used to serve as a wave to ‘surf’ paths of ion streams with levitation?

In asking those two questions, is there a related possibility for using atmospheric ions to create a brand-new mode of transportation with levitation? By the resonance of controlled vibration, it is theoretically plausible for levitation to be used as a transportation mechanism. Several of the CATTCC articles examine the possibilities for using levitation as a transportation mechanism. Leading research in this field was Viktor Grebennikov and his discovery of Cavity Structures Effects (CSE). This provides exploratory possibilities to examine. In another article, levitation is identified as the vibration of mass accumulation .

One of the aspects to examine with Viktor Grebennikov’s work with CSEs, asks the question: does the configuration of bug wings within a cavities structure provide a perpetuating increase to its resonance? Does the shape of bug wing’s aerodynamic shape provide lift? And does the multitude of bug wings amplify resonance?

In the questions regarding possible paths of atmospheric ion flow, is there a quantitative amount of ionization in the air with a source of amplification to stimulate an electric charge that could enable a method levitating vehicle motion? In the article, Build with Levitation , there is a famous photo of Nicola Tesla sitting in his shop. The photo illustrates the amount of available electric potential. Nature has an abundance of available energy.

The article, Using Air for Levitation , has a link to a Richard Feynman lecture: Electricity in the Atmosphere . In the lecture, he describes the variances between the positively charged atmospheric ions and the negatively charge ions on Earth’s surface. Modern technology is capable to measure these variances and look for stream flows. Or, possibly create a mechanism to capture or create ionic streams.

In the search for answers, let’s ask the same question about ion streams that was asked about gravity ( A Study in Gravity ). Since we know ions are an action in atomic structure, it can be assumed ionization is similar to the combination in molecular structure of magnetic action. However, this stream action of ionization differs from magnetic action. It is static charge and flows as flash electric discharge. This energy release is seen as outward centrifugal frequency flow. It is a molecular action as the outward motion of particle collisions. Nature is very structured; it is an incredibly balanced motion. The flow of flash electric static discharge is non-random. An additional assumption is that a tiny fraction of such action should be sufficient to provide motion for levitating a vehicle device.

This raises another question: is that static ionization electric action a method for propulsion or is a portion of that potential applicable for levitation, or both? Seems the key word here to investigate is frequency; a pattern to that centrifugal motion. Since the known pattern of nature is the centripetal flow, seen as an exponential spiral of Fibonacci Sequence observed in sea shell shapes, a centrifugal movement has an opposite motion than nature’s pattern of centripetal flow. The frequency tone of that energy charge action is a clattering hiss sound. The pattern jumps around, seen in a far-away aerial view, like a creek bed.

According to Einstein’s energy equation, energy is light speed (C) squared of the constant: mass times C. This suggests that the frequency pattern of static charge discharge could be the same centripetal pattern of nature, however its pace is C squared. Our perspective in too slow to recognize its frequency flow pattern as it moves at C squared; interacting within the path of its molecular action.

Does this also explain the chemical action of energy in flickering flame as a Fibonacci Sequence?

Which gives rise to another question: how does heat affect a CSE? Does that stimulate vibration and amplify levitation propensity or potential? Or, is levitation merely a reaction of air movement in acoustics as frequency change? Magnets reveal that its levitating action is not related to acoustic frequency changes but, a molecular action of specific elements in close proximity to each other. These questions lead to a conclusion that levitation has multiple variations.

Ion drive

What are current technologies pursuing levitation for transportation? Maglev trains are one example. Another example is ion-drive technology being used as for deep space propulsion.

Undefined Technologies is a company pursuing short-distance levitation transportation. Their project, Silent Ventus , is a new concept in ion drive drone technology, based on T. Townsend Brown’s discovery of asymmetrical electrodes and the Biefeld-Brown Effect. The process ionizes air molecules by using a high-voltage electric fields to create an "ionic wind" that propels the drone forward. It uses this ionic propulsion instead of traditional propellers to generate lift and thrust.

Although Silent Ventus is still in development, their 2022 prototype demonstrated remarkable potential. Silent Ventus is a step into advanced transportation technology.

Other low speed aeronautics with potential for space flight of ion drive technology was performed by MIT. This commercialized nine and a half minute youtube video explains.

Another article highlights the work from the Lyncean Group regarding the 1964 patent of the Ionocraft.

Conclusion

The future of transportation floats. There are several areas open to research in finding ways to enable a vehicle to float in the air. Conversely, the current research methodologies in transportation focus on propulsion, causing answers about levitation and the attractive source of gravity, much more difficult to discover.

Discovering new modes of transportation

Mon, 27 Oct 2025 03:31:37 GMT

Discovering brand-new modes of transportation with revised physics

Photo credits: unsplashed.com, story-cars.com/flying-car

What does it take to discover a brand-new mode of transportation? How can new answers be found while pursuing traditional directions? Seeking new insights compels a change to perspective. Where are new modes of short distance transportation and when will that technology be implemented? The leading fringe in theoretical physics presents a distinctively untraditional view.

Beginning in the 1930s, society was promised flying cars. What happened? There are two ways to answer the question: pessimistically or optimistically; either response leads to conjecture about societal behavior. Alternatively; the appropriate response is figuring out a way to make a vehicle float in air without a propulsive force.

Several of the previous CATTCC articles approach the topic of short distance transportation , let’s revisit and pickup from there. Beginning with a five-part series on levitation , it quickly leads to electrogravitics. This is the point where a reader who has little interest in theoretical physics can stop reading.

Electrogravitics is an unexplored pursuit in theoretical physics. In the phenomenal scientific genius days of the late 1800s and early 1900s, the theoretical physics community discovered electrogravitics. T. Townsend Brown was one of the early pioneers in the field.

Electrogravitics provides the explanation for gravity . Herein are some questions. How is it that that electrogravitics replaces electromagnetics? Looking at the difference between magnetics and gravity, magnetics is an action in electron orbits of elements in their composition of molecules. What is gravity? Is gravity the collection of mass? Or is it a process of matter?

A rock has more mass than a feather. Both are subjected to gravity. Mass is a collection of matter. Newton defined the laws of gravity 400 years ago to explain that a small rock and a big rock are both attracted to Earth which is a bigger rock. A feather is bound by the same principles dictated in Newton’s laws but is subjected to atmospheric interference regarding its speed of attraction to Earth’s gravitational influence.

What is the difference between electromagnetics as a fundamental principle to the makeup of matter and electrogravitics? With this question: what makes a magnet work? A magnet is the molecular combination of electron structure. Magnetic force is the action of electrons in the outer shell in ferrous materials. It is molecular action. Then, how can particles of non-ferrous elements hold electromagnetic properties, since magnetism is only an action of ferrous elements? How can particles with electromagnetic charge exist in subatomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous?

This presents potential validation to electrogravitics as a fundamental component to subatomic structure.

Now, consider gravity. According to Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, his famous mathematical statement of energy is an explanation to his theory of relativity (E=MC^2). It reads: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. His theory of relativity postulates that mass is traveling at light speed; as a constant. To clarify, Einstein’s theory of relativity suggests that the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling through the universe at the speed of light, in a gigantic path of a horseshoe configuration. His use of mass times light (MC) represents a constant. Energy is squaring of that constant, something beyond what perception perceives as normal (as an example: being on a train, unaffected by the movement outside the train-car).

In the pursuit to explain gravity, with consideration in agreement with Einstein’s theory of relativity, that the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling through the universe at the speed of light; the reality is: nothing is static. This declares that everything is frequency of motion. It completely nullifies the subatomic theories of opinion that orbits are elliptical.

An explanation for gravity is given in the article A Study in Gravity : gravity is a process of subatomic movement . With everything of perception being in motion as frequency, it suggests there is a definitive path to all matter. The path of all particles is analogous to a ribbon in an elliptical Mobius strip with twists in the ribbon. But, this elliptical Mobius ribbon with its defined twists is stretched out to a linear path in sync traveling at the speed of light. What is gravity? Gravity is the angular momentum of the twists, at the speed of light.

The orbital paths are circular in the sense of integral equilibrium; traveling at light speed. Dependent upon a two- or three-dimensional perspective, it would appear as a circle or orbital.

Foundation to theory

For many decades, the accepted theory of subatomic physics contends that subatomic particles, which comprise the structure of matter, hold values of electromagnetics which provide positive and negative charge. It is the theory of electrogravitics: this electrical charge is gravitational at the subatomic level.

Pursuing this perspective is the suggested direction for finding a way to use levitation as a method of motion for transportation.

Capturing the motion

There are several questions. is there legitimacy to Einstein’s postulation that relativity is: the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling at the speed of light? Is there a unified path of particle mass? This could enable the possibility to discover a methodology to capture levitation. The search begins with a natural action of simplicity, similar to the simplicity of a surfer riding a wave on the ocean.

The purpose in this direction is, again, finding a way to use levitation for transportation. In the article: What is levitation , it begins with more detailed questions. Where is it found? Does levitation really exist? Is it an action to a body as a whole or is it molecular action? It seems to be an action that takes place to a large mass as a whole. How does it happen? Levitation is another scientific mystery.

Conclusion

A new mode of transportation remains unknown. Researching the leading edge in fringe physics theory regarding the forgotten field of electrogravitics could bring answers. However levitation is discovered, it holds the future of short distance transportation.

Incremental Steps

Wed, 22 Oct 2025 02:12:37 GMT

Incremental steps for transportation change

Photo credits: China maglev (from Futurism.com), Boring Company (from lasvegasthenandnow.com)

Incrementalism is the slow consistent cultural move towards radical change. The most dramatic changes are seen in technology. With all the advances over the past one-hundred years, transportation has seen little change. There has to be an available product to enable a direction for change. Although there are several advanced transit technology companies, there has been little activity. Other than Morgantown opening in 1975 and Vectus in 2013, any semblance to advanced transit has been restricted to amusement parks and parking lot circulators.

The greatest advancements in ground transportation technology are in China with their high-speed magnetic levitation (maglev) train deployments. The fact that China is the global leader in advanced transit technology system deployments is a startling statement. Historically, nearly all technological advances are innovations from non-communist countries. It's the intent of CATTCC articles to be strictly related to transportation, rather than philosophies, merits, and practices of political ideologies. However, pointing out the fact that China is the global leader in advanced transit technology serves to highlight that lobbying policies of free-world politics, have bred a monopoly of corporate dominance which operate global public transportation; restricting any advances in transportation technology.

Transportation innovation

Some may argue that the advent of autonomous cars is a tremendous advance to transportation. While this achievement is indeed remarkable, the technology belongs to the computer industry; it’s computer programing applied to the automobile. This changes nothing from the car being a car. It’s still unsustainable environmentally, economically, and socially. It also has little to no effect to the automobile centric land-use design of urban growth.

The unified concept for all modern modes of transportation is focused on the engineering necessity for acceleration to propel vehicle movement. The one current implementation towards true transportation advancement is shown with the simplistic utilization of gravity in space travel. All the efforts of mankind’s engineering genius with propulsion driven vehicles and aircrafts were exceeded by the success in the mission of the Parker Solar Probe. This mission begs consideration for alternative methods of transportation motion beyond propulsion.

The focus of this article is in regards to the incremental movements to advance transit. The Parker Solar Probe imparts needed research in developing new concepts in physics theory; for technology in a new mode of transportation using brand-new methodologies for mobility. While detailing gravity is beyond the scope of this particular article, such articles can be found in other CATTCC posts .

Transit technology options

How then can incremental transportation advances be met? One technology is CyberTran, an advanced transit system designed for urban transit. As an autonomous vehicle and computer-controlled transit system, it provides 24/7 passenger access. This ultralight transit technology has passive switching which allows direct to destination passenger delivery. Due to its ultralight structure and smaller than streetcar design, its network infrastructure is a fraction of costs of traditional transit for full system implementation.

Hyperloop is a high-speed technology. Hyperloop was introduced as an open-source white-paper in 2013 by Elon Musk to provide a unified technology transit system. The system technology anticipates a speed above 700 mph. The vehicles travel inside an air evacuated tube to reduce air resistance which increases vehicle speed. The tube has a magnetic guideway and levitates the vehicles which further reduces friction, greatly increasing vehicle speed.

The engineered design of the Hyperloop transit system is configured for long distance. Although this is a much-needed addition to regional and long-distance transportation, the design is unsuitable for localized mobility in urban use.

ET3 is an ultrafast global transit technology. Their slogan is “Space travel on Earth”. It is indeed the fastest transportation system on the planet; its computer simulated speed reaches Mach 6. The basis of this technology is very simple: it works by eliminating virtually all aerodynamic friction and rolling resistance. The technology is an air evacuated tube with smaller vehicles than Hyperloop, it’s maximum load is 6 passengers and luggage. It’s smaller size, minimizes costs and increases speed.

This transit system design is the fastest long-distance travel technology in the world. However, similar to Hyperloop, it’s incapable of providing localized short-distance transit.

The only actively growing advanced transit project is from the Boring Company. The beginning of the Vegas Loop was built in about a year and opened in April of 2021. It started with the Las Vegas Convention Center Loop project as a three-station system with 1.7 miles of tunnel. In 2024, the Loop expanded with an addition of 2.1 miles and five stations. Future plans call for a total of 68 miles of tunnel and 90-stations throughout Las Vegas.

From an informative article in Investopedia about the Boring Company, it concludes with: “seeks to redefine our infrastructure and transportation systems via the use of tunnels.”

The aspect of new transportation infrastructure strengthens the demand for new transportation technology. Hyperloop and ET3 both use maglev technology. Due to the lack of an available technologically developed and publicly implemented vehicle system, the Boring Company had to implement what it had available: Tesla cars.

This step of transportation incrementalism is interesting. It’s a direction for infrastructure rather than vehicle technology, nonetheless; it’s a positive step.

The change for transportation’s incrementalism

Incremental change needs a goal, without being arbitrary. As pointed out in the article ‘ Alternative Transportation from a Car’ : “Eliminating the automobile convolutes the functionality of the automobile centric land-use design used with nearly all Western Society.” In other words: removing the car from society is futile without a more suitable replacement.

What type of change can make a difference to transportation? When does the direction of serious research and development bring vehicle development into a brand-new mode of transportation? That level of change is only made possible by altering the conventional mindset of propulsion-based mobility. Transportation change has to seek other methods of movement, something other than propulsion force.

What direction should short distance transportation research go? Changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today. Where are the answers today that can change tomorrow’s future for transportation?

The first direction is to rethink propulsion as an engineering must. What alternative is there to propulsion? The attractive force of gravity has already been proven to far exceed every aspect of propulsion for speed.

Much of CATTCC study and research is about the advancement of transportation. The articles in Future Transportation are specifically about how to attain transportation motion without propulsion.

Integrating Transit

Sat, 11 Oct 2025 01:57:57 GMT

Integrating advanced transit into California's light-rail rights-of-ways

photo credits: CyberTran,

High Speed Rail Alliance, hsrail.org

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are the government agencies assigned to plan and distribute Federal, State, and local tax dollars to maintain and plan new transportation. The general perception of MPOs is that changes in transportation provoke public discourse. Conversely, when an innovative product is created in the private sector, there is no public discourse. Apple didn’t require a public meeting to implement its i-phone network into the public arena. Nor did Microsoft engage public authorization for its release of Windows. There was no public referendum to introduce the internet, which has literally changed the social course of Western Society.

Tantamount to the heavy impact of large tract-house developments, proposed plans are put to a city council vote regarding zoning. City councils’ zoning approvals place heavy negative traffic impacts to surrounding areas. The effected roads become burdensome impediments to existing road infrastructure, additional traffic loads are unable to accommodate the influx of thousands of extra vehicles.

At present, the public embraces three transportation choices: trains, automobiles, or airplanes. The majority of western civilization land-use growth is automobile centric. Does this indicate that the government transportation agencies are restricted from introducing new methods for transportation?

Transportation improvement

With three modes of transportation available in the developed world, how can a new mode of transportation be implemented? Without having a brand-new mode of transportation available, the only changes to transportation are with incremental adjustments in technology. Automobiles necessitate the crowding of unsustainable sprawl land-use development.

Alternatively, transit-oriented land-use requires fixed rail transit incorporated into vertical high-density development. While high-density transit development builds commerce concentration, it also provides transit user convenience for local residents. Even though most people perceive medium or high-density vertical development as over-crowding, concentrating new urban growth along existing transportation corridors preserves the outlying areas for sparse urban growth and agriculture.

California’s transportation solution opportunity

Step One -

Using California as an example, there are valid ways to improve transportation. The first step is converting the failed CA HSR into a central core for a usable transit system throughout CA. This approach stipulates that local decision-making politicians: comprehend California has hundreds of miles of existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways. Its infrastructure for usability is already in place.

Second Step -

Secondly are advances in transit system technology which massively exceed the capabilities of expensive retrofitted street cars. Advanced transit technology meets society’s modern transportation demands. The technologies of modern transit systems are unavailable to the older traditional transit. The ultra-light vehicles are smaller. With safe passive-switch ability, new transit technology systems cater to each passenger’s destination. These computer-controlled technology systems remove schedules and are always passenger ready. Modern transit system technology uses a high car count with system capacity at just a few second headway; this delivers passengers to their destinations without unwarranted stops or delays. The advanced technology mitigates traffic congestion with computerized on-demand service. System build-outs can accommodate up to 90% of the metropolitan populations. System designs carry the ability to increase load capacity with population growth.

Politically, advanced transit technology enables urban growth to increase quality of life by establishing medium to high-density urban growth within existing transportation corridors. An essential understanding to urban planning is knowing that transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. Urban planning is dependent upon its transportation network.

As an immediate and comprehensive modern-day transportation alternative, real estate development provides the transportation solution through fixed-rail type transit. With private sector participation, privately funded sustainable-communities development projects can attain environmentally viable urban growth. This type of development can begin immediately with infill real estate developments throughout existing transportation corridors. An important characteristic for this type of development: it attains California’s stringent environmental goals of reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Economically, as the emergent transit system technology company systems are implemented, they’ll need manufacturing facilities. This brings industrial benefits of economic development and community growth from new engineering and manufacturing jobs. As the VMT is reduced from automobile travel, the necessity of automobile dependency lessens, further reducing economic extraction from the local communities.

Continuation of unsustainability

How much longer will Western Society maintain its dive into the abyss of environmental, economic, and social unsustainability? The phrase: “it’s just the way it is” is technologically unnecessary. Is it not the sworn duty of government officials to serve the public and dedicate their tasks towards improving the public’s quality of life? Whose obligation is it to implement modern transportation advances?

While the public may remain oblivious to the importance of transportation in Western Society, everyone who drives a car is aware of California’s worn-out road infrastructure. Are there any public leaders who are aware of the existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways with viable plans towards their utilization?

Current environmental, economic, and social problems are directly attributed to the arrangement of unsustainable urban growth; based on automobile centric land-use design. Convenience of the automobile is not offset by the intrusive increase to their numbers. Exacerbating transportation problems are directly related to the unsustainable nature of automobile centric urban growth. The demand for transportation is proportionate to the population. As the population continually grows, needs for mobility excel at a proportionally greater rate. With the growing population, there is an increased demand for land and mobility.

Third step to integrate urban transit within the HSR infrastructure

CA’s financial condition is bleak. The Federal government’s is worse. To financially consider building a brand-new traditional publicly funded transit system infrastructure, is a ludicrous suggestion.

The provision allowing modern transit systems to be implemented into the existing light-rail rights-of-ways is with private sector involvement. The funding mechanism comes from building high-density transit-oriented real estate developments at the transit station sites within existing transportation corridors. These privately built development sites incur the expense of the new transit technology system infrastructure costs. This burden of incurred costs is shared with the government, carrying liabilities as joint venture projects. There are examples where this type of involvement has been tremendously successful.

Conclusion

What do we see in today’s transportation? Every mode of transportation, is from the past. As society has grown technologically, it becomes imperative that transportation technology advance into the 21 ^st Century. Applying prudence; we know that changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today.

The importance of introducing new technological industries to Central California is key to regional economic security.

It is important socially to implement new mobility options, as well as consolidating the ever-increasing land-use consumption from urban growth.

Post Script note from the author.

These CATTCC articles are the antithesis of sensationalism in marketing. The articles are not hyperbole. This article in particular is authoritatively qualified.

The CATTCC articles are expertly ascertained dissertations arrived through 30 years and $hundreds of thousands spent on didactics of empirical corroboration in urban growth, transportation, and sustainability.

Future of Transportation

Fri, 03 Oct 2025 18:44:00 GMT

Finding simplicity as the future of transportation

photo credit: dreamtime.com

What is the future of transportation? From previous articles, society of the past expected flying cars within 10 to 20 years. This remains an unmet expectation over the past 100 years. How is someone able to predict with confidence that the future of transportation floats? And this source of motion will be with the manipulation of gravity?

In observing the entirety of the transportation spectrum, what’s the fastest speed ever achieved by human intellect? What was its source of speed? Is it a surprise that its speed wasn’t achieved by powered acceleration? The gravitational pull of Venus and the Sun were used to allow the Parker Solar probe to exceed 430,000 miles per hour.

Inasmuch as human intuition anticipates an intellectual sense of conforming to what a person is conditioned to experience, a preconceived expectation changes with perspective. In other words, counter-intuitive to space travel; there are other methodologies for space travel than chemical explosions of rocket fuel.

The simplicity of releasing an object held in your hand, generates a source of motion. Can that action be applied to transportation? The internet search-engines reveal no tangible experimentation taking place. Can transportation utilizing the simple principles of gravity be found without exploring this research? The one area of research was from a medical article . It reads: “ On Earth, gravity also plays a role in human locomotion, where pendular energy exchange during walking reduces the external work required to move, demonstrating gravity’s influence on motion in biological systems .”

Principles of gravity physics

Newton’s law of gravity explains that the force of gravity is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.

This principle was discovered 400 years ago.

The Department of Energy (DOE) explains gravity as: Gravity is the force of fundamental attraction between all things that have mass or energy. It feels powerful to us in our daily lives, but it is by far the weakest of the four known forces in nature. The strong force is the strongest of the forces and it binds nuclei together. The electromagnetic force is the next strongest and governs almost our entire existence from chemistry to our sense of touch and all the properties of light. The weak force is much weaker than electromagnetism and causes certain nuclei to fall apart. Gravity is also the only force that is not part of the Standard Model of Particle Physics .

In the question that DOE addresses, it states that gravity is the force of fundamental attraction. This justifies a further question of asking what is that force? CATTCC responds to further define gravity in its article, A Study in Gravity . It postulates: gravity coincides with Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in its claim that our galaxy is flying through space at light speed. The currently held belief of all matter; is every particle maintains elliptical orbits. The new theory identifies matter as Einstein’s theory claims; that all matter is moving at light speed. This speed nullifies a model of matter holding elliptical orbits. The new theory of gravity postulates that all matter, as moving at light speed is linear. This linear movement follows unified wave motions. It postulates a specific path of linear movement. Gravity is identified as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path.

Gravity and transportation

The purpose of addressing gravity in this article relates to the future of transportation.

Manipulating gravity as a source of motion for transportation requires the understanding of what gravity is and what makes it work. In the manner of counter-intuitive perception; gravity is a process from the constant motion of mass. In addition to what is described by the DOE (and the overwhelming perspective of academia): that gravity is considered a fundamental force; gravity is the flow of mass as it travels through the universe at light speed.

There are complex intricacies in theoretical physics regarding particle movement. To postulate new theories regarding the path to subatomic motion is controversial. The CATTCC research is uninterested in controversy, its mission is only to advance transportation. Discovering methodologies to improve transportation efficiency and expand transportation technology is CATTCC’s only concern. The reason for mentioning particle physics is to understand gravity and the compelling rational which suggest the future of transportation floats. This also suggests that levitation becomes the basis for a brand-new mode of transportation.

When will levitation be used for transportation? The aspect of today’s technologically advanced society demands advances in transportation. This is an outcry to governmental resources to investigate and supply answers.

Conclusion

Why talk about the future of transportation? The basics and fundamentals of automobile technology are 125 years old. Technology has soared in other industries. The advances applied to the transportation industry are results of other industries but, the basic principles in transportation remain untouched. Basic train technology is still 200 years old, automobiles 125 years old, and the 100-year-old basic principles of airplane flight: all have made improvements to the fundamental principles but, a new mode of transportation option remains undiscovered.

Transportation Overview - part 3 of 3

Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:28:53 GMT

Transportation Options - part 3 of 3, urban growth and politics

Current transportation

In the US, California embraced the political course for transportation advances with its $billions invested into a high-speed train infrastructure. The California high-speed rail (CA HSR) project is now teetering on the fulcrum of failure. Knowledgeable advanced transit industry experts will attest that the CA HSR project can be rescued by involving private sector innovation to integrate the hundreds of miles of allocated transit rights-of-ways with a central Statewide high-speed arterial.

The biggest matter of contention regarding intentional advancements with modes of transportation is politics. The most serious concern is in the question: are there any politicians experienced in advanced transit technology and sustainable urban growth? Where are the resumés? Can astute conclusions be reached without knowledge? Where are the consulting experts found since the government has no relationships established with the advanced transit industry? Can any level of elected US politician describe the details of China’s maglev technological details? Or why China is the global leader in advanced transit technology? Or explain why the US is 25 years behind China’s transportation technology?

Urban growth

Urban growth is extremely important, sustainable urban growth: even more so.

The government’s naive approach to advanced transit technology is detrimental. The constant politization and bureaucratization of the social structure, creates the financial inability to maintain and repair a decaying road infrastructure. Perhaps selective ignorance is a human condition when there are things one doesn't understand, however; the suffering public pays the penalty of consequences for government mismanagement. This is explained as a travesty of incompetence.

An example of this incompetence is California's HSR. Can the failed project be rescued? With the interaction from the private sector, the answer is absolutely: yes. However, the repetitive process of the State's proposal is to obtain money from the carbon credit routine of Cap an Trade. The CA governor and the HSRA Director's solution is continuing the project by adding $1billion per year over the next 20 years, making sure nothing changes. In the words of an advanced transit industry Fellow: “Pursuing a 200-year-old transportation technology has amazingly negative consequences to a technologically advanced society.” The first several years of the project have had immediate results which are seen in Central California cities. There are giant swaths of concrete debris from the $15billion waste of taxpayer dollars. The dismay of closed roads and shuttered businesses are of no concern. The quality of life produced is devastation. Homeless camps abound in the shadows, unseen by the hidden eyes of chauffeured legislators smiling for their photo ops.

How loud does the alarm clock have to ring for people to awaken and realize the year is 2025? All urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. There are only four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design. California has hundreds of miles throughout Central California that are existing allocate light-rail rights-of-ways. This means: they are existing transit corridors. Who has the common sense in political circles to consider these hundreds of miles as actual transit corridors?

The only considerations in government options for transportation today, are continuing to do nothing. Existing road replacement upgrades are deferred due to lack of budgetary outlays which rely on the bureaucracy procedure of State and Federal grant allowances. Road maintenance is allocated to its course of emergency filling of pot holes.

Land-use and transportation

The fundamental component to urban growth is its primary source of transportation. There’s tremendous concern regarding California’s current political directives: legislating high-density real estate mandates that don’t fit into the low and moderate density confinements of the automobile centric land-use design. This is nothing less than intentionally legislating severe damage to Californians’ quality of life. The proper way to approach land-use is to build a modern technology transit network and build-out an appropriate urban design utilizing the transit-oriented land-use real estate development. California has an abundance of existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways within existing transportation corridors to easily accommodate sensible and cohesive high-density urban growth. The social aspects of compressed automobile centric land-use design is an unsustainable approach economically and socially. However, if the political intent is to cause social unrest and economic decline, this approach will reap that goal; perhaps within a decade or so. A politically radicalized social agenda, is irrelevant to the unbiased transportation base of land-use and the perpetual population increase of urban growth.

The new law concerning building apartments in old neighborhoods, is CA’s Senate Bill 9, enacted January 1, 2022. It provides ministerial approval of splitting existing single-family zone housing into two parcels, each with a duplex. Assembly Bill 1584 amends the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) which clarifies incentives and concessions to the State Density Bonus Law (SDBL), intending to increase SDBL projects.

How can these new legislative land-use decrees validate any semblance of traffic load reduction: it’s the absolute opposite of the governmental green propaganda. This legislative action to instantly quadruple housing density holds the prize for blind incompetence regarding transportation solutions. Again, to the earlier point of selective ignorance and unqualified elected officials making crucial decisions they’re totally unqualified to make decisions about. With passage of such decrees, it fully validates the importance of being cognizant to matters with which one is familiar with: in their decision making (rather than blindly being told what to do by their political overseer). With this rampant push to massively increase CA’s population density, what legislative acts are assigned towards decreasing community traffic loads and mediate congestion? What legislation is being created to minimize the increasing burdens of traffic accidents and their related insurance cost increases? Where is the legislation to reduce the rising costs of transportation? Does this not confirm these legislators as unqualified to arrive at transportation solutions?

Can this be perceived as anything other than a land-developer door grab? Does this not push the tone as unsustainability of environmental equity crime or social injustice? Again, is this legislative act a travesty of incompetence, or is it malicious intent towards the populous?

Today’s youth and transportation

Is there any hope that the younger generation entering the political arena will stay in tune with their assigned responsibility of improving the citizens’ quality of life? Is there coherence, as they become involved into politics, to look and see where these transit corridors are? Since they’ve existed for several decades, will there be any curiosity to utilize these major transportation corridors? The older generations were conditioned into conformity and unable to notice them. Perhaps the younger generations will be more perceptive. Or, perhaps they’ll be worse than the previous generations but, optimistically, they’re brighter.

What does it take to communicate intelligence or rational thoughts of common sense to bureaucracy? Its planning departments can only do what they’re told to do, so they hire embedded political consulting firms to compile convincing studies that agree with pre-determined outcomes. The elected officials are at the command of PACs and their favored donating constituents.

To the previous elected officials, the concept of practical transportation solutions was considered an impossible atrocity. Why? In the political world, it would take hundreds of millions of dollars in consultant fees to even look at such a monumental task. Nonetheless, one man: Elon Musk, took a handful of his employees and eliminated billions of dollars of waste in Washington DC within two months. That was impossible.

How many Californian politicians have any experience in the advanced transit industry? How can they possibly claim to have any knowledge about that industry or sustainable urban growth? It would be a viable conclusion that not one single member of California’s legislative body can answer this question correctly: What is the single most important component of sustainable urban growth?

Since it is the biggest responsibility of every elected official and every government employee to improve each citizen’s quality of life, what is the job of every politician? To serve the public. How can they most effectively perform their task? By paying attention to their duty and be cognizant of citizen’s needs, which some actually do their very best at doing.

Transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. Addressing transportation issues is extremely vital to every elected official; an issue that nearly every elected official has very little understanding of. Their understanding of land-use is the commercialization of zoning.

And the answer to the question; as the single most important and valuable component of sustainable urban growth is: dirt. It’s comprised of minerals and nutrients. It filters air and water, and absorbs sunlight. Most people overlook simplicity.

Conclusion

Changes in the future, require actions that alter things we do today.

The implementation of incremental transportation change can be gained by utilizing California’s existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways with modern, efficient, automated, direct to destination, and lower cost advanced transit technology.

Transportation has to be sustainable: environmentally, economically, and socially.

Transportation Overview - part 2 of 3

Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:05:59 GMT

Transportation Overview - part 2 of 3, advancing past the automobile

The previous article ended with the demise of streetcars and the rise of automobiles.

In the late 1800s, shortly after the invention of the automobile, its innovative technology exploded with popularity to the general public. This proliferation of popularity generated Federal regulatory involvement.

Automobile history

The United States began regulating public roads with the establishment of the Office of Road Inquiry in 1893, tasked with promoting rural road development as the first federal agency dedicated to road improvement. This agency, later renamed the Office of Public Roads in 1905 and then the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) in 1915. This marked the beginning of a more formal federal role in highway policy and regulation. The federal government's direct involvement in road construction and regulation expanded significantly with the Federal-Aid Road Act of 1916, which authorized federal funding for state highway improvements. The Federal Aid Highway Act of 1921, transformed the BPR into a central agency for administering federal-aid highway programs.

In 1944, the Federal-Aid Highway Act was enacted. This authorized the construction of interstate highways, leading to the Federal-Aid Highway Acts of 1954 and 1956, which led to the creation of the 41,000-mile National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.

As a consequence to this new highway system, the government's involvement in automotive safety regulation intensified in the 1960s. By 1965, automobile accidents had become the leading cause of death for Americans under age 44.

A more detailed view of how the government influences US road infrastructure is available at this link from the US Department of Transportation .

Advanced Transit

The requirement for transportation’s future is sustainability. With that said, the state of the advanced transportation industry is gasping for funds. A small segment of advanced transit companies have survived for over 20 to 30 years, there’s at least one company has survived for over 40 years. This, in itself is a miraculous feat. And yet, the majority of companies have disappeared.

PRT

In 1975, the Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) industry began to flourish. The Morgantown PRT system was built in Morgantown, West Virginia to serve the West Virginia University campus and the city’s downtown area.

From the industry’s lofty beginnings, this segment of the advanced transit industry has now all but disappeared. Other than the 50 year running of the 70 vehicles running on Morgantown’s 3 ½ mile concrete track, the PRT industry has been relegated to short distance people movers, parking-lot circulators, and proposals of expanded cable car ski-lift technology, glorifying themselves as transit systems.

What happened to the PRT industry?

Throughout the 1990s and into the early 2000s, the innovative PRT industry was moving towards innovation. Innovative transportation engineers and entrepreneurs began pursuing modern transportation solutions to minimize traffic, and a new industry began: personal rapid transit. In the 1990s there were over 100 independent companies involved in research and prototype development. Link to Jerry’s work. Over half of these companies produced prototypes with the hope that their designs would capture the attention of municipalities and be used as transportation systems for the next step in urban growth. In the late 90s throughout the early 2000s, the personal computer industry shrunk computers and expanded the market into mobile phones. The larger computer tech companies bought the smaller successful companies which exploded the personal computer and phone industry into mega conglomerates to market their products further. With massive profits in the computer industry, it bought political power. The computer industry noticed financial potential of the transportation industry and entered the autonomous car market with satellite connectivity. This annihilated the growth of the underfunded PRT potential.

There are many examples of catastrophic financial failures in the rising advanced transit industry. General Atomics had a large investment with its Inductrac project. When showcasing its magnificent magnetic levitation success at the annual premier Maglev Technology global event in the early 2000s, during the question and answers session, following their tremendously successful testing and announcement of their potential industry launch phase, an audience member asked a simple question: “Where’s your switch?” The word ‘switch’ indicates a transit vehicle or train to ‘switch’ from one track to a different track. Millions of dollars were spent on developing a maglev vehicle that doesn’t have a switch. The technology was immediately mothballed and forgotten.

As autonomous vehicle testing continued, and the computer industry lobbyists provided legislative policy provision allowances, the autonomous vehicle market was introduced in the 2000s and is now commonplace.

Introduced in 2013 was Elon Musk’s Hyperloop white-paper. One of the first investors was Hyperloop One. The software financiers looking to cash-in on the potential profits from the transportation industry, hired over 200 young and enthusiastic engineers to produce a new concept in transportation. The management concept in transportation research and development is extremely different than the computer industry. Inexperience and blind management ignorance is a brutal teacher. The consequence was a total investment waste of over $200million. Although early tests were tremendous, their strategy didn’t foresee the necessities of merging the hyperloop concept into the existing urban landscape.

Advanced transportation is the immediate future

What does all this have to do with the future of transportation and floating cars? Societal change is incremental. History reveals that effects of changing a mode of transportation has a direct impact to the natural flow of urban growth. Sustainability in transportation and urban growth is vital.

Politics of transportation

Transportation is a nonpartisan issue. With the large sums of money involved in both urban growth and transportation, the money makes it extremely divisive politically. As time passes and the bureaucracy of government increases, political divisiveness multiplies unfamiliarity into transportation dysfunction.

The current governmental trend for alternative transportation is predicated by the strength of entrenched lobbyists. With the power established by lobbying efforts, the status-quo of antiquated transit technology is an unsurmountable challenge for change.

Transportation Overview - part 1 of 3

Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:45:31 GMT

The overview of US transportation

What does today’s modern society consider as the future of transportation? Since the 1930s, it’s been the same: variations of flying cars within ten to twenty years. The only thing flying-by have been decades of unmet expectation.

What does it take for a car to fly? The one thing everyone agrees on, is that the high number of bad drivers would be worse in the skies. Lots of cars with helicopter blades is out of the question. Part of the reason that cars don’t fly: there’s a plethora of mystifying questions of how can it work? Where’s the beginning for cars to fly? One starting point is that the cabin section of a car has to have the ability to float . It would require an extremely quiet source of control and acceleration, plus automated or autonomous flight paths.

Technology and incremental change

How can the incremental process move to alleviate automobile dependency, as Western Society’s primary source of transportation? The first step in the incremental process is having a viable product. At present, an alternative to replace the car is non-existent. There are, however, advanced transit technology systems available for implementation in certain areas.

Another incremental step: create as much public interest in transportation innovative as there is with cellphone technology. Interest in transportation can grow with revolutionary technological advances when it affects people in a way that provides extremely quick, convenient and effortless mobility access.

Today’s modes of transportation have only seen slight improvements to its 100 to 200-year-old technology. The transportation of yesteryear is antiquated. Its technology is outdated for satisfying the demands for today’s technologically advanced society. Today’s public perception of transportation is fixed in antiquity. The perception of today’s society regarding the minor adjustments of advances in existing modes of transportation: it’s boring.

The subjects of sustainable urban growth and advanced transportation are absent topics in conversation from the general public. This signifies an unrelatable attitude from the general public. Everyone knows a little bit about transportation; they use it every day. Very few know a lot. The word: transportation includes so much. It’s something too large for any one person to make a significant change, and as such, it’s held as unimportant. Nonetheless, it’s important for government planning agencies to be cognizant about the possible realities that technology will bring to the future of transportation.

Incremental change in transportation requires something to talk about. It requires something to be enthusiastic about, something driven with excitement, new and innovative concepts, and creativity with purpose.

Regarding the incremental process of changing society’s transportation, what does history say?

Patterns of change in the history of US transportation

Transportation in the US began with horses and walking. The streets were dirt. As the towns filled with people walking, horses and wagons, the busier they became. The busting commerce centers became larger which produced an overwhelming accumulation of horse manure. The summer accumulation brought stench and flies, the winter rain and snow created a muddy mess.

Train history

There are many articles and books about train history. Rather than adding to the plethora of existing information, this link is to an excellent article, written by Mary Bellis, “The History of Railroad Technology” , which covers the history of trains.

In the short study regarding train history, it leads to another important question. What’s the history of US transportation policy? There were no regulatory standards for walking or riding horses in the 1700s or 1800s. Train technology proliferated in the Eastern and Mid-West as private enterprise throughout the 1800s and into the 1900s. It took an act of Congress to build the Transcontinental Railway in the 1860s.

The direction of this article focuses on passenger service. The history of train service is mixed with passengers and freight. The train service dedicated to passengers in the US is very limited. This Wikipedia link is list of the heavy rail rapid transit systems in the US.

Streetcar history

Streetcar systems were built to carry people as their only function. Similar to the necessity of commerce being built upon transit-oriented land-use at the train stations, the functionality of streetcar systems are the foundation to transit-oriented land-use designed urban growth.

This Wikipedia link is a detailed list to streetcar systems throughout the US.

The demise of streetcars and the rise of automobiles

The best article about the history of and the demise of streetcars is in an article from Vox.com:

https://www.vox.com/2015/5/7/8562007/streetcar-history-demise

UN Speech Invitation

Sun, 21 Sep 2025 23:24:41 GMT

Invitation to 80th United Nations General Assembly

I was honored with being invited to speak at the Banquet Hall at the 80 ^th United Nations General Assembly, September 23rd. Since I was unable to attend the event, due to financial restraints, and had prepared the short five minute speech, here is the script:

"Thank you. I’m humbled by the honor of being invited to speak here today. To respect your time, I’ll quickly explain the value of why I was invited. I’m one of the leading experts on the future of transportation.

As a brief background, my expertise in sustainable urban growth and new technology transit system technology led me to become a best-selling author. I’m also the Director at the Center of Advanced Transportation Technology and Climate Choice. Its website ( www.cattcc.org ) has posted 200 of my articles about sustainable urban growth, advanced transit, and theoretical physics treatises pursuing transportation’s future technology.

My speech is about sustainable transportation and sustainable urban growth. I’ll raise some questions; the time constrains mean that you can talk to me afterwards for the answers.

What do we see in today’s transportation? Every mode of transportation, is from the past. Applying prudence; we know that changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today. I’m going to say that again. Changes to the future, require actions that alter things we do today.

This leads to a question: What’s the primary source of transportation for Western Society? Automobiles. They’ve been around 125 years. Are they sustainable? No, and the intent of their fundamental design wasn’t meant to be. Are they sustainable today? Nothing has changed.

The General Assembly today is focused on sustainability. What is one of the most vital aspects to sustainability? Urban growth. Here’s a very interesting fact: all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation.

We have to ask another question. What is sustainability? In 1983, the UN began a search to answer that question. In 1987, they released their answer with the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, titled: “Our Common Future”. This is often referred to as ‘The Brundtland Report’.

The report was driven by the need to decrease unsustainable land-use growth. Its three main focal points to attain sustainability are: environmental, economic, and social impacts.

The book I wrote (Rising from Unsustainable) goes into detail about Western Society’s reliance on cars and the impossibility of automobiles being sustainable. Also, here’s a quick lesson about land-use: there are four fundamental types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design. And again, an imperative fact to remember is that all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation.

Tying this all together, I have to get a bit personal. I live in Central California where the State has been working towards building a high-speed rail. After many years of political procedure, the federal government audited the project and has cut its funding.

With California’s dependence on federal funds to continue the project, what happens to $15billion of this infrastructure expense?

As a future transportation authority, the heavy rail approach is outdated. It’s absolutely unnecessary and it’s unsustainable.

Again, our topic at this UN assembly is sustainability. The best sustainable transportation solutions are to stop using antiquated and massively expensive technologies designed for society 100 to 200 years ago. Sustainable transportation technology has to begin now. It’s 2025! We have to begin using a modern approach to transportation!

Modern transit technology uses smaller, less expensive, and more versatile infrastructure to support light weight vehicles. These new technology systems are massively more efficient with energy consumption and much lower cost expenditures. The advances in computer technology allow direct to destination capability, some systems are extremely fast. Where are these transportation concepts being implemented? You can think about it but, there’s no answer? Why?

Sustainability demands the necessity of fast, convenient, inexpensive, sleek, safe, and reliable transportation.

There are several options for new transit technology systems. Our modern society demands viable transportation solutions.

Thank you again for your time.

I’m a consultant for sustainability and the future of transportation, JP Sweeney"

Integrating California's High Speed Rail

Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:35:25 GMT

Utilizing California's transit corridors for modern transit technology

In the previous CATTCC article, regarding California’s High Speed Rail (CA’s HSR) project, the article emphases the crucial importance of using a central high-speed transportation arterial as the core element to an integrated transit network. CA’s proposed HSR project is utterly futile without a corresponding network which integrates the hundreds of miles of existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways throughout the State.

With that statement, there is danger. Similar to a personal bank account: a good idea is controlled by the work of one individual. An idea is developed from experience of one person’s opinion. When the idea is shared, it can be built upon, it can be modified and even grown to fruition. The precarious nature of risk is when the original idea is ‘taken’ and twisted into something unintended; like explosions used as a bomb for harm. This is akin to CA’s HSR project, it was originally a good idea but, was absconded by the abusive personal gains within the political process.

Although the idea of using CA’s failed HSR project and utilizing its infrastructure as a high-speed arterial, for the purpose of integrating an advanced transit network throughout California’s existing light-rail rights-of-ways; there is the very troubling political possibility. The political ignorance and the non-existent relationship with the advanced transit industry, the ‘dangers’ are employing antiquated status-quo technologies; outdated by transportation demands of today’s technologically advanced society. The dinosaurs and partizan motivation of young radicalized politicians are focused on agenda driven ideologies. Practicality for techniques in improving quality of life for the citizenry by updating transportation alternatives is unrelated to political divisiveness.

There is a tremendous social outcry for viable transportation alternatives. This demand is merely to keep up with the technological advances throughout all other industries. Today’s culture demands in transportation, are for faster travel speeds and more convenience.

Where are the transportation solutions? Autonomous electric cars are a phenomenal technological convenience. And yet, autonomous electric cars are not exempt from traffic: they’re cars. More cars require more roads, and as urban spawl expands, the roads are more traffic ladened. Transportation is a land-use issue. All urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. Western civilization’s automobile centric land-use design is wholly unsustainable, because automobiles are unsustainable.

Today’s social demands for new transportation choices represents clear evidence: it’s begging for technological advances in transportation; it’s a need for modal alternatives.

Transportation is the foundation to all urban growth

The United Nations began a study of sustainability in 1983. In 1987, they released their ‘Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development’, titled: “Our Common Future.” This is often referred to as ‘The Brundtland Report’.

The report was driven by the need to decrease unsustainable land-use growth. Its three main focal points to attain sustainability are: environmental, economic, and social impacts.

Economics 101 teaches that a local economy prospers when money is circulated locally. Products sold locally provides income for a local economy. Quality of life is based upon the prosperity of local citizens. Removing profits extracts prosperity from a local economy.

Cars are one of the worse financial drains to a community. The cars are manufactured outside the local area, removing the dollars of purchasing a new vehicle from being used locally. Every dollar to fuel the vehicle for its use is removed from the local area. Millions of dollars every day for fuel are extracted from the local economy. And the other invisible expense? Twice as many dollars than fuel every month, is extracted from the local community for car insurance. This expense alone is several billions of dollars every year, from every county throughout the State.

The unsustainable social action is called: “social isolationism”. It’s a relatively new condition that didn’t exist 50 years ago. It’s at the heart of road rage and traffic stress. It leads to an entire array, in an epidemic portion, of poor health conditions.

Many of the environmental concerns are unseen. It goes beyond the accumulation of bad air quality. The worst environmental damage from cars are the roads. One of the first processes of building roads is laying an oil-bed as a sealer. Even though millions of miles of oil-beds with asphalt (oil) laid on top of the oil-beds throughout the country, that isn’t as big of an environmental problem as the cars expending metal friction debris onto the asphalt. Brake dust settles on the roads; exhaust particulates settle on the roads. When it rains, all the toxins are washed into the aquafer.

The duty of politicians

Quality of life is the most essential commitment for every political office and every government servant. It’s the primary task for government. However, the current stance on transportation is a pathetic disastrous blob of selective ignorance. The harsh words are arrived at through experience.

When does improving quality of life for citizenry become important? The consequence of elected officials and government workers seeking a powerplay or a perpetual paycheck, is the loss to serve the public. Tyranny sinks quality of life into servitude to the dictator.

Determining outcomes

California already has the allocated light-rail rights-of-ways to build a high-speed transportation network to maintain quality of life. Where is it? What is preventing its implementation? The core of providing this high-speed network is the I-5 median which was allocated in the 1960s by CA Governor Pat Brown. Why has this been delayed? It’s been available for sixty years. Why has it been delayed? One of the reasons is agenda driven partisan political maneuvers which represent a definitive lack of concern for Californian’s quality of life. A disturbing question is: why do most politicians choose selective ignorance regarding advances with alternative modes of transportation technology?

When will politicians declare it’s time to consider transportation advances? California’s central core rights-of-way, in the I-5 median, was allocated for light-rail in the early 1960s. That was over 60 years ago. When will the politicians consider transportation alternatives? Obviously, 1975 wasn’t the time. Was it in 2000? No, although there was talk about antiquated transportation technology. Will it be politically acceptable to explore alternative technologies for transportation in 2025? Apparently not. When then? In twenty-five more years: 2050? Trains have been around for 200 years. Will cars remain the primary source of transportation in the year 2100? Most people’s reaction would be to consider that thought ridiculous. However, the replacement to a car is still absent. Automobile technology has been around 125 years. 2100 is only 75 years away. The political attitude is to maintain the status-quo, train technology remains fundamentally the same steel wheels rolling on steel tracks. People get accustom to repetition; change is difficult.

Why advances in transportation are important

To integrate traffic into a sensible quick and convenient mobility solution, the first question adults ask: what happens to my car? People love their cars. In the car culture, a car is their second most expensive possession, they pay hundreds of dollars each month just to insure it, hundreds more to maintain it.

The main consideration in transportation and urban growth is land-use. After listening to government workers, officials, planners, politicians, and the public; it’s exceeding clear there is a terrible misconception between the important distinction between land-use design and land-use zoning. There are actually people cognizant to the distinction, perhaps they work in the real estate development industry, or perhaps in hidden segments of government agencies, or in an obscure non-profit sector. The critical point in understanding the distension between the two, is that there are four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit-oriented design (fixed-rail transit) and automobile centric land-use design. Land-use is the overall use of land and depicts urban growth being dependent upon its primary source of transportation. Whereas land-use zoning is about variations in local building allowances.

California’s growth over the past 90 years has predominately been with automobile centric land-use development. Automobiles are unsustainable. Building a society upon an unsustainable foundation is problematic.

As an illustration, there’s a visual example of the negative economic effects of the automobile centric land-use design. Since California boast of its position of being the world’s fifth largest government economy in the world, let’s compare its progress of California’s economic drain. Here are four pictures that compare Los Angeles to Dubai over the past 50 years of California’s economic gains.

Los Angeles in 1970

Dubai in 1970

Los Angeles today

Dubai today

What’s the difference? California boasts of being the fifth largest economy in the world; LA is its largest city. The small buildings in Dubai are taller than the tall buildings in LA. These photos represent the 50-year result of economic unsustainability from California’s automobile centric land-use design; Dubai sells LA the gasoline that it consumes. Hundreds of millions of dollars per day is sent to enrich Dubai’s economy. Is this politically profitable towards the quality of life for Californians?

How difficult is it to see the visual economic impacts? Why do US and CA politicians blindly ignore this?

Transportation solutions enrich Californian’s quality of life

This is a hard-hitting article, intending to strike the nerves of useless apathy and partisan agendas into ideas that matter towards improving California’s quality of life. Its road structure is dying and its sprawl is out of control. Over the past 60 years: transportation nothing. The continual political rhetoric, claiming that anything different; such as a statewide transit network is too expensive, is misinformed and ignorant hyperbole.

The point of this article is to rationalize and recognizing the social demands for transportation advances. California’s allocated rights-of-ways have existed for too many years to continue ignoring. It’s necessary for California’s elected officials to intentionally have open conversations with the private sector leaders in the advanced transit industry that lead to transportation solutions. Discover what today’s transportation technology holds. Reaching out to build new technology transit networks throughout the communities is the job of diplomacy.

Pointing out problems is futile without solutions. What’s the solution to advance California’s transportation? Whose responsibility is it to be innovative and build viable transportation solutions? Private sector involvement.

By incorporating a modern transportation network within the existing light-rail rights-of-ways into a high-speed transportation core, would provide California a convenient modern transit system and lessen the continually growing heavy traffic loads.

The solution scenario is for the State to work with the private sector in a joint venture project. The State’s involvement would consist of using the very capable and skilled Caltrans engineers, coordinating with the many advanced transit system technology companies; to create an integrated transit system throughout California’s vast territory that would comply to the modern cultural demands for viable transportation alternatives, utilizing the hundreds of miles of unused light-rail rights-of-ways.

CA HSR update September 2025

Mon, 08 Sep 2025 01:22:11 GMT

Another CA HSR project update - September 2025

An editorialized comment from JP

In February 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) began an audit of the California High Speed Rail project (CA HSR). After the audit, the Federal agency concluded that the State of CA has not complied to their contract agreement and accordingly moved to discontinued their financial obligation to further assist the California project.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) strongly opposed the USDOT decision, calling the move illegal and politically motivated. CHSRA CEO Ian Choudri stated, "Canceling these grants without cause isn’t just wrong — it’s illegal," emphasizing that the grants were legally binding agreements and that the Authority had met all its obligations. ( Reuters ) The Authority also previously expressed disagreement with the administration’s conclusions, calling them "misguided and not reflective of the substantial progress made" on the project. ( Guardian )

In response to the final decision by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA): to terminate two federal grant agreements totaling $4 billion in remaining commitments, issued on July 16, 2025; the state of California under Governor Gavin Newsom filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Sacramento. ( Wikipedia ) The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging the federal action constitutes "petty, political retribution, motivated by President Trump’s personal animus". The judge ruled to place the funds into an escrow account until the case is legally resolved.

In March 2025, smartcitiesdive.com wrote an article; questioning if the USDOT would kill the CA HSR. In a Feb. 21 statement, the authority said it welcomes the investigation and the opportunity to work with its federal partners. “With multiple independent federal and state audits completed, every dollar is accounted for, and we stand by the progress and impact of this project,” CEO Ian Choudri said.

This was bold statement spoken with authority. That statement would lead people to believe that the HSRA’s CEO has a long history of having gone through several independent, state, and federal audits. He’d been working for the CHSRA six months when he said that in February 2025. He was hired by the CHSRA as CEO in August of 2024.

The author of this writing has been following the HSR project since 1993 when it was a feasibility study comparing maglev technology and steel wheel on rail. Until the 2010s, I attended nearly all of the HSR quarterly public meetings as an audience attendee. My 32 year following provides an in-depth understanding. Is this more experience with the CA HSR project than their 6-month CEO? This author is not a politician and, the viewpoint is from outside looking in. It’s an objective viewpoint, watching the participants of who does what and the corresponding actions.

CA’s current governor (newsom) has no vested interest in the project. It’s likely that his staff has read the original bond measure wording, however, from how the governor talks about the HSR project, it is very likely that he’s never read what the bond measure was about. Or, perhaps he doesn’t remember, the stress of his job is so intense it makes his eyes bloodshot.

CATTCC’s position regarding CA’s HSR project, is to emphasize the importance of integrating a functioning advanced transportation network system and immediately utilize the major transportation corridors throughout the State. By incorporating a modern technology transportation network within these existing light-rail rights-of-ways, it would provide California a convenient modern transit system and lessen the continually growing heavy traffic loads. Traffic stress hasn’t decreased. The continual gas tax increases haven’t improved California’s roads.

Modern transit technology cost less to build and maintain than roads. The hyperbole of the uninformed to maintain transportation’s status-quo equates to ignorance. Or, is that phraseology too harsh?

The ideal scenario would be for the State to work with the private sector as a joint venture project. The State involvement would consist of using the very capable and skilled Caltrans engineers, coordinating with the many advanced transit system technology companies; to create a universally integrated transit system throughout California’s vast territory. This is a solution oriented approach that would comply with cultural demands with modern transit, utilizing the hundreds of miles of unused light-rail rights-of-ways.

The future for CA’s HSR

Here is CATTCC’s analysis of options for California’s High-Speed Rail:

1. Maintain the project and do nothing.

The standard political procedure is to remain the same. This option is to assign the State attorney’s office to file lawsuits against any opposing government agency with the claim that there is nothing wrong. This procedure seeks favorable judges to reclaim funds. This scenario will likely result in the State being obligated to carry out the project’s funding.

This option is defined as the project continuing at a much slower pace. The political rhetoric of media press releases will nurture the message that the project is alive and well; by occasionally releasing stimulating doses of how favorably its tasks are reaching desired milestones.

Simple interpretation: Option One, nothing changes.

2. State sells the project to private entity.

This process of this scenario will extend into the role of California’s next governor. With the appointment of a political “progressive” governor, option one is a consideration. Option Two, for a more centerish governor would be to “save” the CA HSR by selling the project (giving it away for $1) to a private entity. This option gives the project to a private entity, with a promise to continue it as a private project. This would be standard political procedure, including substantial subsidies. There is an engaged train lobby group currently salivating at this option. This option would be fully supported by the government agencies as its standard protocol.

This scenario has the State agreeing to a zero-cost agreement that would enable the entity to finish the first segment and “promise” to build-out the remainder of the project under the same “no EIS” requirement process. And, the “zero-cost” does not include heavy future subsidies.

This is the likely scenario option under the term of California’s next governor, which would elevate the next governor to hero status in the eyes of the blind media.

3. Create PPP to build viable Statewide alternative transportation network.

Creating a Public Private Partnership (PPP) involves both the public sector and the private sector. This scenario outlines an actual transportation solution for California’s technology driven culture and its modern transportation demands. California, like most of Western Society is built upon automobile centric land-use real estate development. Trains were fundamental to the transit-oriented land-use design.

This option calls upon extending the HSR to serve as a main arterial, being part of an integrated new technology transit system. This would indeed place California as the global leader in transportation innovation. It would replace California’s image of having the worst roads, highest taxes, highest gasoline prices, and the blight of having a $15billion failed train project.

However, this approach is in opposition to government’s policies which are against innovation. This transportation solution is contrary to the political standards of engaging established train lobbyists as protocol. And yet, this solution can achieve risk adverse status and gain unanimous voter approval.

This option calls for reformatting the existing segmented HSR infrastructure to a lesser cost, by acquiring a modern transportation technology to be implemented within the corridor. The advanced transit technology system can then be integrated into the hundreds of miles of existing allocated light-rail rights-of-ways throughout each of the local communities along the main artery of the HSR. This can be easily extended throughout the State, and beyond.

How can this receive voter approval? The costs of advanced transit technology is a fraction of the costs of government’s protocol to standard heavy rail.

How does the use of unproven technology comply to the risk adverse nature of political procedure? Through the use of Joint-Venture projects with Public Private Partnerships (PPP). There are several approaches. From the engineering perspective, most Caltrans engineers are capable of being gifted with the ability of common sense. Calculating stress-points of a steel I-beam and load capacity of support beams, is within the parameter of skill qualification for most Caltrans engineering departments. Installation of advanced transit technology system projects require these types of engineering capabilities.

The risk adverse nature of implementing new and advanced transit system technology would be in forming PPPs to allow the government agencies to participate in system development, infrastructure, and system implementation.

Again, the purpose of this type of joint-venture with private entities (plural) is that this process would mix the best available technologies for a combination of several transit technologies in order to attain the highest quality of performance as well as cost savings and quick implementation.

This solution consists of inviting all innovative advanced transit technology companies who desire to participate in building an integrated transit technology, capable of being implemented throughout the State. The absence of risk is the State’s participation of this new technology development.

To ANYONE who would instantly react with ignorant claims that this type of approach is fanciful or would condemn this approach as idiocy, as Director of CATTCC, I can personally deliver several transit technology companies that would be interested in working on such a project. The only ones unwilling to consider such a venture are the established rulers of government train contracts; Czars of the train industry and their engaged contributors; justifiably afraid of losing $hundreds of billions in contracts.

This is a map presented to the voters in the 2008 bond measure.

The map clearly shows over 800 miles of high-speed rail. The current project parameters end with termination points of Merced to Bakersfield. This route is currently served by Amtrak.

The cost of antiquated train technology forecasted in the original 2008 engineering studies, provided for the cost of $75,000,000 per mile: at grade (laying track on the ground with little Earthwork needed). The elevated costs given were $150,000,000 per mile (overpasses and underpasses). Standard tunneling costs in 2008 were $300,000,000 per mile.

New technology transit network systems are one-tenth the costs of heavy antiquated train technology. It’s time for the government to engage modern transportation.

The calendar is well into the 2000s.

Technology is destined to happen to the transportation industry.

Conclusion

The initial concept for CA’s HSR is desperately needed. With that, there is a much needed clarification regarding viable high-speed rail being implemented in a technologically advanced society. First and most vital, steel wheel on rail train technology is 200 years old. If only as a land-use design aspect, trains are totally inappropriate and non-compliant as a mode of transportation in California’s automobile centric land-use design.

Roadblock to the Future

Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:14:17 GMT

Moving forward with transportation advances

Photo credits: pexels.com

What has prevented Western Society from moving forward with transportation advances? This question addresses modality system advances in transportation technology: like the advancement from cars to airplanes that happened 100 years ago. The fundamentals of train technology are 200 years old, cars began 125 years ago, and the fundamentals of airplane technology is 100 years old. What’s the barricade that prevents advancement to new modes of transportation?

The first roadblock is politics. Politics is money. When profit is being made, where’s the incentive for change? Its motivation is to adjust minor design improvements; maintaining the cash flow. Viewing transportation with this perspective, is recognizing the reality of the way it is. To rant or complain about it, is annoying and pointless.

Looking beyond the reality of the transportation industry’s stagnation, that hasn’t had a new modality advance in 100 years, what’s the solution? How can blockades squelching transportation advances be moved?

Finding answers, requires questions: since money is power and politics, what does money want? Similar to bureaucracy, its goal is for more and much more. How can politicians be gifted with more money? The simple conclusion is to create an entirely new stream of income by creating new sources of revenue with brand-new modes of transportation systems income. Political gains in job creation, localized economic increase, and higher quality of life is happy voters.

A deeper dive into the question

Again, the established ways of transportation technology via trains is 200 years old. When trains appeared in the 1800s, newspapers were a brand-new form of communication and letters were hand-written. With the quick pace of technology increase, by the mid-1800s; the telegraph revolutionized the newly formed communications technology industry, and a few years later cars were employed as private transportation, faster and more convenient than owning a horse.

Throughout the 1930s, 40s and 50s, science fiction stories were written about rockets flying in space. In the late 1950s, Otis Carr claimed to have built a craft capable of space flight. (His arrest for SEC violations landed him incarcerated with a 14-year sentence. The initial investigation was under the guise of National Security.) Beyond that and into the late 1960s, a US rocket landed on the moon. A few years later, all transportation advances suddenly stopped.

Meanwhile, today’s culture is saturated with technology. Cellphones are computers which didn’t even exist 70 years ago, with cameras and video editing capabilities that provide live global video broadcasts. The supercars manufactured in the 1960s are identical in style and similar in aerodynamics with today’s supercars. The changes in cars are from advances in the material composites industries and advances of the computer industry. This allows more efficient brakes, safety features, along with the computer industry’s advances that increase development in motor changes and other performance qualities, plus very high-quality sound systems. The basic car technology is the same as it was when cars were invented. Oh, and BTW, no one in the automobile manufacturing industry pays for the public roads they drive on.

Is it just cars?

Another example that thwarts modality changes is the money spent on space exploration. Rockets are another example of inefficient energy use. At the subatomic level, an explosion releases its energy in 360degrees. Yet, a rocket’s trajectory is only one direction. The biggest advancement in the history of space exploration was performed with the Parker Solar Probe. It exceeded the speed of 400,000 miles per hour. The fastest speed ever reached by mankind wasn’t by fueled explosion technology, it was by the technological advance of gravity manipulation.

Engineers are hired to do what they’re paid to do. Since bureaucracy has no desire to change, there’s a question of who will pay engineers to explore advancements in transportation,. Money is power, and politics is bureaucracy divided into massive layers of paperwork management with its sole objective: enlarging itself. Making bureaucracy bigger is another barrier to transportation’s advance. The engaged transportation lobbyists direct established political procedure to maintain the existing mechanism of transportation protocol.

Today’s society asks: what happened to promises of transportation’s advances? While some question why it’s still missing, the majority are complicit to normalcy: acclimated to antiquated transportation technology. Change is disruptive. A solitary voice in a crowd is unheard and irrelevant. There is one conclusion: money is power. Money owns politics. Politicians set regulatory policy. Conversely, wisdom is strength. And, although political strength of money can accumulate and manipulate intelligence reports, genius is unregulated creativity. Intuition, imagineering, and genius; are missing components from regulatory protocol and AI bot programing.

Adapting transportation changes

The solution? Create more money by making new transportation more lucrative. Mathematics is an expressive language that creativity can explain with spreadsheets. In the solution, beyond the profit demand, is the necessity for human compassion to increase quality of life. The transportation solution must include the ameliorate quest for amicable social improvement with raising standards for quality of life, by advancing transportation technology for sustainable urban growth. The term compassion has to be considered as an acceptable task for the public sector; it involves the risk of doing something that hasn’t been implemented elsewhere: which is the modernization of transportation to meet 2025 social demands. The public sector is averse to innovation. This is like a story from history when the saddle makers for horses protested being replaced by cars. They converted their business into making car upholstery.

When cars replaced trains as western society’s primary source of transportation, it was a quick but, incremental change. Today’s Western culture is dependent upon cars. It’s a land-use issue. As transit begins to stick its nose back into the car culture for transportation, the land-use will re-adjust to a transit-oriented land-use design.

The culture corresponds to an area’s transportation and land-use design. In the automobile centric land-use developments, even a person’s financial status in Western Society is represented by their transportation. Quality of life is an absolute component of urban growth design, because it is based on transportation.

Immediate solutions

The US has been plagued by dinosaur status political procedure. “It’s just the way things are” is a mantra that explains the justification of political procedure. But the dinosaurs are old and dead. Today’s growing youth are unfamiliar with the way dinosaurs danced. The politics of pay to play procedure is as useful as solicitating scambots. Today’s youth are more connected to computerized social activity than connectivity to the dinosaur dung dependency of car culture’s yesterday.

Earth keeps spinning and 2025 is nearly gone. Transportation is due for innovative advances.

And what is the solution of making transportation more lucrative? Immediately, one example is to reformat California’s failed high speed rail project with viable modern transit.

This opportunity is a moment for change. The short window to search for solutions, provides the possibility for a private entity to negotiate a public-private partnership with the advanced transit system industry for technology which can be implemented to provide a modern technology transportation solution.

Who is willing to participate in the conversation of advancing transportation into the 21 ^st Century?

Politics in Transportation

Sun, 17 Aug 2025 05:30:52 GMT

The political status in transportation

In a recent article from USA.Streetsblog.org , is a conversation with Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey. In the article, a point is made about The Freedom to Move Act .

Co-introduced by Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D–Mass) and co-sponsored by more than 20 lawmakers, Markey says the bill has won broad support because it cuts through typical arguments about how free fares force agencies to skimp on service, injecting money directly into systems that many feel should be treated as a basic public good. And he says that data from communities in his home state has already proved that this approach "boosts ridership, reduces administrative costs associated with fare collection, and improves safety and on-board experiences for transit workers and riders alike."

With transit agencies across America fast approaching a death spiral, they can use all the help they can get.

"While skeptics of free transit programs worry about the tradeoffs of improving service and affordability, Massachusetts has invested in fare-free pilots for Regional Transit Authorities throughout the state — and shown that instituting fare free programs can deliver on both fronts," he continued. "Unfortunately, decades of car-centric investments are forcing transit agencies to face a fiscal cliff, whether their service is fare-free or not. The federal government must provide support to communities to both improve service and provide fare free pilots. Our communities desperately need both."

One of the key points in the statement of claiming that “decades of car-centric investments are forcing transit agencies to face a fiscal cliff” reveals the political view having a total lack of comprehension of land-use. The understanding that politics has, identifies land-use; only as land-use zoning. Land use zoning is irrelevant to land-use in urban growth. Land use zoning is a localized set of political regulations.

All urban growth is based on an area’s primary source of transportation. There are only four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit-oriented, and automobile centric land-use design.

In looking at the global figures ( Wikipedia Farebox Recovery Ratio ) of transit’s farebox recovery rates, one only has to look at the figures to explain why some localities have much higher farebox recovery rates than others. Areas that have a transit-oriented land-use design, are built upon fixed rail transit to provide the primary source for the area’s mobility demands. The area’s where transit doesn’t work, are areas with the automobile centric land-use design; such as Los Angeles (10.85%), Houston (6.35%), and Dallas/Ft. Worth (7.64%).

The bigger picture to look at in finding transportation solutions is the reality of what year it is. This article is written in 2025. Anyone born prior to 1970 was promised flying cars by the year 1980. Technology advances in transportation are overdue by nearly 50 years. Train technology revolutionized urban growth in Western Society. That was 200 years ago. The automobile replaced Western Society’s growth over 100 years ago. What do we have today? Bitter political fights between funding 100-year-old technology verses 200-year-old technology. Both of these antiquated transportation methodologies are inappropriate for today’s modernized society. Autonomous cars are extraneous extensions of the automobile’s 100-year-old technology; they have four wheels and a motor.

Transportation is wholly dependent upon its infrastructure. The point of Elon Musk’s Hyperloop Whitepaper, and The Boring Company, is to create modern infrastructure. Although the concept of his Hyperloop technology discovered more problems than solutions, there is a transportation solution with infrastructure.

Markey identifies the future of transportation having new technology. That new technology is not 200-year-old train technology, nor is it 100-year-old automobile technology. All that has been clearly identified, is that the future of transportation also has a new infrastructure methodology.

Transit oriented land-use growth is obligated to forms of high-density vehicle passenger load capacity. The new technology transit systems are able to utilize autonomous vehicles with very accurate computer technology that allow extremely short vehicle headways with passive switching for direct to destination capability. This means smaller transit vehicles and increased ridership convenience. Where is the government related interest in this essential social demand?

The recent termination of Federal fund going to California’s High Speed Rail project is emblematic of an attempt to implement a 200-year-old transportation technology into modern culture.

Beyond CA’s HSR are the important aspects of urban growth along the chosen path through Central California. Since all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation, what are the impacts of building a $15billion heavy rail infrastructure?

In the 1960’s Pat Brown’s administration created a passenger rail Rights-Of-Ways (ROW) in the median of I-5 throughout California. Additionally, all of CA’s new freeways include light-rail ROWs. Where is the political support for New Technology Transit systems?

Viable transit is found with modern transit technology. This happens with private sector participation through active real estate development within existing transportation corridors.

The heavily affected areas of the CA HSR project are the Downtown areas of Bakersfield, Hanford, Fresno, Madera, and Merced. These Downtowns were originally developed with a transit-oriented land-use design. They were the commerce centers, served by trains and streetcars. During the 1930s the automobile emerged as the predominant source of transportation and began eroding the strategic commerce hubs. When recognizing that all urban growth is based on an area’s primary source of transportation, the land-use design of the downtowns became dysfunctional.

The ONLY way to revitalize these vital downtown commerce areas is to immediately reintroduce transit to these essential and established transit-oriented land-use designed areas with advanced transit system technology. Transit-oriented land-use development is dysfunctional without the transit component: automobiles are incompatible with the transit-oriented design.

As the USA.Streetsblog.org says in its interview with Sen. Ed Markey; the future of transportation requires new transportation systems technology.

Beyond the Automobile

Thu, 31 Jul 2025 03:42:32 GMT

What the future holds for transportation

photo credits: Pexels / Victor Grebennikov

What follows the automobile? There will be societal changes that happen when automobiles are replaced by a more efficient form of transportation. What’s next? The question is answered by history. What was society’s reaction to the change of using horses and wagons since the implementation of the train and automobile?

The foundation to all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. Western Society is corollary to its land-use. The product of its land-use is today’s dependence on the automobile. Independence of travel has widened with the car culture, and the automobile centric landscape has completely changed Western Society. Adding technological advances in the communications industry and digitization of information storage with computers, there are only sparse remnants that hold onto life’s past generations.

The future of today

The future holds its balance on the scale of artificial intelligence. Will advances in computerization dictate transportation? One viewpoint that predicts the future is a question between pessimism and realistic possibility. That viewpoint asks if AI technology would be used as a method of governmental control over human freedom of independence in travel. This philosophical view is a pessimistic statement which is re-enforced in the bureaucracy of today’s media headlines. With AI being programed by a political agenda, the future of AI regulated transportation is indeed impressionable. An AI enforced transportation system could result into denied access to personal transportation. This is a philosophical argument found in human nature and the politics of the narcissistic behavior of bureaucracy and governmental procedure.

The aspects of humanity’s inventive nature, its entrepreneurial and inspirational advances; in transportation technology: regarding replacing the automobile with a more advantageous mode of transportation, remain to be discovered.

If this were a philosophical article, there could be merit found in questioning the validity of sacrificing freedom to hyper-regulated control of movement. Since this is about transportation and answering a question about its future, what can be expected regarding transportation’s future?

How far into the future will cars continue? Trains were the dominant form of transportation when Western Society was built 200 years ago. Animals were the dominant form of transportation prior to that. Trains are still used today for heavy cargo and streetcars are still used in a sparse number of cities but, have lost their dominance as the primary method of personal transportation in Western Society.

Again, this is to point out the fact that all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. With today’s modes of modern transportation, there are only two predominant forms of urban growth: transit-oriented development and automobile centric land-use design. What type of transportation device can accommodate both of these land-use designs?

Recognizing the reliance of transportation to land-use

The question is important to answer regarding transportation’s future. Not knowing what type of transportation device will replace the automobile, it places an impossibility on today’s land-use development planning. However, continuing the unsustainable patterns in accommodating the automobile centric land-use design is nothing less than a suicidal path into oblivion.

And, yes, animals were used for personal transportation throughout the 19 ^th and early 20 ^th century, however, they’ve all but disappeared as a viable form of transportation in today’s society. The question is, will automobiles eventually disappear into oblivion and only be used for recreation, similar to animals? The answer is a conclusive: yes.

Gravity as a source of motion for transportation

When; is the immediate question. What form of transportation will replace the automobile? Will it fly? That vehicle replacement device hasn’t been offered yet. But, the foreseeable solution is a gravity-based device. How can such a claim be factually stated? This is a CATTCC article. CATTCC is the Center for Advance Transportation Technology. According to conclusive research and study, gravity is a viable source for motion. It’s also the least understood and least studied area of potential use for transportation. The deepest studies of academia in theoretical physics validate the lack of its transportation research, the combined scientific opinion confesses that there is no definition to what gravity is.

How can gravity provide motion for a transportation device? There are two arenas in transportation: short-distance and long-distance travel. Long-distance is regional, or global, and space travel. The use of gravity as a source of travel in space has already been validated on many NASA space missions. The most recent was the Parker Solar Probe which used the gravitational attraction of Venus to accelerate the probe to the fastest speed ever attained by humans. The Parker Solar Probe exceeded 400,000 mph, not by rocket propulsion but by gravitational attraction.

Using gravity as a method of vehicle motion on Earth’s surface has yet to be discovered. However, the necessity for transportation motion is levitation, which is the manipulation of gravity.

Where is the future for transportation?

CATTCC has long said: “The future of transportation floats”. This statement is made with authority throughout CATTCC’s experience over many years in the advanced transportation industry.

There are many CATTCC article posts relating to effectiveness and concepts, proposing ways to enable levitation as a viable manner to initiate a mechanism for short distance transportation vehicle.

From the article: How Vehicles Can Levitate , is the following:

When challenged with a difficult question, a good procedure is to find simplistic similarities. Given the task of finding solutions enabling a levitating vehicle, there are three similarities: vibration, Earth’s atmosphere, and Earth’s core. Grebennikov’s CSEs can provide a platform. Earth’s core can provide a stable electromagnetic foundation. Earth’s atmosphere can provide a static reaction.

The immediate question: how do these three components react with each other in a manner that provides a platform, or device, to interact with each other and allow the platform, or device, to levitate? What are the simple similarities of these three components? They all have frequency signatures. The importance of a frequency signature is its vibrational movement. These three components have the ability to be synchronous in their relational reaction.

Discovering new modes of transportation for space travel requires more than acceleration.

The article: Inertia and Neural Control mentions this: The interior of such a ship design would have to be similar to the Otis Carr design. His ship design was comprised of three sections which produced an independent inertia.

What’s the difference between momentum and inertia? Momentum and inertia are often confused due to their similar definitions. Momentum is the force or speed of movement, while inertia is the resistance offered by a body to the motion.

A previous article asked an important question. How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? The answer goes to explain the design of Otis Carr’s ship. It’s theoretically possible for Otis Carr’s ship to have maintained an independent inertia field within the ship’s control section. The two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. Theoretically, this gives the ship an independent inertia field ability to travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

From the article, What Space Exploration Requires : NASA’s planetary telescope missions suggest that Kepler-69c is the closest planet with the possibility to maintain life. It’s a super-Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of a star like our sun. But it’s located about twenty-seven hundred light-years from Earth, in the constellation Cygnus. This, of course means that getting there traveling at light speed would take 2,700 years.

Conclusion

CATTCC has concluded that the manipulation of gravity is a significant component to the future of transportation.

Why Space Travel Requires New Concepts

Fri, 20 Jun 2025 21:08:07 GMT

The many concerns that are a conundrum to current rocket science

photo credits: pexels; NASA/SpaceX

There was a recent question about problems with current rocket technology. This post is a copy of the response. It's a short blogpost, however, it provides clarity to importance of new concepts for space travel and seemingly worthwhile to post here on the CATTCC blogpage.

There are several issues this question brings up. How do scientists currently plan to tackle the problem of decompression if a spaceship hull is breached at relativistic speeds? And there are several ways to approach the answer.

The first approach to answering such an important question is; who is proposing an answer. Someone with the confined perspective of maintaining the view within a box, can only see what’s inside the box. A bright child using logic could hold the answer to what the entire rocket science industry maintains as an unsolvable problem.

Victor Schauberger (1885 - 1958) was a multi-generational master forester. He was also a scientific genius with a gift to understand how nature moves. He applied this gift of understanding, to motion. Although his life story was not celebrated in the glorious fashion of fame, he was a remarkable genius. One of his discoveries was that all nature is centripetal. He also found that all modern transportation is centrifugal, which opposes nature.

Using the principles discovered by Schauberger is how to find a solution to this; Quora’s hosted question.

The entire rocket industry is based on centrifugal force. Rocket technology pushes a container through air. It’s the same technology of a gun, which launches an object: as a result of an explosive blast. Again, to what Schauberger said: the outward motion of centrifugal force.

That force opposes nature. The explosive force of a bomb is an outward motion. That outward pressure magnifies resistance. At the subatomic level, that action of energy is a colossal collection of colliding particles. Those collisions produce massive amounts of heat.

Conversely, as Schauberger points out, the result of nature’s motion is centripetal. The process of centripetal motion is a vortex which creates compression: removing heat; like the coldness of a vacuum.

Answering the initial question proposes a conundrum to the rocket industry. Fundamentally, the entire space industry is based on impractical and perversely retarded principles. The efficiency of using chemical explosions as its source of propulsion is beyond unreasonable. Again, at the subatomic level; an explosion: a collision of particles. The result of that collision is energy transferred as heat in 360-degrees. When a rocket is launched, its design function has one direction and its trajectory is a single point of 360-degrees. The internal (subatomic) action of those millions of billions of collisions, each moving in 360-degrees is a massive action of chaos being dispersed in 360-degrees. Here’s a question: how much of that 360-degree energy release is efficiently used to propel a rocket on its one-degree of trajectory? The point being it’s a massive waste of energy use.

What is the fastest speed mankind has ever reached? The speed was over 400,000 miles per hour, and attained by the Parker Solar Probe. This speed was NOT by propulsion. The technology was by manipulating gravity. The speed was attained by attractive force.

To answer the initial question, everything has to change. Practical deep-space flight is unable to accommodate the aeronautical industry’s approach with rocket technology. Space is a different science than the engineering applied to aeronautics. There has to be a total shift in space craft design. Space travel requires a different concept in physics principles. That shift requires a new method of engineering principles for acceleration. It requires new concepts of producing energy for motion. The mindset regarding the physics of propulsion is inapplicable.

As for the potential of breaching a hull, new designs that use the hull as a component to its motion, greatly minimize hull vulnerability to foreign object penetration. Unlike a rocket forcing a hostile path through resisting air, a flow of energy is like a river. A frequency flow travels like a wave. A man with a shovel isn’t able to change the course of a river, however, a large number of excavators could.

T. Townsend Brown drew plans for a spacecraft in the 1950s. So did Otis Carr. Both crafts used different principles than the methodology used by traditional rockets with chemical explosions on a launchpad. Both crafts used the principle of spin momentum. Both engineering concepts used the outer hull spin which created an independent inertia field. Linking to the CATTCC blogpost is the Julio Gobbi analysis .

In answering the initial question: new physics concepts for space flight create independent gravitational fields which surround the craft. This independent inertia field acts as a gravitational field that minimizes the craft from hull breach decompression.

The importance in applying new concepts to space travel are imperative for seeking significant speeds necessary with practical space travel.

Therories Towards Space Travel

Sun, 11 May 2025 23:51:29 GMT

New theories of long-distance travel involving intriguing aspects of physics

photo credits:pexels-mikhail-nilov / pexels-pixabay

The science of physics encompasses every aspect of physical existence. Its language is orchestrated with mathematical equations, and yet unknown; is the universe’s complexity. The accepted conformities regarding laws of matter are based on opinion. This blogpost mentions opinions offering alternatives to those who hold themselves as established authority.

Theoretical Physics and Transportation

The subject of CATTCC is specific to transportation. The aspect of advancing transportation technology, mandates progressive investigation into theoretical physics.

One of the alternatives to traditional transportation was from the self-proclaimed protégé of Nikola Tesla: Otis Carr. Besides an incredible concept of how the vehicle was designed to fly, there’s speculation that Otis Carr’s ship had an element of psychokinetic control. This speculation is that neural oscillations are vibrational action that might be used for operational controls. Due to the configuration of the ship design, this type of operational control would be imperative.

How could neural oscillations be used? Minute vibrational action is seen in light. Colored light travels at different speeds. When this light travels at different speed, it creates a different wavelength, or angstrom value. This oscillating action could, conceivably, be utilized for motion to activate switching control.

In the blogpost, Operational Control ; the following section raises the possibility of neural ship controls:

Matching wave patterns

Colored light travels at different speeds. When this light travels at different speed, it creates a different wavelength, or angstrom value.

The implication of significance to this technology application is that an infrared sensor requires a direct line of sight. The neural oscillations generated by a psychokinetic wave is capable to transcend the influence of electromagnetic fields. When the psychokinetic waves are transmitted as hues, the oscillations can be interpreted as an optical switch.

Regarding different perspectives in physics, many of the fundamentals to new concepts in theoretical physics are from ignored physicist’s theories presented in the past.

One of the most profound concepts in the leading edge of fringe science is based on the principle of electrogravitics, discovered by T. Townsend Brown . One of T. Townsend Brown’s most notable discoveries was the Biefeld-Brown Effect . It was named after Brown and his mentor Dr. Paul Biefeld. The effect was discovered in 1920 by Thomas Townsend Brown and Paul Alfred Biefeld during their experiments with a Coolidge X-ray tube. They observed a thrust acting toward the thin electrode. It showed that when an electrical current is applied to a capacitor, it will move in the direction of the flow of current - towards its positive pole.

This effect is the basis for Brown's electrogravitics research. The emphasis relating to the principles of electrogravitics, is that it conceptualizes electrogravitics as the foundation to subatomic action. In the postulation of CATTCC, this electric current flow is a representation of gravitational motion within subatomic motion; rather than magnetic action. Hence, electrogravitics. At a subatomic level, the conceptualization of electro-gravity action replaces the theory of electromagnetics as the basic principle of subatomic motion.

It needs to be pointed out that electrogravitics is too disruptive to be accepted by the practiced standards of academia. With this being said, CATTCC supports the postulation that subatomic matter is comprised with gravity as a fundamental component. One of the supporting considerations is; according to conventional academics, all atoms have electromagnetic potential. Because all magnetic action is ferrous, it is impossible for a non-ferrous molecule to possess magnetic charge.

There are other provocative concepts in physics that propose alternatives to conventional perspective.

A column by Frederick Sinclair, explains why Walter Russell was considered one of the greatest minds of the early 1900s. In an article he writes: In reading the works of Walter Russell, one discovers the power of an illuminated mind as he describes and illustrates how the stillness of the Creator becomes consciousness that vibrates into wave form that follows Natural Law into the formation of physical Creation. The why of it all; is simply because it is God’s Nature. Nature, being the operative clue. Russell was a close friend and associate of Nicola Tesla and the physics of polarity brought forward is also evident in Tesla’s invention of alternating current. Russell forwarded special editions of The Universal One to 125 of the world’s most prominent scientists, physicists and thinkers of that time. The depth and genius of Russell’s cosmology ironically coincides with the birth and formulation of Quantum physics.

One of Walter Russell’s endeavors was developing a variation to the table of elements. Although never accepted by academia, his theory is a light-based periodic table of elements which includes each element’s frequency. An excellent explanation of his proposal is found on Quora, by Andrew Wolff .

In the field of theoretical particle physics, the process of particle destruction in cyclotrons or linear accelerators produces uniform frequency patterns, which might lead to an interpretation of magnetic patterns, yet, this lacks justification to the state of ferrous absence. Nonetheless, all matter holds its gravitational course, which T. Townsend Brown alluded to with his hypothesis for the principle of electrogravitics.

The unknows of traveling in space

This raises a question regarding another aspect of physics: traveling in space. Are there components of space that the perception of man’s intellect isn’t aware of? Is there more about the physics of the make-up of space; do we know all there is to know about the vastness of space, is it merely empty nothing? The relevance of this question is similar asking for the distinction between traveling in Earth’s atmosphere compared to water. Space is not a vacuum.

An AI search version provides the following rendition on Nikola Tesla and ether:

Nikola Tesla had unique interpretations of the concept of ether. He believed it is a primary substance filling all space and acting as a medium for transmitting electromagnetic energy. Tesla described the ether as a dynamic, invisible substance that could transmit and propagate electromagnetic energy.

Tesla's views on ether were influenced by the scientific discourse of his time, which was grappling with the wave-particle duality of light and the need for a medium to support wave transmission. He saw the ether as a substantial and essential part of the physical universe, not just an empty void.

Similar to Russell, Tesla's theories of ether were not widely accepted by the scientific community. The Michelson-Morley experiment, conducted in the late 19th century, failed to detect the existence of ether, leading to a decline in mainstream scientific interest in the concept. This experiment was pivotal in disproving the existence of ether as a medium for electromagnetic waves, and it paved the way for the development of special relativity and modern theories in physics, such as quantum field theory. Curiously, Russell’s work is considered instrumental to the quantum field theory.

Despite the scientific community's shift away from ether theory, Tesla's contributions to the understanding and utilization of ether continue to inspire researchers and inventors today. His conceptualization of ether played a pivotal role in the development of wireless power transmission and other groundbreaking inventions.

From Kendall Milar, in the Astrophysics Data System , writes a supportive paper regarding Tesla and his theories on the presence of ether: In the nineteenth century physicists' understanding of the ether changed dramatically. New developments in thermodynamics, energy physics, and electricity and magnetism dictated new properties of the ether. These have traditionally been examined from the perspective of the scientists re-conceptualizing the ether. However Nikola Tesla, a prolific inventor and writer, presents a different picture of nineteenth century physics. Alongside the displays that showcased his inventions he presented alternative interpretations of physical, physiological and even psychical research. This is particularly evident in his telautomaton, a radio remote controlled boat. This invention and Tesla's descriptions of it showcase some of his novel interpretations of physical theories. He offered a perspective on nineteenth century physics that focused on practical application instead of experiment. Sometimes the understanding of physical theories that Tesla reached was counterproductive to his own inventive work; other times he offered new insights. Tesla's utilitarian interpretation of physical theories suggests a more scientifically curious and invested inventor than previously described and a connection between the scientific and inventive communities.

Nassim Haramein has suggested that Tesla's concept of ether is analogous to the fundamental universal field of energy that exists in the universe, also known as the void of space, the zero point field, the quantum foam, the source field, and even referred to as "the god particle".

Modern science has incorporated many of Tesla’s theories and inventions of electromagnetic field technology into society, advancing the electronics industry with power, communications and data manipulation. Meanwhile, other areas of theoretical physics in particle mass and gravity, remain a mystery and some areas yet unexplored.

Gravity

The blogpost, A Study in Gravity goes into greater detail:

There’s a new theory for gravity that describes what it is. The theory makes no revolutionary proclamation, it merely postulates the identity of gravity.

This theory coincides with Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in its claim that our galaxy is flying through space at light speed. The currently held belief of all matter; is every particle maintains elliptical orbits. The new theory identifies matter as Einstein’s theory claims; that all matter is moving at light speed. This speed nullifies a model of matter holding elliptical orbits. The new theory of gravity postulates that all matter, as moving at light speed is linear. This linear movement follows unified wave motions. It postulates a specific path of linear movement. Gravity is identified as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path.

The new theory suggests that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. This does not negate gravitational laws that dictate its action. In regard to the composition of subatomic matter and what is held in theory as a procession of electromagnetic orbits, this new theory makes the point that magnetism is the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. How, then, can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties? It is the scientific claim that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism. Because science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in sub-atomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous?

“What is gravity?” It can be theorized that gravity is the angular momentum of particle mass along its ‘orbital’, yet linear path; as each particle moves through space at light speed. Gravity is that angular flow pattern of the motion within its path.

This goes into more detail behind the CATTCC paywall : Here is part of this newly proposed theory on particle movement. There is a path to all matter. The path is analogous to a ribbon in an elliptical patterned Mobius strip with twists in the ribbon. But, this elliptical ribbon with its defined twists is stretched out to a linear path in sync traveling at the speed of light. The angular momentum of the twists at that speed; is gravity.

Conclusion

The study of new concepts in theoretical physics are of critical importance to proliferate short distance transportation as well as ultra-fast speeds for space travel.

The bigger launch pad blasts are nothing less than controlled bombs spread over a longer distance. These bigger bombs are unable to provide greater acceleration speed for space flight. Even a method that would reach light speed for space flight is far too slow to explore the universe. Ultra-fast space flight requires an attractive force instead of propulsion. Explosion as a source of propulsion is massively inefficient and shouldn’t even be a consideration for space travel.

Where is the research for efficient energy use regarding space travel? It’s found in the manipulation of gravitational attraction. By learning what gravity is, its use for space flight can be attained. The speed of the Parker Solar Probe used the laws of gravitational principles. By taking advantage of the new theory of what gravity is; use of gravity can be a means for ultra-fast space flight.

Fixed Rail Transit

Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:14:27 GMT

Integrating fixed rail transit into urban growth

photo credits: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/378372806174217273/

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/illustration/elevated-railway-at-grand-central-terminal-royalty-free-illustration/1481761938?adppopup=true

Beginning in the mid-1800s, trains brought the world: transit-oriented land-use design. In the 1930s, the US began leading the world in automobile centric urban growth.

Effects to urban design

Urban design establishes the different types of movement of people and goods. Today’s patterns of population increase with urban growth are a mixture of transit reliant and automobile centric. And as always, transportation remains the foundation to all urban growth.

From a recent blogpost, Urban Growth and Trains , there are three notable paragraphs relevant to this topic: The environmental, economic, and social effects of urban growth are intertwined and directly related to its land-use design. The primary consideration with all urban growth is an area’s type of land-use. To answer questions about any kinds of impacts, the question of its land-use type is the first step to assimilate an answer. There are four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit-oriented design and automobile centric land-use design. There are three types of impacts to land-use: environmental, economic, and social. Any answers about impact have to be isolated specifically to social, economic or environmental impact. Finding an area’s impact can be measured by sustainability.

Urban growth is based on an area’s transportation. Poverty and wealth remain corollaries of human nature. The financial impacts of urban growth are strategic to an area’s land-use design. Struggle and strife of the human condition are unchanged. The dream of utopia is a dream, hope is for heaven. Urban growth is related to its transportation.

The pursuit for environmentally clean transportation can only occur with efficient energy use. This is an arena beyond urban growth; specific to the transportation industry. This is an area of scientific research and require physics study into molecular designs at the subatomic level which eliminate energy loss.

Common-sense acknowledges; as population increases in the cities with high-density vertical growth, transit demands increase. As the land with metropolitan sprawl proliferates, traffic crawls as the demand for more and wider roads escalates.

Where is the population decreasing that lowers the transportation obligation? If there is a population decrease, then maintaining the status-quo is appropriate. Where the population is indeed increasing, then changing its transportation source is imperative.

What relevant new information about urban growth can be added that these blogposts haven’t already mentioned? How can the importance of the sustainability message be recognized? The political ‘green’ diatribe is filled with deceptive inaccuracies. A much more accurate message is that the unsustainable transportation practices are primarily an issue of inefficient energy use.

Fixed rail

Fixed rail transit is only applicable as a primary source of transportation for transit-oriented land-use development. Since transportation is the foundation of all urban growth, fixed rail transit is the transportation component that transit-oriented land-use is built upon. This type of land-use is incompatible to automobiles. Automobiles are incapable of providing traffic flow in transit-oriented land-use areas. Cars are a dysfunctional nuisance in transit-oriented land-use areas. And, of course, transit systems are discordant to sprawl.

PRT and ATN

An advantage to the transit-oriented design is its adaptability to new technology transit systems. Some of these new technology systems are classified as Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) or Automated Transit Networks (ATN). The PRT technology vehicles are designed for low passenger capabilities of four to six passengers. The ATN technologies have a higher passenger load capacity, depending on system vehicle design.

In the early 2000s, there were over 50 active new technology transit system designs being pursued. As of today, many years later, very few of those new technology transit companies have survived the onslaught of autonomous automobile investment that perpetuates automobile transportation dominance.

The introduction of a new transportation technology is extremely detrimental to the growth and profitability of the automobile industry. The automobile industry’s relentless proliferation of the unsustainable nature of automobiles is an increase to the unsustainable land-use with the automobile centric design of its urban growth.

Advanced Transit

With new transportation technology, from maglev guideways, and other innovative new technology transit designs, high-density urban growth within designated transportation corridors can approach building designs that lean towards sustainability. The high-density corridors allow heavy transit-oriented growth in specific areas, sparing the decimation of fertile farmland and open space otherwise consumed by unnecessary sprawl.

There are new rail technologies available for transit-oriented land-use designs. Many of the PRT technology designs remain viable for transit-oriented land-use designs. CATTCC’s purpose is to advance new transportation methodologies, this improves transportation and implements building of sustainable urban growth.

Applying modern transit system technologies into new transit-oriented land-use development designs are with simple transportation technology systems and sustainable building principles. These transportation technologies and building design advances, accommodate both higher and lower population densities. Large cities designs are already formatted to accommodate the longer ten to fifteen train car-sets.

The modern advances of new technology transit system applications, allow smaller vehicle sizes. These smaller vehicles maintain higher passenger numbers by increasing the number of vehicles within the network and provide greater destination flexibility. The term: “headways” references the distance between vehicles. A standard train has very long headways of several minutes to several hours. The new technology transit vehicles are smaller than trains and streetcars. They have fast speeds, and their headways distances can be just a few seconds. PRT system load capacities for passengers can meet or exceed train passenger loads with their ability to have the rail or guideways filled with many vehicles.

Three examples

These are three examples of new technology transit systems.

https://hytrak.net/ A relatively new PRT system design. It has four passenger vehicle capacity and projected top speed of 250 miles per hour. Electric power with steel wheels on a specially designed rail. Vehicle headway is 12 to 15 seconds. This allows a maximum of 1400 per hour capability, presumably per mile. It’s computer operated system technology provides system access for passengers 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and 365 days per year.

https://cybertran.com/ This vehicle design is in the fashion of incremental social acceptance. Its system design is similar to a modern streetcar. Its transit capacities far exceed the 125-year-old streetcar technology. CyberTran is an ultra-light steel wheel electric vehicle with a specialized lightweight steel rail/track infrastructure. This system also has an automated technology control system which provides direct to destination service. CyberTran enables air-freight transport and a 20 to crowded 30 passenger per vehicle capacity.

https://www.et3.com/ ET3 is a very high-speed transit system design for global long-distance travel. Its technology is a magnetic levitation (maglev) vehicle system inside a sealed air evacuated tube. ET3 works by eliminating virtually all aerodynamic friction and rolling resistance. Its technology has been computer simulated to a top speed of 4,000 miles.

Friction technology

Wheels generate friction, with friction there is thermodynamic heat buildup. Heat causes metal fatigue and wearing out of moving parts. Heat increases maintenance costs, and the higher potential for safety concerns due to failing parts.

Technology advances happen incrementally. The advances in disruptive technology aren’t instantaneous change. The transportation industry is past due for disruptive technological advances.

Short Distance Transport Need

Sat, 05 Apr 2025 18:58:34 GMT

Immediate need for short distance transport

photos: pexels

Is there a way to draw attention to society regarding its need to break bad a habit? At what level can such a message be sent? The ‘green’ mantra has been fabricated as an emotionally charged political agenda message. Its hysteria portrayal as ‘climate disaster’ is filled with a deceptive connotation to benefit the self-enrichment in hypocrisy, with tyranny as its intent. What honest way is there to announce that transportation should be efficient?

Sustainability is indeed vital. It’s imperative to urban growth. And yet, with the current methodology of land-use design, sustainability is impossible. The foundation to all urban growth is its primary source of transportation. Since Western Society is based upon the automobile centric land-use design: and the automobile is totally unsustainable, all of its urban growth continues the path of unsustainable.

Where is the research in finding more efficient ways of transportation that can replace cars? It’s fair to say: it doesn’t exist. To those who would argue that VTOL technology is a solution, VTOL technology is only advanced helicopter aeronautics, currently unable to adhere to; or enable an automobile’s independence. Anyone without knowledge of the VTOL acronym is unqualified to participate in a serious VTOL transportation conversation.

Today’s necessity for sustainable transportation

The primary function to attain sustainability is the critical need for new modes of transportation that are sustainable.

Following nature, one observes that it’s undeniably composed with a standard flow of sustainable patterns. It provides a course to follow. Nature has oceans and lakes, rivers and streams, rain and clouds. This sustainable flow can be adapted to transportation.

Transportation is a social need. What is a solution to attain a short distance transportation technology? We’re back to the same predicament. How to design and build a new mode of transportation that doesn’t exist yet? How quickly can such a device be produced?

There are many CATTCC blogposts applicable to advance transportation technology. The two areas of needed transportation advancement are short-distance and long-distance.

Short-distance transportation

Sustainable transportation is with the use of efficient energy. Today’s methodology of utilizing a 2,500 – 4,500-pound vehicle to carry a 300-pound load is not efficient. Without elaborating on the environmental, economic, and social impacts; the physics of energy consumption of an automobile is inefficient. It’s motor or propulsion method is irrelevant. The weight to load capacity restricts its sustainability.

Another aspect of inefficient physics is friction. Utilizing levitation as a short-distance transportation method would avoid the energy consumption of both weight and friction. This provokes questions of why this methodology is refrained from investigation. There are over 30 CATTCC blogposts regarding short-distance transportation research. This is a crucial component to sustainability.

Some of the topics for a discussion about short-distance transportation are about using the available electricity in Earth’s atmosphere. Other topics include engaging Earth’s magnetic field.

Throughout the blogposts are many concepts to stimulate study. Since levitation is vibrational mass, and crystals vibrate specific frequencies, can this be used with electromagnetic fields at the subatomic level to enable levitation for a vehicle?

Electrostatic Levitation

Electrostatic levitation can also be demonstrated using common household materials, such as Styrofoam and tinsel, which can be charged and repelled from each other to create a levitation effect.

L=1/2 pv ² SC _L

This equation represents the lift force (L) generated by electrostatic levitation, where ρ is the air density, v is the velocity of the air, S is the surface area, and CL is the lift coefficient.

Levitating Styrofoam holds a negligible impact as a method of transportation. What this does is to signify that the atmosphere holds electrostatic significance.

Throughout the many blogposts; are mentions of Earth’s atmospheric electric potential, as well as Earth’s massive magnetic field, as potential approaches to be captured for efficient transportation.

Using Earth’s available potential are expounded upon by perceived physics law as taught by notable scientific voices like Richard Feynman . The future is built upon going beyond the perceived perception of physics standards. It’s where the future of transportation begins.

In the blogpost, Levitation, Solve For A+B , a segment; The nature of CSE, is the analysis of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). It refers to an article by Ville Pilppola at Aetherforce.energy :

The nature of the CSE

“There have been many hypotheses about the physical nature of the CSE, but there is one theory that deserves greater attention. It was developed earlier by Valery F. Zolotariov (1931-2000), Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and it is now experimentally confirmed.

“As a result of a long collaborative research Grebennikov and Zolotariov (1987) describe the discovery as “previously unknown phenomena of interaction between multi cavity structures and living systems, in which de Broglie waves associated with motion of electron flows in the solid walls of cavities create, by interference, a macroscopic field of multi cavity structures, which causes changes in the functional state of living objects located in this field”.

“The CSE is caused by the interaction between de Broglie waves and biological systems. Cavities within the solid body are de Broglie wave resonators; they are a source of standing de Broglie waves (longitudinal waves). The rhythmical location of cavities leads to a reinforcement of the effect.

“According to B. N. Rodimov (1976, as cited by Frolov, 2001) the walls of multi cavity structures can be considered as the boundaries of the potential electron’s box. The group movement of electrons leads to a system of standing de Broglie waves, which have classic frequencies.”

The relevance in the study of CSEs is important to levitation. De Broglie waves were discovered by the French physicist Louis de Broglie. In his 1924 PhD thesis, de Broglie postulated a wave nature of electrons which suggests that all matter has wave properties. His concept is known as the de Broglie hypothesis explains wave-particle duality, as both a particle and a wave. This theory addresses the core of quantum mechanics. De Broglie was awarded the 1929 Nobel Prize for Physics.

CATTCC’s research suggests CSEs influence a gravitational reaction. CATTCC also advocates levitation as the modern solution for short-distance transportation. The conclusion being that CSEs provide a means for levitation technology, inasmuch as a necessary avenue for research.

Long-distance space travel

The 45 ‘space travel ’ blogposts explore theories based upon the manipulation of gravity as a viable source for ultra-fast space travel. Both ‘short-distance’ and the ‘space travel’ blogposts correspond to the 60 ‘theoretical physics’ blogposts which investigate the possibilities for new concepts of transportation. These CATTCC’s studies ask in-depth questions for discovering answers of how to implement transportation’s future. These are essential research questions for both short-distance transportation and long-distance space travel.

Conclusion

Going beyond today’s inefficient transportation methods, demands different tactics than the continuation of propulsion for motion.

Priorities in Advancing Transportation

Tue, 25 Mar 2025 03:27:37 GMT

Finding the priorities to advance transportation

photo credits: freepik.com

What happened to the enthusiasm and expectation of flying cars, depicted by futuristic concepts during the 1940s, 50s, and 60’s?

The concept of having flying cars has been thwarted by the financial interests of the automobile industry, the oil industry, and all the affiliate industries. Maintaining the road infrastructure is the government’s obligation in catering to the political function of bureaucratic procedure. Allowing new modes of transportation is perceived as threat to the financial health of keeping the status-quo.

All roads throughout the US are government funded. Eliminating this policy would cause massive amounts of income loss to very large conglomerates who receive $billions each year in government contracts to continue this procedure.

In the early 2000s, a study was done which found it would cost over $17trillion to rebuild the entire US road infrastructure. However, a normally used US concrete freeway has a life expectancy of 15 years; until it has deteriorated to the point of needing major repair. Asphalt freeways have a life expectancy of 7 to 10 years. All roads and bridges need to be constantly maintained, repaired and rebuilt.

The cost of building freeways and roads plus the annual costs of maintaining these roads is a burden paid by tax dollars. The manufactures of the devices used to operate on these roads pay nothing towards building or maintenance. Conversely, railroad companies are fully responsible for every aspect of rights-of-ways, rail line, vehicle (train) purchase, fuel, maintenance and insurance liability.

There is no burden to automobile manufacturers for ANY use of their automobile. They pay no cost for where the vehicles are driven, no cost of its maintenance, no cost for its fuel, and no cost for a vehicle’s damage or property damage for the damage a vehicle causes. The vehicle manufactures, fuel suppliers, affiliate industries, and affiliated road builders have no liability.

The automobile industry, oil industry, and all related industries to automobile transportation have every reason to assure their political lobbyists continue their profitability in the manner it has created over the past 90 years of political lobby maneuvering. Additionally, the automobile affiliate industries maintain their cultural market control by spending $billions to advertise their products; and are fully embraced by the supportive media recipients to propagate a positive outlook towards their products.

This presents a serious challenge against the introduction of new transportation methodologies.

Where do new discoveries in transportation come from?

For new concepts of space exploration, the traditional method for space technology advances come from aeronautic engineers and designers to continue protocol in propulsion driven motion. Rocket engineers build the next generation of bigger rockets and tweak exploding bigger bomb blasts.

Cars and trucks follow this same industry procedure seeking to minimize thermodynamic loss in a never-ending battle to fight friction.

New discoveries are impossible by fostering exhausted protocol

Want to find answers? Find out where the energy of explosions emanate from. Examining why a particle’s centrifugal frequency expands is a different field of study than that of aeronautics technology and design engineers. The mystery of theoretical physics of particle mass and string theory are unfamiliar to wing designers who are experienced in laws of material thickness tolerances, air pressure and load lift rates. And yet, discoveries to alternative forms of motion for transportation will only be found in searching new theories of perspective relating to subatomic particle physics.

One of the best examples to the incomprehension in traditional procedure of aeronautic engineering verses a practitioner in the observation of nature with theoretical physics application, is in this short account about Viktor Schauberger. His intuitive perspective was unaccepted by the tradition of insistence from the protocol of aeronautics. The politics of war eliminated his genius achievements: the 'Repulsator' and the other, a 'Repulsine' (A and B models), reflecting their forces of recoil. From the blogpost, https://www.cattcc.org/vehicle-technology :

Other examples

There are other possibilities for building a space flight vehicle designs that manipulate gravity. There are claims of test model flying saucer shaped vehicles rising into the sky and disappearing. Listed here are three accounts, one each from Viktor Schauberger, John Searl, and David Hamel.

From the website 1Library.net is a synopsis of the book: ‘Brighter Than A Thousand Suns’ which provides the following:

“Another highly-advanced group was led by Dr. Viktor Schauberger, who worked in Austria at the Kertl factory in Vienna. Schauberger's incredible craft allegedly utilized a tornado-like vortex which produced magnetic effects said to cause levitation. Two Schauberger models, both made of copper, were said to have been built with one of them successfully test flown. The story goes that it flew so well, in fact, that it impacted the inside roof of the hangar and was destroyed.

“The SS which was apparently overseeing this and all German saucer research, allegedly stopped further experimentation after accident, dismissed Schauberger, and took all of his work and wizardry to some other location for further development. After the war, Schauberger was lured to the US by an alleged CIA front company and was then duped into signing a contract in English (he knew only German) giving the company all rights and title to his inventions, concepts, and designs. He was then returned to Austria...and died five days later.”

The point being addressed is that people who do not comprehend something are incapable of finding solutions they can’t see. Solutions are discovered by those with ideas from an aberrant perspective. Finding solutions to efficient energy use for transportation, require a deep dive into theoretical physics and a new perspective.

The advantage of classical physics theory is its relationship with cause and effect

Philosophy is subjective to personal perspective. There’s a plethora of philosophical perspective which perceives the proper procedure for modern physics; its pursuit is a fascination with the destructive nature of cyclotrons and linear accelerators. This same philosophical opinion views the procedure of accelerating particles into an oblivion impact, as profitable.

A minority opinion holds an opposing view that the philosophy of classical physics, to study its ebb and flow, is more significant. The objective of classical physics seeks perception into comprehending the building blocks of matter. The perception of life is its structure of expansion. Philosophically, the modern approach in physics shows itself as a search of destruction and separation.

The succession of life reveals that seeds grow and flowers bloom. The destructive path of matter separation eliminates the things that are germane to life. Nikola Tesla’s discoveries laid the foundation to a lot of modern technology. His work was based in classical physics. The philosophy of his work proffered that all matter flows in the aether of motion, whereas the modern scientific approach presents itself in the pursuit of disassociation that the process of life lies within the aether.

The priorities to advance transportation are technologies which create efficient short-distance methodologies: new modes of transport. The automobile is a 100-year-old technology, meaning it is fundamentally neither advanced nor efficient. The solution to meet society’s technologically advanced demands are in developing methods of efficient energy use. These technologies being environmentally, economically, and socially sustainable.

There’s a myriad of CATTCC blogposts presenting concepts for gravity manipulation and levitation; presenting transportation solutions.

The challenge to new concepts and ideas is the intangible ability for immediate physical implementation of a theoretical concept. In other words: ideas and concepts have to be developed into functional products. Another challenge with new concepts is lack of marketing funds to encourage research interest. This absence of monetary ability restricts experimentation.

Human psychology resists change

Would the automobile and oil industry be interested in funding a transportation mechanism that would effectively abolish their business income? Would the aerospace industry be excited about eliminating their livelihood of building and maintaining propulsion-based technology?

Today’s technologically advanced society has outgrown its 100-year-old transportation system technologies. There are two areas demanding new modes of transport: short-distance and long-distance travel. Short-distance travel within metropolitan areas for the future will employ a multitude of tunneling infrastructure. The long-distance travel in space will use gravity based technology for greater speeds.

Quick Way to Sustainability

Wed, 19 Mar 2025 01:04:31 GMT

The quickest way to sustainable transportation is with levitation

photo of Viktor Grebennikov

The quickest way to sustainability is with exploring levitation for transportation. And yet, the cultural mindset today claims it’s impossible to use levitation technology for transportation; saying it’s something for the future. How much research is currently examining levitation as a source of transportation? There’s a reply: how extensive has the transportation industry explored levitation or Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform? Answers are only found with questions. Appropriate questions are only asked by people with a high level of interest and curiosity.

The immediate need to advance short distance transportation

The first step towards legitimizing transportation’s future is acknowledging its skepticism and recognizing that the voice admonishing change is the status-quo. The transportation industry is regulated by those whose interest is in maintaining and growing its existing infrastructure. This routine makes it difficult for advancing transportation’s future. It’s a valid statement that no one knows the future, however, without change everything remains the same.

Directing the social climate to reach beyond the mundane state of its exhausted transportation, is a task to offer something better. The endeavor of seeking a sustainable future is a lofty goal yet, by itself is an empty objective. The realistic approach for the future of transportation is merely finding an efficient use of energy source. The current paths of transportation follow methods of lesser resistance of propulsion. Every avenue of development along this beaten path, continues with results of resistance. Exploring levitation finds an open door without energy resistance.

The momentum of disintegration speed

One of the attributes of resistance is the unforgiving presence of thermodynamic loss and friction with the destructive nature of centrifugal force.

A harsh consideration with space travel in Earth’s atmosphere is its disintegration speed. The pull of Earth’s gravity on a craft through the gases of its atmosphere cause significant heating. Objects re-entering at typical speeds, around 17,450 miles per hour for low Earth orbit, to around 28,000 miles per hour for higher orbits; are subject to potential disintegration. This high speed leads to compression of the air ahead of the object, causing temperatures to rise to over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. The compression and heating can be so intense that it results in the formation of a plasma sheath around the object, which can cause disintegration if the object is not properly shielded.

Scientific approach towards levitation is vital to transportation

In the blogpost, Extending CSE Research , it highlights research of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE):

According to B. N. Rodimov (1976, as cited by Frolov, 2001) the walls of multi cavity structures can be considered as the boundaries of the potential electron’s box. The group movement of electrons leads to a system of standing de Broglie waves, which have classic frequencies.

The classic frequencies are f = nh/4mL2, where n is an integer number, L is the circumference of cavity in centimeters, and m is the effective mass of the electron. As an example, the classic frequency for 4.9 mm (side to side) diameter honey bee comb cell is calculated. The effective mass of an electron in beeswax is a bit hard to calculate, and therefore, in the calculation the free electron rest mass is used.

f = 1 · 6.626 · 10-34kgm2s-2 / 4 · 9.11 · 10-31kg · (1.7cm)2= 0.63 Hz

The importance of understanding CSEs is imperative for utilizing them as a source for motion. Also in the previous blogpost, the article from pdfcoffee was referred to:

In summer 1988, an entomologist from Novosibirsk city, Viktor Stepanovich Grebennikov, examined a micro-structure of the lower surface of beetles’ wing case by a microscope and became interested by “an unusually rhythmic, extremely ordered, incomparable honeycomb, solid multidimensional composition, which looked as if it was pressed by some complicated automatic machine”. Studying this amazing micro-pattern allowed Grebennikov to design an aircraft of a new kind called “Gravity plane”. As usually, this discovery was made by chance. Once Grebennikov put a chitin bristle from some beetle’s shell under a microscope and wanted to put another one but it slipped out from tweezers and… hung in the air.

Patterns of CSEs

Honeycombs have six-sided openings. This geometric structural design is referred to as part of sacred geometry. There’s a relevance to these designs and Earth’s atmosphere. The curvature of this pattern is replicated in flower petals.

What’s the relationship between levitation, honeycomb design of bee hives, CSEs, and a gravitational void? Grebennikov indicated stacking of the cavity structures increases its effect. What are the multiples of its amplification? At what point does the stacking of CSEs amplify the voids into producing a reaction with Earth’s atmosphere? Where are the studies of how Earth’s atmosphere reacts with a gravitational void in a standing platform? And how many sets of cavity structures stacks are required to attain levitating a platform and its passenger load?

The blogpost, How Vehicles Can Levitate , asks the most relevant question: How can vehicles levitate?

When challenged with a difficult question, a good procedure is to find simplistic similarities. Given the task of finding solutions enabling a levitating vehicle, there are three similarities: vibration, Earth’s atmosphere, and the magnetic field of Earth’s core. Grebennikov’s CSEs can provide a platform. Earth’s core can provide a stable electromagnetic foundation. Earth’s atmosphere can provide a static reaction.

Grebennikov’s discoveries led him to a more intense study that introduced him to a specific type of beetle whose wings are made with this same structure. Eventually, he made a small two feet by two feet platform and, allegedly was able to make the platform levitate. He was able to stand on the platform and control it to travel on. He also wrote that if he were to make the levitating platform available to the public, he feared his life would be abruptly ended.

So, the question remains: did Grebennikov really accomplish it? The CSE’s have been scientifically validated. They are legitimately mathematically classified as a void. This is different than a vacuum. It’s different than a magnetic or electric negative field. It is a gravitational void; however, that’s a personal speculation. From the data CATTCC has studied, the speculation concludes: it is a gravitational void.

Other types of levitation

From the blogpost, 5 ^th in This Levitation Series , shows magnetism as means of levitation for transportation:

What is a more efficient method of transportation?

The obstacle of maglev technology is a fundamental of physics: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This identifies the magnetic action as a complete function. Magnetic motion requires a fixed position of either the positive or negative field. This confines transportation motion to a fixed guideway. This is similar to jumping up in the air and catching your feet with your hands; enabling your body to stay suspended in the air. This closed magnetic action eliminates maglev technology the practicability of convenience and independence to replace the automobile as an alternative mode of transportation.

The future of transportation requires floatation. The obstacle to maglev technology, is having no interaction with either the electrostatic properties of the atmosphere nor Earth’s magnetic field. The floatation of levitation is its own action; it involves an interaction with atmospheric subatomic forces and/or a gravitational interaction.

Levitation provides flexibility of efficient transportation independence, without a fixed guideway.

Conclusion

The most relevant provider of research towards using levitation for transportation is Viktor Grebennikov. For those interested to learn more of Grebennikov, can read a portion of his most valuable writings about his device in Chapter 5 of his book, “My World” . This is a fascinating 35-page PDF, explaining how he discovered and built his levitating platform.

Urban Growth and Trains

Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:30:41 GMT

The impacts of rail projects for non-transit oriented land-use

There are so many aspects to urban growth, it’s impossible for an instant download into a thousand words of a blogpost that explains everything. This will be an abrupt and incomplete definition but, with some value. Part of the focus with this blogpost is to address the question: what is to be gained with the implantation of a high-speed (160mph) steel-wheel-on-rail train in California?

China’s rapid growth of GDP in the early 2000’s was based on its long term strategy of major investment into manufacturing infrastructure which began in the early 1980s. With this land-use investment strategy, China transformed; from a poverty-stricken country into the world’s leading manufacturing capital. As a communist country, its arrangement of labor force, which provided its colossal manufacturing machine; brings an interesting content for conversation, however, this blogpost is limited to the transportation components and urban growth. Suffice to say, China operates with a unique technique of government philosophic procedure. Additionally, China’s industrialized land-use is transit-oriented development. Its newest growth is intermixing automobile centric land-use.

What are the impacts to areas with varying economics?

There are good questions that have answers and bad questions that are ambiguous. This question is bad. The question has to be isolated to eliminate its ambiguity. Every region has areas of specific economic income; referred to as Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP).

The environmental, economic, and social effects of urban growth are intertwined and directly related to its land-use design. The primary consideration with all urban growth is an area’s type of land-use. To answer questions about any kinds of impacts, the question of its land-use type is the first step to assimilate an answer. There are four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit-oriented design and automobile centric land-use design. There are three types of impacts to land-use: environmental, economic, and social. Any answers about impact have to be isolated specifically to social, economic or environmental impact. Finding an area’s impact can be measured by sustainability.

Goals of sustainable urban growth

In 1987 the United Nations concluded a four year study which it named the Brundtland Report . This was an ameliorate study to identify and develop sustainable urban growth. This incredible achievement identified three components of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. CATTCC recognizes that all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. This clearly indicates that to have sustainable urban growth, it must have a mechanism of sustainable transportation.

From the blogpost, Building New Land-use Designs , is the following: Inasmuch as transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, sustainability for land-use is the most important aspect for urban growth. This brings the question: how is its sustainability enabled? The political move to force society to remove plastic bags is irrelevant to sustainable urban growth. More relevant than political rhetoric, sustainable urban growth involves nature. Growing gardens, fresh water access and common-sense are among the plethora of following nature’s course.

The primary concern for urban growth is enabling sustainability. Urban growth is built on transportation, it’s imperative that efficient energy use is implemented for transportation if urban growth is to be sustainable.

This brings to question: what are the impacts of our current state of unsustainable urban growth? The blogpost Sustainable Growth for Urban Development , defines these unsustainable impacts:

Environmental Impact

The automobile requires road surfaces. These roadbeds are oil based. Ever watched a road being built? Lots of grading work, scraping dirt, filling, and generally reworking the natural surface of Earth. Okay, not a big deal in small amounts, but tens of millions of miles of roads heavily effect the natural water flow of streams and runoff. Secondly, millions of miles of roadbeds capturing grease, emissions by-products, pollutants, carcinogens, and oil spills are funneled as oil canals called roadbeds flowing directly into the water basins. That is undoubtedly environmentally unsustainable . Millions of electric and autonomous cars won’t resolve the damage caused by the oil-based road infrastructure.

Economic Impact

Ever hear the phrase “buy local, spend local?” This term is what creates regional economic sustainability. A dollar spent locally allows that dollar to stay in circulation, being continually exchanged within a local area. When that money is spent out of the local area, the money is gone; it can no longer be used locally. Automobile-centric land-use design is economically unsustainable. Here’s why: the first product of economic unsustainability is the purchase of a new automobile. Today’s purchase price of an automobile is what, on average? $50,000? That amount is instantly removed from circulation in a local economy, never to be recovered for circulation in that community unless that car was manufactured in that local community. Then there are the fuel consumption rates. Averages vary from region to region. For example, a county consumes 500,000 gallons of gasoline per day. At $3 per gallon, that is $1.5 million per day (less 2 percent for the wholesaler and retailer) permanently extracted from ever being used and circulated in that community. An even greater financial extraction from the community are insurance costs per vehicle, at an average cost of $120 per month per vehicle. This is economic unsustainability from the design of automobile-centric urban land-use.

Social Impact

These aspects are rarely considered by studies, except by a very few stragglers engaged in nontraditional academia. It’s the cutting edge of far-reaching consideration. There was a term coined in the early 2000s called visual hostility. It was popularized then, not so popular now, due to the extent of its content. Visual hostility is found to describe blight. Scores of nonprofit organizations declared war on urban blight. The support money behind nonprofits came from big money interests that cashed in on government subsidized, low cost, low-income neighborhood gentrification near high value real estate areas. A lot of blight was erased within a few years. To elected politicians, like homelessness, urban blight no longer exists.

There’s a segment of people involved in the conversation of sustainability, that have misappropriated its definition. Distorting legislative language of sustainability is a travesty. However, the unsustainability of land-use is an economic consequence of an unsustainable mode of an area’s primary mode of transportation. While there is good to be found in some legislation, there is also harm from vague, ignorant, and unjustified environmental regulations.

The misappropriated social impacts tend to reach into the political realm of emotions. The actual social impacts of urban growth are health related. One of the main concerns of social impacts are the negative effects related to traffic stress.

Societal attitudes are a product of human nature. Cultural attitudes are manifested by community voices, irrelevant to transportation based urban growth.

Unsustainable urban growth

Unsustainable urban growth will continue as long as the automobile remains the primary source of transportation in Western Society.

From the CATTCC website’s information page; Sustainable Urban Growth : Initially, the automobile was sold to the general public as a method of attaining independence. By partaking in the feeling of independence, suburbia was created and progressed into what we have today, which is uncontrollable sprawl. One of the unforeseen aspects to this claim of freedom and independence was dependency to its unsustainable design flaw and costs to its future.

Among the consequences of an automobile-centric society is the pervasiveness of social isolationism. The standard procedure for people today is to get up from bed, walk outside to their car, and drive to work with no social interactions. Many people park in a parking lot, walk to an office, work an entire day without the benefit of the interaction of close personal relationships, and then drive home, lacking any relevant social interaction. In its proposition of independence, the automobile-centric society evolved into a culture of social isolationism, or a lack of social interacting.

Unsustainability of the automobile reaches deep into an automobile-based society. The cultural implications of social isolationism and the myriads of health problems created by the stress of traffic congestion are yet to be fully investigated.

Conclusion

Addressing the initial question to the opening line of this blogpost: what is to be gained with the implantation of a high-speed (160+mph) steel-wheel-on-rail train in California?

With any transportation system, its methodology of integration is dependent upon the area’s land-use design. Just because a project has the political strength for its implementation, this has no bearing on relevance to a project’s public usefulness. In other words: a transit line implanted in an automobile centric land-use designed region; is dysfunctional transportation.

In support of the proposed CA HSR line, it does coincide with the small-downtown station locations that have small sections of transit-oriented land-use design. San Francisco, however, is the only location to effectively use the transit-oriented land-use design. The other proposed station sites have eliminated their transit-oriented land-use designs; and now embrace a dysfunctional transit land-use design with automobiles preventing fixed rail transit within those transit-oriented locations. All urban growth post 1930s is automobile centric land-use design.

So, does the 200-year-old technology of train transportation work well in today’s modern society? Today’s culture has multiple and varied destinations, people travel to separate locations. Today’s culture is dependent upon the travel independence an automobile provides. This is to say; CA’s train is a technological antique and societally unsuitable. Its cost is staggering. Its heavy weight infrastructure is necessarily wasteful. Its massive footprint is obtrusive and a visual nightmare.

For many reasons, all major transit corridors should operate in grade separate ROWs (Rights-of-Ways), specifically: tunnels.

Photo credits: Freepik, Pexels

5th In This Levitation Series

Tue, 04 Mar 2025 19:02:23 GMT

Using Levitation for Transportation

upper photo credit: China's 600kmph maglev, Qingdao, Shandong Province

Currently, the only significant use of levitation in transportation, are trains using magnetic levitation (maglev). There is scientific experimentation with electrostatic levitation and acoustic levitation; their low yields of levitation are unable to support a significant load. Other than experimental testing with ion propulsion , Earth’s atmosphere and its magnetic fields, are not currently explored for levitation with transportation considerations.

What is transportation levitation

There are many CATTCC blogposts about levitation. In the blogpost, Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation , the question: ‘What is Levitation’, states that levitation is an accumulation of vibration in mass. This is evidenced with all levitation. Magnetism involves the exchange of an atom’s outer shell electrons; producing vibration. Ions are in a similar category as magnets; exchanging electrons. The difference with ions is that the vibrational process of electron transfer in ionization, produces a change of state in the element’s electromagnetic charge.

The rising of balloons is merely the action of a lighter gas within a membrane, rising above a heavier gas; a process as normal as running water flowing downhill.

The action of heat rising is a gravitational reaction of gases in air. As a reaction to particle bombardment within a mass, atoms within each element are effected. Their electrons are forced into higher shell layers which transfers to adjacent atoms, causing a reciprocating energy release. This action is comparable to friction in solid objects. This subatomic action of expansion, is an electron movement; this is a vibrational motion. One transportation application in this vibrational reaction was using steam to power train locomotives.

The process of incandescent light is a regulated measure of this heat, exchanged from a flow of electricity.

Another lesser explored consideration of levitation, is the unknown realm of spirituality and brain function. Skepticism is prevalent to areas of levitation that are subjective. Did Christ Jesus and Peter, walk on water?

Are the neural oscillations of the human brain capable of controlling electromagnetic switch sensors?

The possibility of capturing the electrostatic movement in Earth’s atmosphere for levitation, and using its electric field to counteract Earth’s gravitational force, is still in the in theoretical design phase.

Today’s transportation levitation

Again, other than experimentation with ion propulsion; the only other current use of levitation in the transportation industry is with maglev train technology. There are several variations of maglev technology, regarding the different configurations of magnetic field placement and linear motion of the vehicle.

What emerging technologies are based towards levitation being used for transportation?

With an internet search; for using levitation with transportation, it brings up this 2024 article from thefinancialdaily.com . The article is about Japan’s Quantum Machine Unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST). The institute has developed by a diamagnetic material made of pulverized graphite and wax, arranged in a continuous grid beneath them to create the magnetic levitation effect. This allows a vehicle to float above the track, moving without further electrical or mechanical thrust. Further inquiry about this technology is found in epressourcepage.com . This exciting headline hosts a vague and disappointing story written by the bland ambiguity of AI: providing the reader wasted time. There’s another similarly written article in ecoticias.com . It reveals the mechanism in what it calls a technology that provides a magnetic guideway for maglev trains, removing the necessity of electromagnetic electrification.

Although these stories of this newly discovered diamagnetic material mention the material’s magnetic lack of permanent magnet adherence, nowhere in these articles is the mention of the Halbach array . The Halbach array was discovered in the 1970s and maintains a directed high intensity magnetic field with passive magnets.

The electromagnetic technology used in maglev trains, is quite extensive in China:

• Shanghai maglev train : China’s first maglev project. Connects Shanghai Pudong International Airport to Downtown Pudong.

• Changsha maglev train : Operates in Changsha, the capital of Hunan province.

• Changsha-Huawei maglev train : A short line serving the Huawei campus in Changsha.

• https://m.voc.com.cn/xhn/news/202502/28012192.html

• Guangzhou-Shenzhen maglev train : An underground route linking Guangzhou and Shenzhen, two major cities in the Pearl River Delta region.

China’s transportation advances lead the world in the implementation of maglev technology. China is now working to build the world’s fastest transit system technology.

One of the most informative sources regarding maglev train technology is Wikipedia . There are many variations of maglev train technology designs. There are three fundamentals of maglev technology: Electromagnetic suspension (EMS), Electrodynamic suspension (EDS), and the passive suspension of passive magnetic guideways. Passive magnetic guideway technology uses the Halbach arrays of permanent magnets. This methodology is more cost-effective than electromagnets, however the main factor in its efficiency is weight. A passive magnetic guideway is built for new technology systems using smaller vehicles. Another huge disadvantage for the 200-year-old heavy weight train technology: delivering hundreds of people to the same locations, is the requirement of heavily fortified concrete and steel infrastructure, plus massive electricity loads to electrify the guideway.

Applicable transit for modern civilization

CATTCC maintains that while maglev technology provides transportation solutions for the future of transportation, trains do not provide modern societal benefit for Western Society. The social functionality of train technology is 200 years old. Trains were a transportation marvel and a solution to the transportation demands for a non-technology civilization. All urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation. Trains are inappropriate for today’s modern culture in Western society’s automobile centric land-use design. The analyses of pros vs cons to maglev trains are irrelevant.

The optimal transit vehicle size for Western society accommodates six passengers, a maximum passenger capacity for a transit vehicle today is 20. Many transit system technology applications would be ideally suitable with 6 passenger capacity. There are also viable transit technologies available for 20 passenger systems.

Again, implementation of advances in transportation and transit systems are reliant upon land-use design. All urban growth is based upon its primary source of transportation. For any government planning agency, or a politically charged environmental group, to demand an environmental change; it’s inescapable to acknowledge that all urban growth is based on transportation.

The general public holds a presumptive determination that the term ‘advanced transportation’ means electric cars and trains. CATTCC’s research and study is beyond trains, cars, and aerodynamics. The future of transportation floats. This has a different meaning than propulsion based aerodynamically engineered flight.

Although changes are imperative for efficient transportation’s future, all environmental changes rely on changing the perception of what makes transportation efficient. The basic principle of propulsion, is forcing energy against resistance. Conversely, the frequency of harmonics allows a flow of resonance. Surfing is a manner of transportation without resistance; this is an example of efficient transportation.

What is a more efficient method of transportation?

Levitation provides flexibility of efficient transportation independence, without a fixed guideway.

CA HSR update

Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:18:34 GMT

A status update for California's High Speed Rail project

This blogpost warrants a disclosure. The update of California’s High Speed Rail (HSR) project is somewhat of an editorial comment. It’s also written with much trepidation. CA’s HSR project is very political and is politically charged. The task of CATTCC is to advance new ideas and concepts for transportation, this blogpost is written with its intent as an update and without intent to be political. CATTCC has no interest in the bickering of political banter. Yet, there is some merit to sharing my personal views which are relevant to the CATTCC perspective.

In full disclosure, as the managing director of CATTCC and author of this article, it’s a personal story and, without intent: editorializing. I’ve followed the process of CA’s HSR project and attended nearly 75% of the quarterly HSR public meetings from 1993 until 2011 as an unpaid audience attendee and politically naïve, merely very interested in the project. Over that period of time, I discovered I knew more about the project than most of the political appointees who sat on the administrative board.

This blogpost is an update regarding California’s High Speed Rail (CA HSR). The recent political change of federal administration, is again bring attention to the project. This blogpost is an attempt to provide the reader with information to assist the reader forming their own opinion.

In these many years of following the project, and now having made a career in advanced transportation technology and sustainable urban growth, I’m qualified to have a professional opinion. As such, California’s HSR project is a political project and has very little to do with improving transportation. This opinion is based upon the impractical and antiquated function of 200-year-old trains. Trains were a wonderful and useful technology in the 1800s and served society of that time very well. Today’s society is much more spread out geographically, California’s urban growth land-use is based on the automobile. Consequently, with the majority of California’s land-use design being automobile centric, instead of transit oriented, trains are antithetical to transportation function of California’s land-use. Additionally, technological advances over the past 200 years intensify the antiquity of a 200-year-old transportation technology.

In 1993, the Intercity High Speed Rail Commission was established to create a feasibility study for CA to implement high speed rail, and analyze a cost comparison of maglev technology and the European standard of steel-wheel-on-rail technology. At that time, the only maglev technology to be considered was the German maglev technology: Transrapid (implemented in China in 2004 with a 19-mile line between the Shanghai Airport and Downtown Pudong.)

In 1996, the commission was sunsetted and the CA High Speed Rail Authority was established.

This is a long post about the history and personal close-up view regarding California’s high speed rail project. One of the best sources to learn about California’s HSR is Wikipedia.

According to Wikipedia , the history of California’s High Speed Rail (HSR) began in the early 1980s.

Before 1992 . Governor Jerry Brown had long been an advocate of a high-speed rail system for California. In his first two terms as governor (1975–1983) he signed legislation into law for the study of a high-speed rail system. In September 1982, the California legislature passed AB 3647, authorizing the construction of a $2bn “bullet train” between Los Angeles and San Diego, ^[3] including the issuance of $1.25bn in state bonds. ^[4] Brown signed the legislation that same month, and it became law in October that year. ^[5] In 1992 in his run for the Presidency the United States he continued to show his support for it. Then, in 1993 the Intercity High-Speed Rail Commission was created to conduct studies and prepare plans. ^[6]

1992 . At the federal level, in 1992 the San Francisco–Los Angeles rail corridor was proposed in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act as one of five high speed rail corridors.

1996. In 1996 the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), was established by SB 1420 to begin formal planning in preparation for a ballot measure in 1998 or 2000. ^[7] The ballot measure was originally scheduled to be put before voters in the 2004 general election; however, the state legislature voted twice to move it back, first to 2006, and finally to 2008 when 53% of voters approved the issuing of $9 billion in bonds for high speed rail in Proposition 1A . ^[8]

2008. The U.S. Congress enacted the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA), which among other things required the states to develop passenger rail plans.

2013. In May 2013, the California DOT released its 2013 State Rail Plan. ^[9] This helped provide a new perspective that viewed the HSR project as the backbone of a statewide rail modernization plan. This has been used by the Authority in allocating funds to other state rail systems that support passenger rail goals and feed into the HSR system. The plan is being updated by DOT, with the latest revision in process of publication now.

2014. In Jerry Brown's second two terms as Governor (2011 to 2019), in 2014 25% of California's Cap and Trade revenue was allocated to the HSR system. ^[10] In 2017, this was extended into 2030. ^[11]

2022. SB 198 established the priority of bringing a working HSR line into operation as soon as possible in the Central Valley.

The role of CATTCC

As CATTCC is the Center for Advanced Transportation Technology, it’s positioned as a research leader in advanced transportation technology and sustainable urban growth. One part of CATTCC, is to broadcast the message that all urban growth is based upon its primary source of transportation. Maglev technology and innovative concepts for efficient energy solutions are transportation’s future. California’s effort to build an integrated transportation network that fits into a nationwide system, is absolutely needed. However, CA’s pursuit to implement this status-quo of 200-year-old train technology into its automobile centric land-use design is dysfunctional.

Distorting the CA HSR directive

The HSRA archives will show a Board resolution, under Board President Rod Diridon, mandating all five segments of the HSR project to begin construction at the same time. This would provide simultaneous completion of the project, allowing full system functionality.

In a 2016 speech, CA’s governor (Newsom) declared his goal of the project, according to the NewYorker.com article: “The current project, as planned, would cost too much and, respectfully, take too long.” Instead, he proposed focusing on a shorter inland route, between Merced and Bakersfield, two small cities that, it’s fair to say, most coastal metropolitan Californians happily visit rarely or never. The news was received as a downer on par with the extinction of the space program. “This country won’t experience modern rail travel for another generation – if ever.”

Similarly, Governor Jerry Brown had previously promoted the same thing. A excerpt from a Sacramento Bee article: Even as his predecessor, Jerry Brown, pushed to launch an opening segment from Bakersfield to downtown San Jose, Brown administration officials were saying a Valley-only train may be all they could afford for starters. Brian Kelly, CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, told The Bee last summer that consultants were exploring whether an abbreviated segment between Bakersfield and Madera or Merced could generate enough ridership and revenue to meet the no-subsidy requirements of Proposition 1A.

Recent media attention to CA’s HSR project

Each of these media links is either a headline story with vague content or it displays a notable political opinion. Media reporting has bias of political preference which tends to cloud an article’s accuracy, with unnecessary rants of emotional opinion.

https://ktla.com/news/travel/trump-puts-california-high-speed-rail-in-crosshairs/

This is a fairly informative article that also mentions the private endeavor Brightline, which runs from LA to Las Vegas. An additional link to the Brightline project is a comparative analysis listing the distinctions between the two projects. Also, Brightline received a $3.2 billion federal grant.

https://ktla.com/news/california/whats-the-difference-between-californias-2-high-speed-rail-projects/?ipid=promo-link-block3

Meanwhile, the Brightline West project is a relatively straight shot, 218 miles between the Inland Empire and Las Vegas. About 80% of the system will reside in California, following along Interstate 15 between Vegas and Rancho Cucamonga.

Speaking of Interstate 15, another key difference between CAHSR and Brightline is what’s called “right of way,” and it’s possibly the biggest hurdle (aside from funding) these types of projects encounter. A right of way literally means that the train has permission to operate in the area.

The SoCal-to-Vegas bullet train benefits from a relatively uncomplicated right of way. The train will operate alongside Interstate 15 and usage agreements to grant the train permission to operate in that space were established years ago.

Many details distinguishing the difference between two, reveals them to be the same.

Brightline West is using the American Pioneer 220 , an American variant of the Siemens Velaro Novo high-speed electric multiple units, which has a designed top speed of 225 mph. The trains can operate at speeds up to 200 mph and are fully electric. The train-sets are equipped with state-of-the-art amenities. The initial order consists of 10 seven-car American Pioneer 220 trainsets, with a capacity of 434–450 passengers. The Siemens rolling stock will be ‘assembled’ at a new factory in Horseheads, New York.

As an editorial comment, Siemens Mobility was selected as the preferred train vendor due to the strength of its political lobbying. This will presumably be the train technology selected for the CA HSR, providing the political support for the project remains intact.

Alstrom is a money king in Europe, headquartered in France. Formerly an electric power generating manufacturer and grid owner, it’s now a very large train rolling stock and infrastructure equipment builder. They quite literally control public transportation by owning most of the Western World’s rail technology; by building its rolling stock and infrastructure. Siemens/Bombardier is the manufacture of the American Pioneer 220. Alstrom owns Bombardier , a partner in Siemens Mobility.

https://californiaglobe.com/fl/pres-trump-to-investigate-californias-high-speed-rail-scheme-worst-managed-project-ive-seen/

This article begins with mocking a Fresno Bee headline. A lot of the Fresno Bee articles are hidden behind a paywall. This CA Globe article is written about the state of the HSR financial status. For someone who has closely followed the legend of CA’s HSR, there’s a lot more to the project costs than this article alludes to.

Sidenotes: Prior to the legislation placing the HSR bond measure on the ballot in 2008, there was a Stanford Peer-Group Study. The study has disappeared from internet search engines, however, the study caused great controversy at the board meetings. The study claimed the actual cost would exceed $212billion, which infuriated the board as well as the HSR staff. Their response was to table the discussion. At the proceeding board meetings, their response was that it was not on the agenda for further discussion.

In January 2012, according to State law, the Peer Review Group released its report. Will Kempton, former Director of Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) and current head of the Orange County Transportation Authority, chaired the independent review panel and said: "We cannot overemphasize the fact that moving ahead on the project without credible sources of adequate funding, without a definitive business model, without a strategy to maximize the independent utility and value to the State, and without the appropriate management resources, represents an immense financial risk on the part of the State of California."

Regardless of this damning report, Jerry Brown ignored the voice representing CA citizens and pushed the project ahead. This provided his close friend Richard Blum, substantial income; as Blum’s wife (Senator Diane Feinstein) gathered Federal funds. Incidentally, also scrubbed from the internet were the close business ties Richard Blum had with Perini Construction. It’s also notable that Richard Blum was the largest shareholder (at 17%) and President of URS. URS was the transportation engineering and consulting firm that received the contract for the Central Valley portion of the HSR Environmental Impact Study (EIS/EIR) in 2004. The initial EIR was separated into five sections, each consultant group received $5million, a $25million package. When Brown was elected governor, he decided to disregard the previous resolution and ordered the project to begin only in Central CA. This provided all the EIS work to be done by URS as work-order extras for URS. URS billed over $800million by the time the project officially began construction in 2015. This paragraph is merely insight of politics as usual.

Reason.org also posted an interesting commentary regarding the 2012 study .

Also noteable: From Wikipedia: Routing high-speed rail along Interstate 5 , which would have provided a shorter trip between the Bay Area and Southern California but bypassed Fresno and Bakersfield, ^[aa] was also discussed in the 2000s. SNCF , the French national high-speed rail operator, proposed an I-5 alignment to the Authority and offered to build it with the help of foreign investment, ^[231] ^[232] although in 2009 they also expressed their interest in building the state's official proposed alignment. ^[233] The Authority turned down SNCF's involvement in 2011, in part due to "Buy America" requirements that mandate transportation projects using federal funds to use domestically produced trains and materials, ^[234] and due to political considerations as Proposition 1A outlined a route through Fresno and Bakersfield. ^[234] ^[15]

Found in a reuters.com article, dated 2010, Japan offered to finance the project with long-term, low interest loans, provided California would use Shinkansen technology.

More about the project today

The question to ask is: what has changed to improve the project to give it viability? Over the past 12 years, the costs continue to rise, yet, the money pot remains close to the same.

Will President Trump call for an investigation to the waste involved in the project?

Here is a list of articles linking to President Trump’s announcement to the possible investigation to CA’s HSR:

California Globe

Berkeley.edu

Legalinsurrection.com

LA Times

Global Railway Review

Berkeley News

Breitbart

Another article that brilliantly explains why the CA HSR has failed, is from the Hoover Institute , with its publish date in 2023.

Can the project actually be built? Where will the money come from? Will Brightline West be tasked to take over the California’s HSR project? There are more questions than answers.

The unsolicited solution CATTCC offers is recommending a change of technology. Changing its technology with a modern transit technology. This gives the system lighter vehicles, greatly reduces infrastructure costs, lowers build time, increases trip speeds and efficiency, and the system becomes more suitable and relevant to modern society.

Fourth in This Levitation Series

Mon, 10 Feb 2025 02:54:10 GMT

Discovering natures way for efficient transportation

photo credit: pexels, Sebastian

There’s been a lot of speculation about Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device. Only a few photos of its operation can be found in circulation. One of the photos, when enlarged, shows the face of its operator to be blanked out. There are no design plans, no schematics. To make the claim that a device can levitate without a source of fuel is interpreted by the sceptics as malarkey. Without evidence, conjecture is irrelevant. It is therefore, mandatory to produce operational validation.

Cavity Structures Effect

Can the cavity structures of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) produce a levitating reaction from the atmosphere or Earth’s magnetic field? The conjecture regarding the legitimacy of Grebennikov’s might be in question, however, the CSE has been shown to be accurate.

An excerpt pointed out in the article from aetherforce.energy :

"There have been many hypotheses about the physical nature of the CSE, but there is one theory that deserves greater attention. It was developed earlier by Valery F. Zolotariov (1931-2000), Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and it is now experimentally confirmed. (1, 3)

As a result of a long collaborative research Grebennikov and Zolotariov (1987) describe the discovery as “previously unknown phenomena of interaction between multi cavity structures and living systems, in which de Broglie waves associated with motion of electron flows in the solid walls of cavities create, by interference, a macroscopic field of multi cavity structures, which causes changes in the functional state of living objects located in this field”. (1, 3)

In multi cavity structures, where the surface area is repeatedly curved, the super high frequency de Broglie waves are added together and they form, like musical overtones, harmonics with lower frequencies. Thus, by lengthening and strengthening due to the mutual overlap in the cells, they form anti-node maximums of standing de Broglie waves. Running against these passive obstacles, nerve impulses change their frequency and speed, causing not only the apparent sensations, but sometimes also significant physiological changes. (1, 3)"

Levitation is vibrational action. With Earth’s magnetic field, in conjunction with the electromagnetic fields in the atmosphere, it can be theorized there is possible legitimacy to Grebennikov’s device.

Reconstruction of this design to test its effectiveness is imperative.

One of the insightful physicists of the 20 ^th century was Richard Feynman. Listed on the Caltech.edu site are some of his lectures. His lecture on the electricity in the atmosphere: The electric potential gradient of the atmosphere , is particularly relevant in discovering ways to enable Grebennikov’s levitating device. His lecture begins by pointing out: On an ordinary day over flat desert country, or over the sea, as one goes upward from the surface of the ground the electric potential increases by about 100 volts per meter. Thus, there is a vertical electric field E of 100 volts/m in the air. The sign of the field corresponds to a negative charge on the earth’s surface.

Further, Feynman shows the way to measure this gradient.

There is another way to directly measure the potential gradient. Since there is an electric field, there is a surface charge on the earth (σ=ϵ0E). If we place a flat metal plate at the earth’s surface and ground it, negative charges appear on it (Fig. 9–2 a). If this plate is now covered by another grounded conducting cover B, the charges will appear on the cover, and there will be no charges on the original plate A. If we measure the charge that flows from plate A to the ground (by, say, a galvanometer in the grounding wire) as we cover it, we can find the surface charge density that was there, and therefore also find the electric field.

Having suggested how we can measure the electric field in the atmosphere, we now continue our description of it. Measurements show, first of all, that the field continues to exist, but gets weaker, as one goes up to high altitudes. By about 50 kilometers, the field is very small, so most of the potential change (the integral of E) is at lower altitudes. The total potential difference from the surface of the earth to the top of the atmosphere is about 400,000 volts.

In his lectures, he also discusses the activity of ions in the atmosphere. Excerpts are included, as an important consideration when researching ways to enable levitation.

Electric currents in the atmosphere

Another thing that can be measured, in addition to the potential gradient, is the current in the atmosphere. The current density is small—about 10 microamperes crosses each square meter parallel to the earth. The air is evidently not a perfect insulator, and because of this conductivity, a small current—caused by the electric field we have just been describing—passes from the sky down to the earth.

Why does the atmosphere have conductivity? Here and there among the air molecules, there is an ion—a molecule of oxygen, say, which has acquired an extra electron, or perhaps lost one. These ions do not stay as single molecules; because of their electric field they usually accumulate a few other molecules around them. Each ion then becomes a little lump which, along with other lumps, drifts in the field—moving slowly upward or downward—making the observed current. Where do the ions come from? It was first guessed that the ions were produced by the radioactivity of the earth. (It was known that the radiation from radioactive materials would make air conducting by ionizing the air molecules.) Particles like β-rays coming out of the atomic nuclei are moving so fast that they tear electrons from the atoms, leaving ions behind. This would imply, of course, that if we were to go to higher altitudes, we should find less ionization, because the radioactivity is all in the dirt on the ground—in the traces of radium, uranium, potassium, etc.

The purpose for quoting so much of Feynman’s work is to clarify and validate the potential in utilizing Earth’s magnificent volume of available electric and magnetic fields.

Again, analyzing Grebennikov’s device; its simplicity is based on the principles of nature.

Grebennikov’s written work speaks of it being made of an art box. It’s also specified to be made of four fans. The fans are what Grebennikov refers to as “blinds”. The CSEs are intensified by compression. It’s surmised that replicating Grebennikov’s device, requires several layers of CSEs.

The blogpost, Using Air for Levitation , provides an excerpt from pdfcoffee.com :

Two bolt heads can also be seen on the photographs, approximately in the center of each platform halves. This is a bonding of the distribution mechanism, which transfers effort from the “distributors” to a fan opening device. Each fan consists of nine plates. In order to make them strong, the plates are made of sheet metal. Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate. On the one hand, the metal does not prevent nets from operating because the effect of cavitary structures cannot be screened and, on the other hand, protects them from mechanical influences such as influence of grass during landing. Holes in the plates, which can be seen, are not related to micro-cells. They are made only for lightening the metal plates’ weight. Do you see that it is difficult for Grebennikov to hold even a lightened version of his platform?

Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

This ‘fuel’ is speculated to be the interaction of CSEs with Earth’s magnetic field and the current in Earth’s atmospheric electric potential fields.

Conclusion

Theories are great for conversation and provide the foundation of research. A problem with think-tanks and theories is they operate as consultant organizations without the ability for hands-on building research. Beyond theory is proof; evidence through design implementation. The only way to test the legitimacy of Grebennikov’s device is to build it. Several of the previous blogposts provide most of the pieces for how Grebennikov’s device can be rebuilt.

The blogpost: Chitin and Grits , Grebennikov lists many ways to achieve CSEs.

Short Distance Designs asks a question to skeptics who that claim a passive design can’t be used for transportation. Would they deny that skiing, hang gliding, sailing, or surfing is also impossible?

Crystals and Polymers provides possibilities for replicating CSEs, as well as other pertinent details.

Bug Wings for Travel asks the question: can CSEs be manufactured to produce the CSEs needed to support Grebennikov’s device technology?

There are many other blogposts with supporting analysis of Earth’s magnetic core and its atmosphere, which lead to the possibility of validity of Grebennikov’s levitating device.

Third in This Levitation Series

Wed, 05 Feb 2025 05:10:23 GMT

Nature's way to provide efficient motion for transportation

Photo credit: pexels.com

Finding a way to use nature’s motion is essential for efficient transportation. New methodologies require changing traditional scientific perspectives. The leaders in scientific breakthroughs surpass tradition. New modes of transportation technology require vision and innovation.

In the argument of fuel requirement to levitate a vehicle, the argument is erroneous. Similarly; many questions require significant depth to answer. Such a question is: what makes a magnet move? The only legitimate answer to that question is: molecular combinations of electron structure. Using the phrase: ‘a magnet moves because it has opposing poles’ is deferring an answer to the question; in the same way that saying fuel is required to levitate a vehicle.

Being able to use Earth’s existing energy, can provide the mechanism to enhance mobility. Presumably, this is what Viktor Grebennikov referred to, when he alluded to it being the “fuel” needed to levitate his device. This conjecture of his device was able to act upon and capture energy for its movement from Earth’s electromagnet field and the atmosphere.

With the Earth’s atmosphere of positive ions, a negatively charged device would produce an attractive action. The requirement for a significant action capable to carry the weight of a 300-pound load is what Grebennikov refers to as ‘fuel’. This positive / negative action would be minimized its weight by levitation.

What role do Cavity Structures Effect (CSEs) play to influence a transportation device for levitation? As the article points out; as a void, the CSEs would act as negative to gravity. To electricity, a void is different than a ground or a neutral. To magnetism, it would be neither negative or positive. What is the ‘fuel’ that can amplify the CSE to magnify the intensity of its negative gravitational field? A levitating device utilizing the negative charge of CSEs, calls for the compression of CSEs. This could represent the “fuel” application for a levitating device.

Amplifying the intensity of Earth’s positive ion field, or Earth’s negative magnetic field to Increase its field strength, may be irrelevant to CSEs. It stands to reason that Earth’s electrostatic field has more to do with the effectiveness of interaction with resonance in its frequency to CSEs. A CSEs field is intensified by compression. The whole point of levitation is vibration. In developing a levitating device, it doesn’t require electrostatic voltage to carry a load, as much as; it requires vibrational intensity. It’s probable that the intensity of CSEs is what produces a field advantageous to levitation. The positive ions in Earth’s atmosphere provide attraction to a negative field. Earth’s negative magnetic charge produces a negative field advantageous as repulsion for a vehicle device with a negative charge.

Each vehicle device necessitates an encapsulating field. From the article: Toroidal Fields of Dreams ; it investigates these types of fields: In the philosophies of theoretical physics, these five commonalities are expanded to dimensions of existence, as an understanding of more than just five senses in our three-dimensional perception of reality understanding.

What we perceive as visually present, is far less than what is shown on an electromagnetic wave spectrum. The same is to be said for all spectrums of our perception to each of the five human sensory mechanisms.

So, to the point of the toroidal fields; these are fixed electromagnetic energy fields. This leads to a question. Are the human sensory mechanisms based on a subatomic structure which necessitates a ferrous component? This is a legitimate yes, theoretically, because the human body is carbon based. It would also allow electrogravitational composition. Are the human neuron receptors electrogravitic or electromagnetic? Again, the composition of subatomic structure could be either.

Building a device

For levitation as a state of vibration, at what level of subatomic action does this phenomenon react? The article Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation , identifies levitation as a product of mass; rather than subatomic. The perception of CSEs, indicate a subatomic electrogravitic nature. This leads to the postulation that control of a levitating vehicle device requires an interaction with gravity and magnetic fields. Simply stated, this involves an interaction of both ferrous and nonferrous materials.

Where does this take us? Back to the question of how to build a levitating device. Again, it points to Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device that uses CSE’s and Earth’s electromagnetic fields. The blogpost: More About CSE’s highlights Grebennikov’s details of its construction: The article showed that there was a combination of fans with nine ‘blades’. What’s their purpose? The way it’s described; the platform has two halves that unfold to function as one platform. With the two sections combined it’s referred to as a bonding of the distribution mechanism to a fan opening device. Or is there another interpretation to this: “This is a bonding of the distribution mechanism, which transfers effort from the “distributors” to a fan opening device. Each fan consists of nine plates. In order to make them strong, the plates are made of sheet metal. Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate.”

It's assumed that a micro-net is the stacking of CSEs. This structure is undefined. The several articles regarding chitin and crystal polymerizations refer to this type of CSEs.

These details are a starting point to experiment with.

The transportation market

Invention and copyrights are vastly different. This statement is merely making the point that an invention is specific to a product or a device and a copyright belongs to the field of art. The similarities involved require imagination and vision in their creation. Relating invention to the building of a levitating device, the comparison is like a genre of music that doesn’t exist yet. Once a music genre is created, many people are able to copy it, and each performer can have a following. In regards to invention, Henry Ford didn’t invent the car, he mass produced them. He was a marketer. Elon Musk didn’t invent the electric car; he’s a marketing genius. Musk has discovered the marketability of the incredibly lucrative transportation industry.

Researching concepts to discover physics principles of how a levitating vehicle works, is much different than expanding a known technology into a marketing plan, hiring engineers to build a device, then sell the product to the public market.

CATTCC's purpose of discovering a methodology to manipulate gravity is much more important than the financial gain. The societal demand of technology for transportation advances has reached a pentacle. For transportation to be sustainable, it has to be efficient. Reaching this demand calls for a new scientific perspective. This leading edge of transportation research mandates something beyond accepted traditions. It requires new questions and looks for solutions that bring a fresh perspective.

This brings us to re-ask the question of how does a levitating vehicle work?

How to build a levitating vehicle

Levitation is the act of floating in air. A bumblebee hovers, with its tiny wing guiding its path. Birds aerodynamically adhere to nature's atmosphere. A falcon reaches a speed of 200 miles per hour in a dive. Human intellectual capability must surely be able to do more.

A somewhat more conventional methodology to develop a levitating device is with ions in the atmosphere.

Levitation with Earth's atmosphere and ions

What's the difference between positive and negative ions in the atmosphere? The article Ion Drives , touches questions about how ions can be used for transportation devices. There is a Florida company working with drones towards this endeavor: The Silent Ventus . Their concept to the driving mechanism is a different type of operational system methodology.

This drawing is the principle of the Ionocraft , a 1964 patent by Alexander de Seversky.

The Lyncean Group hosts articles of Alexander de Seversky’s work, electrodynamic propulsion, electro-aerodynamic aircraft, and Ionocraft lifters. Regarding the Ionocraft: When charged molecules in the air are subjected to an electric field, they are accelerated. When these charged molecules collide with neutral ones, they transfer part of their momentum, leading to air movement known as an “ionic wind.” This basic process is shown in the following diagram, which depicts a strong electric field between a discharge electrode (left) and a ground electrode (right), and the motion of negative ions toward the ground electrode where they are collected. The neutral molecules pass through the ground electrode and generate the thrust called the ionic wind.

De Seversky built a two-ounce (57 gram) model. The Lyncean Group article describes it: its ability to fly while powered from an external 90 watt power conversion system (30,000 volts at 3 mA), significantly higher than conventional aircraft and helicopters. This translated into a power-to-weight ratio of about 0.96 hp/pound.

A paper by Sanghyeon Park also describes the Ionocraft.

Conclusion

What are the similarities between the principles of an electrohydrodynamic ion-propulsion and Viktor Grebennikov’s design? They both have no moving parts. Patent designs exist for Alexander de Seversky’s Ionocraft. Written designs for Grebennikov’s levitating device are unknown.

The search for discovering a levitating device is different than the work towards a propulsion device. Alexander de Seversky’s Ionocraft required an electrically charged field. It is conjecturally found that Grebennikov’s device used CSEs to affect the molecular polarization of Earth’s atmosphere and its negative magnetic field of the ground. His device used what is already present, without the necessity to stimulate an ionic reaction from an electric field generation.

How Vehicles Can Levitate

Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:19:34 GMT

Finding the necessary components for a levitating vehicle

This article is the second in a series of levitation. The previous article left-off with the question: How can vehicles levitate?

Earth’s atmosphere has a frequency tone of 7.83 Hz . This is referred to as the Schumann Resonances . It’s explained in Wikipedia as: The Schumann resonances (SR) are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency portion of the Earth 's electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances , generated and excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere .

Earth’s core has a much lower frequency, which is around 2.9 to 4.5 millihertz (mHz), as mentioned in a Dec 2017 National Geographic article. This frequency is below the human hearing range and is detected through seismic instruments. The overall resonant frequencies of the Earth are significant in understanding its electromagnetic behavior.

There other important topics for studying Earth’s magnetic field. The British Geological Survey (BGS) provides a thorough examination. This is a paragraph from that document: The Earth's magnetic field is generated in the fluid outer core by a self-exciting dynamo process. Electrical currents flowing in the slowly moving molten iron generate the magnetic field. In addition to sources in the Earth's core the magnetic field observable at the Earth's surface has sources in the crust and in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. The geomagnetic field varies on a range of scales and a description of these variations is now made, in the order low frequency to high frequency variations, in both the space and time domains. The final section describes how the Earth's magnetic field can be both a tool and a hazard to the modern world. First of all, however, methods of observing the magnetic field are described.

Finding effective commonalities for a new mode of short distance transportation is vital. So, how do these three commonalities work to provide a means for a vehicle device to levitate? We’ve shown that levitation is vibrational action. Is the vibrational action in conjunction with spin? It seems that the momentum of spin is an unnecessary component to a vibrating device. The blogpost Developing a Theory for Levitation , points out: The technology will be found to work with Earth’s magnetic field and its ferrous plasma core. Since levitation is molecular vibration, the technology used will be at the molecular level. Also, since an atomic void is negative, this is a component to the technology. Additionally, the process of discovering a levitating device is in discovering how to compress a Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) and controlling its manipulation.

In More About CSE’s : Grebennikov states: the Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

As conjecture, Grebennikov put quotes around the word “fuel” to indicates a non-conventional type of ‘propellent’. This is presupposed by his next paragraph: Roughly speaking, the effect of cavitary structures works the following way: any material consists of particles vibrating by its own frequency (read Tesla’s cosmology, works of John Keely, Thomas Henry Morey, Wilhelm Reich and others). Due to such internal atomic vibrations, a stationary wave exists in the environment, around any object (and further, discrete “reflections” or maximums of such a wave).

Thus, a frequency and length of such vibration are unique for any material (according to Grebennikov, this is a “reflection of de Broglie waves). If we make a cavity, its walls will begin to “radiate” towards each other or under some angles. If a right size of such a cell will be found, waves’ maximums will sum up and a field will be strengthened in the given point of space (field antinode).

The conclusion here is that a device is able to capture energy for its movement from Earth’s electromagnet field in the atmosphere. With the Earth’s atmosphere of positive ions, a floatation device would be negatively charged and its action would be an attractive force. The requirement for a significant charge capable to carry the weight of a 300-pound load is what Grebennikov refers to as ‘fuel’. This positive or negative charge requirement would be minimized by levitation.

How do CSEs influence a transportation device for levitation? As a void, they would act as negative to gravity. To electricity, a void is different than a ground or a neutral. To magnetism, it would be neither negative or positive. What is the ‘fuel’ that can amplify the CSE to magnify the intensity of its negative gravitational field?

The blogpost, Earth’s Electrostatic Charge , searches one of Nikola Tesla’s patents: ‘System of Transmission of Electrical Energy’. This patent shows electrical current potential within Earth’s atmosphere. The full description of Tesla’s patent shows extreme voltage flow. A levitating device utilizing the negative charge of CSEs, calls for the compression of CSEs as the power application for a levitating device.

Increasing power may be irrelevant to CSEs. It stands to reason that Earth’s electrostatic field has more to do with the effectiveness of interaction with resonance in its frequency to CSEs. A CSEs field is intensified by compression. The whole point of levitation is vibration. To establish a levitating device, it doesn’t require electrostatic voltage to carry a load, it requires vibrational intensity. The intensity of CSEs is what produces levitation. The positive ions in Earth’s atmosphere provide attraction to a negative field.

There are many supporting blogposts to validate this rational. Build With Levitation : The point of this blogpost is to point out that Earth holds a negative charge. Grebennikov’s device, with the CSE’s held a negative charge. Earth’s atmosphere consists of both positive and negative charges. Grebennikov’s negatively charged device would repel Earth’s negative charge. The pivoting fans would manipulate a negative repelling action.

Conclusion

This examination seems to be pointing in the direction that the importance of creating a levitation device is found in CSEs. How a platform of CSEs interact with Earth’s magnetosphere is carried into the next blogpost.

Exploration of Levitation

Wed, 22 Jan 2025 16:36:34 GMT

Discovering what it takes to build a levitating device

photo credits: pexels and pixabay

This article is the first part in a series about building floatation devices for short distance travel.

The ongoing theme for the CATTCC endeavor is ‘the future of transportation floats’.

For mass transit system technology , the global leader in new mass transit via maglev technology is currently being implemented by Communist China. Japan is second with their efforts to make trains faster with maglev technology.

Other than mass transit, what advanced type of new transportation technology can be built to enable an efficient short-distance transportation vehicle? A type of vehicle that is more comfortable, faster, less expensive, safer, and easier to operate than a car? Over the couple past years, many CATTCC articles have explored theories and possibilities. CATTCC has been examining these ideas for new transportation technology, the discovery for advanced and sustainable transportation alternatives is imperative.

Where CATTCC is in levitation research

The first place to start is considering the article, Earth’s Electrostatic Charges : In the process of discovering a transportation device, there is question to be answered. What is the power to make a compass operate? The answer is two-fold. First, a power source is not required to operate a compass. Secondly, the answer acknowledges that the components of Earth’s internal composition and its atmospheric makeup; generate useable power. Earth’s core is theorized by sciencedirect.com as: the Earth's core is a nearly spherically symmetrical mass of electrically conducting material in which no current path is preferred.

Clearly, this addresses the acknowledgment that Earth’s composition is comprised of ferrous elements and magnetic action. All magnets affect ferrous elements. The presents of an electromagnetic field surrounding Earth is the corresponding reaction to many forms of Earth’s internal magnetic and electromagnetic action.

Nikola Tesla, and others, have shown that electrical power is accessible everywhere on Earth’s surface. For the past 100-years electronic devices use this medium. Nature displays great electric force in the atmosphere; using it is readily available.

The purpose of these CATTCC articles is to discover a methodology of interacting with Earth’s electromagnetic structure and possibly build a levitating device for transportation. Thus far, we see that levitation is molecular vibration . The several articles highlighting Viktor Grebennikov’s theory for Cavity Structures Effect, such as: Levitation, Solve for A+B , explore possibilities to design an apparatus that engages a way for transportation to engage Earth’s magnetosphere.

How is a floatation device possible

Answers are discovered by asking the correct questions. One of the important questions is found in the article: Extending CSE Research . The pertinent question is: does the negative charge of a CSE have the ability to interact with Earth’s atmospheric charge which can enable a transportation device to float and carry a load?

Referenced in that article is a quote from aetherforce.energy which gives mathematical support for CSEs. A quote from that article: Further, Zolotariov gives a formula for the locations of de Broglie wave maximums: D = 2L(N+1)2K, where L is the circumference of the tube, N is the harmonic number of the wave, and K is the number of the anti-node/maximum.

The importance of understanding CSEs is imperative for utilizing them as a source for motion. In another article, the quote from pdfcoffee was referred to. This is another analysis of Grebennikov’s work. The vehicle he’d supposedly built is explained but, also explains that nothing other than Grebennikov’s book remains in existence. This causes question if indeed his device ever existed. The one thing that remains is the legitimacy of CSEs.

CSEs are described as voids. A void in subatomic physics is empty; this could be considered a negative field or charge. The theory with principles of electrogravitics are different than principles of quantum physics, which is based on electromagnetics. The dielectric principles of electromagnetics are applied to electric currents and magnetics. A void in electrogravitics is an absence of gravity; it is a negative field. This principle is consistent with Viktor Schauberger’s observance of nature. A void would be similar to the properties found in space: empty; rather than the vacuum of a void.

Is there a way to interact the electrogravitic principles of CSEs to the electromagnetic charge in Earth’s atmosphere? A CSE would have to be interpreted as an electromagnetic charge of zero by Gauss's Law. Without a positive or a negative magnetic or electric charge to react to, there can be no electric or magnetic reaction. This would establish a negative electrogravitics reaction. Can this be interpreted by Earth’s electromagnetic fields? A zero measurement of Gauss’s Law would produce a zero electromagnetic reading. Logic dictates that this zero effect would be interpreted with a gravitational reaction.

Gravity is subatomic motion. A gravitational void represents a region unaffected by gravity’s tendencies. This presents opportunity. The questions that hold answers are in discovering a way to capture this interaction for a vehicle. This is a difficult task, encumbered by modern science's lack of study and research in electrogravitics .

One of the theories in subatomic physics postulates that particle mass is electrogravitic. That is, rather than quantum physics based upon electromagnetics, wherein orbital paths of particles rotate with positive and negative poles based on magnetism, electrogravitics is founded upon the principle of a particle's path being directed by the balance and rotation of its spin. This is in accordance with Einstein's Theory of Relativity, which states: the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling at light speed through the vastness of the universe. This declares that the speed of all things within the Milky Way Galaxy travel at light speed. This speed impacts the motion of particle mass and embraces the theory that the path of all particle mass is a linear twist: instead of orbital. Additionally, it supports string theory.

The goal of CATTCC is to investigate subatomic physics theory for transportation advances. CATTCC is pursuing the fundamentals of gravity, based on the theory: gravity is the angular momentum of a particle’s motion along its path at light speed.

This article series is another investigation into levitation for short distance vehicles. Since levitation is a process of vibration , the expectation is to discover a methodology to levitate a vehicle and have gravitational control for the vehicle.

How vehicles can levitate

When challenged with a difficult question, the best procedure is to find simplistic similarities. Given the task of finding solutions to enable a levitating vehicle, there are three: vibration, Earth’s atmosphere, and Earth’s core. Grebennikov’s CSEs can provide a platform. Earth’s core can provide a stable electromagnetic foundation. Earth’s atmosphere can provide a static reaction.

The next question: how do these three components react with each other in a manner that provides a platform, or device, to interact with each other and allows the platform, or device, to levitate? What are the simple similarities of these three components? They all have frequency signatures. The importance of frequency signatures is vibrational movement.

Philosophy and Societal Dilemma

Sat, 11 Jan 2025 05:51:53 GMT

Philosophy, societal dilemma, and transportation

photo credit: pexels.com

The practicality for a new mode of transportation is a result of social demand, this demand makes new types of transportation inevitable. How is this societal demand different than trends and fashion, which are a temporary mood of social conduct? The general public is often compared to a herd of sheep. People follow trends, it makes a thing popular. This isn’t written as a derogatory statement to provoke insult, every human on the planet is a member of the general public.

There is a question: what happens when there is no interest for a new mode of transportation? Although there is a demand to have a suitable mode of transportation to match society’s technological advances of the past 50 years, the public only produces expectation. The demand for change is detached from initiation by followers.

Is this a philosopher’s welcome to the world of pessimists? Not at all. It’s merely the way things are, if any change is to take place, it has to be initiated by those who have an idea about alternatives. Optimism is a choice, and yet there is a fear: nobody likes being wrong. Since so few people understand the symbiotic correlation between transportation and urban growth; the general public expects someone else to make societal course changes. The phrase, “Build it and they will come” is a popular movie line quote from many years ago; which appropriately shows the public attitude. Public includes government.

Society’s voice is a demand for more efficient short-distance transportation. This affects their everyday lifestyle. The transportation industry is relatively absent of funding availability for researching new modes of transportation. As a matter of fact, a new mode of transportation would render their industry obsolete. This means funding of transportation advances into researching new modes of transportation away from the automobile is detrimental to the auto industry and the entire economic structure of Western Society growth. While this prevalent attitude hampers research exploration, the blaring squeal of social demand for transportation’s change, provides motivation. It has to be recognized that market demand stimulates creativity. With this underlying motivation, money has a way of making things happen quicker.

The advance of technology to culture brings the phenomena of social media. Most of the social media chatter shows an inadequacy to generate interest about transportation advances for the creation of a new mode of transportation. The general response for mentioning transportation or the need for sustainable urban growth in a conversation: its boring. This topic produces very little entertainment value for amusement.

In today’s era of virtually unlimited information access, everyone is a genius, or so conveys the opportunity. Yet, with this unlimited knowledge, entire generations are perplexed by the engineering designs of a mere can opener.

Alas, Atlas shrugged.

There is nothing gained by expounding on futility. What stride can be made to discover a brand-new mode of short-distance transportation? One of the things to be recognized is that the social demand for transportation advances includes the cry of social concerns for sustainable urban growth. Its relevancy outweighs the fact of this being a topic without heighten amusement value.

Western society was built by the private sector. Transportation changes in building a new mode of transportation will be by the private sector. Challenges of invention include the social ambivalence with its lack of support. This doesn’t halt invention, just seems to make it move slower.

New innovation in transportation

Innovation for invention requires direction. The direction of CATTCC research is theoretical physics to provide the breakthroughs for new modes of transportation. This includes developing ultra-fast speeds for space travel and short-distance travel. Both include the manipulation of gravity.

Short-distance travel

What is the direction for exploring short-distance travel? Levitation. In a practical sense, this includes the manipulation of gravity. However, long-distance space travel requires a totally different application for using gravity.

In the blogpost, Developing the Theory for Levitation , the response is addressed to the question: what is levitation? Levitation is explained as an action of rapid oscillating motion . Even as an action of what appears as standing still, relativity is in a flow of motion. Inasmuch as a waterfall appears as a steady flow, it is a group of individual moving droplets engaged in Earth’s continual gravitational flow of motion.

How does gravitational motion relate to levitation? Levitation is the oscillation of molecules. It is sort of an amplification of gravity’s angular momentum. A resonance of molecular action within a field.

There are other aspects to short-distance transportation with the use of gravity. Earth’s atmosphere is filled with particles of mass, albeit gases. How can these particles be applied to levitation? The only answer is with knowing the simplicity of nature. Although nature is simplistic, its intricacies are extremely complex, not complicated. Viktor Schauberger discovered that nature is centripetal. Its motion is counterclockwise.

In the blogpost, Earth’s Electrostatic Charge ; it suggests that the connection of Earth’s internal magnetic core, and its electromagnetically charged atmosphere, provide components necessary to be used for a magnetic action. Clearly, this addresses the acknowledgment that Earth’s composition is comprised of ferrous elements and magnetic action. All magnets affect ferrous elements. The presents of an electromagnetic field surrounding Earth is the corresponding reaction to many forms of Earth’s internal magnetic and electromagnetic action.

This raises the plausibility for vehicle designs that levitate.

Having the knowledge from Schauberger, that nature is filled with patterns of flow with currents and eddy’s, this also applies to magnetic currents and flow. It indicates magnetic flow similar to streams, rivers, and the wind. This suggests magnetic intensities to be consistent along certain pathways.

Several blogposts have examined other areas for potential floatation vehicle solutions. The consistent methodology found in CATTCC research is with levitation. The blogpost: Using Air for Levitation explores this concept. It makes the statement: Earth’s electrostatic field is identified as a potential source for magnetic action. Magnets repel and attract. Earth’s core is magnetic. This magnetic action has the ability to repel and attract. Grebennikov’s levitating device utilizes the CSE as a negative charge. Against Earth’s positive electrostatic charge, Grebennikov’s levitating device has attraction potential.

Viktor Grebennikov is said to have built a floatation device. He was a Russian entomologist, and artist; who discovered the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) in the 1980s. His theory for CSE’s was developed from discoveries of bug wings and wasp nests. He discovered these CSE’s are voids. In the blogpost: Levitation: Solve for a+b it describes these voids as a negative field.

There are several CATTCC blogposts examining his proposed technology. These writings show viable possibilities for utilizing Grebennikov’s technology to explore building a levitating vehicle device.

Conclusion

The honest way to accurately describe society’s behavior is determined by one’s philosophical perspective. Patterns of action that are classified by chart numbering are predetermined by those assembling the chart groups. To a certain degree, there are indeed similarities, however, of the 8 billion people currently living on Earth, each person has a unique fingerprint, their own favorite color, and thoughts that no one else can know.

So it is also in determining what choices a person makes in their freedom for spiritual theology. Conditioning a person for lifestyle choice is selected by social behavior. How is this a part of transportation? Land-use design plays a large role in determining social condition.

Part Three in Physics Theory

Sun, 05 Jan 2025 21:04:16 GMT

Finding transportation solutions with physics

photo credits: pexels.com

For the past several decades, transportation has been unable to find a new mode of transportation. There’s a saying in the world of common sense: ‘you can’t find what you’re not looking for.’ The search for a new mode of transportation lacks pursuit. There is an avid pursuit in politics pushing the word sustainability. This huge effort has achieved changing the meaning of words connected to green. This political effort has done little to make any substantial change to transportation.

To the argument that defends electric cars. The offence to that argument is the word ‘cars’ in describing electric cars. Cars are still unsustainable, even though the motors are different. They’re designed to fit into the unsustainable nature of its automobile centric land-use design. There are certain advantages to a car with a different motor, however, the automobile is fundamentally unchanged.

How are new modes of transportation discovered

Innovation begins with new ideas. When the automobile adapts new technologies from other industries and makes change in an automobile’s body style, it’s a modification. A car is still a car. Same with rockets and airplanes. Bigger engines and structural modifications keep the antiquated modes of transportation relevant to its fundamental purpose.

Transportation innovation to new modes of transportation requires a vehicle that doesn’t exist yet. The technology remains unknown. Such innovation for the transportation industry could be a vehicle that floats. Floatation is totally different than flying. A floating vehicle would require gravity manipulation. Its source for motion would require an additional type of energy to be manifested.

Modern scientific academia continues chasing nuances of quantum mechanics. This is useful for delving into digitization in virtual mechanization. Yet, the physical moving in transportation, physics needs the blending from the practicality of cause and effect, found in classic physics. The biggest barrier to the physics of quantum mechanics is similar to Isaac Newton’s mechanics of gravity. His equations explained the effects of gravity but, his explanations failed to describe what gravity is. Again, the practicality of classic physics is cause and effect. The what it is; is equally important to know, as how it affects other objects.

What innovation brings a transportation technology into becoming the next paradigm of technological and inventive growth? Perspective is an important part of invention. Since the practicality of classic physics led the era of industrial revolution, and quantum mechanics introduced the era of digitalization; it makes sense to adapt classic principles to the perspective in quantum physics. Gravity remains a mystery to quantum theory.

With this perspective, Nikola Tesla is said to be the father of modern technology. His principles are foundational to much of modern technology. His theories are still valid. He practiced in the motion of cause and effect.

The tendency in modern education is to copy the thoughts from others and repeat. This stifles innovation.

Transportation requires motion. Virtual mechanics moves infinitesimally small particles. This leads to conclude; there is a need for a new perspective in classical physics. This begins with a new theory that gravity is an action of particle motion. It’s explained as the angular momentum of particle mass in its ‘orbit’ as it travels a linear path at the speed of light.

Where to look

One of the perspectives is The Casimir Effect ; an attractive force between two surfaces in a vacuum. The Wikipedia version explains: When the scope of the physics is widened to include gravity, the interpretation of this formally infinite quantity remains problematic. There is currently no compelling explanation as to why it should not result in a cosmological constant that is many orders of magnitude larger than observed. ^[22] However, since we do not yet have any fully coherent quantum theory of gravity , there is likewise no compelling reason as to why it should instead actually result in the value of the cosmological constant that we observe. ^[23]

There is a new theory that explains what gravity is. It’s found here: ‘ A Study in Gravity ’. Since it is CATTCC’s claim that the future of transportation floats, the manipulation of gravity is a necessity to understand. With this, it has to be pointed out that the mission of CATTCC is advancing transportation technology in discovering a brand-new mode of transportation. The mission of pursuing theoretical claims of physics principles isn’t as important as is the intense need for developing transportation advances.

The demand for a new mode of sustainable transportation solutions is immediate. Innovation for a transportation apparatus is in two distinct arenas; short-distance, and long-distance.

What direction can innovation with a different scientific perspective take the transportation industry? The immediate response is to efficient transportation methodologies. As CATTCC continually states: the future of transportation floats, its method of motion is with the manipulation of gravity. This statement has the possibility of validity with a new understanding of what gravity is.

Invention requires innovation. In the transportation industry, the aspect of innovation that restricts advance is our incomprehension of perception. The three modes of modern technology: train, automobile and airplane were all a product of mankind’s intellect 100 to 200 years ago. Building on those modes is all that happened over the past 100 years. As a comparison with transportation that preceded today’s transportation, modern day saddles for horses are indeed more advanced but, the horses are still the same.

The phrase, ‘incomprehension of perception’ goes much further than a restriction to innovation. Philosophically, this is an attitude of mindset. It’s also a teaching mechanism. It affects schooling at all levels, as well as theology. A lot of what holds us back is our incomprehension of perception. To fully use the power within the capacity of our mind, is to perceive. As says the great motivational teachers, perceive and receive. Belief is from the heart. True perception is knowing. Out of the heart, this is the understanding of growth. The heart is where art is created. Our concern in this blogpost is limited to invention within the transportation industry.

Simplicity

The way of nature is simplicity. The most notable genius in modern time to understanding nature was Viktor Schauberger . One of his discoveries was that all of nature moves in the pattern of centripetal force. He discovered that riverbeds follow specific patterns. Plant life, even the leaves fallen from trees influence this pattern. Additionally, the movement of trees and plants create frequencies with eddy’s which influence the molecules of gases in the atmosphere, producing water from the sky. Nature is a cycle.

Another of Viktor Schauberger’s quotes: ‘study and copy nature’. The synchronicity with nature can produce more than efforts opposing it. This is most applicable to transportation. Every modern vehicle in the transportation industry opposes nature. As Schauberger said: modern transportation uses centrifugal force. To obtain greater speeds and efficient energy use, transportation has to work with nature; instead of opposing nature. Scientific study in theoretical quantum physics, practice incongruous efforts toward the destructive separation of particle mass. This destructive methodology provides only the examination of centrifugal force. This is inadequate in producing efficient motion for transportation. Heat is an action of friction. Friction is resistance. Motion with centripetal force create cold.

The blogpost about John Searl , has this: In his paper on Searl Technology , Julio Gobbi describes the operational concept of John Searl’s Levity Disc. “It is based on the atmospheric pressure gradient caused by the air ionization around the device as a result of the high-voltage electrostatic field developed between the plates and the periphery of the device. The movement and separation of atmospheric electrostatic charges caused by the translation and rotation of the rollers provides a low-pressure envelope that can be used for thrust.”

He then goes on to say: “The magnetic propulsion system works by the principle of controlling the force of the terrestrial gravitational field through the repulsion between the magnetic field created in the center of the equipment and the vertical component of the terrestrial magnetic field.” In a simple way, Gobbi explains that the magnetic field generated in the center of the equipment will react as attraction or repulsion with the terrestrial magnetic field; as a relational component of the device's weight.

Conclusion

This blogpost is yet another piece in laying the groundwork for exploration into efficient transportation. The process of discovering and building a brand-new mode of transportation is more than a simple task. It requires a perspective change. The view requires looking into particle mass at the speed of light. Then conceptualizing a manner of how to arrange molecular structure of objects that can flow within that pattern. The objective is to build a device for a vehicle that operates with an energy pulsation to synchronize and control that frequency flow.

Thus far, it’s a quiet conversation. The arena for possibilities is huge. The demand for a social change in transportation is intense.

Perspective provides answers for questions in places one would not usually search. In Christ Jesus’ sermon on the mount, He illustrates how nature moves. “Observe the lilies of the field, how they grow: they do not labor nor do they spin.” The illustration was a description about the unnecessity for of worrying about the cloths we wear but, it points to how nature operates. The perspective here repeats nature’s simplicity: a flower exerts no work to produce a flower, it merely follows the path of nature. So it should be with a transportation device to rely on nature for its motion.

Theory for Fast Space Speed

Sat, 28 Dec 2024 19:11:35 GMT

More theories for ultra-fast space travel

photo credit, lower picture: ufo, Freepik

This writing follows the preceding article’s subject of quantum physics. The preceding post posed a question about sound vibration and light: can energy be generated in an unconventional manner for transportation; to affect gravity or levitation? This can be updated to a more specific question: can a different methodology of transportation be found: other than propulsion?

There are examples of limited levitation with sound. Levitation by sound frequencies are restricted to a mass contained within a field, between two transmission points. This presents the same physics conundrum as jumping in air and holding your feet up with your hands to remain airborne.

Discovering a brand-new mode of transportation requires a method of transportation unknown to current transportation.

Technological advance

The search for significant new technology discoveries in transportation necessitate exploration into energy motion.

The most significant paragraph of the preceding article was the supposition that within the perspective of classical physics, the smallest portion of particle mass is a tetrahedron. It also postulates that a tetrahedron’s path follows the course of an eight-pointed mobius. Since all particles flow throughout the universe at the speed of light, this conglomeration of particle flow is modulated in harmonious balance.

As a function of this massive harmonious action, it follows that the angular movement of each particle along its eight-pointed mobius path; is gravity.

To create a device to serve as a transportation vehicle, it’s CATTCC’s supposition that the same structural design of particle mass can be amplified to multiples in larger size; and the same principles can be applied.

The concept is to replicate nature, as Schauberger specifies. Build a very large tetrahedron, exact and balanced. Balance is the key component to Keely’s sympathetic streams to mimic nature. The purpose of this action is to increase vehicle speed for ultra-fast space travel.

In the article, John Searl Magnetics , the discussion explores his frictionless generator:

The Searl Effect Generator operates on the principle of using an exact amount of molecular mass with their specific elemental atomic weight in a layered formation. The rollers and rings provide a reservoir, a gate, magnetic, and emitter. Every square represents a quantity of material. The key to the generator producing electricity is electrons and magnetic fields.

In building a generator, either the magnetic field rotates or the conductor rotates. In the Searl Effect Generator, the magnets are aligned at right angles to each other, both the roller and the plates have independent magnetic fields. One vertical, the other radial from the center to the rim. The intersection of these fields produces a wave that carries the roller around the ring.

The Searl Effect is the intersection of two magnetic fields creating a magnetic wave that can be measured and amplified. The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) uses magnetic fields to induce a flow of electrons from a rare earth element through a system of rotating magnetized components so that those electrons can be collected, compressed, used and recycled. The compression is in the creation of a magnetic field on the plate. The roller literally flies around the plate surface without physical contact.

As a result of John Searl’s early work, he found that the high voltage and magnetic effect produced levitating capability. He named this a Gyro-flywheel high energy-density mechanical magnetic device, which he renamed: The Levity Disc. With high pressure pushing down upon the SEG, it essentially overloads and produces extremely high voltage. This causes the device to become extremely cold and negatively interacts with Earth’s gravitational field. As its reaction, the device is then subject to ether and at zero-point energy. It then is capable of flight.

One of the relevant points in his technology is that the faster the generator spun, the colder it became. This reveals: energy efficiency is the lack of thermodynamic loss. In re-reading his work, the statement: “using an exact amount of molecular mass with their specific elemental atomic weight in a layered formation” correlates with the balance of nature.

In a realistic consideration for excessively fast speed, linear speed is imperative. Expending energy in a rotational direction of spin for the purpose of propulsion is improper energy use, or wasted energy. Rotational energy for momentum buildup could be beneficial for energy bursts or pulsations.

Finding fast speed for space travel

In laying out the consideration for design, the first question: how are these principles to be used as linear motion for transportation? How can a tetrahedron shaped ship be built to travel in a rotational motion? The answer is that it travels along a linear path in the ribbon pattern of an eight-pointed mobius linear direction.

How to transform the elliptical spin of a rotational body into a linear direction? Any suggestions? Balance.

Is a concept of the slingshot David used against Goliath is a possibility? The slingshot effect held a mass in a single rotation, then release the mass, hurling towards its target. This design methodology seems valid for exploration.

In a practical engineering sense for design, how can a vehicle be configured to apply the massive speed of particle motion be designed for a vehicle?

Einstein theorized the Milky Way galaxy is traveling at light speed. Additionally, he theorized energy is light speed squared. This indicates that to accelerate a vehicle beyond normal speed, energy has to be employed. This needed acceleration can be best used by exercising energy to match nature’s motion. CATTCC maintains that an explosion force to reach incredibly fast speed, is inefficient for ultra-fast transportation. Synchronicity of mass has to be employed.

In stimulating more to the conversation; as a geometric conceptualization, Keely describes sympathetic streams with frequencies in the ratio 3: 6: 9. This rotational motion is imperative for exploration. This relates to a directed electromagnetic pulsation, to generate rotational momentum.

In building an ultra-fast space travel vehicle, all energy forces exerted; have to be contained within the field of the vehicle. Any exertion of energy force, such as a chemical or nuclear action would require that energy release to have its action interpreted as centripetal. Such reaction could conceivably be directed into a linear type rotational pattern. Engineering a device to interpret the explosive 360-degree energy into a rotational linear pattern requires a multi-dimensional perception.

This is where Keely’s theory of sympathetic frequency streams is studied. The question is how to layout a configuration of arranging a tetrahedron’s balance of mass to follow the pattern of an eight-pointed mobius and initiating the rotational direction to a linear path. The perspective is seen as a ribbon course.

This perspective is supported by the theory that the smallest portion of particle mass is a tetrahedron. It also is in consideration that a tetrahedron’s path follows the course of an eight-pointed mobius. Since all particles flow throughout the universe at the speed of light, this conglomeration of particle flow is modulated in harmonious balance.

Applying theory to speed

In applying the tetrahedron shape to a space craft, its centripetal spin rotation a becomes a linear course direction of trajectory.

The interior of such a ship design would have to be similar to the Otis Carr design. His ship design was comprised of three sections which produced an independent inertia. The article: Inertia and Neural Control mentions this: What’s the difference between momentum and inertia? Momentum and inertia are often confused due to their similar definitions. Momentum is the force or speed of movement, while inertia is the resistance offered by a body to the motion.

Another article asked an important question. How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? The answer goes to explain the design of Otis Carr’s ship. It’s theoretically possible for Otis Carr’s ship to have maintained an independent inertia field within the ship’s control section. The two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. Theoretically, this gives the ship an independent inertia field ability to travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

Conclusion

There are answers for ultra-fast space flight. It requires the application of classical physics with synchronal frequencies.

Deep Dive Into Quantum Physics

Thu, 19 Dec 2024 02:12:41 GMT

Discoveries to find a brand-new mode of transportation

What direction is needed to establish a transportation vehicle for the future? Where is the discovery that finds a brand-new mode of transportation?

Two different technologies are necessary, a short-distance transportation device and a long-distance transportation vehicle device. At this point, it appears they will use different technologies. Current indications suggest, short distance will use levitation. The same indicators show long distance space travel will use gravity. The exploration for discovery seeks solutions.

The formula for transportation evolution begins in unexpected places. The place to discover a completely new mode of transportation, is to search in places unlike current transportation methods. All modern transportation uses propulsion. To address the mindset that there isn’t anything other than propulsion; what else is there? The answer is found in physics.

Quantum physics

In creating something new, this deep dive exploration is into theories of quantum physics. The primary direction for this research is the makeup of matter, which reveals the simplicity of nature’s complexity. The arena of quantum physics this article looks at, pursues the theory that all matter follows a specific path. It postulates that the smallest configuration of matter is a tetrahedron (except its edges are curved instead of straight as in this drawing):

In studying theory of classical physics, the work of John Worrell Keely, (1827-1898) regarding sympathetic streams in the ratio 3:6:9, are among investigation. His work is based on this principle: “Those whose relative frequencies are 3:9, are mutually attractive, while those having the relation of 6:9, are mutually repellant.” The website https://svpwiki.com/369 is an exploration of his findings.

In mathematical exploration of these relationships, is it a valid premise to use base three, six, or nine? Most likely base 9 to correspond with the path of particle mass in its full rotation.

This study follows theory regarding balance flow of the tetrahedron for motion. One key point of transportation interest is that Otis Carr used his Utron as the square, circle, cone; for movement in a centripetal motion for his ship to spin. Along this principle, it recognizes that all matter moves in a unified motion. A molecule follows the same pattern. In this perspective, it is of great interest that Mercury is a dense metal that flows as a liquid at room temperature.

When molecular structure is combined similar to the configuration of Otis Carr’s Utron, the balance in that structure is the 3:9 frequency. This pattern maintains the frequency of a large tetrahedron necessary for spin balance of momentum in transportation. This relates to the smallest shape of an element’s mass as a balance function of its path. Again, this perspective is aligned with the theory that the path of particle mass is its specific eight-pointed mobius pattern on a ribbon type linear course to follow its centripetal action at the speed of light.

How does a vehicle follow this course? In considering Otis Carr and Nikola Tesla’s technology, plus the concept of Keely’s frequency patterns, the question arises: Is the math application for considering the value of these frequencies base 10? Would the values change if the math application be, either base, 3, 6, or 9? (Reference: https://mathcenter.oxford.emory.edu/site/math125/bases/ for numbers in different bases.) Or, the application could be base 12. Twelve represents spacetime. Again, base 9 seems most appropriate.

According to Keely’s sympathetic vibratory frequencies theory, subatomic balance is 3 parts as a whole for motion. 2 parts for charges, 3rd for the centering balance point. 9 is for the particle’s path of the 8-pointed mobius, with the 9 ^th point connecting to the next frequency pattern.

Philosophy extending into theology

One of the scientists basing his work on Keely’s work was Walter Russell. His work was unorthodox to conventional science, yet, he was a man of great accomplishments. His perspective of theology was also controversial. Here is a quote:

"Thus the One Light of God's knowing extended to the two of His thinking , pulsed as the three of all creating things, the One centering the two , the two extended from the One ; the Spirit ; the Father-Mother polarity of Light ; the Trinity centering the shaft of Creations' seeming, fulcrum of its heart beat, all ONE ." [ Walter Russell , The Secret of Light , page 99]

This leans to include the sign of the yin/yang and the centering line. This whole is an action of 3 pieces.

In theoretical physics, the balance of nature to quantum physics is similar to the outer lines of the tetrahedron that are not straight lines but, slightly curve, as the smallest size of atomic matter. This is an accounting for the rapid rotation in the structure of particle mass moving along its path at light speed.

In accordance to theologically in Christianity; the one GOD, Christ Jesus the son, and the Spirit; as the perimeter of the two.

Other sources

James Clerk Maxwell , "9 coefficients determine the relationship between flux and intensity , of these coefficients form 3 pairs of equal quantities
3 pairs of equal coefficients will self-conjugate ."

Genero-Radiative Concept , ‘Two-Way Consciousness’ "These poles are so perfect in their workings, and so sensitive, that if a child throws a ball on this planet, every mass in the universe adjusts itself immediately to the changing position of that ball. The element of time does not enter into this effect of motion for it is universally simultaneous. Every mass in every system has an orderly and progressive change of position for its poles which are controlled from space by like poles, of which they are but the extensions. The spatial poles are also extensions of an infinite number of extensions, which have their focal point in the One universal equilibrium from which all polarized force extends as the appearance of two forces. One extension of the divided One Force controls all of the charging effects which accumulates energy gravitatively, by employing that centripetal, contractive attribute which is the electric endothermic inhalation of the One Force . The other extension controls all of the discharging effects which distributes energy radiationally, by employing that centrifugal expansive attribute which is the magnetic, exothermic exhalation of the living One Force."

369 = Powers of 2 and Volumes

Keely goes onto explain: One of the basic fundamentals of vibration is the formation of its octave or doubling of frequency and simultaneous halving of its wave length. These features are functions of 2 (multiplication) and its reciprocal 1/2 (division).

One of the basic fundamentals of sound or energy is manifesting as (geometric) volume - a function of cubing (n^3).

Merging these two fundamental principles we arrive at a series of cubes derived from powers of two.

One of the points to noticing here is the reference to energy and sound. Sound is only an applicable thing, when in an existing atmosphere. i.e. it is a process in an accumulation of gases or other elements. It has a chain reaction effect. Similarly, this is noticeably in contrast of light.

So where is the reactionary process of energy that provides the sound that differentiates from light waves? In what other dimensions are the energy reactions revealed? What other aspects of energy? Radiation. Where are the other senses of life employed?

Before getting lost in questions regarding sound vibration and light, a relevant question can bring us to the focus of study. Can energy be generated in some other manner for transportation to affect gravity or levitation?

Let’s take another quote from Keely: Every mass is an aggregation of molecules each having its " neutral center " wherein are equated its component forces consisting of the three fundamental modes of vibration . The balanced activity of these vibrations at the " neutral center " without diminution of force , makes possible the permanence of form and matter .

Since the continuity of existence of all molecules and all masses depends on the three fundamental component modes of vibration being held in balance at the " neutral center " it follows that certain orders of vibration can, by their influence on this neutral center , break the balanced equation , divide the components of the molecules , and therefore divide the components of the mass . [ PERMANENCE OF FORM AND MATTER ]

That train of thought concludes with this:

As every mass consists of vibrations in thirds , balanced in harmonic equilibrium without cancellation or diminution of energy, it stands therefore in harmonic relation to every other mass . All forms of matter and of motion are thus interrelated and interchangeable. Through resonance , increasing this sympathy , we can control the states of matter . [ Snell Manuscript - the book ]

Conclusion

A temporary conclusion to keep this post short: it can be surmised that Keely’s supposition supports the theory that the structure of particle mass is founded upon the motion of balance. And, the flow of frequency is based on balance.

It is the supposition of CATTCC, that this balance is predicated on the fundamental structure of particle mass as the tetrahedron. Hence, in postulating that the smallest component of particle mass is comprised of a tetrahedron, and its path is the course of an eight-pointed mobius, it can be seen that the tetrahedron’s path is modulated in a harmonious balance. It follows that this angular movement along its path is gravity.

To create a device or transportation vehicle, it is CATTCC’s opinion that the same structural design can be amplified to a larger size; and the same principles can be applied. This is the theory. And, just as much as Newton’s Laws of Motion are a theory, postulations are subject to question.

Technology for Future Transportation

Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:32:36 GMT

What is the technology for the future of transportation?

photo credits: pexels/pixabay

What will the technology be for the future of transportation? It’s found with the manipulation of gravity.

Gravity

Previous blogposts have critically pointed out that the transportation industry’s interest is only in expanding existing technology. This perpetuates the energy waste of chemical explosions. Where’s the rational in claiming that transportation’s future will be based on the principles of gravity?

Basic physics shows that gravity holds the ability to be unfettered by the principles of thermodynamic loss. Pursuing this unexplored area of physics provides opportunities for the transportation industry.

First, by manipulating gravity, understanding the fundamentals of gravity, it has the possibility to become the most efficient form of motion for transportation. Secondly, by asking the question: what are the thermodynamic principles of gravity; the question is addressed by the scientific community in stating: ‘the concept of the first law of thermodynamics for gravity is a topic of ongoing research and debate in the fields of theoretical physics and cosmology.’

Thermodynamic description of gravity

‘Research has demonstrated that the Einstein field equations can be rewritten in the form of the first law of thermodynamics for isotropic and homogeneous universes with any spatial curvature parameter. This thermodynamic description of gravity has been explored in various contexts, including de Sitter and power-law solutions.

The thermodynamic description of gravity is a theoretical framework that attempts to explain gravity as an emergent phenomenon arising from the thermodynamic properties of spacetime. This perspective is rooted in the idea that gravity is not a fundamental force, but rather a consequence of the collective behavior of microscopic degrees of freedom.’

When exploring theoretical practices of gravity and thermodynamics, entropy and spacetime enter the conversation.

Entropic gravity

In 2009, theoretical physicist, Erik Verlinde, proposed a theory for entropic gravity. It proposes that gravity arises from the entropic force associated with the position information of matter. This theory has been shown to be consistent with the first law of thermodynamics, where the energy of a system is conserved, but the entropy increases.

Entropic gravity is explained in Wikipedia as: Entropic gravity, also known as emergent gravity, is a theory in modern physics that describes gravity as an entropic force —a force with macro-scale homogeneity but which is subject to quantum-level disorder—and not a fundamental interaction . The theory, based on string theory , black hole physics, and quantum information theory , describes gravity as an emergent phenomenon that springs from the quantum entanglement of small bits of spacetime information. As such, entropic gravity is said to abide by the second law of thermodynamics under which the entropy of a physical system tends to increase over time.

The theory has been controversial within the physics community but has sparked research and experiments to test its validity.

Nonequilibrium thermodynamics

‘Nonequilibrium thermodynamics has been explored in the context of gravity, particularly at the apparent horizon. This framework introduces an auxiliary term corresponding to entropy production, which appears due to the nonequilibrium nature of the system.’

Quantum Spacetime and Finite Area

Quantum spacetime ‘In the context of quantum gravity and loop quantum gravity (LQG), is the concept of quantum spacetime which refers to a discrete, granular structure replacing the continuous spacetime of classical general relativity. This discreteness is a consequence of the quantization of spacetime, where the fundamental units of area and volume are finite.’

Gravity theory

The CATTCC theory for gravity supports the string theory model of particle mass. Its theory of gravity coincides with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, which claims that all matter is moving at light speed. This new theory of gravity, aligned with the theory of all mass; moving at light speed, nullifies the model of matter holding elliptical orbits. This new theory of gravity postulates that all matter, as moving at light speed; is linear. This linear movement follows unified wave motions. It postulates a specific path of linear movement. Within this theory, gravity is identified as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path.

This new theory of gravity validates possibilities of manipulating gravity for transportation.

Areas of gravity exploration

Inasmuch as research is at the primary level, exploration through trial and error is inevitable. Is there a possibility for gravity waves and surfing those waves as a method of transportation? This is explored in several blogposts, specifically Gravity Surfboard :

The CATTCC research continues to point in the direction of Viktor Schauberger and his view of nature. All nature is centripetal. A surfboard allows the rider to follow the ocean’s centripetal motion.

With gravity being the angular momentum of particle mass at light speed, it would be impossible to paddle a surfboard fast enough to ride a gravity wave. An electromagnetic switch, however, can alternate a non-mechanical movement at variable speeds. This type of switch could regulate a very fast frequency change.

In riding a surfboard, there are people able to stand on a surfboard in a river with a strong current, stabilizing themselves with a stationary rope; like a skier. The concept of surfing gravity waves is thought provoking. The tangibility of such would require an apparatus that produces the amplification of a gravity wave; then a means of riding it.

Another possibility is with the creation of a gravity generator. Spin amplifies motion. In the blogpost, What and How , the topic of a gravity generator was discussed:

Focusing on the gravity generator, we look at the operation of an electricity generator. The principal of an electricity generator operates on of electromagnetic induction , which means an electric current passes through a magnetic field. When the current passes through the flux, or flow of, a magnetic field, a commutator regulates switching of the current between a positive or negative magnetic sinewave moment. An electricity generator is based on electrostatic principles, using moving electrically charged belts, plates, and disks that carry charge to a high potential electrode. The charge is generated using either of two mechanisms: electrostatic induction or the triboelectric effect .

When a straight conductor is moved in a magnetic field, current is induced in the conductor, resulting in the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy. Electromagnetic induction is defined as the process in which a conductor is fixed in a particular position and the magnetic field keeps varying or instead the magnetic field is stationary and the conductor keeps moving.

In all the CATTCC blogposts regarding the manipulation of gravity for transportation, there is a conclusion. There are two areas of distinction: short-distance travel and long-distance travel, which includes space flight. Short-distance transportation is more compatible with a levitating vehicle device. Gravity based transportation is more applicable to long-distance travel. The CATTCC blogposts are differentiated into these two distinctively different areas.

Space travel

Long-distance travel requires deeper research into the physics of how this new theory of gravity can be used for launching space travel vehicles. Part of this direction of research is examined in several CATTCC blogposts. The only possibility for space travel is with a thorough and practical approach in understanding physics. This must include following the centripetal flow and attractive nature of gravity.

According to NASA, the closest habitual planet is 2,700 light years from Earth. Light travels at 186,000 one hundred eighty-six thousand miles per second. There are 31,536,000 seconds per year. Traveling at lightspeed is 5,865,696,000,000 (five trillion, eight hundred sixty-five billion, six hundred ninety-six million) miles per year (figures are approximate). That’s 15,837,379,200,000,000 (fifteen quadrillion, eight hundred thirty-seven trillion, three hundred seventy-nine billion, two hundred million) miles away. Matching light speed is inadequate to explore deep space.

Theoretical physics

For those who would balk at this huge number, consider what one ampere of electricity is: 1 A = 6.241509074 × 10^18 e/s. For those without a physics, engineering, or electrical work knowledge; one amperage is a standard electrical unit of measurement. It represents a volume of 624,150,907,400,000,000 (six hundred twenty-four quadrillion, one hundred fifty trillion, nine hundred seven billion, four hundred billion) electrons passing a single point per second.

How can such a large number per second exist? Einstein simplified energy to its simplest mathematical explanation. This number represent the Milky Way Galaxy traveling through the universe at the speed of light. Larger bodies of mass are merely molecular combinations of smaller particles following the same path at light speed. The string theory of particle physics partially identifies the motion of particle mass. By knowing the specific path of particle mass, its path can be predicted, even at light speed.

The post: What Space Exploration Requires , lists the necessary speeds to explore the extreme distance of miles in deep space. A decent speed needed to travel in space is appropriately defined in Einstein’s definition of energy.

Following Einstein’s famous mathematical statement in his Theory of Relativity: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. Multiplying the speed of light squared, without being multiplied by mass, is 34,596,000,000 (thirty-four billion, five-hundred ninety-six million) miles per second. Times 31,536,000 seconds per year, says that traveling at lightspeed squared, the miles traveled in a year is 1,091,019,456,000,000,000 (one quintillion, ninety-one quadrillion, nineteen trillion, four hundred fifty-six billion) miles per year.

Mathematically, this indicates that by traveling at the speed of lightspeed squared, reaching the closest planet that might possibly maintain life, could be reached in about eight months.

Conclusion

This post emphasizes that the importance of space travel is in finding faster speeds. CATTCC empathetically recommends gravity as having the means and ability to do so.

Green Growth

Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:03:16 GMT

Green Growth: Effective Strategies for Building an Eco-Friendly Business Model

In an era characterized by climate awareness and ecological responsibilities, the blueprint for business triumph is evolving. Savvy entrepreneurs recognize that sustainability is not just an environmental obligation but a powerful driver of innovation and differentiation in a crowded market. Embracing eco-friendly business models offers a win-win scenario: enhancing your brand’s appeal while fulfilling ecological commitments.

Empowering Teams to Champion Sustainability

Involving your team in sustainability initiatives can significantly enhance your organization’s commitment to eco-friendly practices. By providing employees with the right training and resources , you empower them to advocate for sustainable practices. Encouraging their active participation enables them to contribute meaningfully to sustainability programs, boosting their enthusiasm and dedication. This inclusive approach not only embeds sustainability throughout your organization but also fosters a collective commitment to green goals.

Building Community Engagement Through Social Media

Social media offers a dynamic platform to engage your customers in your sustainability journey. By launching interactive challenges or polls with a unique hashtag , you can effectively promote your eco-friendly initiatives while building a sense of community. Encouraging followers to share their tips on reducing carbon footprints or post eco-friendly meal ideas can amplify your impact and strengthen relationships with your audience. Partnering with environmental organizations on platforms like Instagram and Facebook can broaden your reach and showcase your commitment to sustainability, resonating with socially conscious consumers.

Embracing Circular Economy Models

To truly embrace sustainability, consider adopting circular economy models that focus on extending product life cycles and minimizing waste. By prioritizing designs that emphasize reusability and recyclability, your business can keep products in circulation longer, reducing environmental impact. Implementing strategies such as upcycling, remanufacturing, and participating in second-hand markets can significantly enhance resource efficiency. Transitioning towards a zero-waste model not only conserves resources but also positions your business as a leader in sustainable practices, aligning with modern consumer preferences for eco-friendly products.

Elevating Your Expertise Through an Online Degree

The importance of a business degree includes sharpening your skills in business and marketing. Whether you pursue a degree in marketing, business, communications, or management, the knowledge you gain can empower your sustainable business to thrive. Online degree programs offer the flexibility needed to manage your business while advancing your education simultaneously.

Maximizing Asset Lifespan and Efficiency

Implementing a predictive maintenance strategy can greatly extend the lifespan and efficiency of your assets, reducing downtime and repair costs. By leveraging advanced technologies like machine learning and real-time data analytics, you can monitor equipment health and predict potential failures, allowing for timely interventions. This proactive approach not only maintains asset reliability but also optimizes performance and reduces environmental impact.

Innovating with Product Lifecycle Analysis

Utilizing a product lifecycle assessment (LCA) is crucial for developing environmentally sustainable products and promoting effective recycling processes. By evaluating each stage of a product’s life , from design to disposal, you gain a comprehensive view of its environmental impact. This holistic approach can identify opportunities to reduce emissions and waste. Incorporating sustainability in product development not only enhances your brand image but also fosters customer loyalty by demonstrating a commitment to ecological responsibility.

Rewarding Green Choices with Loyalty Programs

Green loyalty programs are an excellent way to incentivize customers to make environmentally friendly purchasing decisions. Offering rewards like discounts for eco-conscious choices not only boosts customer satisfaction but also aligns your brand with the values of a growing segment of consumers. By aligning your marketing strategy with sustainability efforts, you enhance your brand reputation and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Harnessing the power of eco-conscious innovation is more than just a trend; it’s the heart of a sustainable future. By weaving sustainability into the fabric of your business model, you’re not just addressing today’s ecological challenges, but you’re also pioneering a legacy of responsible business practices. Let your business be the catalyst that spurs a movement towards a greener, more sustainable economy where environmental stewardship and economic success walk hand in hand.

CATTCC comment : This blogpost was put together by Brenda Kirby. The CATTCC policy is an open format where opinions are able to be voiced. CATTCC does not endorse political agendas, including those of green politics. Rather CATTTCC employs the common sense methods of sustainability through the subscription with nature. The CATTCC mission is to engage publicly regarding sustainable transportation. Since transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, sustainable transportation is of great importance.

CATTCC gladly welcomes transportation related guest posts, we encourage non-AI written pieces.

Implementing Tomorrows Transportation

Sun, 08 Dec 2024 05:24:22 GMT

Implementing tomorrows transportation requires brand-new technology

photo credits: pexels.com

What will it take to replace cars and rockets? It requires innovative research for energy efficient vehicles. Cars and rockets are vehicles that oppose efficient energy use. The challenge is the process of maintaining the status-quo in patterns of human thought.

These next two paragraphs are editorializing. When a new idea is proposed, holding a totally revolutionary concept, it’s referred to as disruptive. Market change is incremental. In the transportation industry, the concept of magnetic levitation (maglev) technology is unanimously accepted as a practical approach for transit. With the mystery of entrenched moral turpitude for political procedure in free countries, it’s curious as to why the only country in the world that has implemented maglev technology into public transit is Communist China. The rest of the world is either too poor or too heavily involved in the corruption of incestuous bureaucratic procedure; maintaining its status-quo.

Many new transportation ideas get buried in ruin. Other ideas are ignored. Some ideas are frivolous to begin with. The entire industry of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) was discounted into nothingness. The political will to provide transportation alternatives have been removed in Western culture. The initial concept of PRT computerized switching technology with grade separate transportation rights-of-ways, was thwarted by the financial interest of the affluent computer industry seeking their technology profitability using autonomous cars in the transportation industry. However, computers don’t regulate urban growth, transportation does. The consequence is maintaining the unsustainable proliferation of the automobile centric land-use design.

Viable solutions

The biggest concern and consumption of land with the expansion of automobile centric land-use design is how cars are supposed to fit in a confined area. There isn’t enough space for unlimited freeway expansion in every neighborhood.

In the blogpost Tunneling Transit , there is a glimmer of hope for transportation through the modern advances with tunnelling. The advent of tunneling freeways is unlikely, however, transit tunnels are extremely viable. The Hyperloop concept is still a possibility, although the above editorial accurately describes the lack of political dollars available for disrupting the automobile status-quo.

How does tunneling become viable? The history of the US land-use design in the 1800s was built upon its transit-oriented land-use design. The 200,000 miles of railroad infrastructure was privately funded.

From the blogpost, ‘ What is Alternative Transportation ’:

All rail infrastructure is the responsibility of private enterprise and remains profitable. US automobile infrastructure has only one owner: the government. Roads, in conjunction with the automobile, are unsustainable; and its infrastructure is not profitable. Unlike rail carrier companies, automobile manufactures hold zero responsibility to their product’s infrastructure use. The burden of infrastructure is a contributing likelihood to the fall of railroad miles and the consequent increase of the automobile’s use.

Are there conceivable practicalities for the advancement of a new mode of transportation? Social demand is the main driver for innovation. The necessity for technological advances poise transportation as the next paradigm for technology. This is not to be confused with the massive amount of giant computer technology companies injecting billions of computer dollars in an attempt to manipulate traffic for the purpose of creating additional revenue streams with the advent of autonomous cars; currently being pursued.

By re-creating private infrastructure, therein is viability for transit-oriented land-use development. There are currently two options for transit tunneling, The Boring Company and EarthGrid. A brief review is highlighted in the blogpost, Tunneling Transit .

The advantage to private development with transit-oriented development (TOD) is the use of existing transportation corridors. Many light-rail rights-of-ways currently exist within municipalities’ growth plans. Another advantage to building high-density station sights within transportation corridors is the preservation of outlying urban areas, predominantly used for farming or larger lot size and acreage size development that accommodates large animals.

High-density housing needs to be a choice of independence instead of a demand. High-density residential is advantageous for those who choose the convenience of being close to retail accommodations and business. The concentration of high-density development consolidates urban land area and maintains commerce centers in the high-volume traffic zones.

Land-use for alternative transportation options

Transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. Changing transportation, results in a different type of land-use design. Blending a transit-oriented land-use design into an automobile centric land-use area is comparable to using horses and large animals as a primary source of transportation in a heavily populated transit-oriented downtown area. Large animals would be unpleasantly intrusive. Large animals used as a mode of transportation, fits into the agriculture land-use design.

The urgency to discover a brand-new mode of transportation is at the threshold of emergency status. However, there is extremely little interest from the automobile transportation sector. Maintaining the status-quo is its only priority. As an example, here are two pictures:

This picture is a Ford-F40, considered a modern supercar. These Fords were produced in 1964. The car in the picture is now 60 years old.

This is a Pantera. A mid-engine production car from 1971 through 1973.

Compare the two cars, fifty and sixty years old, to the brand-new supercars available today. How many design changes are there to the overall body style, keeping in mind; these are transportation technology’s most advanced production styles.

This is a brand-new supercar design. Notice the new body style design changes that have been developed over the past 60 years through the sophistication of technology.

The point to be made is that all transportation changes over the past many decades are from the advances in other industries. The computer industry with advances in machining prowess have made incredible advances to materials used in transportation components. Data storage and the communications industries have increased safety for transportation. This shows that transportation as an industry is merely maintaining to improve its 200-year-old train technology, its 125-year-old car technology, and its 100-year-old aeronautics technology. Other industries have made phenomenal technological advances. The transportation industry is reliant on other industries to capture maintenance of its status-quo.

The transportation industry is at the prime place for something new. A new mode of transportation.

Efficient energy for transportation

Where can transportation expect to find a brand-new mode of transportation? Transportation today is fixated on propulsion drive. The transportation industry doesn’t even ask if there’s other way than vehicle propulsion. This concept of physics principal forces resistance.

Discovery for a brand-new mode of transportation requires researching areas of physics where resistance isn’t. The very basics of magnetism clearly show two poles of force: attractive and repulsive. Gravity only holds an attractive motion.

Taking a close look at the fundamentals of physics, it shows that the centrifugal force of a chemical explosion is destructive. A closer view at the center of an explosion reveals atoms of molecules actively expending energy in an equal proportion with waves of energy in 360 different degrees. With the heart of energy release at the subatomic level, it’s impossible for an explosion for the purpose of fuel for propulsion to be efficient. Increasing a rocket’s blast capacity and adding additional rocket engines has proved ineffective to overcome an explosion’s constancy of physics. It’s an inefficient use of energy.

A new mode of transportation is the only solution to attain ultra-fast space travel speed. The fastest speed reached by mankind was with the Parker Solar Probe. By using the attractive motion of gravity, the Parker Solar Probe reached a speed exceeding 400,000 miles per hour. What better example can be used to illustrate the potential of gravity being used for space travel?

Beyond space travel, many of the CATTCC blogposts discuss the researched studies of utilizing levitation for developing a new mode of short distance transportation. As said previously: the future of transportation floats, its source for motion is with the manipulation of gravity.

How to Improve Transportation

Tue, 03 Dec 2024 21:25:40 GMT

Is there a way to improve today's transportation?

photo credit: unknown/pxhere

Someone recently asked a familiar question: ‘How to improve transportation?’ For anyone new to CATTCC, welcome to the answers about the future of transportation. Notice that’s plural.

There are many aspects to transportation but, transportation has only one function: to carry goods or people from one place to another. Additionally, all urban growth is based on the area’s primary source of transportation. This, of course, means that asking how transportation can be improved is a very complex answer that affects not only transportation but all urban growth. The question also alludes to consider how vitally important it is. To properly answer the question of how to improve transportation, the answer also effects the status of urban growth.

Urban growth is land-use. Since all urban growth is based on its transportation, it’s necessary to explain the different types of land-use. There are four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design. The two types of land-use design for modern urban growth are transit oriented or automobile centric land-use design.

Now to the question of improving transportation. In answering the question of how to improve transportation, the question involves asking what has to change with urban growth. Removing an automobile’s gas engine and replacing it to a battery powered electric motor has nothing at all to do with transportation. Nothing has changed. The automobile centric land-use design remains the same.

To improve the transportation function of the automobile centric land-use design is to build more traffic lanes. One of the basic principles of the automobile is recognizing that the automobile is wholly unsustainable . Maintaining the design of automobile transportation for the ever-growing population increase requires an unending widening of roads and freeways. Beyond road widening are bloating costs for constant road maintenance. The bigger the roads, the higher the costs for the worn-out road infrastructure.

Pre-solution

What’s most urgent necessity in building a brand-new mode of transportation? Comprehension of how transportation affects land-use and the consequences of its design; provides the only understanding for its solution. Similar to the medical field of dentistry, a cavity ridden rotten tooth needs to be extracted. The solution to improve transportation is found with discovering and developing a brand-new mode of transportation.

One of the concerns regarding the current transportation dilemma requires implementing efficient energy use for alternative transportation vehicles. This has to be integrated into a viable and superior alternative to the automobile.

Where to find the automobile alternative

There are many CATTCC blogposts suggesting technology research areas for new modes of transportation. What is the most ideal area to explore? The significance of gravity manipulation regarding new transportation methodologies is fundamental to developing a brand-new mode of transportation.

Society’s technological advances over the past 100 years necessitate the demand for efficient transportation. Both short-distance and long-distance transportation require innovative solutions. A reasonable pursuit towards discovering new methodologies in transportation innovation is by the manipulation of gravity.

The difficulty in developing something that doesn’t exist is that there is nothing to expand on or duplicate; no starting point. Knowing that gravity has motion without energy loss to initiate movement, indicates the most appropriate area for beginning researching a new mode of transportation.

Demand for new technology

Any technology innovation requires a device. Obviously, this statement is rhetorical, however, conceptual ideas have beginnings with conversations. Several of the CATTCC blogposts confirm the obvious; that a priority for the transportation industry is to discover and develop a transportation device. Once such a product can be found to work, it can be adapted into implementation for public use. After the initial technology concept is established, modifications can be appropriately engineered by designers. Conceptualizing a new mode of transportation technology is where the need is.

Levitation and gravity

In its technology search, the CATTCC blogposts have pointed to levitation as the beginning point where the new transportation technology can be found. Since levitation is molecular vibration, any new transportation technology using levitation, will be at the molecular level. Another consideration of levitation from CATTCC research is the question of how to compress a Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) in controlling its manipulation for levitation. Since an atomic void structure is negative, this is a possible component to the technology by utilizing Earth’s magnetic field and its ferrous plasma core.

CATTCC recognizes that the future of transportation floats. Floatation is by the manipulation of gravity. By studying levitation at the molecular level, its motion can be discovered. The blogpost: A Study in Gravity asks some pertinent questions. It asks: what is gravity? Is it the accumulation of mass or is it a subatomic process. The answer postulates that all matter is linear in unified wave motions at light speed. Each particle follows a specific path of linear movement. This theory identifies gravity as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path. This corresponds to Einstein's theory of relativity which he expressed in his most famous mathematical statement that energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. It is the component of light speed squared that validates this new postulation in identifying gravity.

How then, is gravity manipulated? By calculating and interacting to synchronicity of a particle’s wave motion. Light speed is very fast.

Path of particle motion

One of the greatest geniuses of the early 1900s was Viktor Schauberger. His background began as a multi-generational forester. He studied nature. One of his greatest quotes was: study and copy nature. Nature is very detailed, nature is very consistent, nature is very simple. It is complex but, simple. To manipulate gravity requires detailed complexity, with simplicity in function.

Another phenomenal achievement of Viktor Schauberger was his discovery that the motion of all nature is centripetal. It’s the simplicity found in the frequency motion of gravity. All plant life grows in the same centripetal counterclockwise pattern, that all planetary bodies move.

When following the work of T. Townsend Brown, and his electrogravitics theory, the pattern of gravity as the angular momentum of particle motion; finds validation.

To take this further, the manipulation of gravity is conceptually valid for study. It’s a possible starting point for the conversation in researching the future of transportation technology.

Finding a new mode of transportation

In the blogpost, Developing a Theory for Levitation , it explores a theory of how levitation can be used as a mode of transportation. Another blogpost, Levitation, solve for a+b , is one of many blogposts that explores the work of Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE).

There are many components to use in discovering a brand-new mode of transportation.

Conclusion

The improvement for transportation is to be found with efficient energy use. The era of friction pushing a 2,500 - 4,000-pound automobile, to carry a 300 - 500-pound load has reached its zenith. Society’s technological expanse demands new transportation technology beyond the automobile. This requires extensive research in areas beyond Western society’s continual expansion of automobile technology and rocket use.

New Modes of Transportation Technologies

Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:20:22 GMT

The necessity for replacing cars

photo credit: pexels

Here’s a question: what’s the necessity for replacing cars? The phrase, ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’; is a common attitude about modern transportation. Convenience is the primary concern of the general public. And yet, the deeper one looks at the transportation used in today’s technologically advanced society, its transportation has not kept pace with the technological advances. Effectively: it is broken. Efficient energy use and sustainability are missing. Today’s social condition is familiarity to increase personal ease produced from technological advances. The mood of US society is its desire to be comfortable and gain profit. Its transportation is a burden.

One of the most troubling aspects to sustainable urban growth planning and the advanced transportation industry, regarding fundamentals for transportation’s future; is a lack of interest. Since the cars do what they’re supposed to do, why replace them? There is general absence of comprehending that cars are unsustainable. Without understanding that urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation, people react as though transportation is insignificant. There is an immediacy to transportation needs; an underlying social cry that demands transportation to advance technologically.

Impacts of a brand-new mode of transportation

Down-casting cars

While this might be read as a criticism to automobiles, that interpretation is contrary to the intent. A lack of concern from the general public is totally understandable. People like cars. Consider the popularity of microwave ovens; they’re immeasurably convenient. Transportation is merely poised to become the next paradigm for technology. It’s simply time for transportation to go faster. This is something that technology can do.

Next steps for transportation

Transportation’s history in the US, brought the early West phenomenal expanse. The businessmen who built train networks capitalized the opportunities. Today’s civilization is filled with massive pockets of unreasonable exploding real estate prices; as the direct result of the unsustainable automobile centric urban land-use design.

Irrelevant to any personal view, today’s most well-known entrepreneur is Elon Musk. His expertise is business and a thorough understanding of transportation. One man has outpaced nations with transportation technology. His financial knowhow has allowed him to exceed NASA’s 18,000 employee’ rocket launching capability. And NASA was the world’s rocket launching leader. One man with a keen transportation understanding has able to lead the world in transportation advances. Where does the understanding of advances in transportation lead Elon Musk? To its infrastructure. Transportation requires infrastructure.

Advances in transportation technology are in the infancy stage

Where does one go to devise a brand-new mode of transportation? There has to be a starting point. Engagement in the conversation requires comprehension to some basic parameters. Once a starting point is selected, experimentation is next to discover new modes of efficient energy use for transportation.

Where is the starting point? CATTCC suggests gravity. Gravity has the ability to provide motion without energy being exerted. The blogpost ‘A Study in Gravity’ claims that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. The blogpost goes on to share that this does not negate gravitational laws that dictate its action. The claim further postulates that gravity is angular momentum of particle mass along the particle’s path of movement at light speed.

A deep look into the composition of subatomic matter finds a theory regarding electromagnetic orbits. This theory from the early 1920s is called electrogravitics. This makes the claim that gravity is responsible for the movement of electrons that circle the nucleus of an atom. Rather than being an electromagnetic event, it is electron gravity that provides a particle’s movement.

Further, this theory of electrogravitics makes the point that magnetism is the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. When asking a simple question of how can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties, it poses a conundrum to the accepted laws of motion. The scientific claim is that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism. Because science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in sub-atomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous?

Discovery to efficient energy use for transportation begins with exploring new perspectives and methodologies

The next step for innovative transportation concepts, is that there has to be a tangible vehicle. There has to be a technology design, a transportation product capable of replacing the car. What is it? To say it floats is nice; what does it look like and how does it operate? The Jetson’s car was a cartoon, and yet the concept is a necessary consideration. Does it matter where the ideas for Innovation come from?

Ideas based on new perspectives in theoretical physics, is a viable starting point.

It’s clear that the road to a brand-new mode of transportation will replace automobile and rocket technology. The process for the new mode of transportation will transcend propulsion technology.

Reading through dozens of other CATTCC blogposts, ideas of gravity generators, bug wings, spin momentum and levitation, the Bible about Ezekiel’s vision in the Bible, Earth’s magnetosphere, spiders, dual oscillations of centripetal motion in synchronous wave motion, and at least a dozen other possibilities are in the discussion for potential contenders for transportation ideas.

Theoretically, the manipulation of gravity is the most likely method of floatation for transportation’s future.

What is Alternative Transportation

Fri, 15 Nov 2024 04:30:26 GMT

What is an alternative mode of transportation from an automobile

photo credit: clickamericana.com/topics/science-technology/future-predictions-from-mid-20th-century-retro-futurism

There’s a vague question that begs an answer. What’s a viable alternative form of transportation from an automobile? The answer is found with an area’s land-use. The four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design, each type of land-use has a specific type of predominant transportation. Nature uses walking. Agriculture uses animals and tractors. Transit oriented land-use design uses a fixed-rail train or streetcar. Automobile centric land-use design is based upon automobiles, and trucks; serving its needs of transportation. Today’s Western Society is built on the automobile. An alternative form of transportation would have to the capability to provide the functionality of an automobile. Riding a horse in nature would work. Using a helicopter with agriculture would suffice to transport people. Traveling by helicopter in a transit-oriented land-use design would be viable with strict limitation. The same is true for traveling by helicopter in an automobile centric land-use design, it would partially work with limitation but, fails to provide an automobile’s full functionality.

Many people assume an electric powered car is an alternative form of transportation. That perspective is as accurate as referring to a car that’s painted grey, instead of yellow as an alternative form of transportation. A car with a different engine is still a car.

What classifies as an alternative form of transportation? Since the 1940s, prototypes have experimented with flying cars. Today’s advancements in technology have upgraded this classification of vehicle to be known as Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL). These vehicles vary from detachable and foldup wings to the more common current variation of large flying drones with several high-speed blades as propellers. The practicality of hundreds or thousands of such vehicles in a small localized area presents a serious public safety risk. This type of alternative is impractical.

What are viable alternative modes of transportation that could be used in the automobile centric land-use arena; other than a car? In addition to being an impractically slow means of transportation in an automobile centric land-use design, walking and riding bicycles on the freeways are illegal. This type of alternative is impractical.

Along with figuring out what type of vehicle can provide a new mode of transportation, potential for its infrastructure is imperative to consider. Transportation is the foundation to all urban growth.

In the late 1700s into the early 1800s, the US land-use was predominantly agriculture based. Every family had a garden to feed them. In the late 1800s, trains brought industrialization. This gave rise to transit-oriented land-use development and large city growth. US land-use development became reliant on trains and streetcars as its predominate mode of transportation. In the 1930s, Western society shifted its reliance to the automobile for its primary source of transportation.

The CATTCC article: ‘Impacts of the Automobile Centric Land-use Design’ presents many aspects to the unsustainable nature of the automobile and its negative impacts. The primary concern is that the automobile is unsustainable. To build an entire culture upon an unsustainable foundation is decisively problematic. This increases the social demand for an alternative mode of transportation.

Is it realistic to replace automobiles as Western society’s primary source of transportation? Choosing an alternative form of transportation requires a mode of transportation that exceeds the conveniences cars have. An alternative mode of transportation requires a method of transportation that’s more convenient, faster, less expensive, safer, and more efficient.

Cars have many good attributes. Yet, the travel speed and independence cars provided 125 years ago, have been outpaced by society’s technology.

Conversely, the rail system peaked in 1916, with 254,000 miles of rail, and over 1,000 rail companies. Today there are only 7 class 1 rail carriers and 140,000 miles of track.

The band-aid methodology to patch a worn-out mode of road and car transportation technology, is merely the status-quo of frustration.

Alternative methodologies for new transportation

The ongoing message from CATTCC is: ‘The future of transportation floats. Its source of motion is with the manipulation of gravity.’

The solution for transportation alternatives is to research brand-new arenas of technology that apply to efficient energy use. To clarify, recommending an efficient energy use for a new mode of transportation has nothing to do with swapping out a car’s engine with a different style of propulsion. Having lots of batteries in a car, it remains a car; running on the same infrastructure.

The only way to improve US infrastructure is with the development of brand-new transportation technology that uses a better infrastructure.

A brand-new mode of transportation requires an operational infrastructure. Dependent upon a new vehicle’s design, its infrastructure varies. Who pays for the new infrastructure; the manufacturer or the government?

Areas to research new transportation technologies

One of the most plausible areas of research is levitation. This arena is wide open for discovery.

Several of the CATTCC articles investigate clusters of scientific disciplines with potential for transportation motion.

The article: Levitation, Solve For A+B is one of the detailed analyses of Viktor Grebennikov’s unusual technological claims regarding Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). This is a significant research topic that brings attention to the structure of certain bug wings. One of the subsequent blogposts: Short Distance Design explains: In looking at microscopic portions of bug wings, it displays flattened elongated structures, similar to the elongated sections of a wasps’ nest or beehive. When relating these geometric bug structures to wasps’ nests, there is an association to a relationship with the CSE. The assumption is that this CSE structure produces a frequency. It’s this CSE frequency that creates atmospheric pockets of levitation.

There are many articles exploring Grebennikov’s technology claims. ‘Build With Levitation’ speaks about the technological adaptations. Answers are found by asking questions. Is it possible to use Earth’s electrostatic charge, with de Broglie waves, extremely low frequency (ELF)s and Schumann Resonances; as potential methods to affect energy use for transportation devices?

Another article: ‘Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation’ is a descriptive analysis that postulates levitation as a product of vibrational mass accumulation. By utilizing Earth’s electromagnetic field, can a vehicle be designed to capture this energy field?

These are some of the questions which have to be asked for answers, in researching brand-new transportation methodologies.

Alternative Transportation From a Car

Wed, 06 Nov 2024 19:28:47 GMT

Directions of the social cry for transportation change

credits: top photo Arthur Radenbaugh, Flying Carpet Car: 1958, bottom photo: Duda

Within the political outcry of climate change, there's a social cry for a change in transportation. The effort of this social demand is to replace the automobile. The issue, however, escalates a more serious concern: all urban growth is built upon its primary source of transportation. Eliminating the automobile convolutes the functionality of the automobile centric land-use design used with nearly all Western Society.

Land-use

The term land-use refers to how land is used. There are only four fundamental types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design. The history of urban growth shows that people congregate into their living environments based on the area’s primary source of transportation. Transportation methods in communities, towns, and cities have grown from walking, animal, train, and now automobiles.

In the CATTCC article, Impacts of the Automobile Centric Land-use Design ; it mentions some of the problems associated with the Automobile Centric Land-use design. The sociopolitical movement to eliminate cars is problematic to the urban design of Western Society. Although the automobile is totally unsustainable, to eliminate the automobile from the automobile centric land-use design renders Western Society’s urban land-use completely dysfunctional. To remove cars, there is currently nothing to replace its transportation function which is dependent upon the automobile.

What is the solution?

Replacing the automobile requires several transportation components. A transportation vehicle has to be more convenient than a car, it has to be faster, provide similar independence, same relative price or less expensive to the consumer, lower fuel cost, much less to insure, and much safer to use. Oh, it also has to have the environmental impact of using an extremely efficient source of energy.

The phrase: the future of transportation floats , has been stated many times throughout the CATTCC website. Is there anything that can provide Jetson’s type of transportation?

Short distance transportation alternatives

Within the CATTCC articles, there are many research recommendations that suggest study in the arena of levitation and the manipulation of gravity. One of these articles is : Short Distance Transportation . This article highlights the necessity of examining a new perspective to discover a brand-new mode of transportation.

The article: Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation is one of the many others. Although it mentions no specific transportation design, is does propose directions for study and research. What it does, is to provide a perspective which is beyond conventional pursuit. Looking for alternative forms of transportation necessitates research in new areas that have potential to provide transportation. This blogpost analyses levitation. It concludes that levitation is an accumulation of vibration in mass. This gives rise to the necessity in discovering how to manipulate the oscillation of mass.

Can oscillating mass be used to levitate vehicles? Not without figuring out how. Research begins with understanding subatomic physics that magnets exchange outer shell electrons; a vibration occurs. Ions are in this same category of exchanging electrons. Vibrational mass is what allows levitation. Using this simple explanation is how research begins.

Heat rising is the exchange of electrons extending beyond their normal shell layers. The process of incandescent light is a regulated measure of heat exchanged from a flow of electricity. Sound amplification is also the vibration of electrons.

Direction of research

The most important place to find something is to look in places that haven’t been looked at. Propulsion driven trains, cars, rockets and planes are all illustrations of inefficient energy use. Listening to the social outcry demanding new transportation options, requires looking for answers in places that haven’t been looked at before.

One such place to looking for answers was written about in another article . Who would ever consider researching spiders as having a connection to transportation? A researcher, Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira, discovered a unique ability to a specific spider. The spider’s electrostatic capability highlights the use of Earth’s atmosphere. The speculation leads to conclude that Earth’s atmosphere has electrostatic energy potential. Can electricity be used for power? Do vehicles use power to allow motion? If Earth’s atmosphere is available as a power source, what is preventing it from being utilized as a source of power for vehicles?

So, spiders don’t generate enough power to move a two-ton vehicle, could the power be amplified? The question of consideration here, is in focusing the question to levitation. Is there enough power to cause levitation. A vehicle comes later; after specific analysis.

What type of device can provide levitation from the reaction of static in Earth’s atmosphere? Clouds levitate. Balloons levitate.

Then there’s all the controversy regarding Viktor Grebennikov. With more from the ‘Levitation is Vibrational Mass Accumulation’ blogpost: What’s the immediate step for a levitating transportation device? What vibrates and is most susceptible to vibrational interaction? The work of Viktor Grebennikov is a focus. The Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) written about in Chitin and Grits , and the possibility of frequency resonance of CSEs with the polymerization of chitin crystals written about in Crystals and Polymers provides a possible answer. This lays the groundwork for more intense consideration of research, holding the belief that a practical mode of transportation is feasible with the technology of amplifying the resonance of neural oscillations.

Enabling cars to be electric and autonomous has not made them sustainable. Replacing the automobile requires a more convenient, faster, more comfortable, and less expensive mode of transportation.

Replacing cars

How are cars going to be replaced? An ongoing statement from CATTCC is: “The future of transportation floats, its source of motion is with the manipulation of gravity.”

What does a new mode of transportation look like? Ever watch ‘The Jetson’s’ cartoon from the 1960s? Their vehicles made funny little noises and they floated. Even though their motion was generated by animation, the concept of that type of floating vehicle is valid for replacing the automobile. This requires manipulating gravity.

To enable the manipulation of gravity, the fundamental principles of what gravity is: has to be understood. Knowing the path of particle motion allows those particles to be manipulated.

There are over 50 articles on the subject of theoretical physic relating to gravity and related physics. Within these blogposts is a specific theory of gravity that postulates gravity as the angular momentum of particle mass along its path of linear motion, as it travels at light speed. In the article: “ A Study in Gravity ”, it suggests that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. This theory coincides with Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in its claim that our galaxy is flying through space at light speed. The currently held belief of all matter; is every particle maintains elliptical orbits. The new theory identifies matter as Einstein’s theory claims; that all matter is moving at light speed. This speed nullifies a model of matter holding elliptical orbits. The new theory of gravity postulates that all matter, as moving at light speed is linear. This linear movement follows unified wave motions. It postulates a specific path of linear movement. Gravity is identified as the angular momentum of matter along this linear path.

This theory does not negate gravitational laws that dictate its action. In regard to the composition of subatomic matter and what is held in theory as a procession of electromagnetic orbits, this new theory of gravity makes the point that magnetism is the electrogravitics action of stray electrons in ferrous materials, rather than electromagnetic.

Philosophically, scientific theory proposes a perspective. Academia science is taught as unanimous opinion. The facts of subatomic action are as yet, too small to be observed, however, when understood that all matter is based on its frequency, it becomes very clear that it has motion. Determining the nature of gravity leads to the perspective that its makeup is a motion.

The necessity for an efficient new energy source is pivotal in developing a new mode of transportation. Discoveries in flotation technology are a product found in physics exploration.

As for finding an alternative form of transportation from a car, the search has to extend beyond cars.

Building New Land-use Designs

Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:43:34 GMT

Creating land-use building designs for new modes of transportation

photo credits: ACROS, Fukuyama / Gene Zellmer, architect

Planning a new urban land-use for a mode of transportation that doesn’t exist yet, is synonymous with the phrase: ‘getting the cart before the horse’. Without knowing the design of the transportation mode’s vehicle, how can new ideas be formulated for its land-use? However, speculation for something new has to be acknowledged.

Sustainable urban growth

Inasmuch as transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, sustainability for land-use is the most important aspect for urban growth. This brings the question: how is its sustainability enabled? The political move to force society to remove plastic bags is irrelevant to sustainable urban growth. More relevant than political rhetoric, sustainable urban growth involves nature. Growing gardens, fresh water access and common sense are among the plethora of following nature’s course.

In 1983, the United Nations (UN) convened the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), which came to be known as The Brundtland Report . The conclusion of the report identified three aspects of urban growth:

Environmental
Economic
Social

As the definition of sustainable development , Wikipedia states:

“The Brundtland Report was intended to respond to the conflict between globalized economic growth and accelerating ecological degradation by redefining "economic development" in terms of "sustainable development". It is credited with crafting the most prevalent definition of sustainability: "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

The blogpost Sustainable Growth for Urban Development , shares information relating to sustainable urban growth.

In 1987, the UN debated the report which eventually led to the creation of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development in 1992. It grew into what is referred to as Agenda 21 .

Key Features

Locally implemented, globally impacting: Agenda 21 encourages local governments and communities to develop and implement sustainable development plans, which can then be scaled up to have a global impact.
Property rights: The agenda acknowledges the importance of property rights, emphasizing that without them, there is no freedom.
Sustainable development: Agenda 21 distinguishes itself from sustainable development, which is often used interchangeably. It is a plan of action for achieving sustainable development during the 21st century.
Influence of NGOs: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) played a significant role in shaping Agenda 21, particularly due to its non-legally binding nature.
Focus areas: The agenda addresses various aspects, including:
Combating pollution of land, air, and water
Conserving and improving biodiversity
Promoting socio-economic development
Improving human settlements and urban planning
Enhancing international cooperation and coordination

Purpose

Agenda 21 aims to provide a framework for achieving sustainable development and economic growth, while protecting the environment and promoting social justice. It serves as a blueprint for governments, organizations, and communities to work together towards a more sustainable future.

As the follow-up to Agenda 21 is the UN’s 2030 Agenda .

Philosophically, agenda setting is problematic for people who disagree with politically appointed rule makers who have placed themselves into such positions of power. There are indeed good people making good decisions. There are also many instances of narcissistic politicians having dominion above the rule of independence. Many such instances show that tyranny pushes social unsustainability into two social classes: rulers and slaves. This is the opposite of social sustainability for human life; disguised as social justice. Trust is earned, demands are questioned when spoken by liars and corrupted thieves.

The point here is to insist on providing a methodology for efficient and sustainable transportation; when adhering to questionable politically motivated agendas having more to do with social guidelines of governmental control to urban growth, that have nothing to do with transportation.

Current impacts of unsustainable urban growth

What are the impacts of the current state of unsustainable urban growth? The blogpost Sustainable Growth for Urban Development , defines the unsustainable impacts:

Environmental Impact

Economic Impact

Social Impact

Unsustainable urban growth will continue as long as the automobile remains the primary source of transportation in Western Society.

Another blogpost regarding the impacts of the automobile centric land-use design says this:

Social

Here’s where things get odd. The style of an automobile is created by designers. Primary influences relevant to these designs are current trends in fashion. Car sales are promoted by advertising agencies’ campaigns exclusively measured by fashion trends to encourage customer purchases. While this is reasonable in business, its effects reach further than mere car sales in the automobile-centric society.

The date of every car manufactured can be visually ascertained by its style of that decade. Further reaching social implications of fashion can be seen in the patterns and styles of the tract housing built to accommodate automobile-centric urban growth. The houses built in the 1920s are different than those of the 1930s, 40s, 50s, etc., through newly built dwellings today; every decade can be visually distinguished in its style.

One of the negative repercussions from fashion-only production in the automobile-centric society is the consequence of worn-out parts. Trends in design no longer fashionable fade into a negative social enigma. Outdated tract homes and strip malls no longer in vogue stimulate economic activity to newer growth centers of sprawl development. The significance can be seen in every urban area that is several decades old.

As clothing fashion styles change from season to season, the automobile and tract house styles make major shifts every decade. Inasmuch as fashions quickly go out of date, each tract style becomes out of fad after a decade and a new tract house area becomes popular. The nature of automobile-centric society follows new trending patterns based on that era’s marketing popularity in cultural and sprawl development.

Conclusion

Again, transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. There can be no sustainable urban growth without changing the primary source of transportation for Western Society.

The conclusion to the social cry for transportation is: “Give me an alternative!”

What Space Exploration Requires

Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:59:13 GMT

The purpose of space exploration is to find habitable planets

photo credits: NASA/Duda

Legitimacy of space exploration requires exceptionally fast speed. The fastest speed reached by current space technology has been attained by the Parker Solar Probe. Its speed reached over 400,000 miles per hour. In terms of space exploration, that’s slower than crawling.

The ultimate purpose for space exploration is to find habitable planets for human life.

Exoplanets

Exoplanets represent the ultimate goal for space flight.

As described in the article: ‘ What Can Be Expected by Exploring Space ’, it explains NASA’s intent with missions that have sent telescope probes to seek out livable places. NASA’s missions include: Kepler, K2, LBTI, JWST, TESS, Hubble, Spitzer, and Roman Space Telescope. These exploratory telescope missions have accumulated a list of over 5,000 possible planetary bodies capable of human habitability. The NASA Exoplanet Catalog is continuously updated, as a catalog of possible habitable planetary bodies.

NASA’s planetary telescope missions suggest that Kepler-69c is the closest planet with the possibility to maintain life. It’s a super-Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of a star like our sun. But it’s located about twenty-seven hundred light-years from Earth, in the constellation Cygnus. This, of course means that getting there traveling at light speed would take 2,700 years.

Warp speed

Is there a fast way to travel in space? Is there any legitimacy to warp drive for space travel?

Warp Drive is a fictional concept from Star Trek. Warp speed doesn’t exist in the current world of physics. In the early 1990s an astrophysicist, by the name of Michael Alcubierre, wrote a paper about modifying the geometry of space. His theory postulated a principle that would allow traveling faster than light. Alcubierre’s theory proposes a geometric assumption that if all of spacetime is expanding, then it must be able to contract. The Alcubierre Drive is based on a small region of space which he referred to as a warp bubble.

The easiest way to understand the warp bubble is to visualize all of spacetime as a trampoline. Then put a bowling ball on the trampoline. The dip in the trampoline is like a specific region of spacetime. Any large mass, like a sun or a planet, applies a dip to the fabric of spacetime. Alcubierre’s concept is to create an expansion of space behind a spaceship (representing what the bowling ball does to the trampoline) and an opposite contraction of space in front of the ship (representing the dip to the trampoline). This is Alcubierre’s warp bubble.

Ultra-fast space flight

Can the Alcubierre concept of a space warp be affected by the small mass of a space craft? Theoretically, the fabric of spacetime could be affected by an impact of gravitational influence. How? Holding to the perspective that gravity is the angular momentum of particle mass; a vehicle utilizing its forward motion as rotational spin, influenced by compression of magnetic fields, is additionally influenced by electromagnetic pulses that provide motion of energy oscillations.

Necessity for ultra-fast speed in space

Every space mission necessitates a goal. What does a viable human mission require in order to reach the closest habitable exoplanet?

Reaching the closest habitual planet, according to NASA, is twenty-seven hundred light years from Earth. That’s 14,112,000,000,000,000 (fourteen quadrillion, one hundred twelve trillion) miles away.

The trip to the closest habitable exoplanet would take 2,700 years to reach, traveling at the speed of light.

Mathematically, this indicates that traveling at the speed of lightspeed squared, reaching the closest planet that could possibly maintain life, would be reached in about eight months.

How close is ultra-fast technology

Current research and development technology considers faster than lightspeed flight impossible. The current procedure for space flight technology is based on chemical explosions fixed in 25,000 miles per hour launch speeds. This explosion technology is inconsiderate to basic subatomic physics. The basic motion of subatomic motion for explosions is a release of energy in 360 degrees. This merely states that the space flight of a rocket’s trajectory with capturing one degree its fuel’s energy release, is extremely inefficient.

How is it possible to capture an efficient energy for ultra-fast space flight speeds? It’s extremely clear that the speeds reached by the Parker Solar Probe were attained by the manipulation of gravity. It’s also clear that the attractive force of gravity is greater than the propelling force of exploding chemicals to attain fast speeds for space flight.

There are several CATTCC articles that talk about directions of possible ultra-fast space flight technology. Here is an excerpt from Otis Carr and Other Methodologies :

The judgement of physics research requires an analysis of what works. Regarding Otis Carr, there is controversy. Then, there is the technology of David Hamel . There is technology from John Searl . And the uninterpreted 2,500-year-old technology that Ezekiel mentioned. Two of the most gifted geniuses of modern times were Nikola Tesla and Viktor Schauberger , who were also embroiled in controversy. In the process of physics research to find solutions: is it more productive to focus on physics or the psychological validation of personalities?

What is the commonality of David Hamel, John Searl, Ezekiel, Otis Carr, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, and others pursuing discovery of new transportation? The common quest is for the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism, and spin. And, what’s the government’s approach to space flight technology? Explosions. Yet, mankind’s fastest speed is by the manipulation of gravity.

The future of transportation floats. Its method for motion is the manipulation of gravity. As stated many times throughout these blogposts, chemical explosions for rocket propulsion are horrendously inefficient. Reaching fast space flight speeds is by using a different methodology than inefficient explosion propulsion. The solution to fast space flight speeds, as well as short distance ground level transportation methodologies, is by levitation.

Beyond the complexities involved in building a craft capable of exceptionally fast speeds, are two imperative considerations: inertia and vehicle control . Without the component of direct propulsion, how is a craft’s control possible? Contemporary physics declares that incredibly fast speed would create unacceptable g-force loads for human existence.

Is there a format for ultra-fast space flight?

Before there is a format, there has to be a design. Prior to a design, interest in study, discovery and understanding is needed. The possibilities for discovery are as endless as the imagination can conceive.

Planning in Urban Growth

Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:09:54 GMT

Planning for urban growth necessitates sustainability

credit: upper photos; Wikipedia, lower photo; unsplash.com/levi-coffin-house-with-windows, Sharon Waldron

Trends are patterns for social popularity; like bellbottom jeans were in the 70s and tattoos are today. Razor cut hairline designs didn’t catch on, but a lot of people went that direction. Styles of music, tv shows, fashions, cars and even urban growth designs are all subject to trends.

In the early 2000’s, the buzz-word for the clamoring of gathered environmentalist’s interest, was the term: “urban blight”. It garnered so much interest from large non-profit foundations that those organizations cleared the path for large financial interests to come to the rescue with gentrification projects and eradicated urban blight. However, homeless camps with rampant poverty indicate the problems remain.

More recently, the legislative powers that glittered Western Society with fantastic fanfare of celebratory glee, came up with a new word: “green’. Green is money, it’s politics.

New Urbanism

A new term was introduced to urban design planning in the 1980s. The term ‘New Urbanism’ brought emotions into the fray of design. To clarify, emotions are in the expression of exterior design. The façade and building color technique has little to do with urban planning; new urbanism involves building design and color. While this does have an impact on individual expression and neighborhood improvement, architectural designs are irrelevant to the flow of transportation to urban expansion.

New Urbanism is described as a planning and development approach that emphasizes human-scaled urban design. Its claim is that it draws inspiration from the way cities and towns were built for centuries, with walkable blocks and streets, housing and shopping in close proximity. Its focus is the accessibility to public spaces. Its concern is creating communities where people can interact and engage with each other in public spaces or on the street. The new urbanism movement is one of the components of “greening’ the environmental look of neighborhoods.

The term new urbanism is fundamentally applicable for transit-oriented land-use, since the design aspects are concentrated to high-density real estate development and non-automobile transportation.

Another way to reach the same goals is with Feng Shui design. Feng shui originated in ancient China over 6,000 years ago. It was used to design and orient buildings, cities, landscapes, and personal space to align with natural energies and promote harmony.

Feng shui uses energy forces to balance and harmonize the environment, promoting peace, prosperity, and well-being. The practice involves:

Arranging buildings, objects, and space to optimize energy flow (chi) and create a sense of balance and harmony.
Using colors, plants, and furniture arrangement to enhance the energy and ambiance of a space.
Understanding the five elements (wood, fire, earth, metal, and water) and their interactions to create a balanced environment.

Beyond the social constructs of New Urbanism, planning for urban growth involves only four types of land-use. There are tens of thousands of politically selected zoning allowances and restrictions; specific to local building codes.

Urban planning for transportation

There is tremendous simplicity in land-use for transportation. Western society has one prominent source of transportation: the automobile. Its land-use design is by the use of road beds. The demand for roads increase as the population grows.

‘New urbanism’ uses the phrase ‘public spaces’, which is a term used in the transit-oriented land-use design that identifies commerce centers. Placing a park within an environmental space is consistent with feng shui. Commerce centers are real estate developments surrounding train and streetcar stations.

The demand for sustainability with urban growth requires sustainable transportation. The automobile centric land-use design prohibits sustainability due to the automobile being unsustainable . What methods of urban planning can accommodate sustainability? And here is the quagmire; the modes of efficient transportation have not yet been implemented. The blog post: Building Sustainable Transportation touches on what it entails. There has to be a brand-new mode of transportation to be developed. It’s disruptive technology. Sustainable transportation is beyond what people perceive as a trendy new thing. It requires innovative solutions that are beyond normal or expected and begins with a conversation.

Sustainability

Webster’s dictionary describes sustainability as: being a method of harvesting or using a resource so that the resource is not depleted or permanently damaged.

Since transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, it is imperative for modern society to engage a sustainable method of transportation.

The blogpost: Expectations for New Modes of Transportation , says this:

The most serious concern of today’s transportation is its massive energy inefficiency. As Victor Schauberger once said; “understand and copy nature”. His reference pointed out that all nature is centripetal. He also made the claim in the 1930s that all modern transportation was centrifugal. It still is. The importance of his claim is that nature isn’t self-destructive. The opposite is true for the destructive nature of centrifugal motion. Nearly all of modern transportation is propulsion by chemical explosion. The physics of propulsion is forcing an object into resistance. Heat is the presence of resistance. Colliding particles produces heat. It displays an inefficient use of energy.

One of the factors to consider is finding an alternative to propulsion. One of the alternatives to propulsion-based transportation is found with the synchronicity of oscillations; they display frequency movement of motion. The mindset requiring propulsion for motion is an inconsiderate notion. That’s like saying a magnet only has one pole. The opposite of propulsion is attraction. Conversely, the terms: centrifugal and centripetal are not opposites. Similar to yen and yang, the two are functions of a whole.

New transportation innovations reaching sustainability require an efficient use of energy. Attractive motion is a viable consideration for transportation. The entire universe operates with the attractive pull of gravity.

Sustainable solutions

What’s the answer? Where can a sustainable mode of modern transportation be found? What is an actual alternative beyond the convenience of an automobile?

In considering answers, an interesting aspect about transportation is the speed rockets fly. The fastest speed ever attained by mankind is the Parker Solar Probe with its speed exceeding 400,000 miles per hour. Most people assume it reached that speed by the strength of its rocket engines. The marvel of rocket science isn’t the engineering of controlled explosions. The marvels of rocket science are performed by the astrophysicists calculating the precise measurements of gravity. The Parker Solar Probe reached the fastest speed ever achieved by manipulating gravity.

Let’s as some obvious questions. How much energy is consumed by using gravity? Is gravity sustainable? The answer to discovering sustainable transportation requires exploration to manipulate gravity.

Answers are found by asking the correct questions. For those interested in sustainable transportation solutions, there are many blogposts here on the CATTCC website.

Tunneling Transit

Thu, 03 Oct 2024 17:58:41 GMT

Immediate steps towards transportation sustainability

To the question that some people ask: what is the best immediate step for sustainable transportation?

Can tunneling be the immediate step for advancing transportation technology? Tunnels carry utility infrastructure. They could easily be enlarged and adapted with electrified guideways to implement high-speed maglev technology.

How are tunnels made?

History of tunneling technology in the late 1800s was predominantly used for transportation. Its technology was by the efforts of hard labor with picks, shovels and dynamite. The earliest use of tunnels was to carry water. A good resource covering the history of tunneling is Britannica .

From an excellent post in Quora by Adam JM Richards:

For longer tunnels one or more vertical shafts would be additionally be cut to enable tunneling from 4 or more tunnel faces simultaneously. The position of the shaft was established from the surface survey and then two posts set up vertically at either side of the shaft along the desired line. The shaft was sunk vertically (established using plumb bobs that were immersed in water or oil to damp out oscillations as the length of the shaft deepened). The shaft was stopped once it was deep enough the depth having been calculated by trigonometry taking into account the elevation of the shaft top. Inside the shaft the direction was between the projection of the two vertical posts - and this line was extended at the right grade once again using a theodolite and plumb-bobs.

One of the best sources for the process of mining is the Colorado School of Mines .

Modern Tunneling

The advances of today’s mining technology is as advanced as a smart phone is over the telegraph.

Once a tunnel's path is selected, a comprehensive study is made of ground conditions. The path above a shallow tunnel or a dig and cover tunnel, can be walked with a high-end metal detector but, most tunnels require ground penetrating radar and a series of bore holes to analyze soil and rock composition.

Wikipedia provides an excellent explanation regarding the process of tunneling.

Geotechnical investigation and design

A major tunnel project must start with a comprehensive investigation of ground conditions by collecting samples from boreholes and by other geophysical techniques. An informed choice can then be made of machinery and methods for excavation and ground support, which will reduce the risk of encountering unforeseen ground conditions. In planning the route, the horizontal and vertical alignments can be selected to make use of the best ground and water conditions. It is common practice to locate a tunnel deeper than otherwise would be required, in order to excavate through solid rock or other material that is easier to support during construction.

Conventional desk and preliminary site studies may yield insufficient information to assess such factors as the blocky nature of rocks, the exact location of fault zones, or the stand-up times of softer ground. This may be a particular concern in large-diameter tunnels. To give more information, a pilot tunnel (or "drift tunnel") may be driven ahead of the main excavation. This smaller tunnel is less likely to collapse catastrophically should unexpected conditions be met, and it can be incorporated into the final tunnel or used as a backup or emergency escape passage. Alternatively, horizontal boreholes may sometimes be drilled ahead of the advancing tunnel face.

The terminology related to tunnels encompasses various concepts and terms. Here are some key terms as a vocabulary guide, also from Wikipedia :

1.Tunnel: An underground passage, often used for transportation (roads, railways) or utilities.

2.Bore: The cylindrical cavity created when drilling a tunnel.

3.Portal: The entrance or exit of a tunnel.

4.Cross-section: A vertical section through the tunnel, showing its shape and dimensions.

5.Linings: Structural materials used to support the tunnel walls, which can be made of concrete, steel, or other materials.

6.TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine): A specialized machine used to excavate tunnels.

7.Cut and Cover: A method of constructing tunnels by digging a trench and covering it.

8.Tunneling Shield: A device used to support the walls of a tunnel during excavation.

9.Groundwater Control: Techniques used to manage water that may enter the tunnel during construction.

10.Excavation: The process of removing earth to create the tunnel.

11.Spoil: The material that has been excavated from the tunnel.

12.Ventilation: Systems designed to ensure air circulation within the tunnel.

Seismic Activity

One of the biggest concerns for tunneling in the mind of the public is earthquakes .

This series of three pictures from several years ago in the futuretransit.blogspot site, presents one of the validations for the public's concern. The pictures are the same spot of a fault line over a five year period of time, and after a couple earthquakes.

Tunneling for transit projects are largely government funded. Conventional boring for such projects is an expensive process. Typical estimates for large scale tunneling projects is $300million per mile. Although many companies can bore small pipe and utility tunnels, only a few are equipped to bore large transportation tunnels. In the US, Granite Construction is one of the large government project contractors involved with transportation infrastructure. Clark Construction and Lane Construction are also large infrastructure project contractors. One of the largest global engineering companies involved with infrastructure tunneling is Bechtel .

There are two relatively new companies whose focus is to reduce tunneling costs: The Boring Company and EarthGrid . Their approach is different; however, their goal is the same. Both companies have a price target to reduce the accepted cost standard by ten-fold.

From The Boring Company website:

Why Tunnels? To solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic, roads must go 3D, which means either flying cars or tunnels are needed. Unlike flying cars, tunnels are weatherproof, out of sight, and won’t fall on your head.

The Boring Company has already engaged in their innovative approach to begin their system technology in Las Vegas, NV .

Meanwhile, EarthGrid has a new type of tunneling technology. From their website:

Our tech is powerful, sustainable, and incredibly efficient.

EarthGrid’s patented plasma-powered machines quickly bore through rock by inducing thermal shock to the surface that results in spallation: tiny bits and pieces flying off due to stress. No drilling chemicals needed.

Our plasma-powered machines can tackle any type of hard rock, like granite or basalt, thanks to our specialized rock-recipes. A dedicated approach to each rock type quickly and efficiently introducing spallation.

Why is EarthGrid technology considered revolutionary? For two reasons, the method of boring is new, plus this technology enables tunnel boring at one-mile per day.

Conclusion

Solutions to existing problems require something beyond maintaining the status-quo.

The two boring companies, The Boring Company and EarthGrid, provide what can be immediate solutions to society’s desperate transportation demands. By designing systems with innovative transit technology companies, like CyberTran , this solution enables the sustainable high-density and low-density urban growth: throughout Western Society.

Expectations For New Transportation

Wed, 25 Sep 2024 01:42:47 GMT

When can we expect a new mode of transportation?

The question poses many considerations. A major portion of the answer is based on psychology, or opinion. The topic of transportation is one of the least sought after topics in normal conversation. Talking about transportation's future is opinion based. The united opinion is comparable to an individual arguing that someone else's favorite color is wrong.

Without the discovery of new innovations for new modes of transportation, there are no changes and all modes of transportation remain the same. Autonomous vehicles, Diesel electric trains, battery operated cars and planes proliferate complacency to the same modes instead of technological innovation towards anything new.

Possibilities

The article: Vehicle Technology provides a glimpse of what’s necessary for discovering a brand-new mode of transportation.

Alternatives

Magnetic levitating (maglev) technology is one of the most efficient forms of transportation. Trains, however, are an antiquated 200-year-old mode of heavy rail technology. For a modern transit system to work well, it needs to provide customers the convenience of immediate direct to destination service. It’s impossible for a train’s heavy rail trunk line to provide convenient transportation which is needed for today’s sprawl development design in Western Society.

Crisis

Transportation of Western society is at a crisis point. The problem isn’t due a climate catastrophe, it’s the massive proliferation of inefficient modes of transportation reliant on propulsion driven vehicles. The article: Current Transportation Dilemma speaks about the consequences of Western Society’s unsustainable transportation.

Transit is certainly a valid transportation methodology for the ever-growing metropolitan land-use design. Transit technology systems with smaller vehicle sizes can provide the convenience for immediate deployment and have direct to destination service capability. One such technology is the Ultra-light technology system of CyberTran . The hyperloop technology is good for long distance transportation solutions, however, its technology is inadequate for being a solution to the immediate needs of municipal transportation.

Urban growth

In regards to battery operated autonomous cars, in terms of adhering to environmental, economic, and social issues (established in 1987 by the United Nation’s World Commission for Environment and Development; "Brundtland Report" ), autonomous and battery operated cars are incompliant. Automobiles are unsustainable, other than changing the motor, a car is still a car, they’re still unsustainable.

The reason cars are unsustainable is land-use. All urban growth is based on an area’s primary source of transportation. The automobile centric land-use design puts an area’s total dependency for transportation upon the necessity to own a car. It’s not as though owning a car is bad, however, having an area’s sole source of transportation necessitating car ownership is addictedness.

From researchgate.net is an article by Chris McCahill and Norman Garrick:

As early as the 2000s, Crawford (2002) suggested that cars consumed as much as 70% of the downtown land in American cities. In a comparative study of 12 USA cities, McCahill and Garrick (2012) found that a ten percentage-point increase in private cars as the commuting mode was associated with more than 2500 m 2 rise of parking per 1000 people; and more than twice as much land was used for parking for each resident and employee in cities having higher rates of automobile use (roughly 30% more driving) (McCahill and Garrick, 2012).

It isn’t about the cars, it’s about land-use addictions brought about by the cars.

In another article, from sciencedigest.com , it mentions some valuable points:

There is little dispute among transportation researchers that expanding highway capacity increases vehicle use. This phenomenon is commonly known as induced demand, and it demonstrates a fundamental economic principle: individuals tend to consume more of a good as the price of the good falls. In other words, wider highways increase traffic speeds and reduce the time cost of driving, thereby inducing additional vehicle travel. In the short run, when residential and employment locations are fixed, faster peak period highway speeds attract drivers from alternate routes, modes, and times of day. Then, in the long-run, faster speeds encourage additional social and economic behavior in areas made more accessible by the new highway capacity, which further increases traffic volumes.

Since transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, sustainable transportation is necessary for sustainable urban growth. The current modes of propulsion driven transportation elevate an inefficient source of transportation with an unsustainable infrastructure. The 1987 Brundtland Report isolated three segments of urban sustainability: environmental, economic and social. All three segments have to be resolved for urban growth to be sustainable. Again, to reach sustainability, transportation has to be sustainable.

Changes

In terms of sustainability, the rhetoric has changed. Green politics have pushed an ambiguous climate emergency narrative onto the media. Yet no one can explain its definition other than banning plastic straws will solve the problems.

Nonetheless, the California Air Resource Board (CARB, originated in 1967 by Governor Ronald Reagan) has legislatively improved California’s air quality of the exhausted fuel from California’s 30,000,000 registered vehicles. This, again, points to the unsustainability of automobiles being a land-use concern.

Expectations

There can be no changes to transportation without establishing a brand-new mode of transportation. Research and study for alternatives beyond propulsion technology are where to find answers.

What Can Be Expected By Exploring Space

Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:22:37 GMT

The underlying purpose of searching space is to discover habitable places

In 2009, NASA launched the Kepler mission . Kepler was a space telescope. The mission was successful but, over time it developed mechanical problems and was reprogramed to perform a modified mission with a different configuration. The reprograming brought it a new name: K2. The purpose of NASA’s Kepler missions was to search for planetary bodies. In 2017, NASA released the final data of Kepler's primary mission. Its number of confirmed planetary finds was boosted to 2,335. The total count of potential planets was 4,034.

Some of the key reporting from other sources finds, including NASA missions:

NASA estimates that there are at least 100 billion planets in the Milky Way galaxy (snippet from “How Many Planets are in the Milky Way?” published on Tuesday, September 29, 2020).
Others estimate that the Milky Way galaxy might have anywhere between 100 to 200 billion planets (snippet from “How Many Planets are in the Milky Way?” published on Tuesday, September 29, 2020).
The Milky Way galaxy contains 200 billion to 400 billion stars (snippet from “Flexi answers - How many solar systems are there in the Milky Way?” published on Tuesday, May 30, 2023).
Assuming a significant proportion of these stars have planetary systems, it’s likely that there are hundreds of billions of solar systems in the Milky Way galaxy.

Description of the Milky Way galaxy

According to Wikipedia, the Milky Way galaxy is a barred spiral galaxy with an estimated diameter of 100,000,000 light years spiraling outward and 1,000 light-years wide. Additionally, it has several smaller satellite galaxies bound to it, and is part of the Local Group of galaxies. These galaxies are a portion of the Virgo Supercluster . The Virgo Supercluster is a component of the Laniakea Supercluster .

Groups of galaxies are the smallest aggregates of galaxies but, the most common structures in the universe. They account for 50% of the galaxies in the local universe, and typically contain no more than 50 galaxies in a cluster.

The Milky Way is estimated to contain 100–400 billion stars and at least that number of planets. Our Solar System is located at a radius of about 27,000 light-years (8.3 kpc) from the Galactic Center , on the inner edge of the Orion Arm . The Galactic Center is an intense radio source known as Sagittarius A , a supermassive black hole of 4.100 (± 0.034) million solar masses .

These estimates are based on current observations and simulations.

Searching for planets

With all the data compiled by NASA and other space agencies, the purpose of such research is ultimately to discover other planets. What is the current definition of a “Planet”? Worldatlas.com provides an excellent definition:

A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.
A 'dwarf planet' is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, (c) has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
All other objects, except satellites, orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as 'Small Solar System Bodies.'"

A question is then asked, how many planets are in the Milky Way? An article in Nineplanets.org answers the question: billions.

All of the planets in our solar system orbit around the Sun. Planets that orbit around other stars are called exoplanets. They are hidden by the bright glare of the stars they orbit. Additionally, because of their smaller size and extraordinary distances, exoplanets are very hard to distinguish with telescopes.

Exoplanets are found within other suns. Based on data, one of the closest exoplanet is Proxima Centauri b. It orbits the star Proxima Centauri, which is part of the Alpha Centauri star system, located in the constellation of Centaurus. It’s located approximately 4.2 light-years away. This makes Proxima Centauri b roughly 26 trillion miles (42 trillion kilometers) away from Earth.

To uphold the fundamental purpose for space travel of finding livable planetary bodies; there is one mandate: speed. The current capacity of rocket technology is unrealistic as a viable method for traveling in space.

Space flight technology

The current speed of rocket technology is 25,000 miles per hour. The Parker Solar probe, through its technological use of gravity, reached a speed of 430,000. Even with this, all of human technological effort has attained 0.000037279123279345 lightspeed.

When will space travel exploration become practical? To design a proper vehicle to fly in space, there can be no conflict from friction For a vehicle to travel near lightspeed, or reaching lightspeed, requires a vehicle using complete energy efficiency. Where can this be found?

All of human effort with current rocket launch technology has attained 0.000037279123279345 lightspeed.

What will it take to reach a fast enough speed essential for space travel? From the blogpost, Building for fast space travel: To design a proper vehicle to fly in space, there can be no conflict from friction For a vehicle to travel near lightspeed, or reaching lightspeed, requires a vehicle using complete energy efficiency. Where can this be found?

What will it take to reach a fast enough speed essential for space travel? It requires a different perspective when considering the question. Chemical explosions for propulsion are a technological embarrassment. Current rocket launch technology’s approach is “bigger bombs”. An explosion releases its energy in 360 degrees. The trajectory of a rocket is 1 degree. Even people with low math skills are able to figure out that 360 minus 1 equals 359. Rocket scientists have captured more than one degree of energy release, nonetheless, it still means chemical explosions as a method of propulsion are extremely inefficient.

How can the engineering intellect of mankind reach significant speed for space travel?

Step 1: stop using explosions to blast a can into space
Step 2: stop seeking propulsion
Step 3: study gravity
Step 4: find people who have built devices and crafts that have the capacity to fly without being based on aeronautic principles

New space flight technology

From the blogpost, Directions for new transportation : The significance of gravity regarding new transportation is fundamental to developing a brand-new mode of transportation. New modes of transportation require new methodologies. Society’s technological advances over the past 100 years necessitate the demand for efficient transportation. Both short-distance and long-distance transportation require innovative solutions. A reasonable pursuit towards discovering new methodologies in transportation innovation is by the manipulation of gravity.

With the components: manipulation of gravity, and momentum of spin, it’s theoretically plausible to produce an independent inertia field . Having a vehicle that has its own inertia field, this presents a new approach to space flight.

Once a new mode for space travel becomes viable, then comes building space ports. These space ports must be sustainable. In the blogpost, Non-Earth Urban Growth , it makes a point that one of the vital components to enhance an Earthlike environment is: dirt.

Conclusion

It’s impossible to explore space and expect to find a habitual exoplanet, without a viable vehicle technology that provides extremely fast space travel speeds.

New Transportation Technology

Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:33:46 GMT

When can new transportation technology be implemented

The social demand of modern technology has driven people into a desire for instant transportation. Trains, cars, and jet planes are too slow for instant transportation transfer to satisfy society’s desire. Teleportation has been on the horizon since the television show: “Star Trek”. “Star Trek” first aired in the 1960s. Although technology has taken phenomenal leaps since the 1960s, transportation is fundamentally the same. Nearly all automobile advances are related to computerization and communications, the mode as automobile transportation is the same. With all the technological advances, the modes of transportation have remained the same for 100 years.

Political climate

When will a new mode of transportation be brought to the market? The high-tech industry is in relentless war to impose driverless cars onto the public. With the thousands of satellites and satellite arrays in orbit, the political ‘green’ mantra is total incoherence to what sustainability is. Sustainability adheres to nature rather than technology dependence. Green politics misrepresents the fundamentals of common sense. Although every aspect of automobile centric land-use design is unsustainable, policies of the green agenda push to proliferate the totally unsustainable current methods of transportation.

Bad habits are only stopped by not doing them. Alternatives provide a way to successful change. Where is an alternative in transportation? It doesn’t exist. Big tech is actively substituting change for its single purpose of profitability. Marketing terms completely lack any ability to provide sustainability. Corporate and their government lobbyists created the 'green' agenda as a marketing tool; strictly as a means towards higher sales profitability. Public targeting of 'green' marketing is based on feelings of desiring good intent but is susceptible to failed policies which fall short of good-intended desires. The consequence of such dictatorship legislating, is that it often causes unintended but, catastrophic problems. The gullibility of the public masses inundated with such a pervasive poisoning agenda is tragic.

This website is about transportation, and legislative dictates of green politics have seeped into transportation. New technology transit systems can only be implemented when new technology systems have funding available to build it. The viability of new and innovative transportation technology poses a threat to the status-quo of embedded political procedure. Many inventive and incredibly good transportation technologies are summoned to oblivion by political will at the command of established financial lobbying interests.

PRT systems

Throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s, one website led PRT technology system technology information. It monitored more than 100 urban transport system innovations from around the world. Some of the technologies were operational, others were in the prototype/testing stage, and others were conceptual with available planning info. Many of the technologies featured autonomous vehicles that provided door-to-door service at higher speeds and lower costs. Although the website is still online, the site was abandoned around 2016. Faculty.washington.edu/jbs/trans still hosts the site.

A website dedicated to existing transit systems is Transitwiki. A generalized transit technology page. At its PRT page , it merely provides a brief explanation about the concept of what PRT is.

It says: Though they operate over fixed routes they can bypass stations and can be part of a denser network of stops that can provide more convenient locations for passenger access than traditional fixed rail systems. Due to their smaller vehicle size, typically carrying 4 or 6 passengers though larger capacity vehicle can be used, the stations can be smaller and less expensive to build. Though they are slower moving and carry fewer passengers per car, because they can operate on reduced headways, over larger areas, and at higher average speeds they are capable of passenger throughputs similar to other rail modes.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Compared to steel wheeled and diesel powered transit vehicles, PRT are quieter and more energy efficient since they operate on rubber tires and are powered by electricity. The are also potentially safer since the vehicles are lighter than LRTs and run on dedicated guideways. They also take up less land for stations and right-of-way though this may be less so with greater network coverage. On the down side, PRT systems require a larger number of vehicles than other modes which could increase maintenance and replacement costs.

The transitwiki.org website illustrates traditions of the government perspective which follows academic dogma. Realistically, the 'downside' of having large numbers of vehicles is a phenomenal advantage. The headway (distance between vehicles), with some PRT systems is remarkably short. This actually largely increases ridership capability, greatly exceeding load capacity of freeways full of cars. Additionally, as a point of fact, not all PRT systems are rubber tire technology. The majority of viable PRT system technologies use magnetic levitation (maglev) technology.

The biggest negative issue with these new transit system technologies; is that as of yet, these systems haven’t been implemented into service. Therefore, to governments and academia, they don’t exist.

The sad story of PRT

This article in treehugger.com is an interesting history of Taxi 2000. The article has pictures of an era that provided innovative concepts that could have been a major transportation influence for the 2000s.

What happened to PRT? Here is one of the best articles that provides information about the PRT industry; from The Verge .

To quote Adi Robertson from the article, PRT was “a public transit revolution that never was.”

Since PRT isn’t going to happen anytime soon, how about replacing streetcars with Group Rapid Transit (GRT)? There are a few transit technologies that have been around for over thirty-five years; still actively working to implement their technology. One such technology is CyberTran .

Why not PRT?

The many opponents and critics of the new technology transit industry represent government. Derogatory articles, such as a 2014 article in Bloomberg present a risk adverse mindset.

A question at quora.com has a couple of responses which provide general unenthusiastic considerations.

First and foremost, the general population has no idea what PRT is. Even the acronym is foreign to most people. Especially legislators who’ve never heard of PRT. To allocate billions of dollars on an unknown and unproven technology is high risk. The government is risk adverse. Lobbyists promote financial interests in ten decades of status-quo transportation tradition.

Beyond PRT is another new technology to replace trains: Hyperloop . Although a new technology, it is fundamentally train technology and incapable of serving society’s transportation needs for today. The limitations of train and airplane type technology carrying passengers from station to station, hasn't changed from the 200-year-old train single point destination technology. Hyperloop's speed capability of 700mph is faster than commercial jets, which travel from 450 mph to 600 mph. It’s not a bad technology, merely not a new mode of transportation.

One of the best explanations of PRT and GRT is that this type of transportation is dependent upon an area’s land-use design. Transit systems are dependent on transit-oriented land-use designs. One of the main reasons PRT doesn't work is the size network. Most PRT systems serve as parking lot shuttles.

Another reason for PRT’s failure is that a metropolitan transit system is dysfunctional in an automobile centric land-use design. The automobile land-use design does not accommodate transit.

Also, the infrastructure is excessively costly, especially in relation to the cost of the rights-of-ways. For a PRT system which is dependent upon its farebox as the only source of income, the cost of infrastructure exceeds its potential income. When the ROI (return on investment) exceeds any potential income; it's impossible for a PRT system to acquire a funding source to be built. Conversely, public transit systems operate on tax money, and can afford to lose exorbitant sums. As an example, it's normal for the government funded transit systems to lose 70% to 95% of dollars spent, just to maintain their public transit costs.

Are there solutions? Of course there are, however, innovation is a product of the private sector.

Julio Gobbi

Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:59:57 GMT

Julio Gobbi's analysis of Otis Carr's technology

How the craft works

This article highlights Julio Gobbi. In his paper, available at gsjournal.net , he presents a thorough analysis of Otis Carr’s ship.

In the third chapter of Julio Gobbi’s paper, he explains how the craft works. According to Carr, when two electrically charged bodies rotate in opposite directions on the same axis, the effect is to create a gravitational center that makes the craft independent of external gravitational forces: "Any vehicle accelerated to an axis rotation relative to its attractive inertial mass, immediately becomes activated by free-space-energy and acts as an independent force… We have shown that a charged body, accelerated to an axis rotation relative to this attractive inertial mass, indicates polarity in a given direction. The dip-needle points, say, up toward the top of the body. But mount this while rotating body (with its spindle) on another platform and rotate this platform on a spindle, then if the counter-rotation is greater than the inertial forward rotation of the body, a dip-needle on the second platform will point down while the first dip-needle points up, indicating complete relativity of polarity. When the exact counter-rotation matches the forward rotation, the body loses its polarity entirely and immediately becomes activated by free-energy (tensor stresses in space) and acts as an independent force… The above-described assembly of counter-rotating charged masses becomes weightless and will escape the immediate attraction of gravitational forces…"

Julio Gobbi goes on to explain: Carr uses an internal platform rotating in direct rotation and places several devices in counter-rotation with its axes fixed by bearings on this first platform. There are six counter-rotating devices, equally spaced along the perimeter of the internal platform and are called Utron regenerative accumulators. There is another external platform that rotates in counter-rotation, as opposed to the first platform, with twelve electromagnets that produce electrical energy during the passage of the Utrons in their air gaps, when the system works as a regenerative generator.

This second external platform rotating in counter-rotation aims to compensate for the rotation of the first internal platform and keep the central cabin stationary. The fact is that the internal platform works like a rotor, while the external platform works like a stator (armature). In another statement by Carr, we can confirm that to create an artificial gravity inside the craft, as well as to keep the central cabin stationary, it is necessary to rotate two systems in opposite rotation: “Yes, this is the beginning of an answer to your question: we have capacitor plates and electromagnets as a part of this system. Now, this is counter-rotating; the electromagnets rotate in one direction, and the batteries rotate in another. The capacitor plates rotate in conjunction with the battery so that we have a clockwise and counterclockwise rotation. Now the third system is the cabin that keeps the crew. This does not rotate; it is fixed due to the fact that the two bodies are rotating clockwise and counterclockwise. Therefore, the system causes the craft to escape from the gravity pull. The craft itself due to this system still has internal gravity because it still has the same weight that it had in the beginning.”

As we can see, one of the functions of Utron devices and electromagnets is to make the system work like a motor, where the rotor and stator (armature) rotate in opposite rotation freely, which keeps the cabin stationary in the center. The switching of the electromagnets is done in a similar way to the present brushed motors and the supply of this “motor” is done by the central battery. However, switching the electromagnets also allows the energy regeneration of the batteries, when the system reaches a minimum rotation that allows the rotor (where the Utron accumulators are) and the stator (where the electromagnets are) to function as a generator. We can describe the central Utron as an energized rotor or, in other words, as a rotor that contains its own battery in motion and that is also capable of continually re-energizing itself. Otis Carr knew that bodies in high rotation create a gravitational field in the direction of the angular velocity vector, parallel to the spin axis. This principle was demonstrated in the chapter Gravitational Neutralization of the article Inertial Field [3], by analogy to the balance of forces that keeps a satellite in orbit around the planet. This gravitational neutralization was further studied in the section Gravitational Potential Neutralization in the article EM-GI Propulsion Systems [4]. We saw that when an object is in high rotation, it is possible to overcome the planet's gravitational field force, and we performed calculations that allow quantifying this phenomenon, known as the gyroscopic effect. This effect explains why, when asked about the square shape of the Utrons, Carr replied: “Dimensionally it is; it is square in these dimensions and when this rotation starts and builds up to a certain velocity, this form is very important because we have the total equation of action and reaction. Now this is done by a system of coil winding wherein we start at a point, expand to an equator, and continue our winding down to a point. With this physical expansion and contraction, is an electromagnetic field. Gravity enters the picture in the form of this relative rotation. When the relative rotation – inertial effective mass –, it's a matter of dimension. So that is the earth, say, is 8,000 miles in diameter, we know its fixed rotation is 1 in 24 hours. If we were 1 mile in diameter its rotation would be 8,000 in 24 hours. And by the same system, our 45-foot craft has a rotation of 580 rpm and when it reaches this rotation it is totally independent of its inertial attractive mass, in an electromagnetic field. …

“This model was spun at 40,000 rpm and when it did it set a pressure pattern of 1,000 tons; the horsepower reading was a little over 700. Six engineers checked this out. Now the relative rotation of this model would be about 68,000 rpm, and when it reaches this rotation, it would immediately take off.”

To overcome the gravitational pull of planet Earth, the relative rotation speed of the platform would be equal to the rotation speed of the Earth at the equator, that is, around 580 RPM. As the rotation of the electromagnets would be 580 RPM and the rotation of the central battery would also be 580 RPM, however, in the opposite direction, the total rotation, in relation to the other, would be 1,160 RPM. Mr. Colton, in an interview continues: “We're not giving it for a certain rotation for the sake of rotation but for the sake of relativity to the attractive mass. The earth at 8,000 miles diameter rotating once in 24 hours is relatively equal to a 45-foot craft rotating at 580 rpm, and 580 rpm would calculate to be the approximate rotational speed of an automobile tire on a car moving at about 25-30 mph.

The rotation at which the 45-foot disc would be independent of its inertial attractive mass presented by Mr. Colton in the interview is not correct. The approximate correct value is 660 RPM:

The six capacitor plates that rotate in direct rotation create a magnetic field on the central axis of the system in the same way as seen in the chapter Magnetic Propulsion Through Mass Rotation of the article EM-GI Propulsion Systems [4]. This central rotating magnetic field collects the ions from the atmosphere, as seen in the section Electric Charge Gathering by Magnetic Vortex of the article Power from Electrostatic Charges [5], and projects the negatively charged particles to the craft's periphery. Capacitor plates are bombarded by these negative electrostatic charges because they are on their path to the periphery and absorb them becoming superconducting due to the structural change in their atoms. The same occurs with the hull surface that is in the projection direction of these particles. This structural change is commented as being similar to jelly, that is, the metal becomes soft. The superconducting characteristic of these plates increases the central magnetic field by more than a thousand times and the projection of particles also multiplies. In this way, the central magnetic field is amplified and allows the disk to float magnetically in the vertical component of the Earth's magnetic field.

Carr's craft used several propulsion systems that, taken together, produced a gravitational center that moved the entire craft together, without the effects of inertia. In addition to the central electrical system, which provides electrical energy to the disk, we can identify the magnetic system of capacitor plates, which provides magnetic levitation, the peripheral magnetic system, which works as a motor and generator, and the gyroscopic system of gravitational propulsion.

There are two other systems that may be explored based on the electrostatic charges projection to the periphery, that we will not describe again in here. The first is the gathering of these charges to get free energy, because it was widely described in the article Power from Electrostatic Charges [5]. The second is the magnetic propulsion system caused by the circulation of these charges in the periphery of the disk. This creates a repulsion between this magnetic field and the vertical component of the terrestrial magnetic field, but it was widely described in the article EM-GI Propulsion Systems [4].

In addition to these systems, there is a secondary effect of producing etheric particles that provides an increase in the mental capacity of the crew. This allows control of the craft's direction according to the will and controlled imagination of its crew. We will not discuss this phenomenon.

According to Carr, the set of batteries that feeds the entire electrical system of the craft consists of the electrical connection of countless electrical cells of any known type (lead-acid, nickel-cadmium, metal hydride, etc.), which form an accumulator of large capacity, mounted inside a device in the form of double overlapping cones (central Utron). “We could use any of the kinds you mentioned; what we have here is tremendous power size in comparison to other batteries; therefore, it's very easy to put 1,000 2-volt cells inside this one unit as you see it. It has functioned very well. In our 45-foot craft we plant to have 12,000-volt batteries which will extend an electromotive force which will energize the electromagnets and the capacitor plates. The generative coils will put back into the batteries in this system the same amount of volts going out until there is a breakdown of electro-chemicals or wear-out of equipment. But it could last as long as average storage batteries in automobiles.”

As described above, the battery pack provides an electrical potential of 2,000 Volts DC for the prototype, but the 45-foot craft will have a battery pack that will provide 12,000 Volts DC for the production of the magnetic fields of the Utrons and electromagnets from the periphery. In order to function as a motor/generator, the Utrons and peripheral electromagnets are powered by synchronized pulses. For electromagnets, which have a ferromagnetic core, the pulsating current is calculated to not saturate the core, but in the case of Utrons, which do not have a ferromagnetic core, the pulsating current must be calculated to provide a minimum magnetic field sufficient to separate a large part, if not all, the electrical charges of mercury (its electrons in the conduction layer). This means that these current pulses can reach 1,000 A or more for the prototype, and 10,000 A or more for the 45-foot craft.

During operation, when the platform (which contains the six Utron regenerative accumulators and the six capacitor plates) rotates in the opposite direction to the external structure (which contains the electromagnets), an intense magnetic field is formed in the center of the disk, all powered by the central battery bank. As clarified by Otis Carr: “Our system utilizes gravity, electromagnetism, and electromotive force and a relative field to get its functional operation. We use an electrified sender. It's a sensor power core. Now this is what we call an accumulator… It is a storage cell, an accumulation of storage cells which provide an electromotive force in the same manner that any known battery produces an electromotive force.”

In operation, the central battery pack releases electromotive force to power the entire ship and, at the same time, is recharged by the energy collected in the coils of the electromagnets that rotate in counter rotation on the external platform. It is the central energy system for the space vehicle. As Carr describes: “This starts out electrochemically the same as other batteries, but we do have a regenerating system that is very unique. We are able here, for the first time to our knowledge, to use atmospheric electricity as a recharging system. This is done as part of the operational principle of the craft.

Julio Gobbi goes into greater detail, found with his analysis found in the General Science Journal .

This article provides information towards innovative considerations for viable space travel.

Current rocket science

Mon, 08 Jul 2024 16:53:15 GMT

Energy waste of chemical explosions for rocket launches

There’s a similarity with space flight, train, plane, and automobile technologies. They simply expand the envelops of the status-quo. It’s like redesigning a mousetrap to do the same task. Nothing new.

With that said, here’s the latest for space flight:

From a 2024 article at popularmechanics.com : https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60608517/overcome-earth-gravity/

In 2001, British Electrical Engineer Roger Shawyer first introduced the “impossible drive,” known as the EmDrive. It was called “ impossible ” because its creator purported that the drive was reactionless, meaning no propellant required—in other words, it defied the known laws of physics (specifically, the conservation of momentum).

As with anything that appears to thumb its nose at Newton and Einstein, scientists raised more than a few eyebrows, and two decades of testing eventually boiled down to an inevitable (and somewhat predictable) conclusion in 2021: the EmDrive was bunk . But that’s the nature of the scientific method—take a seemingly impossible idea, put it through rigorous testing, and hopefully get to an unassailable conclusion (or new discoveries that lead in other directions). But the not-based-in- physics dream of a propellant-less machine didn’t die with the EmDrive. Now, a new challenger approaches, and this one has a former NASA scientist backing it up.

He says his team—made up of people from NASA , Blue Origin, and the Air Force—investigated propellant-less drives for decades before arriving at electrostatics. For years, their devices produced negligible thrust, but saw increases with each new iteration. This culminated in 2023, when this “New Force”-powered drive generated enough thrust to overcome Earth’s gravity.

“Essentially, what we’ve discovered is that systems that contain an asymmetry in either electrostatic pressure or some kind of electrostatic divergent field can give a system of a center of mass a non-zero force component,” Buhler told The Debrief. “So, what that basically means is that there’s some underlying physics that can essentially place force on an object should those two constraints be met.”

Once EmDrive was told it couldn’t work, its creator and supporters had to work even harder to prove that it does. Their Exodus Propulsion Technologies website explains:

Like chemical rockets, Exodus propulsion devices create momentum for a spacecraft's motion. However, Exodus' platform uses the interaction of electrostatic fields to harness the momentum found in electricity rather than in a chemical reaction.

The process of generating the Exodus Effect(TM) is repeatable, predictable, published and well-understood. After being released from a 2-year national security hold, the first patent describing the Exodus Effect(TM) has finally been issued by the USPTO. Both acceleration and thrust (Newtons) are quantifiable and supported by 3rd-party validations. These facts are what separate Exodus from the pack.

EM Drive engine, space.com

CATTCC is a participant in the advanced transportation industry. It’s valid to hold an opinion. A “propellant-less” propellant is grammatically odd. A muscle-less muscle would otherwise be referred to as a spring. And a spring is different than a muscle. Any rocket engine that propels a force through a nozzle is considered a rocket engine. Using an electric reaction as a propellant, produces a heat reaction from molecular collisions. With very high precision to direct the reaction of that collision, a controlled reaction of that collision could be attained. And, this type of action is far more advantageous than a reaction from a chemical explosion; the standard source of fuel for most modern transportation.

It’s important to make the clarification that CATTCC supports exploration of alternative space flight technologies. This blogpost acknowledges there are other means of thrust propulsion. There have been numerous successful space flight missions using gravitational attraction.

Another of the rocket technology pursuits is an Arizona company is working to develop the Pulse Plasma Rocket . – Howe Industries is an advance rocket development company.

Most propulsion systems developed over the past 50 years are either high thrust OR high Isp- not both. A system with 100,000 N thrust and 5000 s Isp requires a power source greater than 2.5 gigawatts. If EP, then roughly 10 gigawatts of thermal heat would have to be radiated- well beyond any system put forth so far. Pulsed power generation allows high Isp and high thrust. As the system is not in thermodynamic equilibrium, the heat rejection can be accomplished.

The Pulsed Fission Fusion (PUFF) NIAC Phase II headed by Dr. Rob Adams at MSFC is complete. •Uses 50-100 MA of current through a liquid lithium liner to z-pinch a SNM capsule to criticality to ignite fusion •Potential of 30,000 s Isp and 100s of KN of thrust •Complex and difficult to test- partly due to classification guidelines; PPR uses a barrel consisting of water moderated HALEU: 1) Keff~.98 if bullet drives criticality or 2) Keff>1 if resonant drum drives criticality Specially designed “bullet” is injected at a velocity commensurate with the reactor period of the barrel 1e12 neutrons are injected along the path via a fast pulsed laser System is designed to preferentially heat the bullet to temperatures of several hundred eV. Resulting plasmoid is ejected and expands into magnetic nozzle ala PUFF.

Another space flight technology is the government’s pursuit. This is nuclear thermal rocket technology. This effort is by DARPA and NASA with a project test flight by 2026.

Instead, you could use nuclear power —not a mere radioactive heat source, the kind that might power the weak ion propulsion of a long-term space probe, but an actual fission reactor. Such a furnace could expand a trickle of 20-kelvin liquid hydrogen into a tornado of 2,700-kelvin gas, enabling a manageable amount of propellent to provide powerful thrust halfway to Mars, then to reverse the thrust to decelerate.

That is precisely what NASA and DARPA want to build, first as a prototype, then as a moon rocket, and finally as an interplanetary vehicle. On 26 July, the agencies disclosed details of the project , a partnership with Lockheed Martin and BWX Technologies, a reactor company based in Lynchburg, Va. They give the project the Harry Potterish name of DRACO, for Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations.

The plan is to test the prototype in space beginning in late 2026. That’s a very short order, eased in part by combining what would normally be the second and third phases of development. The speedup is possible because the prototype “incorporates a lot of heritage hardware from past deep-space missions,” says Tabitha Dodson , the DRACO program manager at DARPA. “We wanted to have a highly reliable space platform, with everything that’s not the engine low risk.”

DARPA is the government’s most innovative agency for scientific advances. With this said, keeping the status-quo is the goal of bureaucracy.

https://www.darpa.mil/program/demonstration-rocket-for-agile-cislunar-operations

The goal of the Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program is to demonstrate a nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) in orbit. NTRs use a nuclear reactor to heat propellant to extreme temperatures before exhausting the hot propellant through a nozzle to produce thrust. Compared to conventional space propulsion technologies, NTRs offers a high thrust-to-weight ratio around 10,000 times greater than electric propulsion and two-to-five times greater specific impulse (i.e. propellant efficiency) than in-space chemical propulsion.

For a better explanation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstration_Rocket_for_Agile_Cislunar_Operations

T he Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) is an under-development launch vehicle by Lockheed Martin in partnership with BWX Technologies as part of a DARPA program to be demonstrated in space in 2027. ^[2] ^[3] The experimental vehicle is planned to be reusable and will utilize next-generation nuclear thermal propulsion technology and low-enriched uranium , ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] with the U.S. Space Force to provide the launch. ^[5] In 2023, NASA joined the DARPA program in developing the nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) to carry astronaut crews to deep-space destinations like Mars . ^[6] DRACO will be the world's first in-orbit demonstration of a NTR engine. ^[7] It will reportedly be launched aboard a Vulcan Centaur as a payload . ^[8]

Tabitha Dodson, DARPA program manager for DRACO says, "Unlike today's chemical systems, which have reached a limit in how far they can evolve, nuclear technologies are theorized to evolve to systems such as fusion and beyond. Spacecraft evolved to be maneuvered and powered by nuclear reactors will enable humanity to go farther, with a higher chance of survival and success for any mission type." ^[9]

According to Lockheed Martin, there are considerable efficiency and time gains from the nuclear thermal propulsion. ^[10] NASA believes the much higher efficiency will be two to three times more than chemical propulsion , ^[5] and the nuclear thermal rocket is to cut the journey time to Mars in half. ^[11]

To explore greater advances, new directions have to be taken. It’s CATTCC’s mission to discover and develop gravity-based transportation advances. The rational for this type of technological advance for space flight has been made clear by many space flights. The most recent voyage of the Parker Solar Probe in reaching a speed of 400,000 miles per hour is certainly evidence to the advantage of using gravity as a source for acceleration.

The wonders of thorium

Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:08:06 GMT

What is it about thorium that is significant?

Thorium is a very electropositive and radioactive metal. It is reactive with halogens, oxygen, hydrogen, and sulphur.

https://techiescience.com/thorium-properties/

Thorium can be categorized under some chemical categories in the list below.

Thorium powder has pyrophoric properties . (It ignites spontaneously)
Thorium is a highly ductile, and fairly soft element.
Thorium is a crucial alloying component of magnesium because it increases the metal’s strength and creeps resistance at high temperatures.
Thorium dioxide was once added to glass to raise the refractive index, generating thoriated glass for use in premium camera lenses.
Thoriated tungsten, or Thorium, may be used to make electrodes and filaments for incandescent lights.

It is considered to be paramagnetic for materials whose electrons are hindered in magnetic fields. Let us examine the paramagnetic characteristics of thorium.

The paramagnetic properties of thorium are caused by the fact that it has two unpaired electrons. The Th has a magnetic moment of 2.83 (spin-only value). The table below displays the magnetic susceptibility value for thorium:

Magnetic properties of thorium and uranium

The dependence of the magnetic susceptibility on the temperature in the compound UB ₄ and system U _1−x Th _x B ₄ has been studied in the temperature range 140–1300°K. It has been established that the paramagnetic susceptibility does not obey the Curie-Weiss law. The experimental results are interpreted on the basis of the Stoner model of collectivized electrons which also makes it possible to explain the magnetic properties of other borides of thorium and uranium.

Why thorium?

Conventional scientific efforts are to use thorium as an energy source to replace radioactive uranium .

What does thorium present potential for? It has a unique magnetic value. As an element in a molecular composite, it provides a positive charge to a particular structure. This could be useful in building a vehicle for space flight.

Thorium having pyrophoric properties makes thorium a volatile substance. It’s use for energy storage make it valuable.

In studying every element’s potential, its molecular composition has to be investigated. Studying the Bohr model helps to analyze an element’s properties .

Thorium 3D model: https://graphoverflow.com/graphs/3d-periodic-table.html

Another Bohr model diagram: https://topblogtenz.com/bohr-model-for-each-element/

Thorium presents questions. In the study of Victor Grebennikov’s gravity platform, its design consists of CSEs (Cavity Structures Effect). This is a negative action. Earth’s atmosphere, in Grebennikov’s gravity platform is the attractive force. Would a underneath lining on the outer layer of the gravity platform act to neutralizing the platform, or would it react to Earth’s positive atmosphere to cause a repelling action beneath the gravity platform?

In a different configuration for a space flight vehicle, there is an absence of atmospheric charge; other than the influence of large planetary bodies. I could be possible to design a configuration where thorium acts as a catalyst to amplify a positive charge.

Either that or a thorium might be able to replace lithium, or other as a battery’s energy storage.

When asking the question: How a battery works, here is the answer:

Batteries use a variety of materials to store energy, including:

Anode: A negatively charged electrode made of materials like zinc, lithium, or graphite.
Cathode: A positively charged electrode made of materials like manganese, cobalt, or nickel.
Electrolyte: A chemical paste or liquid that separates the anode and cathode and facilitates the flow of electrical charge.
Separator: A thin layer of material that prevents the anode and cathode from touching and causing a short circuit.
Casing: The outer casing of the battery, often made of steel or plastic.

How Batteries Work

Batteries work by converting chemical energy into electrical energy through a process called electrochemical reactions. Here’s a simplified explanation:

Discharge: When a battery is connected to a device, the chemical energy stored in the battery is released.
Electrochemical Reactions: The anode and cathode react with the electrolyte to produce an electric current.
Electrons Flow: Electrons flow from the anode to the cathode through the external circuit, creating an electric current.
Chemical Energy Released: The chemical energy stored in the battery is released as electrical energy.
Recharge: When a rechargeable battery is recharged, the process is reversed, and the chemical energy is restored.

Example: Lithium-Ion Batteries

Lithium-ion batteries, commonly used in electric vehicles and mobile devices, use a lithium cobalt oxide cathode and a graphite anode. The electrolyte is a lithium salt dissolved in an organic solvent. When the battery is discharged, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode, releasing electrons that flow through the external circuit. When the battery is recharged, the process is reversed, and lithium ions move back to the cathode, restoring the chemical energy.

Is it possible for thorium to be used as a cathode? Would its pyrophoric properties in a composite be suitable for battery storage? Or are all actinides unsuitable for energy storage?

One of the efforts in transportation, is to use a thorium supply in an ion laser induced fusion for an engine .

No refueling or recharging: just do this with thorium (you won’t believe it)

Laser-Based technology is the prime motto of the thorium power engine. Thorium is anostradic chemical which can be applied to maerootically drive laser beams. While a thorium bomb in an auto engine receives high energy electrons from a channeler, it emits energy.

The laser light is focused into a chamber where nitrogen and hydrogen gas exist which results in plasma reaction that leads to a heated channel. This heat turns a extremely powerful engine, which in convert heat energy to mechanical motion that power of car wheels and its drivetrain.

It does not use air, fuel, and spark plugs as their methods of operation. Thorium is a material with the half-life between 5-10 years, so instead of the regular refueling it is used the full-time. Therefore, thorium cars are unique with the longest range and efficiency among existing cars.

Imagine how mobility could change thanks to the first thorium-engine, which has an extremely higher potential than hydrogen and EVs combined. In fact, carmakers have considered the possibility of producing it without nuclear reactions, which is the only drawback we could find to this proposal (no one would want to drive with a radioactive power plant under the engine).

This article talks about a new form of engine using thorium. It’s an overview of using laser-based technology as a method of using thorium ions to create heat which is used to convert it into mechanical motion. This mechanical motion can be engineered to provide power to a vehicle’s drivetrain. Since there isn’t a clear definition to the phrase ‘anostradic chemical’; the meaning of the word ‘ano’ is from new Latin, from Greek anō is upward, above, from ana up. The closest description of the word stradic is stratum, a plural of stratus from Latin; meaning: spread, or bed.

The need for innovative transportation is with efficient energy use. Thorium 232 is highly radio-active. Efficient transportation has to follow the Victor Schauberger philosophy: understand and copy nature. Chemical explosions for propulsion are inefficient energy use. The centrifugal force pushes outward, this action causes resistance and heat buildup. This produces massive energy loss.

How can thorium be used to increase magnetic spin efficiency? Can thorium be used in an alloy with Niobium or Neodymium? Possibly.

What is plasma

Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:39:26 GMT

One of the most convoluted words in science is the definition of plasma

What is plasma?

Plasma is a basic word referencing blood in medical science. Plasma in geophysics and astrophysics refers to substance as hot as the Sun. The word origination of the word: plasma, is from its Greek definition which means: moldable substance.

Physics now defines plasma as the addition to the three states of matter: gas, liquid, solid, and plasma. This causes obscurity to the name of a Plasma Cutter in the welding industry; since it is heat that produces malleability. In geophysics, the term Plasma as the core of Earth also provides an ambiguous notion; with malleability referring to heat as the source which makes it a liquid state.

With the phenomenally ambiguous meaning of plasma as a moldable substance, this leads one to conclude that plasma is every object, because all objects are formed with molecules. Every molecular structure is moldable. With blood, are the membrane particles of cells holding other particles as a whole be the moldable substance? How is this related to intense heat?

Medical industry

In its biological term , plasma in blood is the yellow hue membrane that contains proteins.

From the A Level Biology website:

Structure of Plasma Membrane

The plasma membrane (also known as the cell membrane or cytoplasmic membrane) is a biological membrane that separates the interior of a cell from its outside environment.
It is a fluid mosaic of lipids, proteins and carbohydrate.
The plasma membrane is impermeable to ions and most water-soluble molecules.
They cross the membrane only through transmembrane channels, carriers, and pumps.
These transmembrane proteins provide the cell with nutrients, control internal ion concentrations, and establish a transmembrane electrical potential.
A single amino acid change in one plasma membrane pump and Cl− channel causes the human disease cystic fibrosis.
The cell membrane is primarily composed of a mix of proteins and lipids.
Depending on the membrane’s location and role in the body, lipids can make up anywhere from 20 to 80 percent of the membrane, with the remainder being proteins.
While lipids help to give membranes their flexibility, proteins monitor and maintain the cell’s chemical climate and assist in the transfer of molecules across the membrane.
The fundamental structure of the membrane is the phospholipid bilayer, which forms a stable barrier between two aqueous compartments.
The plasma membrane is composed of a phospholipid bilayer, which is two layers of phospholipids back-to-back.
Phospholipids are lipids with a phosphate group attached to them.
The phospholipids have one head and two tails.
The head is polar and hydrophilic, or water-loving.
The tails are nonpolar and hydrophobic, or water-fearing.

Plasma in physics

The biological definition does not fit into the physics terminology as being “the fourth state of matter”.

A plasma welder refers to its definition as the use of super-heated gas. From the Abicor Binzel website:

Plasma is a hot ionized gas consisting of approximately equal numbers of positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons. The characteristics of plasmas are significantly different from those of ordinary neutral gases so that plasmas are considered a distinct "fourth state of matter."

Simply put, Plasma is a Gas that has been super-heated to a point where it becomes highly conductive. In Welding and Cutting processes, this allows an electrical current to be transferred.

From the Wikipedia definition, plasma relates to charged particles:

The presence of charged particles makes plasma electrically conductive , with the dynamics of individual particles and macroscopic plasma motion governed by collective electromagnetic fields and very sensitive to externally applied fields. The response of plasma to electromagnetic fields is used in many modern devices and technologies, such as plasma televisions or plasma etching .

Depending on temperature and density, a certain number of neutral particles may also be present, in which case plasma is called partially ionized . Neon signs and lightning are examples of partially ionized plasmas. Unlike the phase transitions between the other three states of matter, the transition to plasma is not well defined and is a matter of interpretation and context. Whether a given degree of ionization suffices to call a substance "plasma" depends on the specific phenomenon being considered.

Plasma as a physics term is defined in the Wikipedia explanation Plasma was first identified in laboratory by Sir William Crookes . Crookes presented a lecture on what he called "radiant matter" to the British Association for the Advancement of Science , in Sheffield, on Friday, 22 August 1879. Systematic studies of plasma began with the research of Irving Langmuir and his colleagues in the 1920s. Langmuir also introduced the term "plasma" as a description of ionized gas in 1928:

The fourth state of matter

Plasma is called the fourth state of matter after solid , liquid , and gas . It is a state of matter in which an ionized substance becomes highly electrically conductive to the point that long-range electric and magnetic fields dominate its behaviour.

Plasma is typically an electrically quasineutral medium of unbound positive and negative particles (i.e., the overall charge of a plasma is roughly zero). Although these particles are unbound, they are not "free" in the sense of not experiencing forces. Moving charged particles generate electric currents , and any movement of a charged plasma particle affects and is affected by the fields created by the other charges. In turn, this governs collective behaviour with many degrees of variation. ^[21] ^[22]

Plasma is distinct from the other states of matter. In particular, describing a low-density plasma as merely an "ionized gas" is wrong and misleading, even though it is similar to the gas phase in that both assume no definite shape or volume. The following table summarizes some principal differences:

Lightning as an example of plasma present at Earth's surface: Typically, lightning discharges 30 kiloamperes at up to 100 megavolts, and emits radio waves, light, X- and even gamma rays. Plasma temperatures can approach 30000 K and electron densities may exceed 10 ²⁴ m ⁻³ .

Plasma in geophysics

This is a photo of the plasma trail from Atlantis during its re-entry into Earth's atmosphere . The photo was taken from the International Space Station .

If plasma is referred to as a comet trail created by atmospheric interference, what is its relationship to blood? Since the plasma element of blood is referred to as a membrane, does this not apply to other aspects of plasma as a membrane as well? How then is it that the above photo refers to plasma in terms of physics as charged particles ?

In the scientific discipline of geophysics, plasma has a different interpretation.

From https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/atmosphere/layers-of-atmosphere

Exosphere is Earth’s outermost atmospheric layer. It extends from about 375 miles (600 km) to 6,200 miles (10,000 km) above the earth. In this layer, atoms and molecules escape into space and satellites orbit the earth. At the bottom of the exosphere is a transition layer called the thermopause.
Thermosphere: The thermosphere is the layer above the mesopause, extending from about 62 miles (100 km) to 620 miles (1000 km). The temperature in this layer can reach as high as 1000 K (1728°F or 927°C).
Thermosphere

Between about 53 miles (85 km) and 375 miles (600 km) lies the thermosphere, known as the upper atmosphere. While still extremely thin, the gases of the thermosphere become increasingly denser as one descends toward the Earth.

As such, incoming high energy ultraviolet and x-ray radiation from the sun begins to be absorbed by the molecules in this layer and causes a large temperature increase.

Because of this absorption, the temperature increases with height. From as low as -184°F (-120°C) at the bottom of this layer, temperatures can reach as high as 3,600°F (2,000°C) near the top.

However, despite the high temperature, this layer of the atmosphere would still feel very cold to our skin. The high temperature indicates the amount of the energy absorbed by the molecules, but with so few molecules in this layer, the total number would not be enough to heat our skin.

Ionosphere: The ionosphere is the layer above the thermosphere, extending from about 48 km to 965 km. The temperature in this layer is typically around 500-1000 K (932°F to 1832°F or 500°C to 927°C).
Mesosphere: The mesosphere is the layer below the thermosphere, extending from about 31 miles (50 km) to 53 miles (85 km) above the Earth’s surface. The temperature in this layer is typically around -100°C to -50°C (-148°F to -58°F).
Stratosphere: The stratosphere extends from from 4 -12 miles (6-20 km) above the Earth's surface to around 31 miles (50 km). This layer holds 19 percent of the atmosphere's gases but very little water vapor.

In this region, the temperature increases with height. Heat is produced in the process of the formation of ozone, and this heat is responsible for temperature increases, from an average -60°F (-51°C) at tropopause to a maximum of about 5°F (-15°C) at the top of the stratosphere.

This increase in temperature with height means warmer air is located above cooler air. This prevents convection as there is no upward vertical movement of the gases. As such, the location of the bottom of this layer is readily seen by the anvil-shaped tops of cumulonimbus clouds

The transition layer at the bottom of the stratosphere is called the tropopause.

Troposphere

Known as the lower atmosphere, almost all weather occurs in this region. The troposphere begins at the Earth's surface, but the height of the troposphere varies. It is 11-12 miles (18-20 km) high at the equator, 5½ miles (9 km) at 50°N and 50°S, and just under four miles (6 km) high at the poles.

As the density of the gases in this layer decrease with height, the air becomes thinner. Therefore, the temperature in the troposphere also decreases with height. As one climbs higher, the temperature drops from an average around 62°F (17°C) to -60°F (-51°C) at the tropopause.

The magnetosphere is the region around the Earth where the planet’s magnetic field dominates the surrounding space. It is not a part of the atmosphere, but rather a region of space that extends from the top of the atmosphere to a distance of about 60,000 to 100,000 kilometers (37,000 to 62,000 miles) into space.

The magnetosphere is shaped like a comet, with the sunward side being about 10 Earth radii (around 60,000 kilometers or 37,000 miles) out, and the nightside stretching out in a long tail that extends beyond 200 Earth radii (around 1.2 million kilometers or 750,000 miles) into space.

The magnetosphere is formed by the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetic field. The solar wind is a stream of charged particles emitted by the sun, and it interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, causing it to compress and shape the magnetic field into the characteristic comet-like shape.

The magnetosphere plays a crucial role in protecting the Earth from harmful solar and cosmic radiation, as well as from the solar wind itself. It also helps to shield the Earth’s atmosphere from erosion by the solar wind, and it affects the motion of charged particles in the upper atmosphere.

In summary, the magnetosphere is not a part of the Earth’s atmosphere, but rather a region of space that surrounds the Earth and is shaped by the interaction of the solar wind with the planet’s magnetic field.

What is the magnitude and extent of the Earth's electrostatic environment?

The electrostatic field on Earth is a complex and dynamic phenomenon that plays a crucial role in various natural processes. The search results provide valuable insights into the magnitude and characteristics of this field.

Atmospheric Potential Gradient

The atmospheric potential gradient, also known as the atmospheric electric field, is a key component of Earth’s electrostatic field. According to the search results, the atmospheric potential gradient is approximately 120 V/m over a flat field on a clear day. Objects protruding from the surface, such as flowers and trees, can increase the electric field strength to several kilovolts per meter.

Global Atmospheric Electrical Circuit

The movement of charge between the Earth’s surface, the atmosphere, and the ionosphere is known as the global atmospheric electrical circuit. This circuit plays a crucial role in shaping the electrostatic field on our planet.

Near-Surface Electrostatic Forces

The electrostatic forces near the surface of the Earth are detected by organisms such as bumblebees and spiders, which use these forces to navigate and initiate dispersal. The atmospheric potential gradient is also thought to affect sub-surface electro-chemistry and microbial processes.

Comparison with Other Fields

For comparison, the magnetic field on Earth, which is a different type of field, has a magnitude ranging from 25 to 65 μT (0.25 to 0.65 G) at its surface. The electrostatic field, on the other hand, is typically measured in volts per meter (V/m).

Conclusion

In summary, the electrostatic field on Earth is a complex and dynamic phenomenon with a magnitude of approximately 120 V/m over a flat field on a clear day. The atmospheric potential gradient plays a crucial role in shaping this field, and the electrostatic forces near the surface are detected by various organisms. While the magnetic field on Earth is stronger, the electrostatic field is an essential component of our planet’s natural processes.

The scientific nomenclature of plasma varies with each discipline. Hence, this shows a curious relationship with transportation. Plasma is a common term in perpetuating rocket propulsion. It’s associated with the ionization of charged high temperature particles, through the process of molecular electromagnetic action.

The stance of CATTCC research continues the search for methodologies of vehicle motion without propulsion. The new rocket research using ion related technologies proselytize the furtherance and amplification of propulsion’s inefficiency.

What is HAARP

Thu, 06 Jun 2024 01:08:01 GMT

High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)

What is HAARP?

The HAARP facility is based on a large antenna array which serves to study Earth’s upper atmosphere. Its function is to perform experiments relating to Earth’s upper atmosphere. It has the ability to create plasma structures and irregularities which use the ionosphere like an antenna to excite low frequency waves, create weak luminous aurora-like glows, and a variety of other experiments. By generating and receiving high frequency radio waves, it tests plasma structures and ion transfers. Additionally, HAARP creates weak luminous aurora-like glows. It also serves as a facility for cooperative atmospheric studies. Their website states: The HAARP site is an ideal location for deploying synergistic instrumentation for studying radio and space physics. Investigators interested in deploying diagnostic apparatus including radio receivers and radar, lidar, optical imagers and spectrometers, and interferometers.

From the official HAARP website:

The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere. "The ionosphere stretches roughly 50 to 400 miles above Earth's surface, right at the edge of space. Along with the neutral upper atmosphere, the ionosphere forms the boundary between Earth's lower atmosphere — where we live and breathe — and the vacuum of space." ( NASA )

Operation of the research facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska Fairbanks on Aug. 11, 2015, allowing HAARP to continue with exploration of ionospheric phenomenology via a land-use cooperative research and development agreement.

HAARP is the world's most capable high-power, high-frequency transmitter for study of the ionosphere. The HAARP program is committed to developing a world-class ionospheric research facility consisting of:

The Ionospheric Research Instrument, a high-power transmitter facility operating in the High Frequency range. The IRI can be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study.
A sophisticated suite of scientific or diagnostic instruments that can be used to observe the physical processes that occur in the excited region.

Observation of the processes resulting from the use of the IRI in a controlled manner will allow scientists to better understand processes that occur continuously under the natural stimulation of the sun.

An excerpt from a more detailed description of HAARP is provided by Wikipedia :

Work on the HAARP facility began in 1993. The current working IRI was completed in 2007; its prime contractor was BAE Systems Advanced Technologies . As of 2008, HAARP had incurred around $250 million in tax-funded construction and operating costs. In May 2014, it was announced that the HAARP program would be permanently shut down later in the year. After discussions between the parties, ownership of the facility was transferred to the University of Alaska Fairbanks in August 2015.

In 2015, operations were transferred to the University of Alaska.

Conspiracies

The process of testing the unknown comes with the risks of effects. There is a question as to this cloud pattern as being an effect of HARRP testing.

HAARP is a test facility to study various atmospheric events. The study of Earth’s magnetosphere is a rational pursuit. Although scientific experimentation holds a different pursuit than nefarious intent, conspiracy enthusiasts have justifiable reasons for government distrust. To validate conspiracy suspicions of a nefarious scientific nature, a rational accusation should hold a respectable scientific comprehension of subatomic action when speaking about quantum mechanics. Accusations of controlling Earth’s weather patterns, creating aurora borealis effects, targeting laser weapons, causing earthquakes, and turning people’s thoughts into acting as weaponized devices are among conspiracy topics. Although government actors may be undermining Constitutional laws to subvert societal peace in an effort to enhance their financial gain or strengthen their grip of political rule, the intent of HAARP is to study Earth’s atmosphere.

DARPA

Conspiracy enthusiasts have more justification to be concerned about DARPA instead of HAARP, it has a much more sinister appearance. Wikipedia explains the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) as an independent research and development agency of the United States Department of Defense , responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

DARPA is independent of other military research and development and reports directly to senior Department of Defense management. DARPA comprises approximately 220 government employees in six technical offices, including nearly 100 program managers, who together oversee about 250 research and development programs.

Wikipedia shows an extremely interesting and extensive list of DARPA projects .

Not all of DARPA is conspiratorial. Some amazing technology has been developed with DARPA innovation.

The Economist has called DARPA the agency that shaped the modern world, with technologies like " weather satellites , GPS , drones , stealth technology , voice interfaces , the personal computer and the internet on the list of innovations for which DARPA can claim at least partial credit." Its track record of success has inspired governments around the world to launch similar research and development agencies.

Advanced transportation technology

Are developing new modes of transportation too advanced for government agencies? Perhaps, nonetheless, social demand for advances in transportation is at its peak. Primarily because there have been no new modes of transportation in over100 years. 50 years ago, space travel was a common theme in conversations. Those conversations today of building space colonies and living on the moon have disappeared. In an abrogating philosophic statement, the spirit of expanse, adventure, and community enrichment seem to have been replaced by a social attitude of self-enrichment and indolence. Perhaps it’s best that the worst of human kind lack the ability to travel in space or have a means of quick and efficient transportation.

There are several aspects for researching efficient transportation; explored in the blogpost Earth’s electrostatic charges :

According to NASA , the magnetosphere also protects Earth from large quantities of particle radiation emitted during coronal mass ejection (CME) events and also from cosmic rays — atom fragments — raining down on Earth from deep space. The magnetosphere repels harmful energy away from Earth and traps it in zones called the Van Allen radiation belts . These donut-shaped belts of radiation can swell when the sun's activity increases.

Further into the blogpost:

This addresses the acknowledgment that Earth’s composition is comprised of ferrous elements and magnetic action. All magnets affect ferrous elements. The presents of an electromagnetic field surrounding Earth is the corresponding reaction to many forms of Earth’s internal magnetic and electromagnetic action.

This trail of research relates to how gravity and Earth’s magnetic field can potentially be used for transportation. Researching this line of studying Earth’s magnetic field is imperative for advancements in transportation.

Potential solutions for efficient space travel can be found in the blogpost Ultra-high-speed travel:

Ultra-high-speed long-distance travel

In the search for how to best build an ultra-fast space flight vehicle; what is the most appropriate technological approach? These pieces for building theories of design for attaining ultra-high speeds for space flight have become the focus of importance: gravity manipulation, spin, magnets, electrogravitics, and electromagnetics. The pursuit is how to fit these pieces together is like a puzzle.

There are two aspects of greatest need for efficient transportation: short distance and ultra high-speed space travel.

Bug wings for travel

Tue, 28 May 2024 17:07:47 GMT

Continuing the search to use levitation for travel

This article continues the research in exploring Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform. Several of these points have been referenced previously, the purpose of further study is to find answers.

There have been several articles looking at Earth’s magnetic fields. These are a component to the levitating process with Grebennikov’s platform.

Nikola Tesla’s use of Earth’s magnetic field

Nikola Tesla spent many years exploring and developing his theories. One of the greatest concepts for energy use of Earth’s magnetic fields was a project that was never put into use. Through his understanding and experimentation, he saw the energy of lightning and found a way to access its power. The power it enabled was to provide free electricity to the general public.

His patent took twelve years to be granted.

The purpose of mentioning Tesla’s Wardenclyffe Tower is to show that there is an abundance of electrical activity in the atmosphere and within the Earth; and it's available to be captured.

Further in this analysis, Earth’s electrostatic charges demonstrates several ways Earth’s magnetosphere displays its active power.

In earlier articles it was shown that Earth’s atmosphere contains positive charge, and Earth’s core is negatively charged. Again, magnets attract and repel. The theory that like charges repel is the basis for constructing a negatively charged platform placed against Earth’s negatively charged ground.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_magnetic_field

Magnetic field fundamentals are consistent within the molecular structure of a device. Additionally, the repulsive force of Earth’s negative charge fluctuates with the density and particular elements involved, including water, which is slightly negative.

Bug wings

This article's title, ‘Bug’s wings for travel’ focuses a perspective of the fan plates : Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate. This examines how the CSEs interact with the chitin nets. How did Viktor Grebennikov wire the three-dimensional bug parts together, and the other question; can these be remanufactured by 3-D printers?

Is it possible to replicate the intricacies of bug wings and manufacture them? A bug’s wing is a biological structure. As such, its structure should be similar to the style of the DNA’s double helix . Can the crystalline structure be matched in a similar style with the technology of chip building ?

What part of a bug’s wing provides levitation? The analysis over many articles is the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). Quantum physics shows that CSEs are voids; pointed out in the article; Using air for levitation . It makes the point that a subatomic interpretation of a void registers as a negative charge. The summation is that Grebennikov’s discovery of the CSE when applied to his levitating platform, has the potential to act as a large negative field.

Having made the supposition that Grebennikov’s platform used the CSE, there is a question. Was the negative field due to what Grebennikov discovered is the chitin geometric structure of elytron , or the CSE?

All the CATTCC articles exploring details of levitation, thus far regarding transportation, touch on CSEs.

It’s compelling to presume that the CSE is more attune to its molecular structure, than its molecular composition. The aspect of capturing a couple thousand beetles and glueing their elytra together could conceivably be replaced by a different material with a similar molecular structure.

Can 3-D printers be used?

Can a cavity structure be manufactured by a digital printer? Is there a CSE difference between chitin and ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), or other material?

A PolyJet 3-D printer produces a very fine, accurate and detailed product. Its rigid and rubber-like photopolymers have the highest detail resolution that doesn’t involve heat, which allows it to maintain tight tolerances.

Although Grebennikov’s platform had elytron CSEs, a larger cavities structures size could be multiplied to affect a CSE that holds a negative charge.

Frequencies

In the article; Extending CSE research , is the highlight from an article “Cavity Structural Effect” by Ville Piippola . He points to other scientists, showing the group movement of electrons within multi cavity structures; lead to a system of standing de Broglie waves, with classic frequencies. This suggests; it’s the cavity structure that garners the CSE. This also leans towards the probability that its composition is less significant than its structure.

Again, by using the ability to manufacture suitable cavity structures, it might be possible to create a negative field platform. How small can these cavity structures be manufactured? Grebennikov pointed out that the cavity structures could be compressed and stacked. This also says the size of the cavity structures can be minimized to multiply the amount of cavity wall surfaces per volume. This, points back to the question for the necessity of elytron as the fundamental component.

It is the postulation of reasoning for the concept importance of this design structure: to interact with Earth’s positive and negative magnetic field. It’s still a question as to the necessity of activating an additional battery power source. There are other theories for Grebennikov’s levitating platform to have a battery source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZYtuvJW_TE .

There is also the question regarding the legitimacy of Grebennikov’s platform to have had flown. The concept of harnessing levitation by attaching bug wings to a piece of wood is bitterly antithetical to academia physics. Nonetheless, by applying a negative field to another negative field, its reaction would be repelled. The concept of utilizing a positive charge in Earth’s electrostatic atmosphere to interact with a small negative field platform is also valid to physics.

Transportation

The majority of conventional teaching adheres to the perspective that transportation has to be driven by propulsion. Levitation provides the ability for acceleration; absent of propulsion. The aspect of attaining acceleration with levitation is a viable consideration through conventional physics. The Parker Solar probe is an example. It has provided the fastest speed ever traveled by an Earth vessel.

To review levitation, a look at the article: Levitation, solve for a+b , in the Levitating vehicle section: What are all the possible aspects involved with levitation? First is electromagnetics. Then, electrogravitics, gravitational influence, psychokinetics, vacuums, CSEs, crystals, polymerization, the Schumann resonance, magnetosphere, ions, chitin, de Broglie waves, mass frequency vibration, dimensional transfer and then whatever else can be found.

How many of these various aspects to levitation would be needed to produce a vehicle capable of levitating?

Directions for new transportation

Sat, 18 May 2024 04:23:39 GMT

New directions for short and long distance transportation

Someone recently asked a question; what is the power of gravity?

Answering the question is twofold. Explaining what gravity is, requires: understanding the nature of gravity, or defining what gravity is. Defining what the power of gravity does; is with Newton’s laws of motion from 400 years ago. He mathematically explained the principles of inertia, acceleration, action and reaction. In response to the question: what is the power of gravity, Newton’s laws of gravity sufficiently address the power that gravity has. What it is, that’s an entirely different question.

What is gravity?

Regarding the question of what gravity is, there is a new theory that determines gravity as an action of particle motion. According this new theory of gravity , which has been stated numerous times throughout these blogposts, it is the angular momentum of particle mass along its path, traveling at light speed through the universe. This suggests that the power of gravity is equal to the momentum of particle motion traveling at light speed.

The nature of this statement is controversial to those who disagree with Einstein’s theory of relativity which states that the Milky Way galaxy is traveling through the universe at light speed. Considering that Einstein’s theory of relativity is correct, the application of gravity being the angular momentum of particle motion is applicable. This theory of gravity, however, does not discount or remove the principle of Newton’s Laws of Motion, which are based on the consistencies of uniform movement at light speed. This consistency of all matter traveling at this speed provides the appearance of standing still. Hence, energy equals mass time times the speed of light squared; rules that energy relates to that which exceeds matter traveling in the consistency of light speed.

New transportation

The significance of gravity regarding new transportation is fundamental to developing a brand-new mode of transportation. New modes of transportation require new methodologies. Society’s technological advances over the past 100 years necessitate the demand for efficient transportation. Both short-distance and long-distance transportation require innovative solutions. A reasonable pursuit towards discovering new methodologies in transportation innovation is by the manipulation of gravity.

Short-distance and long-distance transportation have different approaches

Two separate methodologies are at play with distance traveled. Short distance requires more destination flexibility. Also, a person traveling from their front door to the grocery store has little concern about speeds exceeding a thousand miles per hour.

Conversely, speed is an important factor with long distance travel, especially space travel. The Moon is 225,623 miles from Earth. The average distance to Mars is 200,000,000 million miles. A space ship traveling at light speed would allow the ship to reach Mars in a ½ hour. A space ship traveling from Earth to the moon at one-tenth the speed of light would reach the moon in 20 seconds.

The approach to discovering efficient transportation solutions is by looking where efficient energy sources can be found. The constant redesign of antique transportation technology is synonymous to constantly redesigning frivolous small bends into the wire of a 100-year-old mousetrap.

There is an enormous waste involved with chemical explosions to propel a vehicle. With today’s technological capabilities, it’s beyond comprehension that new methodologies haven’t been implemented.

Long distance transportation

The best illustration that shows energy waste are chemical explosions by rocket propulsion. By looking at a rocket launch from the perspective of physics; consider the action at its atomic level. The fundamental principle of an explosion is a collision of particles that release its energy in 360 degrees. The trajectory of a rocket is one direction of that 360-degree energy transfer. It doesn’t require an engineering degree to recognize this produces a massive amount of wasted energy.

Ion propulsion is a popular area for current research. Although this technology is different than chemical explosions, its design fundamentally replaces a chemical explosion for an electric spark. It produces the electric spark as propulsion thrust. In a recent blogpost; Current state of space flight , a comment summarizes the direction of these endeavors: a propellent-less propellent drive is another word for electric spark.

Rethinking space travel

Long distance transportation includes space travel.

There are several aspects of conventional rocket technology that require new concepts to attaining adequate speeds for space travel to be practical. The most effective method for space travel is with the utilization of gravity. This has already been proven with several NASA missions. The most recent use of gravity is the Parker Solar probe . It’s next loop using Venus’ gravity to accelerate the Parker Solar probe, will achieve a speed of 430,000 mile per hour.

From the article: Ultra-high-speed travel , is the paragraph: Ultra-high-speed long-distance travel. It specifies aspects to discover ultra-fast speeds necessary for space flight. In the search for how to best build an ultra-fast space flight vehicle; what is the most appropriate technological approach? Creating theories of design for attaining ultra-high speed space flight are possibly the most importance: gravity manipulation, spin, magnets, electrogravitics, and electromagnetics. The pursuit for how to fit these pieces together is like a puzzle.

Viktor Schauberger was a 10 ^th generation master forester. His genius is unsurpassed in modern science regarding his understanding nature. One of his assertions: “understand and copy nature”. He found that all nature is centripetal in nature. He also said that all modern transportation is centrifugal, which opposes nature. This is a profound assessment to comprehend in considering new concepts for space travel. To copy nature is especially important as it relates to using the momentum of spin as a launch procedure.

The pursuit of propulsion technology as the only method of motion completely ignores the basic physics of magnets. Magnets repel and attract. How much energy does a magnet require to attract an opposite magnetic pole? This proposes the contemplation for using attraction as a possible means to replace propulsion.

Short distance transportation

The social demand for short distance transportation is to replace the unsustainability and inefficiency of the automobile. This requires: discovering a methodology, development, and implementation of a vehicle technology that is more convenient, faster, less expensive, more comfortable, safer, and easier to drive than a car. What technology can accomplish this? The CATTCC solution is levitation.

Levitation is the accumulation of vibrating mass . By the resonance of controlled vibration, it is theoretically plausible for levitation to be used as a transportation mechanism. Several of the CATTCC blogposts examine the possibilities for using levitation as a transportation mechanism. Leading research in this field was Viktor Grebennikov and his discovery of Cavity Structures Effects (CSE). This provides exploratory possibilities to examine.

The future of transportation floats.

Using air for levitation

Sat, 11 May 2024 17:42:05 GMT

Knowing the available pieces to use levitation for transportation

With a concept of available pieces to use levitation for transportation, next is the methodology for buildout.

Earth’s electrostatic field is a very powerful force with a useable charge. It’s explained well in the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Electricity in the Atmosphere . In the article Build With Levitation is this: The cell phone uses a battery to power its transceiver to send and receive signals. Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device utilized compressed CSEs to enact a negative force to interact with Earth’s electrostatic field. It manipulates the field via pivoting fans attached to an axis of the “blinds”.

In the transportation industry, there is a difference between traditional thought with the perspective of aeronautic engineering, and a perspective with the physics of quantum mechanics. The pursuit of aeronautics is to measure the influence of air flow as a vehicle is propelled through the air.

In researching Victor Grebennikov’s work relating to the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE), here is an excerpt from the abstract of a government study relating to the effects of cavity resonance. This is an example of traditional procedure in pursuit of aeronautic engineering; Complex Geometry Effects on Cavity Resonance :

The flow over an aircraft bay is often represented using a rectangular cavity; however, this simplification neglects many features of actual flight geometry that could affect the unsteady pressure field and resulting loading in the bay. To address this shortcoming, a complex cavity geometry was developed to incorporate more realistic aircraft-bay features including shaped inlets, internal cavity structure, and doors. A parametric study of these features was conducted based on fluctuating pressure measurements at subsonic and supersonic Mach numbers. Resonance frequencies and amplitudes increased in the complex geometry compared to a simple rectangular cavity that could produce severe loading conditions for store carriage. High-frequency content and dominant frequencies were generated by features that constricted the flow such as leading-edge overhangs, internal cavity variations, and the presence of closed doors.

Pointing out this differentiation is to emphasize the importance in perspective. Traditional procedure for flight is propulsion. Following this perspective eliminates efforts to discover attraction as a method for flight.

Relating to transportation of flight, the perspective with quantum mechanics is to discover subatomic influences of electrostatic action to varying elements and molecular reactions. The CATTCC pursuit is utilizing the presents of Earth’s electrostatic field and the CSE within a levitating device.

In a previous article, Earth’s electrostatic charge , Earth’s electrostatic field is identified as a potential source for magnetic action. Magnets repel and attract. Earth’s core is magnetic. This magnetic action has the ability to repel and attract. Grebennikov’s levitating device utilizes the CSE as a negative charge. Against Earth’s positive electrostatic charge, Grebennikov’s levitating device has attraction potential.

How to rebuild Grebennikov’s levitating platform

This is the challenge. The layout is clear, who can build a prototype? The first component is to build large segments of CSEs. In the article, Developing the theory for levitation , this picture of Grebennikov’s levitating device is shown.

The pivoting axis isn’t clearly definitive. Nor is the device’s operational diagram detailed. This photograph, however, is a very clear layout of the supposed operational functioning CSE configuration. The question remains, can this, or how does this interact with Earth’s magnetic and atmospheric electrostatic field? The answer seems to be clear: its negative charge.

CATTCC’s research in quantum mechanics shows that levitation is accumulation of vibrational mass . It’s theorized that there is a vibrational interaction from Grebennikov’s cavity structure to Earth’s magnetic and atmospheric field which produces levitation.

How does the device work? There is light shining through the fans, in the picture. Are the fans, which serve as blinds: open or closed? Does this pictured device utilize compressed cavity structures?

Grebennikov spoke of chitin as a component

In the article: From the Notebook of a Naturalist , with excepts of the blogpost: Chitin and Grits is this, from Viktor Grebennikov:

How and why did I make this discovery? I was examining the chitin shells of insects under my microscope in the summer of 1988 along with their pinnate antennae, the fish-scale microstructure of butterfly wings, iridescent colors, and other inventions of nature. I became interested in an amazingly rhythmical microstructure of one large insect detail. It was an extremely well-ordered composition, as though stamped out by factory equipment according to special blueprints and calculations. As I saw it, the intricate sponginess was clearly unnecessary either for the strength of the part, or for its decoration. I have never observed anything like this unusual micro-ornament either in nature, in technology, or in art. Because its structure is three-dimensional, I have been unable to capture it in a drawing so far, or a photograph. Why does an insect need it? Besides, other than in flight, this structure at the bottom of the wing case is always hidden from the eye. No one would ever see it properly. Was it perhaps the wave emitter using "my" multiple cavity structures effect? That truly lucky summer, there were very many insects of this species and I would capture them at night. I was not able to observe these insects neither before, nor later.

I placed the small, concave chitin plate on the microscope stage in order to again examine its strangely star-shaped cells under strong magnification. I again admired this masterpiece jewel work of nature. I was about to place a second identical plate with the same unusual cell structure on its underside almost purposelessly on top of the first one. But then!

The little plate came loose from my tweezers, hung suspended above the other plate on the microscope stage for a few seconds, then turned a few degrees clockwise and slid to the right, then turned counterclockwise and swung and only then it abruptly fell on the desk.

You can imagine what I felt at that moment. When I came to my senses, I tied a few panels together with a wire and it wasn't an easy thing to do. I succeeded only when I positioned them vertically. What I got was a multi-layered chitin block and I placed it on the desk. Even a relatively large object, such as a thumbtack, would not fall on it. Something pushed it up and aside. When I attached the tack on top of the "block", I witnessed incredible, impossible things. The tack would disappear from sight for a few moments. That was when I have realized that this was no "beacon," but something entirely different.

This poses a challenge: how to catch a particular bug and extract its parts.

From the pictures in More About CSEs and Levitation Finding the Solutions for a+b , Grebennikov’s levitating device shows a slight wall surrounding the receded area holding the fan components. The fan structure is metal. Where and how are the cavity structures assembled, Grebennnikov spoke so much about? He mentioned bug chitin panels attached with wire. Within the high tech world of manufacturing, there should be able to be a way to duplicate this. The complexity of data wafers might be able to comply with manufacturing crystalline cavity structures.

As Viktor Schauberger says: ‘Understand and copy nature’. Nature’s phenomena with its presence in certain bugs isn’t found in the intellect of mankind’s use of centrifugal force in aeronautics as a methodology for travel. To attain efficient transportation methodologies, discoveries pertinent to nature must be used.

Levitation is a mystery. The common practice of mankind for levitation is trickery and deception. The practice of lying is merely falsifying science. Those who seek answers from Schauberger’s perspective search for physical mechanisms to activate nature’s techniques.

From pdfcoffee.com in the article, Levitation, solve for a+b :

Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

Roughly speaking, the effect of cavitary structures works the following way: any material consists of particles vibrating by its own frequency (read Tesla’s cosmology, works of John Keely, Thomas Henry Morey, Wilhelm Reich and others). Due to such internal atomic vibrations, a stationary wave exists in the environment, around any object (and further, discrete “reflections” or maximums of such a wave).

Since these things have been pointed out before in these blogposts, the point of bringing them up again is the perspective of the fan plates: Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate.

It’s how to attach the CSEs of the chitin nets. How did Viktor Grebennikov wire the three dimensional bug parts together, and the other question, can these be remanufactured by 3-D printers?

Current State of Space Flight

Sun, 05 May 2024 21:38:46 GMT

Current state of space flight is to maintain the status-quo

Title photo: NASA Parker Solar mission, headline photo: SpaceX mission to Mars

Where is the new technology in today's space travel?

One of the greatest accomplishments for innovations in space travel is the speed found in NASA’s Parker Solar Probe . It’s traveled faster than any spacecraft has ever flown.

An active participant in space flight is Elon Musk with his SpaceX organization. His mission to Mars exceeds all the world’s government efforts by placing mankind on Mars.

The approach of human inhabitants in space is understood as a natural conclusion to human progress for exploration. One of the mission task intents from Musk’s contemporaries, Jeff Bezos, is to build a space port and visitor’s center with his Blue Origin company. His mission also surpasses any government project. One of the partners with his Orbital Reef project is Sierra Space , an experienced space exploration organization.

Here is a list of the major countries involved in space exploration:

Global space agency, IAFASTRO The International Astronautical Federation is the world’s leading space advocacy body with 513 Members from 78 countries

United States

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is a prominent space agency.

Russia

Roscosmos State Corporation for Space Activities is a major player in the space industry.

China

The China National Space Administration (CNSA) has been actively involved in space exploration.

Europe

The European Space Agency (ESA) represents 22 European countries.

France

The National Centre for Space Studies (CNES ) is involved in numerous space projects.

Germany

The German Aerospace Center (DLR ) is a key player in space research and technology.

United Kingdom

The UK Space Agency is responsible for the country's space program.

Luxembourg

The Luxembourg Space Cluster is Luxembourg’s space agency.

India

The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) is responsible for the country's space program.

Japan

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) conducts various space missions.

Canada

The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is involved in various space projects.

South Korea

The Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI ) is responsible for the country's space program.

Australia

The Australian Space Agency (ASA) was established in 2018 to coordinate and lead the country's civil space sector.

Kenya

The Kenya Space Agency (KSA) was founded in 2017 to leverage space research and technology for various applications.

Aerospace-technology.com provides list of the top 10 countries and a synopsis of their space activities.

The commonality to all these organizations is that current rocket launch technology remains in its tradition of chemical explosions as the primary source for all its space launch technology. Other than rocket launches, NASA has more than brute force rocketry in its arsenal for space travel. Deep Space 1 was launched on Oct. 24, 1998, its mission was to test a dozen new technologies including the use of an ion engine for spacecraft propulsion.

Ion thruster

Wikipedia : An ion thruster, ion drive, or ion engine is a form of electric propulsion used for spacecraft propulsion . An ion thruster creates a cloud of positive ions from a neutral gas by ionizing it to extract some electrons from its atoms . The ions are then accelerated using electricity to create thrust . Ion thrusters are categorized as either electrostatic or electromagnetic .

Stemming from the Deep Space 1 testing, NASA began the Dawn project , a test mission using ion drive to carry the vehicle on an interplanetary cruise.

How does the ion thruster work? The device that emits electrons to ionize xenon was heated to drive off contaminants, and then the thruster ionized xenon (but was not commanded to accelerate it). In addition, the gimbal system that points the thruster in the required direction was operated for the first time in flight.

September 24 - 28, 2007 - Dawn Launches!!

Dawn had a beautiful ride to space on September 27

2007 Archive

December 17 - 21, 2007 - Interplanetary Cruise Begins

With the successful completion of the initial checkout phase of its mission, Dawn began the interplanetary cruise phase. While other activities will be conducted occasionally, the project's focus now is on thrusting with the ion propulsion system to reach asteroid Vesta (and later dwarf planet, Ceres).

November 1, 2018 — Dawn's Long and Successful Mission Concludes

Dawn depleted its hydrazine propellant on Oct. 31,

Propulsion as a form of space flight requires exhaustible fuel. Although ion thrusters are much more efficient than traditional means of chemical thrust. Wikipedia state s: Ion thrusters in operation typically consume 1–7 kW of power , have exhaust velocities around 20–50 km/s ( I _sp 2000–5000 s), and possess thrusts of 25–250 mN and a propulsive efficiency 65–80% ^[3] ^[4] though experimental versions have achieved 100 kW (130 hp), 5 N (1.1 lb _f ). ^[5]

The use of chemical explosions as a source of fuel is impossible to be perpetual, without a mechanism to replenish its fuel supply. The eleven-year mission of Dawn was a remarkable task using an alternative source of fuel, however the twin Voyager probes launched in 1977 remain active. Gravity is a perpetual force.

Alcubierre Drive

Alternative methodologies for space travel includes the term ‘warp drive’. The term was initiated by science fiction. Wikipedia explains it best: In 1994, Miguel Alcubierre proposed a method for changing the geometry of space by creating a wave that would cause the fabric of space ahead of a spacecraft to contract and the space behind it to expand.

This is what is called Alcubierre Drive .

This is a mix between science fiction and the study of physics to figure out how it can be made possible.

A major hurdle for work at the forefront of fundamental physics is the inability to test cutting-edge theories in a laboratory setting. But a recent discovery opens the door for scientists to see ideas in action that were previously only understood in theory or represented in science fiction.

MIT ionic wind plane

From 2018, MIT engineers have built and flown the first-ever plane with no moving parts. Instead of propellers or turbines, the light aircraft is powered by an “ionic wind” — a silent but mighty flow of ions that is produced aboard the plane, and that generates enough thrust to propel the plane over a sustained, steady flight.

Unlike turbine-powered planes, the aircraft does not depend on fossil fuels to fly. And unlike propeller-driven drones, the new design is completely silent.

“This is the first-ever sustained flight of a plane with no moving parts in the propulsion system,” says Steven Barrett, associate professor of aeronautics and astronautics at MIT. “This has potentially opened new and unexplored possibilities for aircraft which are quieter, mechanically simpler, and do not emit combustion emissions.”

A 2023 article in newatlas.com describes a Florida company, Undefined Technologies, that has developed a drone technology known as Silent Ventus . The "Silent Ventus" drone doesn't use propellers to fly. Instead, its entire broad structure creates two stacked grids of electrodes, designed to create high-voltage electric fields that can ionize the oxygen and nitrogen molecules in the air, freeing electrons to give them a positive charge, and then propelling these downward to create an "ionic wind" that can produce thrust.

In another post at thedebrief.org is an article about the company Exodus Propulsion Technologies : “Essentially, what we’ve discovered is that systems that contain an asymmetry in either electrostatic pressure or some kind of electrostatic divergent field can give a system of a center of mass a non-zero force component,” Buhler explained. “So, what that basically means is that there’s some underlying physics that can essentially place force on an object should those two constraints be met.”

To editorialize a comment; a propellent-less propellent drive is another word for electric spark.

Another methodology for propulsion is the Biefeld-Brown Effect. The article in gravitycentral.space describes electrogravitics .

To the CATTCC research studies, there are many blogposts which describe nontraditional space travel alternatives. One of the most important geniuses to heed is found in the words of Viktor Schauberger: “understand and copy nature”. Since Earth’s electrostatic field is always present, a suggestion for research is to build a device that reverses Earth’s electrostatic polarity, which should allow a device to be pulled, rather than pushing against it. To reach an efficient methodology to launch a space craft, using an attractive force where resistance is eliminated, would be found as the most advantageous. Resistance based Chemical explosion technology produces tremendous resistance and massive heat. It is the least efficient method for accelerating spacecrafts into space.

De Broglie waves

Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:51:35 GMT

What is a de Broglie wave and what is their significance?

Title photo: artistic rendition of the wave-particle duality. Credit: Timothy Yeo / CQT, National University of Singapore

The first thing to define a de Broglie wave, is to examine the one who bears its name. He was a French physicist born, August 15, 1892 in Dieppe, France. He was of French nobility, his full name was Louis-Victor-Pierre-Raymond, 7th duc de Broglie .

De Broglie

His 1924 PhD thesis postulated a wave nature of electrons and suggests that all matter has wave properties. His concept is known as the de Broglie hypothesis de Broglie hypothesis which explains wave-particle duality, as both a particle and a wave. This theory addresses the core of quantum mechanics. De Broglie was awarded the 1929 Nobel Prize for Physics for his discoveries.

To explain wave-particle duality, the purdue.edu website explains it as: De Broglie started with the fact that light acts as both a particle and a wave. In many ways light acts as a wave, with a characteristic frequency, wavelength, and amplitude. Einstein argued, however, that light carries energy as if it contains discrete photons or packets of energy. In his doctoral thesis at the Sorbonne in 1924, de Broglie looked at the consequences of assuming that light simultaneously has the properties of both a particle and a wave. He then extended this idea to other objects, such as an electron.

When an object behaves as a particle in motion, it has an energy proportional to its mass (m) and speed with which it moves through space (s).

When it behaves as a wave, however, it has an energy that is proportional to its frequency.

Wikipedia refers to the de Broglie waves as “Matter wave” : The de Broglie wavelength is the wavelength , λ, associated with a particle with momentum , p, through the Planck constant , h:

Wave-like behavior of matter has been experimentally demonstrated, first for electrons in 1927 and for other elementary particles , neutral atoms and molecules in the years since.

The de Broglie wave is consistent with the CATTCC theory for the path of particle motion

From behind the CATTCC paywall: The cyclic pattern of motion in particle mass is similar to the particle string theory of particle mass presented by Gabriele Venezianoin. The actual path of motion in particle mass was discovered in the search to find a definition for gravity. It was found that Einstein’s famous theory of relativity holds the answer in explaining gravity.

Magnetics is the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. Then, how can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties, since it is the scientific claim that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism? Since science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in subatomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous?

The conclusion is found with the science of electrogravitics.

There are questions which science hasn't answered. Here's another question: do gravitational properties only exist in large quantities? This has an answer. Gravity is a process of subatomic movement.

There is a strong relationship with de Broglie’s theory of wave duality and gravity.

Here is part of this newly proposed theory on particle movement. There is a path to all matter. The path is analogous to a ribbon in an elliptical Mobius strip with twists in the ribbon. This elliptical ribbon with its defined twists is stretched out to a linear path in sync traveling at the speed of light. The angular momentum of the twists at that speed; is gravity. ©

The significance of knowing this pattern is in manipulating the wave pattern for traveling along that frequency; surfing gravity waves. This concept is useful to transportation, for speed potential in space flight.

Furthering the exploration into de Broglie’s theory is the following in support of his postulation of particle wave duality. This is another excerpt from behind the CATTCC paywall.

Electricity is different than gravity.

Magnetism is different than gravity.

Gravity is a subatomic action; a process of motion. It is the angular momentum of a particle’s frequency pattern in the flow of mass.

Electrogravitics replaces magnetism’s positive and negative charges with a subatomic particle rotation? Or is electrogravitics the flow of electron spin: the flow of motion.

Based on the speed of a particle’s speed at 186,000 miles per second, it’s difficult to grasp the perception of its travel. Nonetheless, gravity is the angular momentum of rotational spin at that speed. In the blogpost - How to gauge time , it states: at 5280 feet per mile, light speed is 982,080,000 feet per second. Using the time stamp designation, the moment is reflected as; t231102:21:58:0982080001 seconds per foot.

There is a question; how many spin cycles are there per mile and per second? With the identification of this time stamp, it is a known path in that cycle which quantifies this motion. Using the elliptical orbit type linear path (like a ribbon) the spin cycles provide a balanced course.

A molecule’s frequency determines the number of cycles per distance. A molecule's weight is determined by its density and regulates its frequency. That number of cycles per distance in a molecule is also influenced by each particle within each element in that molecule.

As a reminder to visualize this perception, the uniformity of light speed allows every particle in every element within each molecule to hold its own separate path traveling at light speed. It is this individual path of each particle that maintains the particle’s gravitational balance of angular momentum at light speed.

A gravitational wave is generated by the influence of momentum from the spin of this rotational motion.

With this consideration, it’s easy to conclude that the mass of heavier particles holds the greater ability to influence gravitational waves. This action is analogous to ferrous molecules.

Transportation

How does de Broglie’s hypothesis of wave duality pertain to Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device? It ties into the presence of Earth’s electrostatic field and the recognition that levitation is vibrational mass accumulation which interacts with the Cavity Structures Effect.

Build with levitation

Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:13:57 GMT

Connecting a device to Earth's electrostatic charge

How are electromagnetic charges to be activated, or transmitted and received? Nikola Tesla found that power of Earth’s atmosphere is high voltage. His theory is best describe in Quara by William Beaty : Wardenclyffe Tower was a type of spark transmitter, operating in groundwave mode in the ELF frequency band.

ELF frequency band

An Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) band refers to electromagnetic radiation (radio waves) with frequencies ranging from 3 to 30 Hz, as designated by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). In atmospheric science, the range extends from 3 Hz to 3,000 Hz. ELF waves have corresponding wavelengths of 100,000 to 10,000 kilometers, respectively. The extremely low frequencies are generated by Earth’s magnetosphere, and from Earth’s electrostatic fields, the fields generate lightening. In addition to nature, ELF frequency bands are used for underwater communication. These extremely low frequencies are also seen in Schumann Resonances .

Where is the correlation between Earth’s radiating electrostatic field and the ability for a Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) to interact with it? A CSE is always active. Its void holds a negative charge. Earth’s electrostatic field and its magnetosphere are also always active. Most of the lightening charges are negative, positive charged lightening is more powerful.

From the blogpost Extending CSE research : The Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) is caused by the interaction between de Broglie waves and biological systems. Cavities within the solid body are de Broglie wave resonators; they are a source of standing de Broglie waves (longitudinal waves). The rhythmical location of cavities leads to a reinforcement of the effect.

From the blogpost: Levitation, solve for a+b ; Thus far, studies show that levitation is an accumulation of electrons’ frequency vibration. From the past few articles about levitation, it becomes clear that research needs to go back to the work of Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE).

With this, a platform built with compressed CSEs, has the potential to interact with Earth’s negative electrostatic atmospheric charge. Viktor Grebennikov’s platform had control “blinds”. This is a first step.

How a cell phone interacts with Earth’s electromagnetic field

Asking questions of how to connect Earth’s electrostatic field to CSEs to provide levitation for a transportation device, there might be a correlation in asking another question. How does a cell phone work? A cell phone works by using radio waves to transmit and receive signals, allowing for wireless communication. Here’s a simplified explanation of the process:

Microphone and Speaker: A microphone inside the phone interprets the voice and converts it into electrical signals. These signals are then sent to the speaker, which converts them back into audible sound waves.
Radio Transceiver: The electrical signals are transmitted and received via radio waves through an antenna.
Cell Towers: The radio waves travel through the air and are picked up by nearby cell towers. These towers are strategically placed to create a network of coverage, dividing the area into smaller sections called cells. Each cell has an antenna that receives cell phone signals.
Signal Transmission and Reception: The cell tower’s antenna transmits the signals to a base station, which is connected to the larger cellular network. The network then routes the call or message to its destination, whether it’s another cell phone or a landline. When the recipient’s phone receives the signal, their radio transceiver converts the radio waves back into electrical signals, which are then sent to the speaker to be heard.
Roaming: If you’re outside of your cellular network’s coverage area or if the nearest cell site’s signal is too weak, your phone may automatically connect to a different network through a process called roaming. This allows you to continue making and receiving calls even when you’re not in your usual coverage area.

In summary, a cell phone works by converting your voice into electrical signals, transmitting those signals as radio waves to nearby cell towers, and then routing the signals through the cellular network to reach their destination. The process is reversed for incoming calls and messages.

How is data transmitted over a cellular network different from voice transmission?

Data transmission over a cellular network differs from voice transmission in several ways. While both use radio waves to transmit signals to and from cell towers, the way the signals are processed and handled by the network can vary.

Signal Type: Voice transmission involves converting your voice into electrical signals, which are then converted into radio waves. Data transmission, on the other hand, deals with digital information, such as emails, web browsing, and app usage. This digital information is converted into a series of 1s and 0s, which are then encoded into radio waves for transmission.
Transmission Protocols: Voice transmission typically uses older analog technologies, such as 2G (GSM, CDMA) and some parts of 3G (UMTS), while data transmission relies on more advanced digital technologies, such as 3G (HSPA), 4G (LTE), and 5G. These newer technologies offer faster data speeds and more efficient use of network resources.
Network Prioritization: In most cases, cellular networks prioritize voice traffic over data traffic. This means that during periods of network congestion, voice calls are less likely to be affected by slower data speeds or dropped connections.
Frequency Bands: Cellular networks use different frequency bands for voice and data transmission. For example, in some networks, voice calls may use lower frequency bands (e.g., 850 MHz or 900 MHz) for better building penetration and wider coverage, while data transmission may use higher frequency bands (e.g., 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, or 2600 MHz) for higher data speeds.
Charging and Billing: Charging and billing for voice and data services can also differ. In some cases, carriers may charge separately for voice and data usage, while others may offer bundled plans that include a certain amount of voice and data. The pricing and billing structure can vary depending on the carrier and the specific plan.

In summary, data transmission over a cellular network differs from voice transmission in terms of signal type, transmission protocols, network prioritization, frequency bands, and charging and billing structures. While both rely on radio waves for signal transmission, the underlying technologies and network handling can differ significantly.

(AI-generated answer)

Interacting with Earth’s electrostatic field

Looking into the details at the presents of Earth’s electromagnetic field is the question. This is associated with De Broglie waves.

De Broglie postulated that an object (Earth’s electromagnetic field) can be both a particle and a wave. He derived a relationship between one of the wave-like properties of matter and one of its properties as a particle, which is called duality. The de Broglie waves can be identified as the unified path of particle mass. In a new theory for gravity , it explains: This new theory for gravity postulates that gravity is angular momentum in the path of particle motion in accordance with Einstein's theory of relativity. His explanation of relativity being energy equal to mass times the speed of light squared shows perception of relativity: is traveling at the speed of light.

The cell phone uses a battery to power its transceiver to send and receive signals. Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device utilized compressed CSEs to enact a negative force to interact with Earth’s electrostatic field. It manipulates the field via pivoting fans attached to an axis of the “blinds”. This seems to be the answer.

One of the greatest lectures regarding Earth’s electric potential gradient of the atmosphere is from the California Institute of Technology: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Electricity in the Atmosphere :

Although the electric current-density in the air is only a few micromicroamperes per square meter, there are very many square meters on the earth’s surface. The total electric current reaching the earth’s surface at any time is very nearly constant at 1800 amperes. This current, of course, is “positive”—it carries plus charges to the earth. So we have a voltage supply of 400,000 volts with a current of 1800 amperes—a power of 700 megawatts!

Feynman’s lecture goes into great detail, and an exquisite explanation on lightening.

The point of this blogpost is to point out that Earth holds a negative charge. Grebennikov’s device, with the CSE’s held a negative charge. Earth’s atmosphere consists of both positive and negative charges. Grebennikov’s negatively charged device would repel Earth’s negative charge. The pivoting fans would manipulate a negative repelling action.

Again, first step in the answer.

Earth's electrostatic charges

Tue, 16 Apr 2024 20:22:56 GMT

Can there be connectivity with the electrostatic charges in the atmosphere?

How much power can the atmosphere provide to power a transportation device? How much power is the atmosphere capable of generating? From Space.com is an article about Earth’s magnetic field: Earth's magnetic field — also known as the geomagnetic field — is generated in our planet's interior and extends out into space, creating a region known as the magnetosphere.

Without the magnetic field, life on Earth as we know it would not be possible as it shields us all from the constant bombardment by charged particles emitted from the sun — the solar wind .

Further into the article: According to NASA , the magnetosphere also protects Earth from large quantities of particle radiation emitted during coronal mass ejection (CME) events and also from cosmic rays — atom fragments — raining down on Earth from deep space. The magnetosphere repels harmful energy away from Earth and traps it in zones called the Van Allen radiation belts . These donut-shaped belts of radiation can swell when the sun's activity increases.

In the process of discovering a transportation device, there is question to be answered. What is the power to make a compass operate? The answer is two-fold. First it points out that a power source is not required to operate a compass. Secondly, the answer acknowledges that the components of Earth’s internal composition and its atmospheric makeup; generate useable power. Earth’s core is theorized by sciencedirect.com as: the Earth's core is a nearly spherically symmetrical mass of electrically conducting material in which no current path is preferred.

The strength of Earth’s electromagnetic power was studied heavily by Nikola Tesla. His theories suggest that electrical power is accessible everywhere on Earth’s surface. The purpose of this CATTCC study is to discover a methodology of interacting a levitating device for transportation. Thus far, we see that levitation is molecular vibration .

Nikola Tesla discovered Earth resonance and designed a device to utilize its power. In 1900 he was awarded a patent for his System of Transmission of Electrical Energy. This link includes his letter of introduction with his patent # 645576 . Here are two excerpts: Expressed briefly, my present invention, based upon these discoveries, consists then in producing at one point an electrical pressure of such character and magnitude as to cause thereby a current to traverse elevated strata of the air between the point of generation and a distant point at which the energy is to be received and utilized.

What I now claim is—

1. The method hereinbefore described of transmitting electrical energy through the natural media, which consists in producing at a generating-station a very high electrical pressure, causing thereby a propagation or flow of electrical energy, by conduction, through the earth and the air strata, and collecting or receiving at a distant point the electrical energy so propagated or caused to flow.

This patent shows electrical current potential within Earth’s atmosphere. The full description of Tesla’s patent shows extreme voltage flow. A levitating device utilizing the negative charge of CSEs, calls for the compression of CSEs as the power application for a levitating device.

According to the Atmospheric electricity article in Wikipedia: Near the surface of the Earth, the magnitude of the field is on average around 100 V/m, ^[4] oriented such that it drives positive charges down. ^[5]

Earth’s positive atmospheric charge would tend to attract a concentrated negatively charged field of a CSE. This could raise a levitating platform.

What would attract Earth’s positive field to enable the negative attraction of a CSE field? Earth’s magnetosphere is a reflecting action of Earth’s core. From the calacademy.org website is this explanation of Earth’s core:

Inner Core: The innermost part of Earth is the core and is about 1500 miles (2414 km) thick. Both the inner and outer cores consist primarily of iron and nickel. They're extremely hot, with temperatures ranging from 7200–9000℉ (4000–5000℃). The inner core is under intense pressure, which keeps it solid despite high temperatures.
Outer Core: The outer core, which is liquid, is about 1300 miles (2092 km) thick. Both the inner and outer cores consist primarily of iron and nickel and are extremely hot with temperatures ranging from 7200–9000℉ (4000–5000℃).
Mantle: Most of Earth's volume is in the mantle. This layer is about 1800 miles (2880 km) thick. It's composed of dark, dense rock, similar to oceanic basalt. The deeper you go inside the Earth, the hotter it gets. Mantle material near the cold outer crust is about 1300℉ (700℃) while rock near the Earth’s core heats up to about 7200℉ (4000℃).
Crust: Two types of crust make up Earth’s outermost layer: continental and oceanic. Continental crust is composed of silica-rich rocks and is an average of 44 miles (70 km) thick. Ocean crust is made of dark, silica-poor rocks like basalt. It is thinner and more flexible than the continents, only about 3 miles (5 km) thick.

The melting point of nickel: 2646 F (1452 C)

The melting point of iron: 2800 F (1538 C)

The heat generated from the activity with ferrous elements in Earth’s core, produces magnetic action. Again, interacting with magnets is the molecular combinations of electron structure. This raises the question of exactly how a CSE structured platform can interact with Earth’s magnetic field to engage a levitating action.

Developing a theory for levitation

Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:18:31 GMT

Developing the theory of how levitation can be used as a mode of transportation

This blogpost continues research for using levitation as a means of transportation. With Viktor Grebennikov’s floating platform being reproduced into an actual scooter type of device capable of floatation, what then? Could the device ever be popularized into a mode of transportation? There are some questions that have to be answered. First, what size is it? How much does it cost? What are the impacts? Who could use it? And, most important; since it hasn’t yet been reproduced, is it even possible? Without the device existing anywhere, planning on its impact is irrelevant.

Clearly, a levitating device has to be discovered and developed as the priority. Once such a product can be found to work, adapting it into implementation for public use would be by appropriate engineering designers. Its technology is what the need is. In the technology search, these blogposts about levitation have pointed out where the technology can be found. The technology will be found to work with Earth’s magnetic field and its ferrous plasma core. Since levitation is molecular vibration, the technology used will be at the molecular level. Also, since an atomic void is negative, this is a component to the technology. Additionally, the process of discovering a levitating device is in discovering how to compress a Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) and controlling its manipulation.

This is the model that is said to have worked

According to Viktor Grebennikov, the direction of the CSE can be manipulated. What is also apparent, is the creation of using the CSE field for transportation.

Levitation

It’s an accepted certainty that magnets have the ability of levitation. Magnetic action is an event of molecular action with ferrous elements. A magnetic field has a limited range.

The CSE is an action of nonferrous elements. What the CSE has is a similar action to crystals, in that they have a specific frequency resonance. This action could be determined as electrogravitics and as a void, has a negative gravity charge.

Ultimately, levitation is an action of molecular vibration . At what level? A frequency has the intrinsic component of flow. Is there a field limitation to the flow of a frequency resonance? Stars emit their element frequencies as spectral analysis. At what range does a the negative CSE frequency operate (vibrate)? How does this negative field manifest into having the capability of carrying a load? It should be by a more rapid frequency rate; increased intensity. To generate a vibration, does this represent or require a power source? Is the action centrifugal? A centrifugal action generates a friction action with thermodynamic increase. This would require a power source due to friction loss.

Bugs are small, their power source could come from what is equivalent to calorie production. Such as that seen by the energy consumption of flapping wings. The flapping of wings suggests aeronautics or centrifugal force to provide motion.

An electromagnetic charge, focused into the negative void of a CSE will affect a reaction. Either a positive charge reaction or a negative charge reaction.

Earth's atmosphere

There are many layers to Earth’s atmosphere. The question becomes, where are different charges found in Earth’s atmosphere? How can they be activated to interact with a CSE?

From sciencedirect.com is an article explaining Atmospheric Potential Gradient (APG):

The Atmospheric Potential Gradient (PG) is the vertical electric field present in the atmosphere, with positive values indicating a downward pointing field. The PG is an atmospheric measurement that has been recorded through recent history and is now becoming more common as modern field mill designs enable continuous robust measurements in many different environments. These measurements have been used to infer presence and physical characteristics of aerosols, and the passage of smoke in historical data. PG has been used to measure meteorological phenomena and the passage of charged plumes overhead. Current research on the electrosensitivity of insects and spiders require an understanding of the local PG to better understand animal behaviour.

A more detailed study relating to insects by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira, is found in this researchgate.net article. This was the topic of the Short Distance Resonance Technology blogpost. His study is based on the understanding of principles relating to negatively charged Earth and her positive charged atmosphere and how they affect certain spiders. The following is an excerpt from the researchgate.net “Anti-Gravity: No Crazier than Flying Spiders” article:

One hundred lightning bolts strike the earth every second. The atmospheric potential gradient (APG) is an electric circuit between the earth and the atmosphere maintained by thunderstorms through the constant, and for the most part, negative lightning discharging all over the earth’s surface at any given time. Usually this collectively amounts to one hundred lightning bolts striking the earth every second. This ﬁeld exists globally in the atmosphere with an average surface magnitude of 120 V m−1 pointing downward towards the earth from the heavens. Due to the accumulation of this charge potential the earth’s surface is then, under most conditions, negatively charged compared to the atmosphere, which is generally positively charged. During storms, however, the earth’s surface builds up positive charges which when accumulated to a sufﬁcient degree induce a discharge from the negatively-charged bottom of storm clouds, which usually also have a positively-charged top. The positive electrostatic charge manifesting on the earth’s surface during thunderstorms accumulates particularly well in tall conductive objects; as they are not only far from the ground’s general negative charge, but also allow charges to ﬂow freely through them. During the discharge of lightning, positive leaders are sent upwards through the conductive object to meet with the negative leaders from the clouds, and it is only upon their union that a strong upward stroke/surge of high voltage and current is formed. This ﬁnal discharge is what gives rise to the light and sound wave-forms of lightning and thunder, respectively. The tree-like fractal pattern which is in most cases from the ground up is formed as the charges ﬁnd the path of least ionization resistance in the gaseous atmosphere. This extremely powerful discharge also generates extreme air pressures which create the audible and revered sound of thunder. It is due to this continuous ‘dumping’ of negative electricity unto the earth by storms all across it that its surface remains negatively charged, and that under usual conditions it serves as an electrostatic ground towards which the positive charges in the atmosphere are constantly ﬂowing. Just like a magnet can store and create single- point aetheric (magnetic) ﬂux, deﬁned simply by cyclic dielectric and electric potentials simultaneously charging and discharging each other as a torus ﬁeld geometry, the ’primary solar rays’ as referred to by Tesla create a ‘river’ or current and a gradient of electric potentials which can be harnessed for imparting mechanical momentum upon an object that is inversely charged with respect to its ‘ﬂow’. This phenomenon has been observed in nature when ballooning spiders, through biological electrochemical mechanisms, accumulate charges on a brush of silk strands spun out and deployed from their spinnerets during optimal atmospheric electrostatic conditions. These spiders contain trichobothria; electrosensitive hairs on their front limbs with which they scan the earth’s Schumann resonance, which really is also attributed to the APG, to determine whether the electrostatic currents are ‘rideable’. After this ‘pre-ﬂight check’ they stand on their front limbs and point their abdomen to the sky, and begin simultaneously weaving out many individual strands of silk to which they impart electrostatic potentials of high ‘negative’ voltages (relative to their size) which nullify all primary solar ray centripetal electrostatic acceleration upon their mass. The lowest charge needed (which could indicate the charge scale used by the spider) has been determined in a study under controlled zero-wind conditions to be possibly as low as in the nanocoulomb-range.

CSEs

How does Earth’s atmosphere interact with CSE’s?

As the study of Viktor Grennaikov’s device continues. His device carried batteries to power a light. Did the batteries assist as an antenna or transceiver in an interaction with Earth’s electromagnetic sphere? Could the shaft have been filled with batteries as a power source? The question here: is there a battery power source needed to engage Earth’s magnetosphere or its ionosphere to interact with its static charge?

What is levitation

Levitation is explained as an action of rapid oscillating motion . Even as an action of what appears as standing still, relativity is in a flow of motion.

Inasmuch as a waterfall appears as a steady flow, it is a group of individual moving droplets engaged in Earth’s continual gravitational flow of motion.

Where else is levitation seen? It can be an action of the mind. This is seen in instances as an action of psychokinetics.

Considering levitation as an accumulation of ‘holes’ is a provocative speculation. This is consistent with Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). A synchronization of cavity structure’s frequency motion.

Schumann Resonance

Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:23:22 GMT

How do Schumann Resonances relate to a new mode of transportation

The Schumann resonances are identified as a series of low frequency electromagnetic waves in Earth’s ionosphere. This series of electromagnetic spectrum range from 3Hz to peaks up to 60Hz. The Schumann resonances were discovered by physicist Winfried Otto Schumann in 1952.

Wikipedia describes the Schumann frequency as:

The Schumann resonances (SR) are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency portion of the Earth 's electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances , generated and excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere .

Schumann resonances occur because the space between the surface of the Earth and the conductive ionosphere acts as a closed, although variable-sized waveguide . The limited dimensions of the Earth cause this waveguide to act as a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves in the extremely low frequency band. The cavity is naturally excited by electric currents in lightning.

Effects on Schumann resonances have been reported following geomagnetic and ionospheric disturbances. More recently, discrete Schumann resonance excitation has been linked to transient luminous events — sprites , ELVES , jets , and other upper-atmospheric lightning .

Do the Schumann resonances have relevance to Grennikov’s Cavity Structures Effects (CSEs)? In a remarkable new study by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira, the Earth’s magnetosphere does have an effect to spiders movement.

The basis for the theory of Schumann resonances are defined by Wikipedia as:

Lightning discharges are considered to be the primary natural source of Schumann resonance excitation; lightning channels behave like huge antennas that radiate electromagnetic energy at frequencies below about 100 kHz. ^[23] These signals are very weak at large distances from the lightning source, but the Earth–ionosphere waveguide behaves like a resonator at extremely low frequency and amplifies the spectral signals from lightning at the resonance frequencies. ^[23]

In an ideal cavity, the resonant frequency of the n-th mode fn is determined by the Earth radius n and the speed of light c

The real Earth–ionosphere waveguide is not a perfect electromagnetic resonant cavity. Losses due to finite ionosphere electrical conductivity lower the propagation speed of electromagnetic signals in the cavity, resulting in a resonance frequency that is lower than would be expected in an ideal case, and the observed peaks are wide. In addition, there are a number of horizontal asymmetries—day-night difference in the height of the ionosphere, latitudinal changes in the Earth's magnetic field , sudden ionospheric disturbances, polar cap absorption, variation in the Earth radius of ± 11 km from equator to geographic poles, etc. that produce other effects in the Schumann resonance power spectra.

The bigger question relates to the relationship of Earth’s magnetosphere, de Broglie waves, the ionosphere, electromagnetism and its potential to affect a levitating transportation device.

The other related topic for study is Earth’s magnetic field. In the British Geological Survey (BGS) is a thorough examination:

The Earth's magnetic field is generated in the fluid outer core by a self-exciting dynamo process. Electrical currents flowing in the slowly moving molten iron generate the magnetic field. In addition to sources in the Earth's core the magnetic field observable at the Earth's surface has sources in the crust and in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. The geomagnetic field varies on a range of scales and a description of these variations is now made, in the order low frequency to high frequency variations, in both the space and time domains. The final section describes how the Earth's magnetic field can be both a tool and a hazard to the modern world. First of all, however, methods of observing the magnetic field are described.

The electromagnetic fields which surround the planet are astounding. NASA describes Earth’s magnetosphere as:

Earth's magnetosphere is part of a dynamic, interconnected system that responds to solar, planetary, and interstellar conditions. It is generated by the convective motion of charged, molten iron, far below the surface in Earth's outer core. Constant bombardment by the solar wind compresses the sun-facing side of our magnetic field. The sun-facing side, or dayside, extends a distance of about six to 10 times the radius of the Earth. The side of the magnetosphere facing away from the sun - the nightside - stretches out into an immense magnetotail, which fluctuates in length and can measure hundreds of Earth radii, far past the moon's orbit at 60 Earth radii.

To consider a levitating transportation device having the ability to interact with Earth’s magnetosphere, places that possibility in the realm of a radio signal being able to be transmitted and received at a different location. De Broglie waves consist of matter waves having the function of travel. The importance of Einstein’s theory of relativity proposing that the Milky Way Galaxy traveling at light speed, holds the postulation that matter is traveling. Electromagnetic waves carry their motion in the similar manner that matter moves through the universe. A levitating device should be able to utilize the compression of a void (CSE) with that interaction.

As an explanation of the ionosphere, let’s ask the question: what is an ion?

An ion is a charged atom or molecule. It is charged because the number of electrons do not equal the number of protons in the atom or molecule. An atom can acquire a positive charge or a negative charge depending on whether the number of electrons in an atom is greater or less then the number of protons in the atom.

When an atom is attracted to another atom because it has an unequal number of electrons and protons, the atom is called an ION. If the atom has more electrons than protons, it is a negative ion, or ANION. If it has more protons than electrons, it is a positive ion.

This activity is similar to electromagnetism. Ion interaction without the presents of ferrous elements is electrogravitics :

What is electrogravitics? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component to subatomic electric fields. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.

Inasmuch as electromagnetics is the current dictate considered as the primary source of particle charge, it is the supposition of a new theory for gravity that electrogravitics is responsible for what is referred to as electric charge in subatomic matter.

This information is more research in the study to find an answer in discovery for developing an new mode of transportation.

Light as a method of power

Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:24:09 GMT

Concepts of light and physics theory

Is there a relationship of light, power generation, levitation, gravity and transportation? This article looks at light potential for its use with transportation.

What is light?

There is a National Geographic article , that examines the scientific exploration of light. Its writing approach of the article, is profound. The author makes an opening statement: “We don't see light; we merely see with it.”

What is light, exactly? The article’s author went to many places for answers, including the world's largest laser, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and asked questions. The laser is actually 192 lasers in collusion—or perhaps one should say collision. The 192 individual beams of light, grouped in bundles of four, will travel the length of a hulking building 700 feet (213 meters) long and 400 feet (122 meters) wide.

One of the first questions asked of the project’s director: How is it that light is such a useful source of energy? "Because you can compress a lot of light's energy in a very small point." He said, ”Children discover this when they play with a magnifying glass on a sunny summer day.

“Here we come to one facet of the miracle of light. It has no volume. And photons have no charge, so in the process of being concentrated into a very small space, they don't repulse each other as negatively charged electrons do. (NIF will fit 4 x 1024 photons into the target capsule.) They don't bother one another."

The many authorities the author interviews in the article provides tremendous insight to current uses, as well as a through history of scientific discovery about light. The author points out that the photon is massless, a different technological aspect than electromagnetism.

Einstein’s postulation from 100 years ago with his theory of relatively: E= MC^2, states that our relativity is based on the Milky Way Galaxy traveling through the universe at the speed of light.

Looking at light

What is light? Light is said to be a photon. The scientific claim is that light is an extremely small particle that travels through space. When it collides with other particles, it ignites that electron into an excited state. This is said to cause an electron to jump into the element’s upper shell layer. Because there is nothing to hold its level at that higher state, it collapses to its prior state, which emits another photon.

Nikola Tesla claimed to have found light significantly faster than its accepted 186,000 per second speed.

Perhaps that explanation has changed and improved over the last 50 years, maybe not.

As the smallest classification of light is a photon, it could be argued that a single photon is a combination of colored light since each frequency of colored light travels at different speeds.

How about this; light originates with a power source. As Einstein’s theory hypothesizes, our galaxy is traveling at the speed of light. This necessitates everything within this complex (the Milky Way galaxy) to move at this speed (light speed). Einstein’s famous equation states that energy travels much faster. His statement says that energy is equal to mass multiplied by the light speed squared. By removing the energy component, relativity is mass times light speed. This indicates that without light speed, mass by itself does not exist with relativity. This statement suggests that without the speed of light, the relativity of mass would be absolute zero. This speculates that the presents of ether in empty space could be the motion of light speed. It presents a philosophical statement that the word: “all” is inclusive but, not infinite.

Light is the expression of energy. It is the extremely short wave length movement which exceeds nature’s motion of speed in relativity.

Gravity

A new astronomy study now suggests that gravity travels at light speed. Of course it does. Now, how to apply that to enable fast space flight. An interesting thing of gravity laws of application are related to Earth’s rotational speed.

Gravity is explained as a mathematical formula: F = G(m ₁ m ₂ )/R ² t. This says that an attractive force (F) is equal to the gravitational constant (G) multiplied by the product of the masses (m ₁ and m ₂ ) and divided by the square of the distance (R). The new theory of gravity is shown as angular momentum in the path of particle mass.

How do these things relate to transportation? Light speed and gravity are both essential to space flight. To attain these components of space flight, it necessitates independent inertia. This again brings us to Otis Carr’s ship . Having the neutral inter-shell is vital. Also important is the pattern of an atom’s motion. The ship replicating the linear movement of an atom is how to travel fast. However, there is a serious concern, a very large object traveling very fast presents centrifugal force. The ship motion has to be centripetal. As Viktor Schauberger says: comprehend and copy nature. Centrifugal force causes friction, with heat and destruction.

The account of experience by Ralph Ring in Otis Carr’s ship provides a platform to the explanation for centripetal motion. Metal would show a fluid type transparency in its form. The entire ship would be perceived as a single frequency movement of a single object.

A single large object traveling at light speed as a unified mass, is a frequency of a combined mass of particles. A single particle rotates in unison with other particles. Nature’s rotational motion is linear in a centripetal movement at light speed. The twist of its linear path is centripetal. The platform for this motion is the vastness of space, according to Einstein’s theory of relativity; with the vastness of space shaped as a giant horseshoe, to account for its centripetal motion.

Hard physics of new CATTCC particle theory

With Otis Carr’s ship, or any other ship, design to be based on the principle of rotational spin, the outward push would be centrifugal force. The engineering must replicate nature’s motion with gravity as the angular momentum to capture centripetal motion with its linear movement.

As an atom moves as a whole, its movement of a nucleus and its electron are in a unison motion. In its linear path, the electron twists several times in its elliptical pattern around the nucleus. Due to its larger mass, the nucleus rotates only once to the electron’s eight twists of the electron’s rotation. The electron’s linear twist motion as it acts as a type of circular ellipse pattern around the nucleus, is an undulatory angular momentum motion. This undulatory motion and nucleus reaction for the entirety of this atom mass is its frequency pattern. These atomic masses combine with other singular atomic masses and form molecules which produce variations in their linear speed.

A light switch engages and is perceived as instantaneous. Does engaging the switch on Otis Carr’s ship design cause instantaneous activation to light speed? A debate is unknown, practically; the answer is no. Spin and momentum require an engagement period. What is the source of power to initiate ship movement to such a fast speed? The speculation is electromagnetism.

This has been a study of light. The CATTCC directive is relating study and research to discovering a new mode of transportation.

More about CSEs

Fri, 22 Mar 2024 04:19:23 GMT

Details of Cavity Structures Effect

This article will follow the past several articles which research Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform. The previous article provided a step-by-step look to define rebuilding Grebennikov’s platform. There are still many questions. Our study continues a little at a time. Deciphering it, it’s like a puzzle.

Continuing the study

The previous article showed that there was a combination of fans with nine ‘blades’. What’s their purpose? The way it’s described; the platform has two halves that unfold to function as one platform. With the two sections combined it’s referred to as a bonding of the distribution mechanism to a fan opening device. Or is there another interpretation to this: “This is a bonding of the distribution mechanism, which transfers effort from the “distributors” to a fan opening device. Each fan consists of nine plates. In order to make them strong, the plates are made of sheet metal. Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate.”

It's assumed that a micro-net is the stacking of CSEs. This structure is undefined. The article: chitin and crystal polymerizations refer to this type of CSEs.

These two photographs are of the undersection of Viktor Grebennikov’s flying platform.

Similar to a bee hive, the two photographs show no specific mechanical apparatus.

This following photograph is a simulated drawing indicating principles which use a mechanical apparatus.

Grebennikov explicitly signified 9 blades in his platform. Other than the 13 blades and a few other technical issues, this simulated drawing seems to be a fairly valid illustration for mechanics.

Grebennikov states the: Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

This process is known as resonance. It can be energized by an electromagnetic pulsation. Further documentation shows that the strength of a CSE is multiplied by number, not by its size.

What exactly is this saying?

To look at the work done by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira in the article: Short Distance Resonance Technology , it clearly defines Earth’s magnetosphere as having a direct influence to the reactionary effects of bugs. A sort of “fuel” that provides a reciprocating action.

Vitor provides a clear understanding to a spider’s movement. “This phenomenon has been observed in nature when ballooning spiders, through electrochemical and biological mechanisms, accumulate charges on a brush of silk strands spun out and deployed from their spinnerets during optimal atmospheric electrostatic conditions.”

This is a clear statement that an electromagnetic mechanism can provide a methodology to allow manipulation of resonance by a constructed device to react to Earth’s atmosphere or its magnetosphere.

This is an explanation of Earth’s magnetosphere by the British Geological Survey : The Earth's magnetic field is generated in the fluid outer core by a self-exciting dynamo process. Electrical currents flowing in the slowly moving molten iron generate the magnetic field. In addition to sources in the Earth's core the magnetic field observable at the Earth's surface has sources in the crust and in the ionosphere and magnetosphere. The geomagnetic field varies on a range of scales and a description of these variations is now made, in the order low frequency to high frequency variations, in both the space and time domains. The final section describes how the Earth's magnetic field can be both a tool and a hazard to the modern world. First of all, however, methods of observing the magnetic field are described.

Another explanation from Wikipedia

Computer simulation of Earth 's field in a period of normal polarity between reversals. The lines represent magnetic field lines, blue when the field points towards the center and yellow when away. The rotation axis of Earth is centered and vertical. The dense clusters of lines are within Earth's core.

How to make a flying platform float

From one of the statements made in the pdfcoffee.com article, from Solve for a + b : When Grebennikov was working to explain how his flying platform worked, theoretical physics had recently theorized leptons. These particles were shown to theorize an explanation for ambiguous particles. The perspective of rationalizing ambiguous patterns in subatomic matter is valid, yet the research continues seeking answers. Classical physics still prevails with its accuracy to a definition regarding aether being ever present.

Grebennikov credited leptons holding the explanation to CSEs, in this statement, however, it may be more accurate to accredit the action to aether: Thus, pressure from the direction of the internal space will be less than the external pressure, which leads to attraction (i.e. pushing together) of two bodies.

So, we need antigravity. There are leptons or aether everywhere in universe. If a device will be invented, which will be able to change leptons’ direction to the necessary one (create aether wind), our task will be solved. We already have such a device – this is our cell. A cell of the conic (or cuneiform) kind takes up a lepton stream from the horizontal direction (it will become obvious after we read Wilhelm Reich’s works in the attachment) and reapportion it to the vertical one: a small part of the stream goes in one direction while almost the whole stream goes in another. Of course, if the cell’s axis is placed vertically as in Grebennikov’s platform.

Continuing the study

The pursuit of Viktor Grebennikov’s work have a specific purpose. Its purpose is to create a levitating environment to enact a situation for atomic vibration. This vibration involves an interaction with Earth’s atmosphere or magnetosphere. The research thus far has clearly indicated this is not an aerodynamic principle; its lift is not a reaction of propulsion. The continuing pursuit is to develop a new mode of short distance transportation.

Extending CSE Research

Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:31:11 GMT

Researching the impact of CSEs to transportation

As we see from the previous blogpost, Viktor Grebennikov’s flying platform is described in detail. However, we didn’t spend much time analyzing the platform. Prior to a more in-depth study of the platform, a reexamination of the Cavity Structure Effect (CFE) is necessary. Also from the previous blogpost is the article “Cavity Structural Effect” by Ville Piippola :

f = 1 · 6.626 · 10-34kgm2s-2 / 4 · 9.11 · 10-31kg · (1.7cm)2= 0.63 Hz

Relation of CSEs to transportation

The importance of understanding CSEs is imperative for utilizing them as a source for motion. Also in the previous blogpost, the article from pdfcoffee was referred to. This explains Viktor Grebennikov’s floating platform and it mentions the role of leptons . Theoretical physics is an interesting field of science: it’s filled with theories.

CATTCC subscribes to a theory of particle mass that postulates all mass travels a specific path, a unified direction. This theory minimizes many other theories relating to how particles react. The path of particle movement is foundational to the explanation of gravity that CATTCC subscribes to. In regards to leptons, gravitons, and even aether, matter is traveling at a consistent frequency as the speed of light; explained by Einstein’s theory of relativity.

The discovery of particle mass by bombardment of accelerating particles, smashing them into another particle and then naming the offshoot remnant, is not a natural occurrence. The flow of particles traveling at light speed through the universe is more consistent to natural occurrence. The point here is to identify aether as the presents of relativity; it is the movement of light speed motion. Leptons and gravitons are the ambiguous particles that account for wrecked, and perhaps stray particles; inconsistence with nature’s consistence flow. This is to say that nature is consistent with natural flow instead of intruding particle bombardments. CERN and other particle accelerator labs are similar to being on a train and throwing a rock through the train window and taking a picture of the braking glass to see what’s outside. Perspective is a variable.

All this rambling to say that in context to the term ‘leptons’ used synonymously with aether; use of the term aether is more consistent in accuracy to relativity. An understanding of deBroglie waves can be found in Wikipedia but, is redirected as an explanation of Matter wave :

Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics , being half of wave–particle duality . All matter exhibits wave -like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave.

The concept that matter behaves like a wave was proposed by French physicist Louis de Broglie ( /dəˈbrɔɪ/ ) in 1924, and so matter waves are also known as de Broglie waves.

The de Broglie wavelength is the wavelength , λ, associated with a particle with momentum p through the Planck constant , h:

Further in Wikipedia’s definition, is the following:

Collective matter waves

What is the structure

A micro-net is the stacking of CSEs. This structure is undefined. The several blogposts regarding chitin and crystal polymerizations refer to this type of CSEs.

Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

This process is known as resonance. It can be energized by an electromagnetic pulsation.

So, let us make conclusions. First, as many as possible surfaces are necessary for one cell (it may seem strange but a polygon with maximal quantity of sides, which can be used for filling a plane without gaps and fractally is a hexagon). Second, the less the size of each cell, the more quantity of surfaces, which we can have with the same volume. The more cells and, accordingly, the more surfaces, the stronger the effect of cavitary structures. Let us remark more that size of one cell is not arbitrary but divisible by wave “reflections” (maximums’ position), which, in their turn, depend on a used material. Wave “reflections” can be far from the surface as well as very close to it. Closer ones have stronger power.

Further analysis is needed to build a levitating transportation device. This study will continue.

Levitation: solve for a+b

Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:04:43 GMT

Researching and finding answers for lev itation

Levitating vehicle

What are all the possible aspects involved with levitation? First is electromagnetics. Then, electrogravitics, gravitational influence, psychokinetics, vacuums, CSEs, crystals, polymerization, the Schumann resonance, magnetosphere, ions, chitin, de Broglie waves, mass frequency vibration, dimensional transfer and then whatever else can be found.

Thus far, studies show that levitation is an accumulation of electrons’ frequency vibration. From the past few articles about levitation, it becomes clear that research needs to go back to the work of Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE).

One of the most relevant articles not yet mentioned is information relating to CSEs in the article “Cavity Structural Effect” by Ville Piippola at Aetherforce.energy :

The nature of the CSE

There have been many hypotheses about the physical nature of the CSE, but there is one theory that deserves greater attention. It was developed earlier by Valery F. Zolotariov (1931-2000), Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and it is now experimentally confirmed.

A particular point of interest in the research collaboration of Grebennikov and Zolotariov, is their finding of connection to de Broglie waves.

The CSE is caused by the interaction between de Broglie waves and biological systems. Cavities within the solid body are de Broglie wave resonators; they are a source of standing de Broglie waves (longitudinal waves). The rhythmical location of cavities leads to a reinforcement of the effect.

f = 1 · 6.626 · 10-34kgm2s-2 / 4 · 9.11 · 10-31kg · (1.7cm)2= 0.63 Hz

In a future blogpost article, the de Broglie waves will be a topic, including a short history of Louis-Victor de Broglie .

Beyond the article by Ville Piippola, are a few Youtube videos relating to CSEs. This is an interesting experiment relating to CSE s.

Here is another video by the Limitless Research channel . This is an important video, in that this is produced to debunk the fraud aspects of levitation.

Another article link; it requires an email subscription to download the free information about Viktor Grebennikov’s discoveries, from academia.edu .

And finally: pdcoffee.com . This link is the key to all of Viktor Grebennikov’s research regarding his flying platform.

The details of Viktor Grebennikov flying platform is explained.

Each number corresponds to a function detail.

The most important aspect to the levitating vehicle is shown here. This is the bottom portion of the flying platform.

Directly from the article:

Blinds (block-boards) The blinds’ design is a standard FAN made of flat long elements. There are four fans. Each of their four axles is fixed vertically at the platform’s corners. It can be seen in photographs. Even a picture by Grebennikov showing its device from below exists!

Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

So, we have a very fine net. By specifying a certain geometry of its cells (size and form of planes, angles between the planes), we concentrate our STATIC field (the material’s “radiation”) in certain points of space. However, we are interested, first of all, in force GRADIENT. The mentioned static field does not produce yield and confirms the law of energy conservation. We don’t have antigravity so far.

Then we use lepton theory of Isakov (remember that lepton, aether, and orgone are the same). We have to determine such a form of cells, which will allow having different field force: from avery low on the one side to a very high on another. The less distance to the cell material surface, the stronger wave “reflections” we have. We make a simple and logical conclusion that one side of the cell must be geometrically less than another. If an initial cell is cylindrical, we have a cone: if it is triangular or square, we have a pyramid with a triangular or square base. If we initially have a hexagonal cell, the pyramid will be hexagonal too.

It is necessary to tell about lepton explanation of gravity effect. This means that leptons fly all over space in all directions, chaotically. They pass through all bodies but still they transmit some (very small) part of their speed to these bodies. Now imagine two spheres. A lepton stream flying from one sphere to another passes through the first sphere, brakes and “irradiates” the second sphere less than the first one (the second sphere is in “lepton shadow” of the first one). And on the contrary. Thus, pressure from the direction of the internal space (between the spheres) will be less than the external pressure, which leads to attraction (i.e. pushing together) of two bodies. This effect is called gravity.

Now, if we place such a solid net consisting of the micro-cells under the platform (in a zone BETWEEN the bodies, i.e. between the Earth and the platform with a man) and orient it in such a way that “aether wind”, which is created by it, blows the platform from the bottom compensating insufficiency of lepton pressure (as described above), the platform and its passenger will become imponderable and fly up. Controlling a power of an aether stream and its directions (the blinds are used for this), we have the same rough material idea of force vector as in the case of jet streams. The only difference is that aether is so insensible for us that there are no strong air streams. At first sight, there is nothing! The platform just picks up speed and height without any sound, visual and other effects. Inertia force doesn’t influence a pilot. It is necessary to note that a head is heavier than legs while the legs, in their turn, are heavier than the platform – it is a gradient of the antigravity force!

It is interesting that it is possible to make symmetric cells (like usual honeycombs) instead of cuneiform ones. A half of this “aether wind” can blow in the ground – it’s all right. It is unreasonable: about a half of the power is lost (power, however, can be increased by decreasing cells’ size by 0.5) but, technologically, such nets are easier to build.

This is one of the most important articles relating to Viktor Grebennikov. The article continues on. It’s a fascinating and relevant 21 page pdf.

Using levitation as a transportation device requires a detailed explanation of levitation. The understanding of what levitation is, is a necessary part to be able to utilize its manipulative capability.

Wikipedia lists four category functions for levitation :

Levitation (illusion) , an illusion where a magician levitates somebody or something
Levitation (paranormal) , the claimed paranormal phenomenon of levitation, occurring without any scientific explanation
Levitation of saints , a mystical phenomenon attributed to some saints
Levitation (physics) , the process by which an object is suspended against gravity, in a stable position without solid physical contact

Illusion - Of this list, illusion is irrelevant.

Levitation as paranormal - This indicates a close tie between paranormal and spirit. Webster’s defines paranormal as something without scientific explanation.

Levitation of saints - Paranormal and levitation of saints relates to a spiritual action. This spiritual action can be interpreted as dimensional conceptualization.

In a previous article from the philosophy and theology sections, what ability did Christ Jesus and Peter have that provided them the ability to walk on water? In the search to understanding levitation, it’s a question of instantaneously transposing traditional laws of physics to unexplainable. Was Christ’s action neural oscillations? Even with this being a theological power and Jesus Christ being a man, how was that? Was it transposing dimensional transfer? How then did Peter walk on water? His mind over matter belief was short lasting. Is this power of mind available to anyone? Is there a presence of holiness of spirit required? Was it a purely spiritual action that interacts with a dimensional transfer?

Is this spiritual dimension accessible as a neural manifestation? The conclusion to these previous studies is that levitation is an occurrence of molecular vibrations, a resonance of inaudible harmonic frequencies to a mass.

In defining the word: levitation, there seems to be a quagmire in definition between physics and philosophy.

The spiritual realm might be compared to various levels of consciousness. Unlike a dream, in which the sub-conscious mind is unable to manifest a presence to other levels of relativity; higher levels of consciousness may carry a greater capacity for neural strength. This is a pre-supposing statement that relativity provides multiple dimensions of relative existence.

Referring to dreams, they lack a particular luminance from the speed of light that is present in the physical realm of cognitive awareness. Levitation and flying are logistically feasible in a dream state of consciousness. There are different principles of action in the cognizant state of awareness than in the dream realm.

It could be postulated that the presence of a dimensional shift is the difference in timeline action due to a variation in the perceived perception to the speed of light; as the blood-flow or chemical reaction change of neural frequency.

What is a spirit? The chemical alteration of alcohol in a person’s bloodstream has a direct impact upon brainwaves. It changes the processing speed of neural oscillations. Any differentiation to the speed of light changes its hue. A brainwave that changes its frequency patterns, alters its speed.

Within the variations that are manifest at other levels as frequency levels change to accommodate the physical world traveling at the speed of light, present in relativity; it poses a similar relevance to the situation with prayer. Belief is a state of mind; a fixed attitude of assumption. How do prayers interact with manipulating matter? Is it as a level of determination? Can neural oscillations involve a manifestation into the active conscious levels of physical relativity? How is there a transfer of mass manifest through this thought process? Prayer and thoughtful determination might be a spiritual realm of psychokinesis and telekinesis. The answer to the question; what determines psychokinesis and telekinesis, still remains conjecture as being an undefined neural oscillation. Here is a postulation: prayer is a spiritual connection defined as a brainwave vibration that enters into a dimensional plane which is a variational shift of perceived relativity.

With Einstein’s theory of relativity being accurate, that the Milky Way galaxy is traveling through the universe at light speed; there is a consistency in its frequency pattern. Any variation to the consistency of the flow, causes a differentiation. There is a physical distortion to one’s perception regarding the speed of relativity.

Levitation of physics - Levitation of physics is the overall application of levitation. This is the focus of this study, and yet; as an object is suspended against gravity, it’s also necessary to comprehend what gravity is in relation to levitation.

The theory of relativity and levitation

Now, to the question: how do oscillating brainwaves manifest into matter manipulation? This can be visualized in similarity to aerodynamic reactions with a moving object causing the movement of air. It’s also seen by the molecular flow of electromagnetic and electrogravitics patterns of frequency. As to the question: how does a thought manifest into a change of particle matter to a solid mass at an obscure location? The vibrational frequency of all particle mass travels in the same direction in the relative path at light speed. In accordance to Einstein’s theory of relativity, the flow of all things, with density of a mass body being irrelevant; travel at light speed. In the same manner that all things are traveling at the same relative speed, thoughts traverse separately at that same relative speed.

Nikola Tesla was a contemporary of Albert Einstein. Einstein began his career as a Swiss patent examiner . Throughout his career he was a professor at different universities, including the University of Zurich and eventually at Princeton University. Early in his career, when Einstein proposed his new theory of relativity, Tesla criticized Einstein’s new theory, calling it foolish for discounting the classical theoretical physics accounting of ether. Fifteen years later Einstein rewrote his original thesis, acknowledging the presence of ether in his new Theory of General Relativity.

The presence of ether is critically important; to have consistency in space. Ether is a way to manage the accounting for time, as maintaining speed while traveling at the speed of light. Einstein’s first theory claimed that space was a vacuum. Theories are assumptions. Sometimes correct, other times adjustments are needed

What’s the tie-in with the theory of relativity and levitation? The aspect of ether with classical physics and the speed of light is the relationship of mass and its relationship with the motion of all things and path of matter.

What is levitation

To the postulation for the question: what is levitation, it seems that levitation is an accumulation of vibration in mass. Magnets exchange outer shell electrons, a vibration occurs.

Ions are in this same category of exchanging electrons.

Heat rising is the exchange of electrons extending beyond their normal shell layers. The process of incandescent light is a regulated measure of heat exchanged from a flow of electricity.

Additionally, levitation can be seen as thought transfer of neural oscillations into matter vibration.

Transportation

Now, the question becomes: how can a brainwave, or neural oscillation, frequency be amplified to manipulated for a transportation device?

In pursuing this line of reasoning, the point here is to emphasize the importance for amplifying of neural oscillations as a control mechanism for motion. What’s the immediate step for this in a levitating transportation device? What vibrates and is most susceptible to vibrational interaction? The work of Viktor Grebennikov is a focus. The Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) written about in Chitin and Grits , and the possibility of frequency resonance of CSEs with the polymerization of chitin crystals written about in Crystals and Polymers provides a possible answer. This lays the ground for more intense consideration of research, holding the belief that a practical mode of transportation is feasible with the technology of amplifying the resonance of neural oscillations.

To quote a couple paragraphs from Crystals and Polymers :

I n replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s device, the first experiment is the possibility to grow crystals of chitin polymerization into a cavity bee hive type structure. It seems there is a characterization of makeup in chitin that has an affinity with cavity structures effect (CSE) to provide levitation. This requires a deeper look into the physics of its composition. Compression; by stacking of wasp nest type structures, is vaguely similar to an aeronautic reaction. The atmospheric interaction, due to a vacuum within the cavity structure would provide an air movement to allow for aeronautic lift. Is this the application for levitation?

An interaction on a molecular level would be significantly different than an aeronautic action. Similar to the definition of how a magnet attracts (molecular combination of electron structure) a magnet requires ferrous elements. A polymerization of chitin is not ferrous and is an electrogravitics action.

Additional quote from Building Whirling Wheels towards the effort to create an intensified gravity field:

Either way, the operational intent for a gravity generator is to create a toroidal field, generating a gravity influenced sphere, capable of lifting its own weight and the weight of its payload.

As pointed out in a previous post ; one consideration is that when the device is in full motion, it would be similar to how gravity travels. A particle’s path; perceived as a ribbon with a linear twist at light speed. The consistency of these twists uses a specific mobius type direction pattern. Synchronizing parallel fields by manipulating a pulse type motion of magnetic moment, would affect a braided path. The reaction for the empty matter path might/could/should create a gravity fluctuation. An amplification of the void in the pathed braid might/should cause a “surfable” condition.

Somewhere in the answer is a correlation in using Earth’s magnetosphere. Each of these articles is a study towards discovery.

Hyperloop Update

Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:14:22 GMT

Update regarding recent global events of hyperloop

The previous hyperloop article was posted about a year ago . This article is a hyperloop update.

China hyperloop

China is the current global leader in advanced transit technology. The term hyperloop for the China technology is somewhat of a misnomer. China doesn’t call its maglev in a tube, hyperloop; although the most rapid amount of hyperloop vehicle technology progress is taking place in China. The majority of hyperloop companies are working towards track infrastructure and politics. Significant hyperloop vehicle technology is taking place in China. The article in Interesting Engineering highlights the newest of hyperloop tests.

The Chinese company, the Third Academy of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) announced it has achieved significant advancement with its superconducting maglev train technology. CASIC's announcement indicates that the performance surpassed the previous known record set by a superconducting maglev vehicle, which reached 623km/hr (387mph) under non-vacuum conditions in October 2023. The maglev vehicle showed stable levitation while traversing a low-vacuum tube, on its full-scale 2km (1.2-mile) test line.

https://newatlas.com/transport/china-vacuum-maglev/

In China, transportation is different; innovative technology is promoted and produced by the government. In other countries, large transportation projects are political and the product of bureaucracy, lacking innovation. China’s communist government eliminates competitive practices.

Hyperloop TT in Europe

https://www.hyperlooptt.com

One of the original hyperloop companies is Hyperloop Transportation Technology (HTT). It’s founder, Dirk Ahlborn, found a better reception in Europe than in the US. The European co-founder Bebop Sherpa, has aligned tremendous political support throughout Europe. One of the most active hyperloop technology companies is now located in Italy.

This type of transportation project requires massive rights-of-ways and infrastructure costs. It also requires tremendous political support. Due to the risk adverse nature of politics, gathering support for any new transportation technology is next to impossible.

HTT says its breakthrough vehicle technology is a next-generation passive magnetic levitation system called Inductrack. The Inductrack technology was originally established by General Atomics by their development team in the mid-1990s’s and early 2000s. Inductrack was designed as a small vehicle, Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) system technology. The passive maglev technology development was shelved in the early 2000’s by General Atomics, with the conclusion that its wrap-around technology design has no interactive switching capability. The HTT team feels the larger vehicle size can adapt the Inductrack technology with its single dedicated guideway configuration. Inductrack uses a passive magnet alignment configured in a Halbach array. The HTT system, has been tested and validated on a full-scale passive magnet levitation guideway. The Inductrack technology enables passive levitation over an unpowered but conductive track.

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/hyperlooptt-unveils-full-scale-capsule-for-760mph-travel/

Hyperloop in Italy

https://hyperloopitalia.com/

From their start in Europe, HTT’s expansion can be attributed to Bebop Sherpa. He has assembled a tremendous alliance and political support. This group has taken great strides in breaking the mold of traditional transportation projects.

The link to Hyperloop Italia’s agreement with Italy’s government to build the first Hyperloop system in the world: https://www.breakinglatest.news/technology/the-first-hyperloop-ultra-fast-train-in-veneto-gresta-the-signature-is-there-important-momentum/

A good journalistic piece: https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/2024/02/17/new-hope-of-uae-hyperloop-system-as-italian-passenger-line-gets-green-light/

Hyperloop in Holland

https://www.hardt.global/

The Hardt Hyperloop organization has a great mixture of political participation and early development funding. A large portion of its funding is from the European Union.

The difference with Hardt is their vehicle technology is apparently a suspended maglev technology. This is very different than the other hyperloop vehicles.

In the 1990s, a PRT company was started with the goal of creating a traffic solution. The company’s founder was a very enthusiastic proponent of reducing freeway and road congestion. He promoted the company and received quite a bit of support. The company, SkyTran, sold to a company in Israel in the mid-2010s. After announcing several technological advances, the announcements stopped and has quietly disappeared. The interesting aspect to their technology advances, Hardt has appeared with similar technology.

Hardt will be an intriguing hyperloop company to watch.

Hyperloop in Germany

https://tumhyperloop.com/

With the support of the Bavarian state government and their Hightech Agenda, the demonstrator is the key technology piece developed by the TUM Hyperloop Program at the Technical University of Munich (TUM).

The TUM Hyperloop website refers to themselves as building Europe’s first hyperloop passenger demonstrator.

The TUM Hyperloop organization is German academia. A playful and fun college group that has won several Hyperloop technology awards. Their website is vague, without an explanation of their vehicle technology.

Hyperloop in Spain

https://zeleros.com/

This company has a global vision. It uses a giant electric fan to propel the vehicle inside an air evacuated tube. The company has a nice website.

Hyperloop in the USA

Although the Hyperloop concept began in the US, the government’s political agenda has a different direction. Hyperloop technology is a more efficient form of transportation for public transit; however, US government’s agencies are heavily influenced by lobbyist’s interests. Those interests only benefit from maintaining status-quo technology with the results seen as the government obsessing to an agenda of lower standards which perpetuate the status-quo. Rather than engaging in sustainable transportation, which is the basis of urban growth, the politics in the US have moved in the opposite direction of productivity. It’s as though innovation is the enemy of bureaucracy. Following this procedure, the government raises taxes. With every gas tax increase, public transit stays the same and the worn-out roads get worse.

This link is a mostly accurate article explaining the demise of hyperloop in the US. https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/21/24011448/hyperloop-one-shut-down-layoff-closing-elon-musk

Trains are a 200-year-old technology. They provided the ability to carry large groups of passengers, and cargo, from one central location to another central location. The automobile provided transportation independence 100 years ago. The merits for building new train lines are valid. Implementing trains with efficient maglev technology is practical. For the government to grant billions of dollars to a private company to build a train line, is another example of the US commitment to lobbyist dictates.

This link is an article about the new Brightline West line: https://thepointsguy.com/news/brightline-west-more-funding/ . The article is about Brightline, however, it could have been hyperloop.

Levitation with philosophy, theology and physics

Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:31:24 GMT

Seeking levitation with philosophy, theology and physics

Levitation in physics

Another possibility for the definition of levitation is that it could be seen as an action of rapid oscillating molecular motion. Even as an action of what appears as standing still, it’s a flow of motion. Inasmuch as a waterfall appears as a steady flow, a waterfall is a group of individual moving droplets.

How does gravitational motion relate to levitation? Levitation is quite possibly a synchronization of oscillations with bodies of molecules. This would be a sort of an amplification of gravity’s angular momentum. Levitation, however, holds the appearance of a much slower motion, more similar to an accumulation of mass; such as a helium filled balloon.

Considering levitation to be an accumulation of ‘holes’ is a provocative speculation. This is consistent with Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). A synchronization of cavity structure’s frequency motion.

Polarization

There is a suggestion that levitation is polarization. What does that mean? Brittanica describes polarization: Polarization, property of certain electromagnetic radiations in which the direction and magnitude of the vibrating electric field are related in a specified way.

Light waves are transverse: that is, the vibrating electric vector associated with each wave is perpendicular to the direction of propagation . A beam of unpolarized light consists of waves moving in the same direction with their electric vectors pointed in random orientations about the axis of propagation. Plane polarized light consists of waves in which the direction of vibration is the same for all waves. In circular polarization the electric vector rotates about the direction of propagation as the wave progresses. Light may be polarized by reflection or by passing it through filters , such as certain crystals, that transmit vibration in one plane but not in others.

Scrolling down from that same link in Britannica, also mentions gravitational waves as variations, and how electromagnetic fields travel as waves.

As a sidenote, it’s likely that some readers have issues with certain aspects of this content. Learning, particularly in physics and math; has to account for the reader who strives to understand but, is unfamiliar with particular terms. Some people reading this blog article might be unfamiliar with the terms used to explain polarization. Without understanding, it’s difficult to comprehend a topic. It’s curious; what percentage of people comprehend the terminology. This paragraph might seem like a distraction but, it remains as relevant.

As the Britannica explanation describes polarization, it says light waves are transverse, then continues by saying each wave is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. A transverse wave is explained in Wikipedia in a very detailed manner which includes GIFs. The easiest explanation is: back and forth motion. A transverse wave could be understood as being a product of; or a process of filtration. As a power source flows in its constant frequency, it bumps into an obstacle. Similar to a stream of water hitting a rock, that flow is disrupted and causes a wave reaction. Wave reactions are the terms propagation, transverse waves, etc.

The topic of levitation as a component of polarization, could certainly relate to a synchronization of transverse wave action. One of the definitions of levitation is that it’s a series of vibrating waves.

Variations to wave propagation

A deeper study into the compositions of atomic mass in relation of potential for discovery of levitation is necessary. This requires an in-depth look at identifying element paths in their particle mass. Specifically, is the motion of specific elements and how that relates to wave propagation . And potential to a synchronization of wave action.

A study of the Biefeld-Brown Effect found that the odd nuclear spin values of Barium (+3/2) with Titanium (-7/2) maximize electrogravitics effect.

Similarities in levitation for transportation

One of the similarities relating to transportation, and most aspects of physics theory; is the absence of accounting for Einstein’s postulation that the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling through the universe at light speed. As an example in mentioning this; Newton’s law of gravity has a formula that accounts for its action on Earth’s surface. This also accounts for other planetary bodies within this solar system. Since all relativity within the Milky Way Galaxy acts in unison, the gravitational constants are consistent, and gravitational laws are valid. There is, however, more to relativity in the universe than the laws of consistency within the Milky Way Galaxy. This statement is written as an opportunity for perception beyond the nearly infinite bounds of this galaxy.

As a philosophical statement to theoretical physics, this is not a claim that the laws of physics are incorrect. It’s a statement to validate the presents for beginning an explanation as to the presents of multidimensions.

Light speed is a dimension which holds variations to what is perceived as relativity. It’s in this dimensional speed that vibrational frequencies can provide differing manifestations. This reaches towards explaining telekinesis. And how brainwaves have the potential for psychokinesis. Which leads to unasked questions regarding the amplification of psychokinesis.

Can a brainwave, or neural oscillation, allow a person’s relativity to transpose physical alterations? Could a thought allow a physical body to transfer a physical body to change location? In other words, since it is possible to transfer a person’s voice and images of two dimension, the transfer of additional dimensions of mass should be equally possible.

Philosophy and theology

There have been many references to Jesus Christ and his walking on water. What ability did he have that provided him the ability to walk on water? This isn’t a specific theological question about having the ability to perform miracles of healing. This is a question of instantaneously transposing traditional laws of physics with neural oscillations. Theologically, what power of mind did Christ Jesus have? The obvious answer is in His name: Christ. He has a title of purity. The entirety of such conversation is related to the dimension of spirit.

In spite of a person’s emotional reaction to a conversion relating to spiritual context, it exists. Regardless of a possible emotionally negative reaction, the spiritual realm has relative presents. This dimension is accessible in a neural manifestation. This is attained through neural oscillation. How is there a transfer of mass manifest through this thought process?

In previous decades, it was common place of restaurants for their signs to display the term: “Food and Spirits”. This indicated the restaurant establishment served food and liquor. The spirts were contained within the bottles of liquor.

With Einstein’s theory of relativity being accurate, there is a consistency in its frequency pattern. Any variation to the consistency of the flow, causes a differentiation.

Now, the question becomes: how can a brainwave, or neural oscillation, frequency be amplified to manipulated for a transportation device?

What allowed Christ Jesus the power of mastery to physically manifest matter transfer? His actions violated principles of physics. That same principle was provided instantly to Peter as well.

There is control of neural oscillations available. The brain is fully capable to transmit variating frequencies that effect mass. It is the vibration in relation to light speed?

Otis Carr, in his experience as a protégé to Nikola Tesla, studied in the field of frequency waves. The blueprints of his ship define the potential for frequency wave synchronization.

What is Levitation

Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:00:47 GMT

Levitation, what is levitation?

Now to find the answer to a really important question: what is levitation? Where is it found? Does levitation really exist? Is it an action to a body as a whole or is it molecular action? It seems to be an action that takes place to a large mass as a whole. How does it happen? Levitation is another scientific mystery.

Tricks are deception, a false perception. In the process of discovery, perception is extremely important. On the trail of discovery, it’s imperative to recognize the line of separation between what is real and what is not.

What is levitation? The action of a helium filled balloon isn’t generally referred to as levitation. A balloon is an act of small quantity of lighter gas rising in an atmosphere of heavier gas. The action of levitation is more closely associated with a controlled movement and ability to float or stay motionless in mid-air.

Magnets have the ability of levitation, this is certain. Magnetic action is an event of molecular interaction with ferrous elements. The levitating action of magnetic reaction effects a whole body of mass. This clearly shows that one premise to establish the action of levitation is with the molecular reaction of electrons in certain elements. This explains the levitating action as merely an identifying portion of a specific magnetic action.

Magnetic levitation accounts for a torus field of magnetic action. Does non-magnetic levitation involve molecular action? Is it a subatomic action with an element’s electron structure? Again, what is the definition of levitation? Is its behavior centripetal or centrifugal force? The instances of levitation seem to be without heat buildup. This indicates centripetal force.

Where else is levitation seen? There are claims of Its process being an action of the mind. This is uncommon, only found in a few instances of psychokinesis.

The act of both Christ Jesus and Peter walking on water is an example of levitation. Magnets weren’t involved with that event. This is an act of the mind overcoming physical understanding. What is it? How powerful is psychokinetics? What are the parameters for brainwaves to transpose principles of physical matter?

For psychokinetics to transpose physical action and move a transportation device, requires an amplifier. Is this process is found in CSEs? The egg carton type structure of a crystalline structure emits a frequency that can be regulated. Can it be amplified to be interpreted within Earth’s magnetosphere as a wave that can be resonated? So then, a vibration?

How is a radio signal sent? How is it received? A speaker magnet sends a vibration to a paper cone. Changes of frequencies send different vibrations. A CSE is at a different frequency. It would be at a frequency level that bugs can instinctively interpret.

Ultimately, levitation is an action of molecular vibration. At what level? What frequency and how does it manifest the capability of carrying a load? It would be by a more rapid frequency rate, increased intensity. To generate a vibration, does this necessitate a power source? Is the action centrifugal? A centrifugal action generates a friction action with thermodynamic loss. This would require a power source. Bugs are small, their power source could come from what is equivalent to calorie production. Such as the flapping of wings.

As a transportation methodology, levitation has to be accessible by a device. The mind over matter type approach would have to be amplified by a transmitter and receiver through a device. Viktor S. Grebennikov spoke often about his discovery of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) . Is there an application of the CSE to enable levitation? Viktor Grebennikov says there is.

Where does levitation come from, what is it and how is it initiated? Asking the same question as was asked about gravity: is levitation a product of molecular accumulation? It seems as though it’s more of the opposite of mass buildup. Is it a sub-atomic action? Its action seems to be a product of an accumulation of the holes of structural molecular frequencies. What type of action would it be called to be an effect of a spiritual or brainwave action? As a brainwave reaction, levitation would be psychokinetic; a neural oscillation: frequency manipulation. A sort of matter manipulation. Can this be synonymous to a purposeful thought in a smile usually receives a smile as the physical response; a producing of an effect?

There is also work regarding ion reactions as levitation.

The other aspect of levitation by psychokinesis, there is a tremendous possibility into the unknown realm of a dimensional action. This would be a transition between the obvious dimensional barriers.

Viktor Grebennidov’s device is never explained. It’s very possible that his levitation device carried batteries. The shaft which carried the control mechanism could have been filled with d size batteries. As such, it would have been a power source to amplify an atmospheric electromagnetic action or interaction with the magnetosphere’s action.

Considering levitation to be an accumulation of ‘holes’ is a provocative speculation. This is consistent with Viktor Grebennidov’s CSE. To perceive levitation as a synchronization of cavity structure’s frequency motion shows a new concept for scientific endeavor.

In the blogpost Questions in Levitation , it’s apparent that a frequency tone is inherent in the cavity structures. The frequency tone isn’t an audible tone within the human sound spectrum. This requires such action to be in the realm of interaction with atmospheric pressure; Can the compression of a CSE cause an intensification of the CSE field? Similarly, wings of an airplane lift are due to the airflow vacuum created above the wing; does a CSE field compression create a similar vacuum to create lift? Do gases in air show an intensified CSE field? In a CSE field, what aspect of a crystallization frequency provide an apparatus to allow a levitation motion? Can the crystal frequency generate a CSE field to interact with atmospheric gases to enact an electromagnetic action?

From the section ‘Spiders don’t jump by an action of their muscles’ in the blogpost Short Distance Resonance Technology , is a phenomenal new study by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira . After an exquisite explanation of electromagnetic flow and atmospheric potential gradient, Vitor provides a clear understanding to a spider’s movement. “This phenomenon has been observed in nature when ballooning spiders, through electrochemical and biological mechanisms, accumulate charges on a brush of silk strands spun out and deployed from their spinnerets during optimal atmospheric electrostatic conditions.”

What else can levitation be? One can study and consider the embers floating upward in a fire. What causes the flame to rise? Looking at the vertical rise of embers in a crackling fire, one might consider it is essentially levitating. This upward motion of heat is centrifugal. This process is a consideration for more study and its possible relation to the fundamental principles of levitation.

Patent References

Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:07:04 GMT

Reference page of relevant patents relating to space flight

These patents list various contributions of creative thinking. These designs aren’t particularly supported by CATTCC, nor are they discounted. These are patents that have been awarded over the years. The purpose for this blogpost is to compile a reference list. This list will continue to grow, as abandoned or forgotten information and technology is rediscovered. These first five patents are typical variations of extending currently used propulsion technology.

Variations of current technology

Lighter-than-air craft Patent number 4,014,483

Roderick M. MacNeil, March 1977

SUMMARY - In accordance with this invention, a lighter-than-air craft has a substantially discus shape so as to minimize drag and wind resistance about the craft's circumference. A plurality of ailerons distributed about the circumference of the craft compensate the craft as wind direction and velocity change. Pilot effort in stabilizing the craft therefore is minimized.

Rotary and Circular Saucershaped Airfoil Aircraft Patent number 3,469,804

Steven T. Rowan

“ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE This invention relates to a rotary airfoil aircraft and, more particularly, to a saucer-shaped aircraft capable of both vertical and horizontal flight. Still more specifically, this invention relates to an airfoil aircraft including a. central pilot's control compartment; a circular airfoil wing means rotatably mounted on and extended laterally from the control compartment; and power means pivotally connected to the outer periphery of the airfoil wing means to provide vertical, horizontal, and any combination there: of propulsion. This invention also relates to an airfoil aircraft capable of take-off, vertically, flight in all directions, landing anywhere, and having parachute means mounted thereon for soft landing in cases of emergency to provide the utmost in Safety.”

Aircraft, especially of the vtol type Patent number 3,514,053

Gilbert R. McGuinness, May 1970

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Aircraft, especially of the VTOL type, in which a disclike fuselage has a bladed rotor concentrically mounted thereon in surrounding relation thereto with engine means in the fuselage for driving said rotor on the fuselage and for developing forward and maneuvering thrusts on said aircraft; the blades of said rotor extending radially and being tiltable on respective axes which extend radially.

This invention relates to aircraft, and is particularly concerned with a vertical take-off and landing aircraft, commonly referred to as a VTOL type aircraft

Aircraft using lifting fans Patent number 3,752,417

Prejean Lagace August 1973

Abstract - An aircraft of VTOL or STOL type is provided with at least one vertically extending duct in the fuselage containing an upper and a lower fan. Air valve means between the fans divide the duct into upper and lower regions and control the air from the upper fan to flow downward and/or into a duct extending rearwardly from the upper region. Other air valve means control the flow of air from a front duct into the lower region.

Lighter-than-air-semirigid combined controllable flying vehicle – Patent number 3,820,744

Denton June 1974 March 1999, filed in Russia; Application by Ишков Юрий Григорьевич

Also known from US patent N 3820744, NKI 244 - 5, 1974, comprising a body in the form of an elastic convex shell with gas cylinders placed therein lighter than air and a cowl forming its edges, mounted on a rigid external force frame connected by an internal suspension in the form longitudinally rigid elements having devices for changing their tension, with an internal hollow rigid power skeleton fixed to the lower shell and forming the cargo compartment, a control cabin, a power plant and controls.

Innovative approach to technology

The following patents reach beyond typical aerodynamic flight methodologies. Clicking on their links to read the technology claims is interesting and educational.

Magnetohydrodynamic propulsion apparatus Patent number 3,322,374

The present invention relates in general to craft propelled by magnetohydrodynamic effects and methods of propulsion and control thereof, and more particularly to heavier-than-air craft which are propelled by interaction of magnetic fields upon electrically conductive fluids such as plasma, surrounding the craft.

Method and apparatus for generating a secondary gravitational force field - Patent number 3,626,605

Abstract: Apparatus and method for generating a time variant non-electromatic force field due to the dynamic interaction of relatively moving bodies and for transforming such force fields into energy for doing useful work.

Ionocraft Patent number 3,130,945

Claims: This invention relates to improved heavier-than-air aircraft, and more specifically to structures which are capable of either hovering or moving in any direction at high altitudes by means of ionic discharge.

Space propulsion system Patent number 3,504,868

ABSTRACT: A propulsion system for a body moving in a nonuniform magnetic field, for example, along a polar orbit in Earth’s magnetic field, which comprises a coil or loop or wire attached to the body and carrying a current to produce an auxiliary magnetic field as the body travels from the equator to one of Earth’s magnetic poles. The auxiliary field is terminated as the body moves through the next quadrant so that a net accelerating force is exerted on the body as it moves in said nonuniform field. The coil or loop may be formed of superconductive material and means provided for maintaining this material in its superconductive state.

Propulsion device and method employing electric fields for producing thrust - Patent number 6,492,784

Summary: In view of the foregoing background, it is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a device for a practical conversion of energy of an electrical potential to a mechanical force suitable for propelling a transport vehicle.

Electrokinetic Apparatus Patent number 2,949,550

T. Townsend Brown: My invention relates to electrokinetic apparatus, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for utilizing electrical potentials for the production of forces for the purpose of causing relative motion between a structure and the surrounding medium.

Electrokinetic generator Patent number 3,022,430

T. Townsend Brown: Generators in which thermal or kinetic energy is converted into electrical energy by ionization of a fluid and removal of the charge therefrom.

Dipolar force field propulsion system Patent number 4.663,932

A dipolar force field propulsion system having a alternating electric field source for producing electromotive lines of force which extend in a first direction and which vary at a selected frequency and having an electric field strength of a predetermined magnitude, a source of an alternating magnetic field having magnetic lines of force which extend in a second direction which is at a predetermined angle to the first direction of the electromotive lines of force and which cross and intercept the electromotive line of force at a predetermined location defining a force field region and wherein the frequency of the alternating magnetic field substantially equal to the frequency of the alternating electric field and at a selected in phase angle therewith and wherein the magnetic field has a flux density which when multiplied times the selected frequency is less than a known characteristic field ionization potential limit; a source of neutral particles of matter having a selected dipole characteristic and having a known characteristic field ionization potential limit which is greater than the magnitude of the electric field and wherein the dipoles of the particles of matter are capable of being driven into cyclic rotation at the selected frequency by the electric field to produce a reactive thrust, a vaporizing stage which vaporizes said particles of matter into a gaseous state at a selected temperature, and a transporting system for transporting the vaporized particles of matter into the force field defined by the crossing electromotive lines of force and the magnetic lines of force.

Nonlinear electromagnetic propulsion system and method Patent number 5,142,861

An objective of the invention is to provide an electromagnetic device whose geometry and energy conversion mechanisms are optimal for the production of propulsive thrust rather than the radiation of electromagnetic energy into space.

Electrical thrust producing device Patent number 2,958,790

This invention relates to electrical apparatus and more particularly to an apparatus for utilizing electrical current and voltages for the production of forces for causing motion of the apparatus.

Flying apparatus Patent number 3,120,363

This invention relates generally to heavier-than-air flying apparatus and methods of propulsion and control thereof. More specifically, this invention relates to such apparatus and methods utilizing reaction motors of the type operating on the principle of ionic discharge.

Craft using an inertial mass reduction device Patent number 10144532 B2

Abstract - A craft using an inertial mass reduction device comprises of an inner resonant cavity wall, an outer resonant cavity, and microwave emitters. The electrically charged outer resonant cavity wall and the electrically insulated inner resonant cavity wall form a resonant cavity. The microwave emitters create high frequency electromagnetic waves throughout the resonant cavity causing the resonant cavity to vibrate in an accelerated mode and create a local polarized vacuum outside the outer resonant cavity wall.

Previously mentioned

These seven patents are mentioned in the Available Technology blogpage. They have descriptions written on that page; the links are also included here.

Anti-gravity machine -

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040070299A1/en

Gravity and buoyancy driven power generators -

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4718232A/en

Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state -

https://patents.google.com/patent/US6960975B1/en

Method of gravity distortion and time displacement -

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060073976A1/en

Propulsion system using the antigravity force of the vacuum and applications -

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120092107A1/en

Gravity continuous power generation mechanical device adopting gyroscopic effect -

https://patents.google.com/patent/CN105736260A/en

Field resonance “propulsion” concept assumptions -

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19800010907/downloads/19800010907.pdf

Other technology

In addition to these patents being listed, there are other pieces of abandoned and hidden technology.

First in this list are the ships of Otis Carr and David Hamel .

In the 1930s, a flying craft was built. It’s referred to as Die Glocke: The Bell . One of the most comprehensive articles for that era of technology is found at 1library.net . Similar work recently using this design concept is called the Fluxliner . The Fluxliner is detailed in this 1 ½ hour youtube video . The power source is somewhat vague but, based on the flux of red mercury.

In searching more patents relating to potential space flight using new technological concepts, these are interesting to check out.

https://segmagnetics.com/

http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm

https://rimstar.org/sdprop/hamlshfs/hamlshfs.htm

Additional patents after original post

Bobbin Electromagnetic field Propulsion Vehicle

Patent application May 9, 2002

Inventor John Quincy St.Claiir

https://whatihavefoundsofar.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/us20030209636a1.pdf

Flying Saucer

Patent number: 3,774,865

Patent issued Nov. 27, 1973

Inventor: Olympio F. Pinto

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3774865A/en

pdf: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/12/e6/10/a0eeb1c04741f7/US3774865.pdf

Apparatus and method for providing an antigravitational force

2002-06-27 - Publication of US20020079440A1

Inventor: Randell Mills

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20020079440A1/en

Description: This invention relates to methods and apparatus for providing repulsion, in particular methods and apparatus for providing antigravitational repulsive forces adapted to provide propulsion and levitation.

(Portion of abstract) A method and means to produce an antigravitational force for propulsion and/or levitation comprise a source of fundamental particles including electrons and a means to give the fundamental particles negative curvature; whereas, the gravitating body is comprised of matter of positive curvature where opposite curvatures provide a mutually repulsive antigravitational force.

The status of this patent: Abandoned

Electromagnetic Energy Propulsion Engine

Patent Number 5,197,279

Inventor: James R. Taylor

March 30,1993

pdf: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/39/63/8a/eb4682fb187963/US5197279.pdf

An electromagnetic energy propulsion engine system including a hollow housing having a front part and a rear end part of material transparent to the passage of electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic field generating solenoidal windings, having central axes parallel with the central axis of the engine and axially spaced from each other to provide a forward field generating winding and a rear field generating winding, a power source, a control computer, and a power pulse generator connected between the electromagnetic field generating windings and the power source and control computer,

Pulsed Capacitor Discharge Electric Engine

Patent Number 3,890,548 A

Inventor: Edwin V. Gray

June 17, 1975

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3890548A/en

Abstract : There is disclosed herein an electric machine or engine in which a rotor cage having an array of electromagnets is rotatable in an array of electromagnets, or fixed electromagnets are juxtaposed against movable ones. The coils of the electromagnets are connected in the discharge path of capacitors charged to relatively high voltage and discharged through the electromagnetic coils when selected rotor and stator elements are in alignment, or when the fixed electromagnets and movable electromagnets are juxtaposed. The discharge occurs across spark gaps disclosed in alignment with respect to the desired juxtaposition of the selected movable and stationary electromagnets. The capacitor discharges occur simultaneously through juxtaposed stationary movable electromagnets wound so that their respective cores are in magnetic repulsion polarity, thus resulting in the forced motion of movable electromagnetic elements away from the juxtaposed stationary electromagnetic elements at the discharge, thereby achieving motion. In an engine, the discharges occur successively across selected ones of the gaps to maintain continuous rotation. Capacitors are recharged between successive alignment positions of particular rotor and stator electromagnets of the engine.

Long and Short Distance Solutions

Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:03:51 GMT

Progress for long and short distance transportation solutions

Efficient long range space flight is an important task. Yet, the immediate priority for transportation solutions; is to discover and develop a brand-new mode of short distance transportation. Throughout these blogposts, a fresh perspective has been a priority. It’s also the direction of CATTCC research to discover and develop a levitating vehicle. Secondary to the immediate need in transportation is to discover and build an efficient vehicle for long distance space flight. Developing short-distance transportation is vital for the practical purpose of integrating a more convenient method of transportation than an automobile. Long distance space flight technology is currently the most inefficient method imaginable. A new methodology for ultra-fast spaceflight would prove advantageous for anyone working towards any spaceflight missions involving human passengers.

Ultra-fast space flight technology

How well developed is the CATTCC research? Previous blogposts reveal research direction. At present, the research lacks capability of design for a prototype. The current research is study in previously unexplored directions. The greatest factors found in CATTCC’s research for ultra-fast space travel are technologies established on the manipulation of gravity, spin, momentum, magnets, electromagnetics, and principles of electrogravitics. The study is more heavily involved in theoretical physics than traditional application of aeronautical engineering and reactionary measurements of chemical explosions for rocket technology. Gravity is the fundamental component of CATTCC’s research for ultra-fast space flight.

Some important figures for space flight from the blogpost: To the Drawing Board Using the best rocket science engineering available, rocket power has achieved 25,000mph. Light speed (C) is 186,828 miles per second. 25,000mph is one-twenty-five-thousandth of C (actually, 0.000037279123279345). For human intellectual engineering to reach only 1% of C, it requires a mechanism to attain the speed 186.28 miles/second, or 670,617 miles/hour. Parker, NASA’s solar probe, reached half the speed of 1% of C. How? By utilizing the attractive nature of gravity.

In the blogpost: The Vehicle , it references key components for ultra-fast space travel. Thus far, there are several pieces in building a sustainable transportation vehicle that seem to set the parameters. Next is establishing technology, vehicle design, and operation. The technology is multifaceted. The considerations and components are: gravity, centripetal force, spin, momentum, magnetism, possibly high voltage electricity with the Biefeld-Brown Effect, toroidal fields, multi-point Mobius, oscillating variables, in addition to a few other things still being researched.

Replicating existing approaches have a unique impact for space flight. Is there merit to pursue these technologies ? What is the commonality of David Hamel, John Searl, Ezekiel, Otis Carr, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, and others pursuing discovery of new transportation? The common quest is for the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism, and spin. And, what’s the government’s approach to space flight technology? Explosions. Yet, mankind’s fastest speed is by the manipulation of gravity.

There are many considerations in discovering a new mode of transportation. The biggest question is; what is the basis of such technology? The most efficient use of energy is by manipulating gravity . To the question; how can gravity be used for transportation? One possibility is by creating a defined gravity field that causes wave action, then surfing that wave. This, however, requires creating the technology and designing a gravity generator based on that unknown technology.

Another blogpost, Blueprint for Building , shows existing concepts leading to transportation alternatives.

What is the future of transportation to be based on? Current transportation is based on propulsion, its high-speed transportation is based on reactions to chemical explosions and aerodynamics. The future of transportation reaches beyond current technology, it captures efficient energy with a new perspective of physics .

Short distance technology

Building a brand-new mode of transportation requires something unfamiliar. The leading edge of untraditional research in advanced transportation technology can be found within the CATTCC blogposts. The Chitin and Grits blogpost presents some of this study. This introduction of Viktor S. Grebennikov’s discovery of Cavity Structures Effect presents an entire realm of possibility for the solution of short distance travel. He introduces the topic with the psychokinetic aspect, having an impact to gravity. This gives remarkable continuity to explaining why Peter was able to walk on water . Adding the component of Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) brings incredible possibility for insight to a new mode of short distance transportation.

A good illustration to the questions relating to the power of psychokinetic's: when a person sees someone else yawn, it creates a sense of yearning to yawn. The question is: does yawning in front of a person who is blind, does the blind person react by having the yearning to yawn also. Here is another question regarding the reaction of a blind person. When someone smiles, other people react by smiling. Does a blind person also react with a smile?

The question then, is in relation to emotions. Are emotional reactions psychokinetic? And how much of emotions are psychokinetic?

This carries into prayer. What level of prayer is psychokinesis? There is a growing cultural trend of popularity in ‘life coaching’. This trend is based on the psychokinesis of positive affirmations, or the repetition of self-affirming mantras. This form of psychokinesis provides a mindset similar to prayerful meditation.

Brain waves are between 1 and 100 hertz (cycles per second). Audible sound ranges to the human ear are from roughly 20 hz to 20k hz. What prevents brain waves from being heard: or understood by other people?

More details of Viktor S. Grebennikov’s levitating device is found in the blogpost Crystals and Polymers . In replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s device, the first experiment is the possibility to grow crystals of chitin polymerization into a cavity bee hive type structure. It seems there is a characterization of makeup in chitin that has an affinity with cavity structures effect (CSE) to provide levitation. This requires a deeper look into the physics of its composition. Compression; by stacking of wasp nest type structures, is vaguely similar to an aeronautic reaction. The atmospheric interaction, due to a vacuum within the cavity structure would provide an air movement to allow for aeronautic lift. Is this the application for levitation?

Why the crystallization? It has to do with creating the shape of the structure. This would require a CSE structure beneath the wood platform. The levitating process has to be at the molecular level. An aeronautical action involves an interaction of an object with air movement. A molecular interaction is as close to a subatomic action as possible. In creating a crystalized structure of chitin, the polymerization provides the opportunity to manipulate a frequency resonance to amplify the CSE. Perhaps, below the wood covering visible in the picture are layers of cavity structures which are regulate by a lever.

From a subatomic perspective, an electromagnetic action is magnetic. The process of what makes a magnet attract is the molecular combination of electron structure. This is exclusive to ferrous elements. Other elements affecting an attractive or repulsive reaction which are unable to adhere to magnetism use the principles of electrogravitics.

From the blogpost Bug Wings and CSEs : In looking at microscopic portions of bug wings, it displays flattened elongated structures, similar to the elongated sections of a wasps’ nest or beehive. When relating these geometric bug structures to wasps’ nests, there is an association to a relationship with the CSE. The assumption is that this CSE structure produces a frequency.

There are several questions that call for answers. How does this frequency produce energy patterns that enable the platform to levitate? The frequency response isn’t within the audible the sound spectrum. Is it interaction with atmospheric pressure as an aerodynamic action? Is it an ion reaction? This is something of nature. A sort of reaction to CSE compression? Wings of an airplane lift due to the vacuum created above the wing. Does a CSE field compression create a similar vacuum to create lift? The gases in the air, shows an intensified CSE field. So, there is a CSE field; what aspect of a crystallization frequency provides an apparatus to allow a levitation motion? How does a crystal frequency generate a CSE field to interact with atmospheric gases?

So far, we have a lot of questions. The Levitation for Short Distance Transportation blogpost explores polymorphic metals. Entropy- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy . Entropy is central to the second law of thermodynamics , which states that the entropy of an isolated system left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease with time. As a result, isolated systems evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium , where the entropy is highest. A consequence of the second law of thermodynamics is that certain processes are irreversible .

The Short Distance Resonance Technology blogspot highlight a phenomenal new study about jumping spiders. Additionally, is a phenomenal new study by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira . His study is based on the understanding of principles relating to negatively charged Earth and her positive charged atmosphere: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358647592_Anti-Gravity_No_Crazier_Than_Flying_Spiders

After an exquisite explanation of electromagnetic flow and atmospheric potential gradient, Vitor provides a clear understanding to a spider’s movement. “This phenomenon has been observed in nature when ballooning spiders, through electrochemical and biological mechanisms, accumulate charges on a brush of silk strands spun out and deployed from their spinnerets during optimal atmospheric electrostatic conditions.

“Thus it can be inferred that the negative brush discharge from their strands create a centrifugal electrostatic potential which after compressing the aether through drawing in an increased positive flux and imparting this as electrical momentum in the body of the spider akin to a capacitor accumulating electric charge. However, when the spider reaches its critical capacitance, the centrifugally divergent field of aetheric compression generated by the brush envelops the spider’s body and folds inwards to centripetally converging at the two front limbs. This causes an ‘outflow’ or rather elevation upwards and out-feeding of rarefied electric field lines in the atmospheric potential gradient (APG), which impart mechanical upward momentum into the spider’s body and oppose all ‘gravitational’ effects, which really are all attributed to electrostatics. There is promise in this as a medium of propagation wherein machines could through electrostatics deploy. In the case of gravity for mutual-mass acceleration, it is due to intermolecular electrostatic attraction. In the phenomena of downward acceleration towards the earth, ‘physical’ matter exhibits some resistance to primary solar rays from the heavens, which compose of a constant flux of electrostatic leaders that pass through objects while dragging them along towards the earth, henceforth creating them; matter would not be stable were it not for the constant supply of intramolecular oscillation and spin inertial energy from the primary solar rays.”

In his analysis of the flying spider, his considered approach of perspective analysis is brilliant.

The Next Steps for Levitation blogpost analyzes Earth’s magnetosphere. This electromagnetic action provides the foundation in searching Earth’s magnetosphere and its interaction with spiders and chitin shelled bugs for the possible relationship to transportation. The pursuit for sustainable transportation is in finding an efficient power source. The key aspect in this analysis, is the knowledge that there is energy in the atmosphere; there is energy potential in Earth’s magnetosphere. Earth’s surface provides a common ground to engage electric action for connectivity.

Transportation solutions

This is compilation which shows several pursuits in CATTCC’s transportation research. There are several avenues to explore alternative methodologies for short distance and long-distance transportation.

Standards to Measure Sustainability

Sun, 04 Feb 2024 21:59:17 GMT

Analyzing the standards to measure sustainability

There are three aspects of sustainability in urban growth.

Environmental standards

What’s the standard to measure sustainability? The environmental standards are set by legislative dictate based on political perspective. The results of these standards show regulatory control and massive bureaucratic growth. While common sense practices have eliminated hazardous and toxic chemical wastes, the process of bureaucratic waste proliferates in unbridled fashion towards cancelling rational thought.

Economic standards

The economic standards of sustainability are virtually ignored. An honest observation of economic standards is the market place. The public market place is what regulates the standards for what is sustainable. The market, however, is overshadowed by legislative dictate.

Social standards

Measuring the social standards for sustainability is an unknown quantity. A large segment for this measurement standard is social relevance and is totally subjective. Acts of subjectivity are wholly individual. While it is possible to monitor social action, the discussion in terms of regulating individual action becomes a conversation about philosophic principles. This is an arena of theological, political, and philosophical choice. It’s an area of tremendous ignorance and subjected to propaganda promotion. When social standards are implemented by government dictate, individuality is removed. Control is strategically placed into the hands of a select few. The ultimate goal of propaganda is control of the masses to operate massive financial gain.

In viewing the relevance of social commentary from tv shows and popular media, the conversations are extremely controversial. What some consider as horridly pointless, others find value as entertainment. This causes a distorted sense of emotionalism that is embedded into the perception of sustainable conversation.

Sustainability

How realistic is it to implement sustainability ? Prior to the popularized term, life was predominantly sustainable. A hundred years ago, technology was at a low level, people followed nature. Today’s culture is completely submerged in technology, nature is foreign. The discussion of sustainability is largely philosophical and inundated with emotional context.

Regarding sustainability for urban growth, it has to be acknowledged that transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. With this understanding, sustainable transportation is very important.

What is sustainable?

Here's what Webster's says is the definition of sustainable :

1: capable of being sustained (maintained at length without interruption or weakening)

2: a; of, relating to, or being a method of harvesting or using a resource so that the resource is not depleted or permanently damaged

b; of or relating to a lifestyle involving the use of sustainable method

The connection to sustainability is its land-use. There are four types of land-use: nature, agriculture, transit oriented, and automobile centric land-use design. Of these four types of land-use, the automobile centric design is based upon a wholly unsustainable foundation: the automobile. There is nothing about the automobile that is sustainable.

Unsustainable Land-Use Growth

To more clearly define unsustainable land-use design, there are three fundamental components in explaining land-use sustainability: environmental, economic and social.

Environmental: the automobile requires road surfaces. These road beds are oil based. Ever watched a road being built? Lots of grading work, scraping dirt, filling and generally re-working the natural surface of Earth. Ok, not a big deal in small amounts but, tens to hundreds of millions of miles heavily effects the natural water flow of streams and runoff. Again, Earth is a big place, small impact. Secondly, millions of miles of road beds. Capturing of grease, emissions by-products, pollutants, carcinogens and oil spills funneled through oil canals called road beds flowing directly into the water basins. Yeah, that is environmentally unsustainable. Millions of electric and autonomous cars won’t resolve the damage caused by the oil-based road infrastructure.

E conomic : economic impacts of sustainability. Ever hear the phrase: buy local spend local? This term is what creates regional economic sustainability. A dollar spent locally allows that dollar to stay in circulation, being used within a local area. When that money is spent out of the local area, the money is gone; which can no longer can be used.

Automobile centric land-use design is economically unsustainable. Here’s why. The first product of economic unsustainability is the purchase of an automobile. Today’s purchase price of an automobile is what on average? $50,000? That amount is instantly removed from circulation in a local economy, never to be recovered for circulation in that community unless that car was manufactured in that local community. Then there are the fuel consumption rates. Averages vary from region to region. A fairly typical region, as a county of one million, the county consumes 500,000 gallons of gasoline per day. At $3 per gallon, that is $1.5millon per day (less 2% for the wholesaler and retailer) permanently extracted from ever being used and circulated in that community. An even greater financial extraction from the community are insurance costs per vehicle, at an average cost of $120 per month per vehicle.

This is economic unsustainability spawned from the design of automobile centric urban land-use.

Social : what are social impacts? These aspects are rarely considered by studies, except by a very few stragglers engaged in non-traditional academia. It’s the cutting edge of far-reaching consideration.

There was a term coined in the early 2000s called: visual hostility. It was popularized then, not so popular now, due to the extent of its content. Visual hostility is found to describe blight. Scores of non-profit organizations declared war on urban blight. The support money behind non-profits came from big money interests that cashed-in on government subsidized, low cost, poor neighborhood gentrification near high value real estate areas. A lot of blight was erased within a few years. And, to elected politicians, like homelessness; urban blight no longer exists.

Transportation solution

The biggest concern regarding the current transportation dilemma is to develop a solution, implementing the use of efficient energy use in transportation. The solution is found with finding a brand-new mode of transportation. The greatest need is discovering a superior alternative to the automobile.

Autonomous vehicles

The enthusiasm and speed of many organizations working on autonomous vehicles has simmered over the past few years. Google has high interest for profitability in the autonomous vehicle industry. Other organizations perceive the autonomous vehicle industry to be very lucrative, this is a strong motivation factor for its development.

One of the concentrated areas preforming research work for autonomous vehicles has been in San Francisco. One of the companies working to implement autonomous vehicle use was granted a public market test by the State to allow autonomous taxi cabs in San Francisco for one year. After the year long test, the State denied the company a license to continue its operation.

Tests in other areas have also failed. One of the obstacles to autonomous vehicle operation is the human component of unpredictability. In San Francisco it was the inability for vehicle sensors to detect hazards and emergency situations.

The advanced transit industry has acknowledged since its inception that automated vehicles require a grade sperate rights-of-way. Autonomous vehicle engineers feel there is no need for separate rights-of-way.

The reality of autonomous vehicles in public use sharing the roadways, is a political decision. There is consistency to political procedure. The final analysis will show that cars are an unsustainable form of transportation and people will still be stuck in traffic jams.

Flying cars

As for flying cars; it is possible for vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft to be viable. Is it practical? There has to be a restriction as to the number of “flying cars” that is allowed. Wrecks on the highways are bad, car wrecks in the sky would be much more damaging.

A solution for our modern society transportation is imperative. The solution can only be found in a brand-new mode of transportation. The future of transportation floats, its source of motion is by the manipulation of gravity. How soon can this new mode of transportation be discovered? As soon as people begin to look for answers, instead of focusing on building a different style of mouse trap.

Introduction to Ecopreneurship

Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:19:36 GMT

Nurturing the planet through innovation: an introduction to ecopreneurship

Image: Freepik

In the age of global environmental awareness, the rise of ECOpreneurship marks a pivotal shift in the business landscape. ECOpreneurs, driven by a passion to make a positive impact on the planet, are revolutionizing industries by merging ecological sustainability with entrepreneurial spirit. This article delves into the core of ECOpreneurship, offering insights into the journey of becoming a successful ECOpreneur. From education and training to embracing digital security, there is a multifaceted approach to building a business that not only thrives financially but also contributes to the well-being of our planet .

Embracing the ECOpreneurial Mindset

Transitioning into an ECOpreneur requires more than a business idea; it demands a mindset that sees beyond profits to the broader impact on the environment and society. This shift in perspective is fundamental in driving innovative solutions that align with ecological principles.

● Prioritize Sustainability: Embed sustainability into your business model from the start. This means considering the environmental impact of every decision, from sourcing materials to product lifecycle management.

● Innovative Problem-Solving: Stay informed about the latest environmental challenges and focus on creating innovative solutions that address these issues effectively.

● Ethical Leadership: Lead by example , fostering a company culture that values transparency, sustainability, and social responsibility.

Gaining the Right Knowledge and Skills

In the realm of ECOpreneurship, education serves as a cornerstone, equipping aspiring entrepreneurs with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate the complexities of sustainable business.

● Pursue Relevant Education: Consider degrees or courses in environmental science, sustainable business, or green technologies to build a solid foundation in the field.

● Continuous Learning: Stay abreast of the latest trends , technologies, and regulations in sustainability to ensure your business remains competitive and compliant.

Building a Sustainable Business Model

The heart of ECOpreneurship lies in developing a business model that harmonizes profitability with environmental stewardship. Crafting a sustainable business model requires a thoughtful approach, considering the long-term impact of your operations.

● Life Cycle Assessment: Conduct a comprehensive assessment of your products or services, focusing on minimizing environmental impact throughout the lifecycle.

● Resource Efficiency: Implement practices that reduce waste , promote recycling, and optimize the use of resources, leading to cost savings and reduced ecological footprint.

● Collaborate for Sustainability: Engage with suppliers, partners, and customers who share your commitment to sustainability, creating a value chain that supports your environmental objectives.

Leveraging Technology for Environmental Impact

Technology plays a crucial role in scaling sustainable solutions and enhancing the efficiency of ECOpreneurial ventures. Embracing technological innovation can drive significant environmental benefits, from reducing carbon emissions to conserving natural resources.

● Invest in Clean Technologies: Adopt renewable energy sources, energy-efficient appliances , and eco-friendly materials to reduce your business's environmental impact.

● Digitalize Operations: Utilize digital tools for remote work , online marketing, and e-commerce to minimize your carbon footprint and reach a wider audience.

● Data-Driven Decision Making: Harness the power of data analytics to track your sustainability performance, optimize operations, and make informed decisions.

Prioritizing Cybersecurity in the Digital Age

In an increasingly digital world, safeguarding your business's data and digital assets is paramount. ECOpreneurs, often relying on digital platforms for operations and communications, must prioritize cybersecurity to protect their intellectual property, customer data, and reputation.

● Cybersecurity Education: Pursue an online degree or certification in cybersecurity. With a cybersecurity degree , you can understand the risks and implement robust security measures.

● Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security assessments to identify vulnerabilities and update your security protocols accordingly.

● Employee Training: Educate your team about cybersecurity best practices, ensuring they are equipped to recognize and respond to potential threats.

As we stand at the crossroads of environmental challenges and technological advancements, ECOpreneurship emerges as a beacon of hope and innovation. By embracing a sustainable mindset, gaining relevant knowledge and skills, building eco-friendly business models, leveraging technology, and prioritizing cybersecurity, aspiring ECOpreneurs can lead the way towards a greener, more sustainable future. The journey of an ECOpreneur is not just about building a successful business; it's about being a catalyst for positive change, fostering a harmonious relationship between commerce and conservation. As we venture into this new era, the fusion of ecological consciousness and entrepreneurial drive will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping a sustainable and prosperous world for generations to come.

Questions in Levitation

Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:47:40 GMT

Where is levitation found?

Where is levitation found? Is it only in magnets? Is it found in mysticism or magic? Is it a trick to defy gravity? Perhaps it’s an action of atmospheric voids. Or maybe electromagnetic responses to atmosphere. Can it be a function of the magnetosphere? Is it found in cavity structures? There are many questions.

Searching for answers

Photoshop levitation is illegitimate. Magic tricks are part of a performer’s routine. Mysticism runs in the gambit of control that begs question of deception. What keys unlock gravity’s secret? Can crystals radiate harmonics to oscillate frequencies to such a degree of magnitude that enables it to carry a load? Beyond the toroidal fields of magnetic action, what holds gravitational fields with non-ferrous elements?

Since crystals radiate oscillations that interact with electromagnetic action, then two crystals can be manipulated by regulated resonance vibration. Since non-ferrous crystals are able to resonate electromagnetic oscillations, what is the component to respond to magnetic action? Is sound an electrogravitics or an electromagnetic action? A sound transmitted from a speaker is a ferrous action. The sound from vocal cords is a vibration generated by a non-ferrous action.

The vibrational action of sound transmitted by a resonance oscillation through the air is more than a moving electron, the motion of gases is a wave transferring location of element atoms in molecules. Sound vibrations involve more than electron motion, it is molecular.

Part of this one-sided conversational dialog is redundant but, it’s written to make a point. The point is to ultimately ask a question regarding the validity of electrogravitics. Electromagnetics is the assumed relationship to electron movement. However, magnets are encompassed by a toroidal field of influence. Gravity is merely the angular momentum in the path of all particle mass, as all matter travels at the speed of light.

Unconventional thought brings a different perspective to ask unusual questions. This brings up the primary philosophical statement of Viktor Schauberger: comprehend and copy nature. Therefore: what are nature’s fundamental actions of beehives? How powerful is the cavities structures effect (CSE) and is there any levitation action? This also raises the questions about the crystallization formation of chitin in its relation to the CSEs. Can this type of resonance be amplified by nature; electromagnetically?

The blogpost Short Distance Designs asked similar questions that call for answers.

There are many questions about CSEs. What effects do they produce? How is their proclamation of levitation made available? Apparently, the frequency tone is inherent in the cavity structures. This sound isn’t an audible tone within the human sound spectrum. Again, this is an apparent interaction with atmospheric pressure as an aerodynamic action. It doesn’t appear as an ion reaction.

Can the compression of a CSE cause an intensification of the CSE field? Similarly, wings of an airplane lift are due to the airflow vacuum created above the wing; does a CSE field compression create a similar vacuum to create lift? Do gases in air show an intensified CSE field? In a CSE field, what aspect of a crystallization frequency provide an apparatus to allow a levitation motion? Can the crystal frequency generate a CSE field to interact with atmospheric gases to enact an electromagnetic action?

This is something of nature

Regarding CSEs, how does this frequency produce energy patterns that would enable Viktor Grebennikov’s platform device to levitate? Is there a relationship with crystals and their frequency oscillations regarding electromagnetics? Are there properties within the cavity structures for a resonance frequency to interact for a manipulation of gravitational fields? Viktor Grebennikov claimed to have answered this.

And where do CSEs act? In beehives. Why? It’s the same question Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira asks: ‘What’s the relationship between electromagnetism and a spider?’ it draws the same attention to the question: is there a connection to levitation?

The excitement found in theoretical physics is asking unasked questions

Sometimes the questions have answers. Sometimes the questions need answers.

Does nature have another way to levitate larger objects than bugs through a leverage or amplification process? In considering the measurement of leverage, another of Viktor Grebennikov’s process of logic in this area is psychokinesis, the blogpost Chitin and Grits talks about this. The aspect of smiling at someone to perpetuate their smile is a weak form of psychokinesis amplification.

How deep does a CSE need to be for it to provide a physical affect reaction? Repeating the question: can the CSE field be compressed? And, the most effective question to be answered is in finding the relationship to Earth’s electrogravitics or electromagnetic action. In other words: a form of crystallization structure that can provide a manageable interaction with Earth’s magnetic field. This field is in close proximity to Earth’s surface and within the same spectra as electromagnetic radiation.

This question is asked specifically in regards to: can this magnetic field response be affected without an electrical charge? Again, electromagnetics requires a ferrous reaction. Okay, then; can there be an electrogravitics reaction or interaction? This is where wave action of sound oscillation becomes involved.

Air pressure can cause levitation. This requires a sound force between two transmissions.

To copy and paste an appropriate review, here is a section from the blogpost, Crystals and Polymers :

Crystal frequencies, chitin polymerization, and the unexplored field of electrogravitics brings even more to contemplate in replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device.

What is electrogravitics ? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component to subatomic electric fields. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.

This carries the conversation of CSE to a different level. Again, it goes beyond the currently accepted opinion of academia. The purpose of CATTCC’s research is discovery for a brand-new methodology of transportation. Pursuing stagnant and massively inefficient methodologies for propulsion, reaches no significant gain. New scientific theories bring new technology. Electrogravitics, however, was discovered over 100 years ago. It’s an unexplored field of science.

Levitation is a relevant avenue of transportation to pursue.

Next Steps for Levitation

Sat, 27 Jan 2024 20:32:08 GMT

Discovering a short distance levitation transportation product

Main photo by Andrew Spencer on Unsplash

What are the next steps for levitation in transportation? The continuation of levitation research finds there is an adaptation to how bugs move in relation to Earth’s magnetic field. Atmospheric fields contain static electromagnetic action.

A few blogpost s ago, a phenomenal study in researchgate.net by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira, was highlighted. That study raises a brilliant conclusion that some spiders jump by the static electricity of Earth’s atmosphere.

Magnetosphere

NASA : studies of the magnetosphere include research into: understanding the nature of the electromagnetic phenomena in near-Earth space; how near-Earth space responds to external and internal stimuli; how the coupled middle and upper atmosphere respond to external factors; and how the various regions of the magnetosphere and upper atmosphere interact with each other.

A magnetosphere is the region around a planet dominated by the planet's magnetic field. Other planets in our solar system have magnetospheres, but Earth has the strongest one of all the rocky planets: Earth's magnetosphere is a vast, comet-shaped bubble, which has played a crucial role in our planet's habitability. Life on Earth initially developed and continues to be sustained under the protection of this magnetic environment. The magnetosphere shields our home planet from solar and cosmic particle radiation, as well as erosion of the atmosphere by the solar wind - the constant flow of charged particles streaming off the sun.

According to Britannica.com : Magnetosphere, region in the atmosphere where magnetic phenomena and the high atmospheric conductivity caused by ionization are important in determining the behaviour of charged particles.

The Earth , in contrast to Mars and Venus, has a significant surface magnetic field (approximately 0.5 gauss), which, like its gravitational field , becomes weaker as the distance from the centre of the Earth increases. In the direction of the Sun, at approximately 10 Earth radii (almost 65,000 km, or 40,000 miles), the magnetic field is so weak that the pressure associated with particles escaping from the Earth’s gravity is comparable to the opposing pressure associated with the solar wind —the flux mainly of protons and electrons escaping from the Sun’s gravitational field. This equilibrium region, with a characteristic thickness of 100 km (60 miles), is called the magnetopause and marks the outer boundary of the magnetosphere. The lower boundary of the magnetosphere is several hundred kilometres above the Earth’s surface.

Measuring the magnetosphere

According to the US Dept of Energy , the magnetosphere is measured by intensity of magnetic field strength. An honor reserved for very few scientists, the tesla (T) was designated as the unit of measurement for magnetic flux density, or the strength of a magnetic field, in 1956. The tesla is used as the unit of measurement for very strong magnetic fields and is the International System of Units (SI) standard, while the gauss (G) is commonly used for weaker magnetic fields. The determination for the unit of measurement is one of scale: one tesla is equal to 10,000 gauss. For comparison, the Earth's magnetic field has a magnetic flux density of about 50 microtesla, or 0.00005 tesla.

Interactions of Earth’s electromagnetic charge

Lightening carries extraordinary energy. It’s found to be electromagnetic radiation or heat created by the rapid movement of electrons. This movement creates a tremendous negative discharge from atmospheric energy buildup within certain storm patterns. However, the presents of electromagnetic energy, is constant.

Nikola Tesla wanted to take advantage of Earth’s electromagnetic presents which encompasses the planet and her atmosphere.

The largest endeavor by Nikola Tesla was unfinished. Wikipedia explains: Wardenclyffe Tower was his idea to provide free electricity access to everyone on the planet; In laboratory work and later large-scale experiments at Colorado Springs in 1899, Tesla developed his own ideas on how a worldwide wireless system would work. He theorized from these experiments that if he injected electric current into the Earth at just the right frequency he could harness what he believed was the planet's own electrical charge and cause it to resonate at a frequency that would be amplified in "standing waves" that could be tapped anywhere on the planet to run devices or, through modulation, carry a signal. His system was based more on 19th century ideas of electrical conduction and telegraphy instead of the newer theories of airborne electromagnetic waves, with an electrical charge being conducted through the ground and being returned through the air.

The magnetosphere and transportation

Analyzing this electromagnetic action provides the foundation in searching Earth’s magnetosphere and its interaction with spiders and chitin shelled bugs for the possible relationship to transportation. The pursuit for sustainable transportation is in finding an efficient power source. The key aspect in this analysis, is the knowledge that there is energy in the atmosphere; there is energy potential in Earth’s magnetosphere. Earth’s surface provides a common ground to engage electric action for connectivity.

The purpose here is to find nature’s methodology of levitation. Is there indeed an electromagnetic power source for some bugs? In the levitation device allegedly built by Viktor Grebennikov , is there a relationship with electromagnetic action and his discovery of cavity structures effect (CSEs)?

Levitation of bugs and electromagnetism

The excitement found in theoretical physics is asking unasked questions. Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira asked such a question: ‘What’s the relationship between electromagnetism and a spider?’

There is a relationship with crystals and frequency oscillations. This relationship interacts with electromagnetics. How does this relationship interact with CSEs and the manipulation of gravitational fields? Viktor Grebennikov claimed to have answered this.

Does nature have another way to levitate large objects through a leverage or amplification process? How deep does a CSE need to be for it to provide a physical affect reaction? Can the CSE field be compressed? And, the most effective question to be answered is in finding the relationship to Earth’s electrogravitics or electromagnetic action. In other words: a form of crystallization structure that can provide a manageable interaction with Earth’s magnetic field. This field is in close proximity to Earth’s surface and within the same spectra as electromagnetic radiation.

Ultra-High-Speed Travel

Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:12:01 GMT

Physics basics and ultra-high-speed travel

Outside the box for general bureaucracy protocol; theories can be based on inductive reasoning, intuition, and one’s own opinion. Conjecture is often agreed with, other times it’s bitterly disputed with conflict of perspective.

The postulations presented here are merely speculations based on subjective logic built upon perspective. The fact that the human eye inverts visual perception is one of the most important aspects for perspective. Although Einstein’s most famous scientific statement: E=MC^2 says that our galaxy is traveling through space at the speed of light, it is accepted as an energy statement; without the comprehension of what it says that mass is multiplied by light speed.

Science is lacking the definition of what gravity is.

Of other ambiguous definitions; what makes a magnet attract and repel?

This question of magnets, led to a personal 15-year journey in finding the answer. What makes a magnet attract and repel? Everywhere I searched, the question brought this similar non-answer : “Magnetism is the force exerted by magnets when they attract or repel each other.”

The advantage to this seeking of an answer to this question, led to a lifelong task of discovering other answers relating to theoretical particle physics. It’s also led to today’s task in discovering a brand-new mode of transportation (beyond rockets and cars).

What makes a magnet attract and repel? The answer is five words: ‘molecular combinations of electron structure’. A deeper explanation is that every element is made of various particles. Every element listed on the Periodic Table is different. Every element has a basic nucleus of a specific number of protons and neutrons. Each element also has a corresponding number of orbiting electrons. These electrons are arranged in various layers, called shells. Molecules are combined with various elements. A magnet is combined with ferrous elements whose electrons in their outer shells interact with each other. Iron is a ferrous element.

Electromagnetism presents different characteristics.

During what was involved in that 15-year search for an answer to what makes a magnet attract and repel, came an understanding about particle mass. Beyond that answer has been a lifetime search for other answers. One of the discoveries is a theory that all particles follow a path. This path is very specific. It’s also overwhelmingly complex in considering Einstein’s hypothesis that our galaxy is traveling through the universe at the speed of light. This complexity follows each particle in its centripetal linear ‘orbit’ within every element, in each molecule, as they travel at 982,080,000 feet per second (an estimated rate, strictly based on the speed of light without other influences). However, with this incredible complexity; is nature’s simplicity. The harmonious flow of nature is the frequency of each part.

Today’s task to discover a new mode of transportation

There are effectively three pieces to discovering a new mode of transportation. First is the overall perspective for where the transportation is to be used. This requires understanding of land-use. The second and third pieces are discovering short-distance and long-distance transportation alternatives. For the purpose of this blogpost, the use of land-use transportation has been elaborated in other blogposts.

Ultra-high-speed long-distance travel

Gravity

The component of gravity manipulation is interesting. The first aspect to manipulate gravity is answering the question of what it is. As mentioned in previous blogpost , a new theory suggests that gravity is a subatomic process, rather than a product of mass. This does not negate gravitational laws which dictate its action. In regard to the composition of subatomic matter and what is held in theory as a procession of electromagnetic orbits, this new theory finds that gravity is angular momentum of particle matter along its linear path as it travels at light speed.

In the blogpost ; there is a strong point made in asking a question. To the question; how can gravity be used for transportation? One possibility is by creating a defined gravity field that causes wave action, then surfing that wave. This, however, requires creating the technology and designing a gravity generator based on that unknown technology. In answering: it arrives at the conclusion that the entire context of building a gravity wave generator is conceptually unnecessary.

Spin

One of the other components for ultra-high-speed travel is spin. This involves an enormous amount of physics’ principles. Spin ratios, momentum, centripetal and centrifugal forces, balance, internal and external field influences.

Magnets

As described above; molecular combinations of electron structure, specific to ferrous elements. The approach with magnets is the strategic placement to enact a ship’s hull for its physical spin. The purpose is to control balance and manipulate gravitational influence, rather than building a vehicle device reliant upon principles of aeronautic engineering.

Electrogravitics

This is an unaccredited field of science. Electrogravitics is an alternative to the currently accepted theories regarding particle physics. Electrogravitics proposes that gravitational motion is subatomic. It proposes that subatomic movement is gravitation action, rather than electromagnetic; hence: electrogravitics.

Electromagnetics

Electromagnetism is a process associated with magnetic action in ferrous elements. The field of electromagnetics is still an action of accumulated positive and negative charges. Electromagnetic charge affects most elements. The accepted laws of thermodynamics and electromagnetics relate to existing rules of centrifugal force. But charge and spin with centripetal motion move at light speed as the galaxy travels through the universe at each element’s precise frequency. All other motion corresponds to that frequency motion.

What are the similarities of electromagnetism and electrogravitics? Since magnets involve the molecular combination of electron structure of outer shell electrons, then conversely; electrogravitics and gravitational influence should allow a manipulation to molecular structure of non-ferrous solids. Potentially; molecular combinations of metalloids such as silicone and germanium should be appropriate for structural compliance to generate a gravity field. Is there potential for granite, marble and other rock of non-ferrous elements suitable?

Vehicle motion

One of the important factors is how to attain movement that provides vehicle speed.

In earlier conversations, it’s been suggested there is something to the resonance of oscillations. One of the greatest geniuses is Nikola Tesla. Naturally, his work regarding oscillation resonance is to be studied.

Tesla began his high-frequency investigations by building rotary AC generators that could run at higher speeds; but as he approached 20,000 cycles per second, the machines began to fly apart, leaving him far short of his goal. The answer came with a remarkable device still known today as a Tesla coil, still widely used in radio and television sets and other electronic equipment for wireless communication. Patented in 1891, this invention took ordinary 60-cycle-per-second household current and stepped it up to extremely high frequencies—into the hundreds of thousands of cycles per second. In addition to high frequencies, the coil could also generate extremely high voltages.

The practicality to incorporate the Biefeld-Brown Effect to enact resonance is similar to a propulsion push with extremely high frequencies. The use of a Tesla coil, generating extremely high frequencies, ultra-fast spin could conceivably be used to produce charge for a spin mechanism system.

Whereas a spin mechanism is an unnecessary application to a short distance levitating ground transportation device, its application is appropriate for a space flight vehicle.

Additionally, to ultra-high-speed travel, is the consideration from of the works of men who’ve claimed to have built space flight vehicles. The principles mentioned by Otis Carr are the most provocative. One of the best explanations for Otis Carr’s operational design is in an article from The General Science Journal: Carr Technology by Julio C. Gobbi, 2021, January 30. From his ABSTRACT:

This article aims to demonstrate that Otis Carr developed a complete craft with autonomous energy and propulsion systems. His experiments on rotating mercury devices like Utron and magnetic fields gave him the knowledge to build a functioning craft with these technologies. The base of all his technology is the rotation of metallic parts to produce magnetic fields. It will be developed a first mathematical approach to quantify his “Amusement Device”, that is a model for a flying saucer.

This remarkable study by Julio C. Gobbi, provides the mathematical foundation for rebuilding Otis Carr’s vehicle.

Another reference to acknowledge is Viktor Schauberger.

Other references are these patents cited:

4,014,483 March 1977 Roderick M. MacNeil

3,469,804 September 1969 Rowan

3,514,053 May 1970 McGuinness

3,752,417 August 1973 Lagace

3,820,744 June 1974 Denton

There are other questions which seek answers. The answers to attain ultra-high-speed space travel are beyond a few blogposts. It’s a new frontier in scientific discovery. The direction to these discoveries is clear.

Current Advanced Transit

Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:02:59 GMT

Conflit of mixing cars with transit system technology

Cars are unsustainable. The political motivation to remove them is irrational without offering a better alternative. Legislative dictate is pointless; with a better alternative, the market will eliminate cars.

All urban growth is based on its source of transportation. With only four types of land-use, Western Society’s transportation is restricted to cars for the automobile centric land-use design, and public transit for transit-oriented land-use. Removing cars from the automobile centric land-use design will cause all the automobile centric land-use development to become dysfunctional land-use. Essentially, this confirms that having no current alternative to the car produces a problematic situation. It also means that the only current alternative form of transportation is found in new transit system designs for transit-oriented land-use design.

All issues regarding publicly allocated funds, demand political decisions. Standard government procedure for public transit in the US, and most other countries, is limited to variations of the 200-year-old steel wheel on rail train technology. This is a terribly vital concern that all transit technology decisions are made to accommodate the status-quo of a 200-year-old technology. In most countries, the political procedure for large disbursement of public funds involves the benefit to lobbyists’ interests. This procedural mandate has terribly stagnated transportation advancement.

Trains were an advanced and wonderful technology when they were new: 200 years ago. When streetcars were implemented 150 years ago, Western society had tremendous growth. Society’s technological achievement have grown in the communications and information industries, yet, while the modern transportation demands have advanced; the basics of modern transportation technology have remained unchanged for the past 100 years. To clarify: the electronics industry has revolutionized the automobile, engineering improvements have vastly changed the complexity of comfort, however, the fundamental principles of the automobile are the same.

The environmental, economic, and social aspects to the automobile centric land-use design are totally unsustainable. There can be no sustainable urban growth in Western society with the automobile as its primary source of transportation.

The political lobbyists who represent advances for transportation don’t exist. The new technology transit industry for advanced transportation systems is only an emerging entity with no relative financial support that can support political lobbyists. There is a complete political absence to advance transportation interests for the future of transportation. Battery operated cars pursuing 100-year-old transportation principles are irrelevant to technology advances for transportation. A brand-new mode of transportation is the solution.

Maglev and wheeled new technology systems

There are a several types of transit systems using and proposing new technologies. All transit systems provide land-use availability for transit-oriented land-use development.

The difference between wheeled technology and maglev transit technology is efficient energy use with maglev having the lack of friction resistance.

Maglev technology

Magnetic levitation is a new type of efficient transportation. For transit-oriented land-use design, public/mass transit transportation, the advances in technology are sparse. China, Japan, and Korea are the only countries throughout the world that have attempted to capture advanced transportation technology. These three countries are active in building magnetic levitation (maglev) transit technology systems.

The priority of relevance to the implementation of maglev train technology is the use of efficient energy.

Train technology for transit-oriented land-use remains viable for high density populations. Technology has advanced in 200 years but, transit systems of carrying large groups of people from a central location to another central location, remain the same. It’s what trains do. Meanwhile, today’s societal transportation demands have exceeded society’s demands of the past. Modern transit systems are capable of much more.

PRT / GRT

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) Group Rapid Transit (GRT) is a mode of public transportation that utilizes smaller automated vehicles. The PRT mode of vehicle system design is called personal; with its passenger ridership of 3 to six people. These vehicles operate on automated networks. By the nature of their design, PRT systems are closed networks, only able to serve the limited areas within their boundaries. GRT systems use a larger vehicle size which accommodates up to 20 passengers per vehicle.

The varying styles of technology are as different as their designers. Varieties of system design are wheeled rubber tire running on pavement, nylon wheels suspended from a rail, suspended maglev and ground-based maglev guideways.

PRT systems are in the class of what is called: automated guideway transit (AGT).

The advantage of these transportation network designs is the automation. Some systems allow specific passenger destination choice. The guideways are specific to more heavily traveled transportation corridors and are laid out with passive switching that allows passenger loading and unloading at siding station sites. This enables vehicles to bypass the small passenger loading and unloading points when the rider is not going to that destination. This allows for nonstop and point to point passenger service.

These computer-controlled network systems have no driver. They feature quiet, on-demand and direct-to-destination, or point to point capability; analogous to a horizontal elevator. System design of this vehicle system is ideal for all urban areas with moderate population density. The vehicles are one-tenth the weight of any other light-rail vehicle, system wide area infrastructure is one-tenth the expense.

By lowering the usual cost of transit system infrastructure, these advanced transit technologies enable private investment to build the transit system by engaging Transit Oriented real estate Development (TODs) throughout the system area at each of the station locations as the funding mechanism of the entire system.

The concept of PRT is; as the passenger load increases, so does the number of vehicles on their guideway. The distance between vehicle placement on the grade separate guideways is called: headway. Some system designs have the capability of high speeds with a half second headway.

Dozens of PRT systems have been proposed in the USA since the Morgantown PRT system was installed in Morgantown, West Virginia in 1975. In 2010, a 10-vehicle 2getthere system was installed in Masdar City, UAE. In 2011, a 21-vehicle Ultra PRT system was installed at London Heathrow Airport. In 2014, the 40-vehicle maglev Vectus system was put into operation in Suncheon, South Korea.

Dual Mode

The transit industry holds a term that is consistent to land-use, called: the last mile dilemma. How to get from your front door to the door of the transit station, and from the transit station to the door of your destination. The problematic issue between the transit-oriented land-use design and automobile centric land-use design are not compatible to each other in their function with transportation.

The Dual Mode concept is in the design of an automobile type vehicle that also fits into a specialized PRT guideway. The designs have produced a multitude of interesting vehicles. These designs have also revealed no significant cost reduction with their increases to engineering obstacles.

Addressing integration of conflicting technologies

This is one of the roadblocks to advanced transit technology: conflicting infrastructure.

Inventors are akin to artists; their visions are singularly one view. Adaptation to other technologies can terminate progress when the invention of a particular vehicle system design is unable to interact to other transit system designs.

When the streetcars were the predominant mode of transportation in the early 1900s in the beginning of Western Society, and throughout the transit-oriented land-use design, there was occasionally competition between rival streetcar companies within the same community. The result was a disaster to the customers. A passenger would have to exit one company’s streetcar and pay to enter another competitor company’s streetcar vehicle and only be able to travel a short distance, then exit and pay to enter yet another competitor company’s streetcar vehicle to reach their destination. The city of Seattle had five different streetcar companies in the early 1900’s.

Today, there is no regulatory body to unify or coordinate design efforts of transit system inventors. The inventor’s efforts in design are confined to closed systems and unable to integrate to any other mode of transit. Rubber wheeled systems are restricted to the curse of friction- based automobile inefficiency.

Next steps for transportation

Where does all this lead to? The immediate necessity for a brand-new mode of transportation.

Long Distance Space Flight Solutions

Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:49:38 GMT

Long distance solutions for space travel

Theoretically, the Biefeld-Brown Effect can be a source for ultra high-speed space flight technology as its use as a propulsion type of motion. The concept is similar in relation of how a wave is perceived as a frequency flow, rather than a push. In another way to explain: inasmuch as water moves in a waterfall; it is literally: droplets. The flow is seen as a solid motion instead of a rapid frequency.

With the Biefeld-Brown Effect: to electrogravitics; the trailing edge portrays a pushing motion; its leading edge attracts. Again, flow is a frequency, it’s a motion. Another way to visualize this perception is frequency as the speed of light. Each particle is like a drop of water in a waterfall. It appears as a constant flow and yet, every particle is a separate cyclic action. The Biefeld-Brown Effect (BBE) is the action of applying a power source at the trailing edge, causing the leading-edge attracting reaction. Electrogravitic motion is different than electromagnetic. Magnetic action requires ferrous elements. Electrogravitic is as ether. This is to point out that that the flow of electricity can be perceived as an independent water droplet, with a leading edge and a trailing edge. Each water droplet has form. Each is consistent within the flow of a stream. Its form is cyclic in linear flow of a stream.

Theoretical physics

This flow, however, becomes very complex in perception; to visualize the theory of relativity which suggests the Milky Way Galaxy is moving through the universe at light speed. This magnifies the massive flow of every particle moving in linear motion as frequency flow.

The perception to this theoretical motion of relativity at the speed of light does explain color as having the appearance in filtration. Each appearance of filtration varying as an interaction with other particles in the linear path. This color represents a shift in velocity.

This, going back to the consideration of BBE, with the high energy electromagnetic pulse of energy being applied to the trailing edge of a solid object; the electrogravitic reaction to that object is similar to a nerve reaction in a living object with a contraction. A contraction is a collapsing motion. This motion is a negative force, a vacuum effect. This reaction can be measured as cold: the opposite of heat expansion.

By removing a large electromagnetic voltage application with the impact of a correspondingly large magnetic action to an object and a pivotal action with spin, the reaction of heat would be eliminated. The impact of thermodynamic heat loss would be removed. The motion of potential energy remains as an action with momentum. The question becomes; how much of a load can it carry? The answer would seem to be relevant to the temperature of its environment.

Space flight

In considering an immediate technology application towards space flight; requires an investigation to existing/expired patent applications. The blogpost: Future of Transportation lists some of these patents. There are many other significant patents relevant to study.

Additional to these, is patent number US3626605 . A more detailed view is available with this pdf link .

US Patent # 3,626,605, Method & Apparatus for Generating a Secondary Gravitational Force Field, Henry W. Wallace, December 14, 1971

Abstract -- Apparatus and method for generating a time variant non-electromagnetic force field due to the dynamic interaction of relatively moving bodies through gravitational coupling, and for transforming such force fields into energy for doing useful work.

In describing this patent, it is described at rexresearch.com :

In one kinemassic machine a pair of wheels of brass alloy, like gyroscopes, are mounted in close-fitting air gaps between massive structural supports formed from steel. The wheels are driven to a high speed of rotation by jets of compressed air or nitrogen. The inventor claims that, at speeds of about 20,000 rpm, polarization of the spin nuclei of the alloyed metal occurs. If one wheel is balanced on a knife edge, it will start to oscillate under the influence of the other. If the spinning wheels are rotated abut another axis, a secondary gravitational field is created which reduces the wheels’ weight. If a sufficiently strong field is created, it can generate localized areas of gravitational shielding and thus provide an effective propulsion force.

Further in this document is; Henry W. Wallace: "Concerning Mass Dynamic Interactions" (31 January 1983)

As this kinemassic field (KF) explanation evolves from the micro to the macro condition, it is appropriate to note that matter possesses two properties germane to this writing. There are two mass properties related to all matter: the quiescent property of weight and the dynamic property of inertia. The weight property relates to the gravitational mass since the mass of a body is regarded as the generator of the gravitational field. The inertial property is that property of a body by which the body will remain at rest, or in the same straight line or direction, unless acted upon by some external force. When that external force action is applied, an equal and opposite force reaction concomitantly occurs, as conceived by Newton. According to KF reasoning, this inertial property exists because of the KF presence, and this force reaction is the force reaction of the secondary, time-variant gravitational field induced by the kinemassic field made time-variant.

Deeper in the document, Wallace adds;

The point that is made here concerns the relationship between energy states and the energy fields associated with these energy states during this cycle of energy transformations. Kindly note: of all these energy states, only the kinetic energy state has no inherent, essential field associated with it, according to the current teachings of physics. This unrecognized field, this missing link, this source of an empty niche, the filling of which is required for energy/field symmetry, a field needed for both rational and linear kinetic energies --- if Nature’s orderliness is to be kept --- is the kinemassic field.

Later, Wallace adds;

Although straight-line motions and linear velocities are taught as acceptable states of matter, these concepts may prove to be a handicap in truly understanding Nature since the earth continually accelerates towards the sun which, in turn, is in a continuing state of acceleration towards the center of our nebula which, in turn, is in a state of deceleration with respect to the expanding universe. A path or ray of light could be considered not to represent a straight line due to the gravitational field gradients filling space. No orbit is truly circular. The warped deviations of the near-ellipsoidal orbits of earth satellites tells us much about the earth’s pear-shaped configuration. And so it may be reasoned that so-called straight lines, or curved displacements, are, in reality, extreme examples of curved lines, or curved displacements, possessing near-infinitely long, and curvy, radii; correspondingly, bodies traveling at extremely miniscule accelerations respectively. A geodesic line is the path followed by a particle upon which only gravitational and inertial forces act. An example of such a path is that traveled by a spacecraft towards the outer regions of out planetary system. Such a path is te straightest path possible in a 4-dimensional space-time continuum.

It's noted that this statement is precise to understanding the perception of nature.

Inasmuch as Henry W. Wallace’s patent attributes the possibility for creating a neutral gravity field, there is strong sentiment to acknowledge Viktor Schauberger’s motto: “comprehend and copy nature”. Attributing the necessity of massive momentum for a space flight vehicle, perhaps this type of Wallace’s patent device could be an essential component for a vehicle’s liftoff.

Manipulating gravity

The manipulation of gravity for space flight is essential. Technology with the ability to magnify and decrease a space craft’s gravitational field would be a phenomenal tool for space travel. Using gravity as a source of motion for space flight, a space craft has to develop the ability to be attracted by large planetary bodies. Technology that manipulates gravitational fields would include a craft’s ability to create a massive gravitational field. This type of “faux field” would be necessary to make it attractive to other bodies of mass.

Such technology would have to include the adaptation of creating the influence of a large gravitational field and also have an ability to reverse a gravity field and repel objects, as well as to levitate.

Is levitation treated as a scientific taboo? The laws of gravity were written 400 years ago. 100 years ago, Einstein postulated that the Milkey Way galaxy is traveling through the universe at light speed. This seems to cause a concern of conflict in the 400-year-old laws of gravity and physics; plus, science still has no definition of what gravity is.

Gravity, spin, magnets, electrogravitics, and electromagnetics hold answers to ultra-fast space travel. Understanding the nature of these are the things Viktor Schauberger spoke of about. How can the manipulation of gravity be possible without knowing what it is? Gravity is the angular momentum in the path of particle mass, as matter travels at the speed of light. Understanding that matter travels at the speed of light, and its path is linear with a twisting motion; this is a significant thing. These things have been mentioned previously, there needs to be more study as to how it is to be assembled to make it work for attaining ultra-fast space flight.

Strategic Relocation

Wed, 17 Jan 2024 03:52:29 GMT

A Remote Worker's Guide to Climate-Resilient Living

Image via Freepik

In an era where climate change increasingly influences our choices, remote workers face unique challenges and opportunities when considering relocation. This guest blog article from greenstillmatters.com is designed to assist remote workers to navigate the complexities of relocating in response to climate change.

Research and preparation are crucial to ensuring your chosen destination aligns with your professional demands and offers a safe, sustainable, and fulfilling living environment. Here are some actionable insights into making informed and environmentally responsible relocation decisions.

Do Your Research

Embarking on a relocation journey requires a keen understanding of potential destinations. Investigate areas by examining their weather patterns, including temperature fluctuations and risks like hurricanes or wildfires. This information is vital in choosing a location that suits your professional needs and ensures your long-term safety and comfort.

Consider the historical data of climate events in these areas to predict future patterns. Exploring various climate models and projections can also provide a broader perspective on how a region might evolve in terms of climate in the coming years.

Create a Top-Notch Resume

When searching for work, a stellar resume showcasing your best skills and attributes is paramount. Managing documents efficiently is key to a hassle-free relocation. Incorporate the use of digital PDFs and editing tools to handle your paperwork with ease. Remember, looking for a PDF editor online to manage these documents can save you invaluable time and effort, ensuring a seamless transition to your new location.

Digital documents also offer better security and easier accessibility, allowing you to retrieve and share important paperwork from anywhere. This approach simplifies the moving process and supports a more sustainable, paperless workflow.

Understand Local Environmental Practices

Each community has its unique approach to environmental conservation. Familiarizing yourself with these practices and regulations is not just about compliance; it's about contributing positively to your new home's ecological sustainability.

Understand local recycling policies, water conservation methods, sustainable urban growth initiatives , and any eco-friendly projects you can participate in. Research the community's efforts in renewable energy use and sustainable urban development. This knowledge will help you integrate more smoothly into the community and live in a manner that respects and preserves your new environment.

Talk to the Locals

Building connections with residents in your potential new home can provide you with invaluable insights. These individuals can offer firsthand information on the locality's climate resilience , the robustness of its infrastructure, and the overall quality of life.

Engaging with the community also helps in easing the transition and feeling more at home. Residents can also share tips on living sustainably in the area and introduce you to social and professional networks to enhance your relocation experience.

Study the Costs

Understanding the financial implications of your move is crucial. Consider the cost of living in your potential new home, including housing costs, utilities, and transportation. This analysis will help you budget accordingly and avoid any unwelcome financial surprises post-relocation.

Additionally, research any potential tax implications and insurance costs that may differ from your current location. Being financially prepared will ensure a smoother adaptation to your new environment and help you make informed decisions about your lifestyle and expenditures.

Opt for Efficient Housing

In your quest for a new home, prioritize energy efficiency. Homes equipped with eco-friendly appliances minimize your environmental footprint and can lead to substantial savings on utility bills . Energy-efficient living is a responsible choice that aligns with the very reason for your relocation: climate change.

Look for properties with features like solar panels, energy-efficient heating and cooling systems, and well-insulated buildings. Such features contribute to a healthier planet and offer long-term financial benefits.

Build a Remote Network

You are not alone in this journey. Reach out to other remote workers who have relocated for similar reasons. Their experiences and advice can be a goldmine of information and can offer emotional support.

Moreover, this network can become part of your professional and social circle in your new location. Joining local or online communities of remote workers can also provide collaboration opportunities and introduce you to local events and activities catering to remote working lifestyles.

Always Find Resources

Make sure your chosen location has all the essential resources and amenities you need. This includes access to quality healthcare, educational facilities if needed, and recreational areas. These amenities are crucial for your well-being and work-life balance.

Consider the availability of reliable internet connectivity , which is essential for remote work. Checking for community centers, parks, and cultural activities can also give you a sense of the lifestyle and social opportunities available in the area.

Final Thoughts

The journey to relocate as a remote worker in response to climate change is a multidimensional endeavor, blending practicality with sustainability. It calls for a strategic approach that balances personal and professional needs with a commitment to environmental stewardship.

You can confidently navigate this transition by embracing these guidelines. Doing so will ensure your new home is a haven of safety and stability, as well as a testament to your adaptability and responsible living in a changing world.

Short Distance Resonance Technology

Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:59:27 GMT

Establishing short distance system resonance for a new mode of transportation

There are myriads of ideas for the development of ground level transportation. To attain sustainability, it’s CATTCC’s position that a brand-new mode of transportation is needed. Cars are unsustainable; environmentally, economically, and socially. Replacing a car’s engine is futile towards changing it to become sustainable. Sustainability reaches into urban growth, it touches culture; its tentacles affect the fabric of society. Replacing the automobile, however, requires it to be replaced with a more convenient vehicle. It has to be faster, easier, more comfortable, less expensive, more efficient and safer.

Levitation

A new mode of ground level transportation has to be better than a car. What can perform better than a car? The future of transportation floats. Levitation is a primary component in building transportation’s future. Researching levitation in the pursuit for a ground level transportation solution, has a different set of characteristics than the requirements for space flight.

Levitation can be sought; as a mechanism or particle reaction to a particular molecular mass. Levitation is a component to manipulating gravity.

Transportation solutions

These five recent blogposts add varying views in approaching short distance transportation solutions.

Levitation for Short Distance Transportation

This blogpost asks several questions. What other applications are needed in considering ways to build a levitating device? Polymorphic metals? Electrogravitics?

This leads to the question: how to assemble an egg carton type of configured structure to produce an effectual Cavity Structures Effect (CSE)?

The next question is: can a device be built to contain and be built to manipulate a CSE? Can such a device lift its own weight? Can two or more structures be stacked to multiply the CSEs? Can such a device be assembled and built to carry heavy loads?

In the process of experiment implementation, an analysis of chitin molecule for structural manipulation is a necessity. Now to build an apparatus with a cavity structure.

Crystals and Polymers

Can crystals be grown to specific shapes? Can Viktor Grebennikov’s device be replicated?

Crystal frequencies, chitin polymerization, and the unexplored field of electrogravitics brings even more to contemplate in replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device.

And again, the question of applying electrogravitics into the conversation.

Short Distance Designs

A more in-depth look into chitin as a polymerization. A closer look into bug wings and CSEs from Viktor Grebennikov’s work.

This blogpost brings another concept with excerpts from the book, ‘ Rising From Unsustainable ’:

Surfing Gravitational Wave Pulse Resonance

The concept of gravitational wave pulse manipulation is unknown. In searching the term wave pulse, answers are found as physics questions. The concept of gravity wave pulse manipulation is yet to be understood, nor even explored. What does it require to explore this realm of technology?

Can the unexplored technology of gravity wave pulse manipulation, relate to the concept of levitation?

Short Distance Transportation

In this blogpost, the question is: what do we find in CSE fields? Viktor Grebennikov refers to it as a zone. Then we have to expand the question and ask; what is an electromagnetic field in its relation to a toroidal field? What are the similarities? Viktor says the CSE can’t be shielded. An electromagnetic field is easily shielded. The immediate distinction is that the field of a CSE has a crystalline type configuration. A magnetic field has a toroidal shape.

Due to the claim of Viktor Grebennikov having built a levitating platform, investigating this as a possible methodology for short distance transportation is an absolute necessity. Legitimacy of its claim is up to the fringe scientific community and their capability to replicate his work.

Viewing a CSE at the subatomic level, what does it show? It’s a crystal shape that emits a specific frequency. This is common to crystalline structures. In comparing this view to electromagnetic fields on a subatomic level, an electromagnetic field is specific to a ferrous reaction from an electric/magnetic charge. The crystalline structure is a passive frequency generator. A magnet is a molecular combination of electron structures that cause/provide ferrous reaction of attraction or repulsion due to element electron’s action.

Chitin and Grits

This brought the questions about the relatively unexplored scientific field of psychokinesis. This field in terms of acceptance by academia science might be considered illegitimate. The long blogpost holds writings of Viktor Grebennikov, to show his thoughts; representing his work.

These various blogposts are explored here again to compile relevance in discovering a methodology for a levitating transportation device. It might be impossible for one blogpost to revolutionize the transportation industry; however, study and research will provide direction for changing it.

In addition to the previous posts, there is a description into a related technology from Ralph Ring while describing the technology of Otis Carr’s ship. Ralph Ring talks about nature’s explanation of levitation. This is a two-minute video clip about bumble bees: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2slfum . He mentions a book, titled: ‘Tomorrow’s Future Need Not Be Fuel’, by Arther C. Aho. It gives reference to how a bumble bee flies. He says the bumble bee has a hollow cavity next to the larynx. He then submits that the flapping of a bee’s wing creates a resonance. It reaches a balance of frequency to its surrounding electromagnetic field frequency and creates a magnetic bubble. This bubble allows the bumble bee to fly.

When this is analyzed next to the work of Viktor Grebennikov, discussed in the Short Distance Designs blogpost, the application of frequency resonance is added to the consideration of chitin crystallization and cavity structures effect reactions.

Spiders don’t jump by an action of their muscles

Additionally, is a phenomenal new study by Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira . His study is based on the understanding of principles relating to negatively charged Earth and her positive charged atmosphere: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358647592_Anti-Gravity_No_Crazier_Than_Flying_Spiders

Thus it can be inferred that the negative brush discharge from their strands create a centrifugal electrostatic potential which after compressing the aether through drawing in an increased positive flux and imparting this as electrical momentum in the body of the spider akin to a capacitor accumulating electric charge. However, when the spider reaches its critical capacitance, the centrifugally divergent field of aetheric compression generated by the brush envelops the spider’s body and folds inwards to centripetally converging at the two front limbs. This causes an ‘outflow’ or rather elevation upwards and out-feeding of rarefied electric field lines in the atmospheric potential gradient (APG), which impart mechanical upward momentum into the spider’s body and oppose all ‘gravitational’ effects, which really are all attributed to electrostatics. There is promise in this as a medium of propagation wherein machines could through electrostatics deploy. In the case of gravity for mutual-mass acceleration, it is due to intermolecular electrostatic attraction. In the phenomena of downward acceleration towards the earth, ‘physical’ matter exhibits some resistance to primary solar rays from the heavens, which compose of a constant flux of electrostatic leaders that pass through objects while dragging them along towards the earth, henceforth creating them; matter would not be stable were it not for the constant supply of intramolecular oscillation and spin inertial energy from the primary solar rays.

In his analysis of the flying spider, his considered approach of perspective analysis is brilliant.

Interaction of resonance

This gives credence to Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device as an electromagnetic reaction between Earth’s neutral common and the atmosphere’s charge. Is it possible to utilize a variable control of compression of CSEs (presuming this has a negative charge) and produce an oscillation with a (non-ferrous) crystal polymerization to resonate? A non-ferrous crystal polymerization would react more favorably (as a support structure to stand on) to interact with an electrostatic atmospheric charge.

Current Transportation Dilemma

Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:13:44 GMT

Urgent need to repair the consequences of unsustainable transportation

Both long distance space travel and short distance ground transportation are embraced with a similar dilemma. Inefficient energy use. In space travel it’s seen with limited speed. With short distance ground transportation, the dilemma is more extensive. Since all urban growth is based on its primary source of transportation, the consequence of inefficient energy use creates problems from unsustainability.

In the search for transportation solutions, these blogpost questions and answers have changed over the past year. Questions are asked, ideas are formed, answers proposed and considered, and some reformed to other questions. It’s apparently the process; in development of researching ideas.

Reaching fast speeds for space travel is the most important aspect of carrying humans into space (safety as a pre-concluded assumption). Rocket technology is bound by slow speeds; far too slow to carry passengers to any long-range distances. A new mode of transportation for ground level transportation has a more imperative urgency for a solution to sustainability.

What’s more relevant for immediate demand, replacing rockets for faster speed or replacing cars to be more convenient and efficient? The space flight industry has reached the understanding that rocket technology has a speed limit. Quadrupling rocket size for launch blasts does not quadruple speed. There are actually people who understand that an explosion is a molecular reaction at the subatomic level. These same people know that an explosion is an expansion of energy that extends in 360 degrees. An astute rocket scientist has the comprehension of knowing that a rocket’s trajectory ascends in one degree. The common math equation would conclude that 1 degree is a very small portion of 360 different degrees. This is not efficient energy use.

What of automobiles? The future of transportation floats. Flying cars don’t float. The current transportation dilemma is that it relies on propulsion. Propulsion is an energy source pushing against the resistance of mass. Levitation is a neutral action.

With the introduction to a new mode of transportation, can a new mode of transportation technology eliminate bad drivers? What’s the result of people’s car accidents? As new transportation technology is developed with increased efficiency, lighter vehicle weight and faster speeds will place a high demand on safety.

Ground level transportation

The most important aspect of current ground level transportation is the unsustainability of urban growth. Transportation’s need is greater for cars to be more efficient. Since transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, its inefficient source of transportation has become unsustainable infrastructure. In 1987, the UN established the "Brundtland Report" , the UN’s World Commission for Environment and Development. It identifies urban sustainability in three segments: environmental, economic and social. All three segments have to be resolved for urban growth to be found sustainable. But, to reach sustainability, transportation has to be sustainable.

To discover what is unsustainable, one has to understand what it means to be sutainable. When referring to sustainable urban growth, it is a reference to how the land is utilized.

Land-use Types

There are four types of land-use:

Nature – this refers to nature.

Agriculture – this is land used for agriculture. Tractors are the primary source of transportation for work.

Transit-oriented design – is a real estate development design based on a fixed rail transit system as its primary source for transportation. This is a common type of land-use design for large city and downtown centers and uses vertical building development.

Automobile centric design – is generally the land-use design found in Western Society. This land-use design is centered on the automobile as its primary source for transportation. This type of land-use design is referred to as sprawl development. It’s predominantly single story building design, streets and large parking lots.

Of these four types of land-use, the automobile centric design is based upon a wholly unsustainable foundation: the automobile. There is nothing about the automobile that is sustainable.

Unsustainable Land-Use Growth

To more clearly define unsustainable land-use design, there are three fundamental components in explaining land-use sustainability: environmental, economic and social.

Environmental : the automobile requires road surfaces. These road beds are oil based. Ever watched a road being built? Lots of grading work, scraping dirt, filling and generally re-working the natural surface of Earth. Ok, not a big deal in small amounts but, tens to hundreds of millions of miles heavily effects the natural water flow of streams and runoff. Again, Earth is a big place, small impact. Secondly, millions of miles of road beds. Capturing of grease, emissions by-products, pollutants, carcinogens and oil spills funneled through oil canals called road beds flowing directly into the water basins. Yeah, that is environmentally unsustainable. Millions of electric and autonomous cars won’t resolve the damage caused by the oil-based road infrastructure.

Economic : economic impacts of sustainability. Ever hear the phrase: buy local spend local? This term is what creates regional economic sustainability. A dollar spent locally allows that dollar to stay in circulation, being used within a local area. When that money is spent out of the local area, the money is gone; which can no longer can be used.

This is economic unsustainability spawned from the design of automobile centric urban land-use.

The solution

Otis Carr and Other Methodologies

Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:43:21 GMT

A closer look at Otis Carr and existing methodologies from the past

Precise clarity in achievement to build existing alternatives of space flight technology remains elusive.

One of the most compelling pursuits for existing methodologies in space flight, surrounds the work of Otis Carr. A generally reliable source for information is Wikipedia, yet, there are many contradictions in Wikipedia regarding Otis Carr. Here is one of the most remarkable Wikipedia statements : In January 1961, Carr was convicted of "the crime of selling securities without registering the same" in Oklahoma, ^[9] and fined $5,000, far less than the sums he had obtained from investors in the area. ^[10] ^[11] He was denied an appeal on March 1, 1961. Carr could not pay the fine, and served part of a 14-year jail term.

A 14-year jail sentence as a method to pay for a $5,000 fine, is curious. Could Otis Carr have been the protégé to Nikola Tesla that he said he was? The only conclusion in his conviction of a crime is the total absence of possibility for any type of different or unusual technology being involved. The government’s authoritative vitriol was an approach of preconceived contempt and malice with total disregard of any scientific comprehension of what knowledge Otis Carr may have held.

The Freedom of Information release of the FBI files regarding Otis Carr’s case reveal a very high level of questionable government action. The government’s attack of Otis Carr was intensified by previous actions of Carr’s associate, Norman Colton. Colton had published a military related magazine, that had apparently printed derogatory cartoons of military commanders. Previous to Colton’s association with Carr, the FBI held a two-year investigation against Colton regarding two bounced checks that Colton had written which totaled $80. When Carr began his business relationship with Colton, there were accusations of them meeting at an AA meeting, which seemed to justify the government’s actions of character assassination.

In 2007, nearly 50 years after Carr’s arrest and the confiscation of all his equipment, Ralph Ring began sharing his story to the public. His account of what happened to Otis Carr is extremely different. He explains his life story and what led him to become an employee of Otis Carr. His account brings credence to the project’s Nikola Tesla’s influence. It validates Otis Carr’s technology.

What is the commonality of David Hamel, John Searl, Ezekiel, Otis Carr, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, and others pursuing discovery of new transportation? The common quest in transportation is for the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism, and spin. And, what’s the government’s approach to space flight technology? Explosions. Yet, mankind’s fastest speed is by the manipulation of gravity.

The future of transportation: floats. Its method for motion is the manipulation of gravity. As stated many times throughout the CATTCC articles, chemical explosions for rocket propulsion are horrendously inefficient. Reaching fast space flight speeds is by using a different methodology than inefficient explosion propulsion. The solution to fast space flight speeds is by manipulating gravity. Reaching short-distance ground level transportation sustainability and increasing travel convenience is with levitating platform vehicles.

A previous article asked an important question. How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? The answer goes to explain the design of Otis Carr’s ship:

I t’s theoretically possible for Otis Carr’s ship to have maintained an independent inertia field within the ship’s control section. The two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. Theoretically, this gives the ship an independent inertia field ability to travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

Also, in viewing the perspective of wheels being vehicles in Ezekiel’s vision, it validates a craft having the ability of levitation and independent inertia. This also gives merit to the consistency of wheel within a wheel and spin as a necessary component to this new transportation technology.

The concept proposed by David Hamel is also interesting. There are many pieces, how it all fits together and becomes operationally functioning; remains a missing component. His technology is comprised with three layers of spinning components.

The other two: Viktor Schauberger and John Searl are also simplistic in design. As with John Searl’s levitation disc, it is an intensely precise and complex apparatus with a simplistic technological functioning design.

The purpose of questions is to find answers. Often, the same questions have to be asked again and again to find suitable answers. This questioning applies to the technological aspects of levitating a vehicle for transportation. It also applies to its operation, the aspects of ultra-fast speed inertia, and a mechanism for vehicle control. Beginning with vehicle control, in a vehicle with three separate spinning electromagnetic field sections; how can a signal from the inter control center reach the outer level? This capability doesn’t exist.

There are more questions. Beyond the aspects of discovering a brand-new technology to achieve ultra-fast speeds for space travel, initiated by levitation; are magnetic spin and a synchronization of nature’s centripetal pattern entering it into an independent inertia field. A ship has to use neural operational controls. This isn’t even advanced enough to be a controversial area of physics. Talk of exploring this technology doesn’t even exist in Neurophysics .

The operational control of a neural switch is hypothetically possible. The direction Otis Carr pursued for neural control was transmitted by brain wave frequency, measured by the frequency of hue.

In the operational control article, it talks about the possibility of a psychokinetic transmission in the color spectrum. It’s theorized that the hue pattern transmitted a focused and measurable signal, interpreted as a specific control switch to perform a task.

Colored light travels at different speeds. When this light travels at different speed, it creates a different wavelength, or angstrom value.

Building a receiver to capture an angstrom signal would seem to be a relatively simple process. Similar to capturing a cell phone signal. Should be similar technology as adjusting for a frequency signal. A transmitter based on angstrom frequency should be sufficient to transmit a signal from the inner sphere of the ship and transcend the electromagnetic field of the outer shell and be received as a switch signal for outer shell operational function.

Again, this technology is completely unknown, however, it is reflective of Nikola Tesla’s influence.

Long Distance Flight and Space Colonies

Sat, 06 Jan 2024 20:54:58 GMT

How important is fast space flight?

Serious consideration in colonization of the moon or other planetary bodies requires very fast travel speeds to get there. Traveling eight months one way on a trip to Mars is an excessively long time. A previous article shows relevant times with more appropriate speeds.

The current time frame for a flight to Mars is 7 to 8 months. Top speed for a rocket to Mars is 25,000mph. Why?

When will space flight be fast?

In November 2021, the NASA solar probe, Parker, had become the fastest object built by humans. It passed the Sun at a speed of 364,621mph. This was accomplished by its “gravity assist” speed boost in making a close passage to Venus.

Just to be clear: the pentacle of human speed is not by propulsion.

Using the best rocket science engineering available, rocket power has achieved 25,000mph. Light speed (C) is 186,828 miles per second. 25,000mph is one-twenty-five-thousandth of C (actually, 0.000037279123279345). For human intellectual engineering to reach only 1% of C, it requires a vehicle to attain the speed 1,862.82 miles per second, or 6,706,152 miles/hour. The Parker Solar Probe reached a speed of approximately 0.064% the speed of light with the speed of 118.7 mi/sec by utilizing the attractive nature of gravity.

(An update to the Parker mission : Dec 28 2023, Parker reached a speed of 394,736 in its perihelion and 430,000 mph in December 2024)

As human life expands, both in population and intellectual advances, how important is space flight? Space is referred to as ‘the next frontier’. Exploration is a natural human trait. There are unknown and unexplored opportunities of every kind in space. The barrier to space exploration is the excessively slow launch and travel speed.

The product of a chemical explosion as fuel for rocket propulsion is an instantaneous molecular expansion. Its release of energy is in 360 degrees. The current design of rocket propulsion requires this massive 360-degree release of energy. A rocket’s trajectory, however, is only in 1 degree of direction from that energy release. This horrendous waste of energy will always eliminate current rocket technology from being a practical method of energy use for efficient space flight travel.

Why does the entire space industry pursue this obstacle of engineering? It’s called procedure but, people get paid to do what they’re told to do. To disagree with protocol is disruptive and without question, grounds for dismissal. In pointing out the serious flaw of propulsion as the basis of space flight is by no means a particular criticism to the genius engineering and work of the space industry. And yet, pursuing rocket propulsion is like making the best of what you have by asking directions from a blind person, by pointing.

What’s important for space flight?

Reaching fast speeds for space travel is the most important aspect of carrying humans into space (safety as a pre-concluded assumption). How do humans attain the necessity for fast space travel? A major focus throughout the CATTCC blogposts is research to discover new methodologies for space flight.

One example is the ship allegedly built by Otis Carr . A storyline that conflicts the clouded and questionable government attack against Carr, is a detailed story from Ralph Ring . This blogpost is to support the concepts spoken about by Otis Carr and Ralph Ring, rather than an essay to argue politics. Arguably, however, disbelief seems to be the status of non-traditional technological research regarding work outside the accepted methodologies of rocket science.

In 1960, Otis Carr is said to have built a vehicle that was capable of space flight. This vehicle, and where it was built is unaccounted for in any government documentation, or other source. The vehicle’s details are closely described only in Ralph Ring’s personal account.

Other technology concepts from David Hamel and John Searl , also provide a lot of controversy. And, of course, there is considerable skepticism and doubt from The Bible’s account of a flying apparatus being described 2,500 years ago.

Thus far, CATTCC’s research shows that fast speed for space flight include the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism, and spin.

How to pursue technology research

The methodology of discovery for unknown technology is risk. Funding is illusive and considered either frivolous with no ROI or, as illustrated by Otis Carr and others; fraudulent until proven accepted by mass market implementation.

How did Nikola Tesla develop products? His lab was his mind. He would conceptualize an idea and perform experiments step by step in his mind; seeing the process of reactions to different application processes. This is the first step towards development is to understand concepts and sharing its visualization. This is where design is displayed for the aspects to the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism and spin hold relationship to each other.

Eventually, it merges into place and a product is manifest into a prototype for production.

After attaining fast space flight

Once the space industry overcomes the obstacle of explosions for vehicle launches, there is an entirely new set of circumstances awaiting. Next is the practicality and building long term space station habitations . Space science engineering has already mastered phenomenal work in this arena. Schematics of space stations and design drawings of space stations is amazing. From recycled water to the stations creating their own gravity is already established. Yet, one of the most important components for sustainability and to enjoy human experience is to have the presents of Earth’s everyday dirt. is

Are there other places in space that can accommodate human life? Space stations can be built as large habitable containment colonies. Or they can theoretically be built on otherwise uninhabitable planet surfaces.

Future plans for exploration include this: https://phys.org/news/2022-07-nasa-mission-samples-mars-soil.html

In the perpetual expanse for technological achievement is step for building sustainable habitats .

The Sun is Getting Brighter

Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:55:45 GMT

Making the case for cyclic climatic phenomena on Earth

For almost four years, this writer has been claiming the sun is getting brighter than it was in our recent past observations. Upon query with others, many have agreed. This prompted some digging around for evidence, not just hearsay. Here are some facts to support the phenomena.

To begin, this writer has become more than interested the solar phenomena. Much of the efforts taken to find out what is going on with the earth's climate with the wrangling's of the politicos dictating to the public there is climate warming and we'll all be dead in 12 years. Of course, the time has come and passed like so many doomsday predictions. So, it is this effort taken to 'shed some light' on the subject. My dad reminded me of an old saying, "Figures don't lie, but liars often figure."

Hopefully, what readers find here will be an objective and informative approach to answer questions, which are on so many minds these days. It is perforce not the direction to determine a political 'global' attempt stated, which is caused by human activity. Personally, this author considers it a direct affront to the miraculous balance of nature of earth itself. It is further quite egotistical to consider humans are this important where global climate determinations are considered.

It is the personal observation we are protected from those above, thankfully. Truly, humankind is and always has been able to 'make a mess in the sandbox', but this is about all humanity can attempt to do until the advent of the nuclear bomb. Even with this event, proof now exists where volcanic and CO2 emissions are more frequent and actually lower global temperatures. A case in point is where we observed the aftermath of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption in the Philippines on June 15, 1991. There was a 2-3 degree lowering of atmospheric temperatures where we lived for over 2 years while we watched the volcanic cloud cross overhead until it dissipated

Please note, there have only been direct climate measurements being taken since the 1880's. Before then, measurements for temperatures and humidity conditions have been the best kept ones over time. The oldest continuous temperatures recorded is the Central England Temperature Data Series, which began in 1659, and the Hadley Centre has some measurements beginning in 1850, but there are too few data records before 1880 for scientists to estimate average temperatures for the entire planet. As for humidity and barometric pressures, some rudimentary records were taken over the years. Other records from China and other countries existed where farmers would closely observe the stars, snows, thunder, frosts, sunshine, winds, birds, flowers and a host of other natural phenomena. These, according to their time of observance, could all be used to predict weather conditions.

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, how can noted scientific, political, educational, and medical experts without guidance from 'somewhere'. Again, it is not the point of this article to determine the origins. However, it can be one where the seeds are planted for a different venue of truth over lies and sensationalism? Please understand, this writer has seen a lot of speculation and lies over the years. It has also been observed some incredibly brave stances based on reality from all the experts who espouse the truth in the face of adversity. This author tends to agree with those who go against the grain, so to speak while divulging facts based on empirical research. As for being one who sticks to evidence over speculation, this writer does. Certainly, the reader should decide and should conduct their own research as to whether or not human effect on global climatic conditions really exists. So, let us move forward with some researchers who do so.

The sun is getting brighter and hotter

The following article, courtesy of Space.com explains more about the present sun cycle, which occurs in 11-year intervals. It is noted the current cycle is much more prominent. CME (Coronal Mass Ejection) events are more prominent than others in the recent past. Gamma ray bursts are also on the increase. The sun is getting brighter:

https://www.space.com/solar-maximum-expected-2024-new-predictions-suggest?fbclid=IwAR0ychTtGOpfPbKpLkRIUXmiO55nGbTkDHjoPTFN1GCTM_IJJ89f2EA25Pc

What follows in the next link is important and reflects some of this author's views on the present condition of solar events with a very good historical analysis of the sun's affect on planet earth. Please remember, the best analysis of solar effects on earth are derived from geological and archeological on and in the earth's crust. Scientific research in these areas has dramatically improved since the 1800's. The article views and determines the sun's history in a refreshing light (pun intended):

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-sun-was-dimmer-when-earth-formed-how-did-life-emerge-20220127/#:~:text=In%20the%20mid%2D20th%20century,star%20gets%20brighter%20over%20time

More scientific evidence about the sun

The Sun is getting hotter and brighter, adding heat to the global warming that has been linked to greenhouse gases, which trap heat in the atmosphere. The following quotes (combined) are from Dr. Richard C. Willson of Columbia University. Then follows statements from Dr. John Firor from the National Center for Atmospheric Research:

Solar radiation reaching the Earth is 0.036 percent warmer than it was in 1986, when the current solar cycle was beginning, said a study published on Friday in the journal Science. The finding is based on an analysis of data from satellites that measure the temperature of sunlight.

The increase is only a small fraction of the Sun's total heat, but over a century, it would be enough to seriously aggravate problems of global warming, said Dr. Richard C. Willson of Columbia University's Center for Climate Systems Research. Dr. Willson said most researchers expected greenhouse gases to warm the planet by 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit over the next 100 years. Solar irradiance could add another 0.72 degrees, he said.

Other experts agreed, although some argued that the satellite data used by Dr. Willson may be suspect. ''This is a significant increase,'' said Dr. John Firor of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. ''It would increase the rate at which we go into warming.'' He said that based on current estimates, the solar heat increase found by Dr. Willson would increase that warming trend by about 20 percent. But, whether the Earth is being heated by an increase in greenhouse gases, which are produced by the burning of fossil fuels, is still not universally accepted by scientists. Although studies show that the Earth has warmed about one degree in the last century and that the trend is continuing, some scientists say it is part of a natural cycle for the planet. Dr. Willson said his finding supported the idea that a variable Sun could play a powerful and natural role in the Earth's climate.

Notwithstanding, there are other views based on scientific data from the government, which concludes global warming may very well be directly caused by solar activity. This author recalls and states where current solar activity are affecting global glacier melting events around the world are part of this situation. The following article from a government website states succinctly there are many more factors, which affect earth's climate:

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun-be-cause-global-warming

The next article of interest is from academic research and more. This gives the reader more empirical evidence to consider regarding the sun's effects on the earth and its atmosphere. Please bear in mind the affects infrared radiation has over ultraviolet radiation. And, we should be glad:
https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/earth-system/types-of-energy#:~:text=Over%20half%20of%20the%20Sun's,atmosphere%20as%20the%20surface%20warms

Further, stop for a moment to reflect on one of the pollutants, which is considered a greenhouse gas in certain atmospheric situations, but not all. Ozone. This is a derivative from mechanical/electrical activity on earth. But, so much more origins from ozone are critical and important to life on earth. In the 1980s global alarms were sounded where the ozone over Antarctica disappeared? Well, it was back in the 1990s. This is all global cyclic phenomena. However, where ozone accumulates in areas such as southern California where it is a caustic contaminant. It is also limited to certain small areas where air contaminants are briefly trapped until the weather changes. Notably, when weather changes isn't it amazing how quickly the air is cleaned? This writer stops here before we get into regional situations most people, especially in America have no idea.

Summation

This author has read, seen, researched so much about the earth's climate over the years, it is almost better to stop reading. Therefore, please accept this humble summation, which indicates present politically-based hoaxes about global warming is a bunch of poppycock. There, it has been stated. Agendas perpetrated on innocent humans of a grand nature are evil, in nature. Please wake up to realize the gaslighting and agenda-driven propaganda is rampant. Elevating the human condition is what we do who care. We have been deceived for so long. It is time for the reality of love and caring for mankind is paramount. We have a penchant for telling the truth. Nothing more. Love is the answer.

To all viewers, readers and those who care, Universal Digest is here to deliver the truth of what is happening around us. However, it is up to each and every one of us to do our parts to elevate the human condition, not subjugate it.

WAIT! There is more

Since the writing of this article, more corroborative evidence has been published. This author will let it sit where it is with more evidence of the truth of what is happening around us on this gift from God, planet earth. There are more species, intellects, and other sentients who share it with us. And, this is good news. We'll leave it at this, for now.

Recently, from Space.com:

https://www.space.com/sun-x-flare-december-2023-most-powerful-since-2017

And, with continued thanks to Space.com:

https://www.space.com/solar-orbiter-understand-sun-flare-mysteries

Yes, here is more in bold print, dear viewers. This recent video from the Tucker Carlson Network featuring Dennis Quaid who reports the 100% chance of another solar event, which will occur one day. The last major event occurred in 1859, which obliterated the telegraph network. Now, just imagine for a moment what would happen this time?

https://youtu.be/5kJ_SofFm0g?si=ilnpXs2ns1c5xDdA

With everything else happening in craziness on earth this warning comes to you with love and caring. Be prepared.

Special thanks to Ed Smith

Universal Digest

www.universaldigest.com

Levitation for Short Distance Transportation

Wed, 03 Jan 2024 01:25:52 GMT

Levitation for short distance transportation

CATTCC continues its research to discover and develop a transportation device that utilizes levitation as its methodology for mobility.

As of this writing, CATTCC’s research shows that the most plausible effort towards building a levitating device is by replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s device. There is, however, insufficient information to build such a levitating device. Nonetheless, something along this type of technology is necessary as a brand-new mode of transportation for today’s society. How can such a product be designed and built? It requires experimentation. Simplicity is the way of nature. Without having adequate information, such a product has to use experimentation as its source for building.

Polymorphic metals

There is new experimental work in polymorphic metals. Wikipedia has a page on polymorphism , as materials science. Another article: “Polymorphism in a high-entropy alloy” is found in nature.com , it describes polymorphism as the occurrence of different lattice structures in crystalline material, it’s defined as a critical phenomenon in materials science and condensed matter physics.

In the Nature article: “Polymorphism in a high-entropy alloy”, the article begins with: Polymorphism, which refers to the ability of a solid material to exist in more than one crystal structure, is widely observed in many materials including polymers, minerals and metals. The polymorphic transition is a well-known yet critical phenomenon in nature and surprisingly, polymorphs with identical compositions can have different physical, chemical and mechanical properties due to different structural characteristics, which have attracted considerable attention over the last few decades. Pressure and temperature are usually controlling parameters for inducing these transitions by altering the atomic and/or electronic structures and creating novel materials. For example, carbon can take on graphite and diamond under different pressures and temperatures.

This leads to an understanding that the entropy of metals will maintain consistency with electromagnetic properties. Our search is specific towards the molecular actions relating to electrogravitics.

Electrogravitics

In previous blogposts, the topic of electrogravitics was brought up. Electrogravitics is a relevant topic when searching the physics of subatomic makeup. There seems to be a relationship between non-ferrous elements, electrogravitics, and the cavity structure effect (CSE); in comparison to the entropy of ferrous elements and electromagnetic composition of subatomic action.

In a deeper look into electrogravitics and its impact on the subatomic physics aspect of the CSE, here is an excerpt from the book, ‘Rising from Unsustainable’:

For all those interested in the topic; theoretical physics is a fascinating subject. Spintronics, as explained in Wikipedia is:

“Spintronics (a portmanteau – a linguistic blend of words – meaning: spin transport electronics), is the study of the intrinsic spin of the electron and its associated magnetic moment, in addition to its fundamental electronic charge, in solid-state devices.

“Spintronics fundamentally differs from traditional electronics in that, in addition to charge state, electron spins are exploited as a further degree of freedom, with implication in the efficiency of data storage and transfer. Spintronic systems are most often realized in dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMS) and Heusler alloys and are of particular interest in the field of quantum computing.”

In the theory of spintronics, the spin of the electron is an intrinsic angular momentum. That is separate from angular momentum due to its orbital motion. Then, the theory claims the magnitude of the projection of the electron’s spin along an arbitrary axis is ½ħ (one half times Planck constant), implying that the electron acts as a Fermion by the spin-statistics theorem (relates the intrinsic spin of a particle - angular momentum not due to the orbital motion but, to the particle statistics it obeys).

The argument is a claim that an electron’s spin is NOT arbitrary. Rather, it follows a distinct pattern along its linear path at the speed of light. The purpose of adding the book’s excerpt is pointing toward the discovery of the sub-atomic movement path in particle physics. This topic of electrogravitics also accents gravitational control, for which these blogposts are based; the future for transportation.

Levitation

This research relating to levitation considers properties of electrogravitics. Experimentation with certain non-ferrous elements of crystal polymerization in lattice structure and the compression of CSEs, will likely reveal a subatomic electrogravitics action; rather than electromagnetic. This would seem to be where levitation action can be found.

In the process of elimination through experimentation, a quick look at Britannica.com shows hexagon shaped minerals. There are only a few minerals whose internal structure is classified under the hexagonal system . They include calcite , dolomite , quartz , apatite , emerald , and ruby . Their structures allow light to travel through the crystals at difference speeds and at different angles. These minerals are hexagonal structures.

Is there any necessity to build a hexagonal shaped crystal? The requirement for CSEs is a cavity structure. Building a configuration of crystalized polymers with chitin is necessary for the honeycomb shape in forming a cavity structure. It is only the cavity within the structure where the CSE takes place.

The question becomes: how to assemble an egg carton type of configured structure.

In the process of experiment implementation, an analysis of chitin molecule for structural manipulation is a necessity. Now to build an apparatus with a cavity structure.

Sustainable Growth for Urban Development

Sun, 31 Dec 2023 01:00:43 GMT

Three segments in the development of sustainable urban growth

The advantage of this year's final blogpost is with a post mark-date of 123123. This post will close the year with the important topic of sustainable urban growth.

Sustainable urban growth development has three segments: environmental, economic, and social. In addition to transportation, there is an intersecting component with sustainable building methodologies, gardens and landscape design.

How does urban growth happen with sustainability? There are different types of urban growth development; low-density, medium-density, and high-density. High-density urban growth is the most challenging to maintain social sustainability.

To make urban growth sustainable, one has to understand land-use. There are four types of land-use:

Nature
Agriculture
Transit Oriented
Automobile Centric

Of these four types of land-use design, automobile centric land-use design is wholly unsustainable.

From the blogpost Why Current Urban Growth is Unsustainable :

The first official use of the term “sustainable development” came from a report in the 1980 World Conservation Strategy of the International Union for Conservation of Nature .

In 1983, the United Nations (UN) convened the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), which came to be known as The Brundtland Report . One of the conclusions identified three aspects of urban growth:

Environmental
Economic
Social

In 1987, the UN debated the report which eventually led to the creation of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development in 1992. It grew into what is referred to as Agenda 21.

As the definition of sustainable development , Wikipedia states: “The Brundtland Report was intended to respond to the conflict between globalized economic growth and accelerating ecological degradation by redefining "economic development" in terms of "sustainable development". It is credited with crafting the most prevalent definition of sustainability: "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

From the book: ‘Rising from Unsustainable’ :

To more clearly define and summarize unsustainable land-use design, there are three fundamental components in explaining land-use sustainability, each with its own impact:

Environmental Impact

Economic Impact

Social Impact

Unsustainable urban growth will continue as long as the automobile remains the primary source of transportation in Western Society.

From the blogpost https://www.cattcc.org/impacts-of-the-automobile-centric-land-use-design:

Social

Sustainability

In reading all this information about sustainability, what’s the point of talking about it? Pointing out problems about things that people are satisfied with is futility. “Give me an alternative” is the point.

Again, transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. There can be no sustainable urban growth without changing the primary source of transportation for Western Society.

The current transportation mindset regarding changes in transportation is to convert a gasoline engine to an electric motor. Throughout the CATTCC documentation is the constant phrase: ‘the automobile is unsustainable’. Changing its engine has little effect on the negative environmental, economic, and social impacts. As much as all of Western Society is dependent upon the automobile, the automobile is unsustainable.

To replace the automobile as society’s primary source of transportation, it can only be replaced by a methodology that is more convenient than a car. Such methodology has to go faster, be significantly less expensive, more comfortable, safer, more efficient, and lastly; better environmentally.

What transportation advances has CATTCC made?

In exploring where such a transportation device can be found, the CATTCC search began with physics. It seemed the most practical approach. It didn’t take a tremendous amount of effort to find that the greatest source of energy in the universe is gravity. There is more to gravity than throwing something up in the air and watching it fall to the ground. Studying gravity as a source of motion for transportation is relevant to efficient energy use. This is one of the primary pursuits of CATTCC . Discovering answers and developing transportation solutions is a necessity for sustainable urban growth.

One of the most significant discoveries is in the field of theoretical physics. What is gravity? 400 years ago, Isaac Newton wrote the Law of Universal Gravitation . His law explains properties of mass and the effects of influence to other bodies of mass. However, the why it does what it does is absent from his law of gravity. CATTCC has postulated a new theory of gravity .

Another significant effort is the recognition for two areas of transportation; short-distance and long-distance travel. This is defined as creating a brand-new mode of transportation. Yes, this requires finding a way of doing something that hasn’t been done before (or alternatively, discovering something that isn’t currently normal). There are several considerations of importance in developing a brand-new mode of transportation. To approach this, CATTCC took the view from the aspect of energy efficiency; friction is the by far the biggest contributor to ineffective energy use.

Current technology

Current rocket technology for long-distance space travel is by propulsion. Here is a simple analysis of rocket inefficiency: the molecular release of energy in a chemical explosion is 360 degrees. A rocket’s direction is only one degree. The maximum speed attainable by rocket technology is 25,000 mph. The fastest speed ever reached by mankind was attained by the Parker Solar Mission with a speed of 300,000 mph. It reached that speed by the manipulating the gravity of Venus.

Short distance transportation is currently dominated by the automobile. To change this; requires a transportation device with the capability of levitation. CATTCC research carries this discovery into 2024.

Crystals and Polymers

Thu, 28 Dec 2023 03:40:02 GMT

Replicating a levitating device

The best way to build a levitating device is to replicate Viktor Grebennikov’s device. Firstly, there is insufficient information to build such a levitating device. Nonetheless, such a device is necessary as a sustainable energy transportation vehicle for today’s society. Without having adequate information, such a product has to use experimentation as its source for building.

One of the first steps might be to grow synthetic bug parts. Can crystals can be grown into assemblages that replicate wasp nests? How to make crystals? Here: https://sciencing.com/make-polymer-crystals-7883400.html

https://www.mrsec.psu.edu/content/growing-crystals

Can crystals be grown to specific shapes? Even though growing crystals is more of an art than a science, luck is a major factor. There are some things to do and some other things not to do. https://chemistry.mit.edu/facilities-and-centers/x-ray-diffraction-facility/growing-quality-crystals/

In replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s device, the first experiment is the possibility to grow crystals of chitin polymerization into a cavity bee hive type structure. It seems there is a characterization of makeup in chitin that has an affinity with cavity structures effect (CSE) to provide levitation. This requires a deeper look into the physics of its composition. Compression; by stacking of wasp nest type structures, is vaguely similar to an aeronautic reaction. The atmospheric interaction, due to a vacuum within the cavity structure would provide an air movement to allow for aeronautic lift. Is this the application for levitation?

From the website: http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm

Once I lost the left handle in a free-falling descent and would have been in a better world if the platform hadn't dug out a rather deep well in the tillage, first a vertical one, then horizontal, facing away from the sun. Thus I not only survived, but I also felt almost no impact, just darkness. I extracted myself and my fairly badly damaged device from this well, although not without effort, because the "well" had no slag heaps! I had to use all my ingenuity to disguise it. If it were seen from the road, it would have caused much speculation and may even have led some over-zealous investigators to the culprit. Similar wells, also with the side-tunnel and without slag heaps, were suddenly formed on October 24, 1989 in the fields of Khvorostyansk District of Samara Region. Komsomolskaya Pravda [magazine] described it in detail on December 6. of the same year and it seems that I am not alone. I am quite likely "inventing a bicycle". Well, actually the top part of my device looks very much like one. The right handle is used for horizontal motion, also achieved via a cable, regulating the incline of both groups of the "wing case" blinds. I never fly faster than 25 km/min and I prefer to go ten times slower. I don't know whether I have persuaded you, my reader, that similar devices will soon be available to practically everyone, while the living nature, without which humans cannot survive, won't be available to anyone if we don't save it and preserve it.

With the continual reference to the RexResearch.com website regarding Viktor Grebennikov’s research and his levitation device, the more difficult it becomes to attribute the device as fraud. The closeup picture, however, seems to display two 2”x12” pieces of wood.

The presents of a wood base eliminates the compression of CSEs. Standing on two short pieces of wood does not provide the capability for levitation.

What then is the subatomic catalyst that provides the mechanism for levitation? Viktor mentions the effect of vents, or “blinds”: regulating the incline of both groups of the "wing case" blinds. This corresponds to the picture of a mechanical mechanism attached to the underside of the platform.

The style of Viktor’s writing holds a fascinating curiosity. His stories hold answers to his discoveries.

How do the “blinds” operate? What do they do? With the operation of a vent, or blind; it regulates an action. Earlier, Viktor said that the CSEs have no shield. A mechanical twisting of CSE fields would have the same effect as a shield.

What is electrogravitics ? As to relevance for a discussion about electrogravitics it delves into theoretical physics fundamentals. Electrogravitics is proposed as a foundational component to the theory of particle mass composition. Electrogravitics is similar to electromagnetics but identifies gravity as the component to subatomic electric fields. This leads to speculation that gravity is a subatomic process rather than a product of mass. With this perspective, electrogravitics holds more validation than electromagnetics as the source of particle charge.

Crystal frequencies, chitin polymerization, and the unexplored field of electrogravitics brings even more to contemplate in replicating Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device.

Short Distance Designs

Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:11:19 GMT

Study in short distance transportation designs

In the previous blogpost: Short Distance Transportation was another look at Viktor Grebennikov’s cavity structures effect (CSE). With a deeper investigation to Viktor Grebennikov’s work, it’s reasonable to study the composition of wasp nests and bee hives. This blogpost is a continuation regarding the composition of CSE structures.

Chitin

Chitin is a polymerization. Quoted is a paragraph from the previous blogpost: Viewing a CSE at the subatomic level, what does it show? It’s a crystal shape that emits a specific frequency. This is common to crystalline structures. In comparing this view to electromagnetic fields on a subatomic level, an electromagnetic field is specific to a ferrous reaction from an electric/magnetic charge. The crystalline structure is a passive frequency generator. A magnet is a molecular combination of electron structures that cause/provide ferrous reaction of attraction or repulsion due to element electron’s action.

As Viktor Schauberger says: comprehend and copy nature. To discover nature’s process of levitation, it requires the study of magnet action and in this example: CSEs. The CSEs are prevalent in wasps’ nests and bee hives. Their composition is a polymer crystallization. What’s the frequency range of this crystallization? How does the composition of this structure impact its frequency?

In describing chitin, here is a direct quote from Wikipedia :

The transition between glucose and N-Acetylglucosamine
The polymerization of N-Acetylglucosamine to chitin
The polymerization of glucose to cellulose.

Glucose

Glucose changes depending on what form it takes, glucose is the basis of both chitin and cellulose and the only difference between the two types is what form glucose takes in each polymer. When it becomes chitin it changes to N-Acetylglucosamine which then gets polymerized into chitin. Glucose remains in the same when it becomes cellulose and only needs to get polymerized to become cellulose.

Cellulose

The structure of cellulose is chained together glucose molecules all joined through a dehydration reaction to form a chain. Cellulose form chains that when combined form up to microfibrils that then form microfibrils that form cellulose fibers that then form up to form cell walls. The properties of cellulose depends on its chain length or degree of polymerization. The polymerization in bacteria is more pure than those found in plants and for that reason it has a higher water content and higher tensile strength along with it.

Chitin

Chitins structure is similar to celluloses structure except for at the second carbon where instead of another OH (hydroxyl) there is a NHCOCH3, the monomer is called N-Acetylglucosamine. Chitin starts with the N-Acetylglucosamine molecules that when chained together become an chitin chains that form into chitin nanofibrils that are combined with the protein for that respective structure type that then form into mineralized protein plains, that are then twisted to form a more compact protein plane that then are stacked together to form multilayer cuticles. Pure chitlin is a clear flexible substance and needs to be mixed with different proteins to form the structure found in other creatures. Chitin is combined with calcium carbonate when it is within crustacean shells and is combined with sclerotin to form cuticles. Chitin is used by several species most notably fungi and insects.

The key seems to be calcium carbonite in its intermixing polymer shell. The buildup of this protein component is through the heat process of calories. In other words, a slow process. This building process activates centripetal structural crystallization of nature. Its CSE is nature’s electrogravitic manufacturing process. It also makes reference to sclerotin : “Chitin is combined with calcium carbonate when it is within crustacean shells and is combined with sclerotin to form cuticles.” The sclerotin is found as a natural occurrence within bugs’ growth as a phenol secretion.

Bug wings and CSE

In looking at microscopic portions of bug wings, it displays flattened elongated structures, similar to the elongated sections of a wasps’ nest or beehive. When relating these geometric bug structures to wasps’ nests, there is an association to a relationship with the CSE. The assumption is that this CSE structure produces a frequency.

This picture shows a definite atmospheric reaction.

There are several questions that call for answers. How does this frequency produce energy patterns that enable the platform to levitate? The frequency response isn’t within the audible the sound spectrum. Is it interaction with atmospheric pressure as an aerodynamic action? Is it an ion reaction? This is something of nature. A sort of reaction to CSE compression? Wings of an airplane lift due to the vacuum created above the wing. Does a CSE field compression create a similar vacuum to create lift? The gases in the air shows an intensified CSE field. So, there is a CSE field; what aspect of a crystallization frequency provides an apparatus to allow a levitation motion? How does a crystal frequency generate a CSE field to interact with atmospheric gases?

Placing your feet on two flat and narrow boards and pointing downward at the top of a mountain creates a tremendous velocity while gliding on the surface of snow. The atmosphere is a gaseous fluid. It does seem plausible for a device to interact with air and manipulate movement through the air.

The most intriguing aspect of Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device is that it’s presumably passive. This technique for transportation is rendered by industry experts as impossible. Like skiing or hang gliding, or sailing, or surfing is also impossible?

There are several previous blogposts that discuss surfing gravity waves. The blogpost: https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-surfboard The tangibility of such would require an apparatus that produces the amplification of a gravity wave; then a means of riding it.

https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-motor With a gravity generator, we’re looking to capture and manipulate gravitational fields. Its operation would capture the linear motion of particle movement as it travels through space at light speed. This is found in a frequency pattern. The movement is very fast, its motion is very minute.

The frequency of a particle is consistent with its orbital diameter. Molecules build upon the toroidal fields of an element’s particles. A gravity generator would be based upon the orbital frequencies of molecular bodies as these fields travel at the speed of light, in sync with all matter.

https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-waves How does the functionality of gravity waves effect the concept of gravity? From the aspect of physics: all things in nature flow in synchronous motion. Gravity is a motion; all motion has frequency as its pattern.

Excerpts from the book, ‘ Rising From Unsustainable ’:

Surfing Gravitational Wave Pulse Resonance

These three blogpost excerpts bring a unifying concept to attention. The CSE fields holding a similar concept for short distance transportation in associating the CSE field to that of a gravity wave, wherein the levitating platform acts as a type of surfboard.

There is much to be contemplated in Viktor Grebennikov’s claim to have built a levitating device. The significance remains in replicating his device into an apparatus that is applicable to serve as brand-new mode of transportation.

Short Distance Transportation

Mon, 18 Dec 2023 19:03:13 GMT

Transportation solutions for short distance travel is by levitation

In the search of finding transportation solutions, it’s necessary to have a new perspective. What’s currently used for all modern modes of transportation? Propulsion. What else can be used as a method of transportation? There are at least two possibilities; gravity and levitation. The attraction of gravity can be considered as a methodology for long-distance travel .

One of Viktor Schauberger philosophical statements says: comprehend and copy nature. In the search for efficient transportation methodologies, his reference can be applied to the sustainability of motion. Another scientist claiming discoveries on the side of fringe science was Viktor Grebennikov’s . One of his discoveries was a claim to have built a floating transportation device. This is a possible application for a short distance transportation technology.

Short distance travel has to account for Earth’s gravitational attraction. What methodology of motion can be used for short distance transportation? This can use a methodology of floatation. A levitating device. Maglev is currently used for levitating trains in China. Maglev requires a guideway, its use is exclusive to transit oriented land-use design. Train technology is dysfunctional in the automobile centric land-use design of Western Society. Floatation of a levitating vehicle is still viable without the necessity of a guideway infrastructure.

Land-use and transportation

With the four types of land-use, urban design has two: transit oriented and automobile centric land-use design. The transit-oriented design accommodates building magnetic levitation (maglev) guideways. Maglev technology provides efficient energy use in building transportation networks, sufficient to meet transportation demands with a transit oriented land-use design. Reducing vehicle sizes and increasing headways is this natural progression for technological advance.

For the automobile centric land-use design, developing an automobile alternative is possible with levitation. The fundamental concept to comprehend and copy nature is the only answer in finding a transportation solution to replace the car. The alternative has to be comparable in many ways to the automobile.

Western Society has shifted technologically since the invention of the automobile of 125 years ago. With its massive increase in population, transportation needs are more independent. As the population grows, the transportation demands are critically more independent. Destination locations are diverse instead of centralized. This requires a lesser vehicle size and an increase for safety protection.

What type of technology can be researched and studied to provide a transportation solution to replace the automobile? It’s clearly understood that the solution has to be more convenient, faster, less expensive, and safer than a car. This automatically leads to the knowledge that such a technology is energy efficient with a very simple engineering design. Where does this lead to? Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structure’s Effect, with a study of crystalline structures and polymers.

There is a particular philosophy as an approach to this study. Being on the leading edge of scientific exploration requires a fresh perspective. This fringe directive calls for clarity. It’s a different path than the standard procedure of human intellectualism. To comprehend and copy nature with a fresh perspective is to follow the ways of truth, seeking righteousness. The path is exceeding entertaining and exciting. It pursues truth found in Godly wisdom.

Short distance transportation

Viktor S. Grebennikov discovered the cavity structural effect (CSE). This led to his claim of having developed a levitating transportation device. Here are the details of Viktor’s experimentation in his discovery of the CSE:

I have created a few dozen artificial honeycombs from plastic, paper, metal and wood, based on the structures of bee nests. It turned out that the cause of all those unusual sensations was not a biological field, but the size, shape, quantity and arrangement of cavities formed by and in any solid object. And as before, the organism felt it, while the instruments remained silent. I called the discovery the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) and I have carried on with my experiments. Nature has continued to reveal to me its innermost secrets one after another. It has turned out that the CSE zone inhibits the growth of saprophytic soil bacteria, inhibits the growth of yeast and other similar cultures as well as it inhibits wheat grain germination. The behavior of microscopic agile chlamydospores also changes in this effective zone. Leaf cutting bee larvae begin to phosphoresce, while adult bees are much more active in this field and finish pollination two weeks earlier than they would otherwise. It has turned out that this CSE, same as gravitation, can't be shielded.

What do we find in this CSE field? Viktor refers to it as a zone. Then we have to ask, what is an electromagnetic field in its relation to a toroidal field? What are the similarities? Viktor says the CSE can’t be shielded. An electromagnetic field is easily shielded. The immediate distinction is that the field of a CSE has a crystalline type configuration. A magnetic field has a round shape.

The exploration of these questions is the continuing search for the purpose of a levitating platform that functions as a short distance transportation device.

To the Basics

Fri, 15 Dec 2023 21:02:55 GMT

The fundamentals of sustainability and its urban growth

The basics of understanding urban growth is knowing that transportation is its foundation. Since the development of all urban growth is based on its source of transportation, transportation is the root of sustainability. This understanding is vitally important to Western Society since the primary source of its transportation is automobile centric. Then comes the realization that the automobile is wholly unsustainable.

The automobile

The automobile is unsustainable, yet, the media broadcasts its support for a political directive to make its unsustainability irrelevant. There’s a forlorn frustration to watch the masses being led to believe an intentionally deceptive political narrative. Things like: banning a plastic straw will change the weather. A majority of students in modern institutional education; are convinced that plastic grocery bags are the cause of unsustainability. And, cow poop is the source of poisonous methane: destroying Earth’s breathable air. Western culture says smoking cigarettes are bad but, smoking pot is okay. Here’s a practical question: can a person ride a unicorn with a saddle? The level of intriguing and culturally profound questions ask: how do elephants pee? The point of this paragraph is satire; mocking society for eluding the consequence of cognitive presence.

Regardless of how a car’s motor is powered, automobiles are unsustainable environmentally, economically, and socially.

Sustainability

Discovering the basics of sustainability includes comprehension of its components. There are a lot of pieces to sustainability. Food grown in a person’s garden is sustainable; after the food is eaten and processed, manure nourishes the soil. Most things we use in modern life are packaged in disposable containers. When people are concerned about whether a product’s packaging is sustainable, the fact that its purpose of packaging is to be thrown away; identifies the packaging as unsustainable. The concept of package marketing for a product renders that marketing process to be unsustainable. This is an important issue when considering the sustainable ideology. Tagging sustainable labels on products is strictly a mode of increasing product sales.

Sustainability includes: economic, environmental, and social parameters. An urban area’s economic sustainability relies-on the source of its local economic production. Also, the ability for the area’s currency to remain in circulation within the influence of that area. Again, things like product packaging are predominantly waste. Another piece of packaging is the behemoth of marketing. Labels are designed to generate emotional interpretation. Social identification is based on emotional response. Personal interaction and public contact are intimately tied to social sustainability.

Many of the CATTCC blogposts contain details of environmental, economic and social impacts of unsustainable urban growth . CATTCC’s purpose is for sustainable transportation solutions.

The greatest component for increasing sustainability into society is injecting the use of common sense.

Importance of transportation sustainability

In 1988, the UN developed a paper which established an understanding of how to address sustainable development. The Brundtland Report , the UN’s World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future . This report established the identity of environmental, economic and social issues as pertinent to sustainability and urban growth. What were the impacts from cars as the primary source of transportation? The automobile was identified as unsustainable.

In the 1930s, Viktor Schauberger identified chemical explosion propulsion-driven transportation; as a terribly inefficient method of transportation. He defined it as being against nature .

What is sustainable transportation?

What has the most significant environmental impact on the planet? Transportation and its interaction with urban development.

Most people agree that merely by the mass of numbers, cars have the greatest impact to the environment. While this may be an accurate assumption, what is most susceptible to weather influence? The sky. Does an automobile leave a trail to show where it’s traveled? How about airplanes? Are the trails of a passenger jets visible from a distance? Dependent upon each day’s atmospheric wind and moisture content, some days reveal heavier vapor trails more than others. Hundreds of planes producing intensive heat vapors on take-off is likely to have an effect on the area’s regional weather.

In contrast to what the general opinion of what people are led to believe, electric cars are automobiles. All cars, whether electric, hydrogen, autonomous, or just regular petrol powered; cars are still cars.

As outlined in the Brundtland Report, there are three areas of concern regarding urban growth: environmental, economic, and social. This specifically points out the vital importance for an area’s primary source of transportation to be sustainable. Not only environmentally but, economically, and socially.

Sustainable transportation solutions

What’s the best way to reach economic and environmental transportation sustainability? With efficient energy use. It eliminates chemical explosions as a source of propulsion. This includes modes of transportation for both long distance and short distance. It disqualifies rockets and automobiles as viable transportation.

Since combustion driven transportation is an inefficient source of transportation, what is the alternative?

There are two types of transportation. Short distance and long distance. Short distance travel is restricted to land-use design; either transit oriented or the sprawl land-use of automobile centric design. Transit oriented land-use can be addressed efficiently with maglev technology which requires the addition of a guideway. Automobile centric land-use design needs an alternative to the automobile.

Fundamentally, the basic structure of transportation in Western Society’s land-use design is unsustainable. The solution for transportation is the discovery and development for a brand-new mode of transportation. The key word of focus: discovery. Then development.

For long distance travel, a replacement for rocket technology is imperative. The rational for discovering a brand-new mode of long-distance travel (space flight) is essential for the practicality of speed. With the massive inefficiency of current rocket technology, its locked into a maximum speed of 25,000 mph. With today’s rocket-ship speed, it would take about eight months for a rocket-ship to reach Mars. At a speed of one-tenth the speed of light, a spacecraft could reach Mars within three hours. Efforts on the razor’s edge of fringe science theorize this fast speed is plausible.

CATTCC is involved in research for advanced transportation discoveries.

Eco-Friendly Technology

Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:11:24 GMT

Eco-Intelligence: Smart Steps to Make Your Home Environment-Friendly

Photo by Unsplash

As the world continues to grapple with climate change, sustainability is becoming more important than ever. This trend has given birth to an emerging interest in eco-friendly smart homes. How else can you enhance its environmental-friendly design further? The Center for Advanced Transportation Technology and Climate Choice (CATTCC) outlines eight smart steps you can take.

Build in a Strategic Location

When seeking a neighborhood for a new eco-friendly home, choose a location for your new home that is highly walkable with a pedestrian-friendly area. This forms a pivotal part of your strategy to create an eco-friendly habitat. The decision to build in such an area inherently lessens reliance on vehicles, thereby encouraging healthier and more environmentally conscious forms of transport like walking or cycling.

Insulate to Save

When looking to make your current home more sustainable, it pays to properly install insulation. LeafScore notes that this eco-friendly measure conserves energy by helping maintain a comfortable indoor temperature throughout the year. Whether it's chilly winters or scorching summers, a well-insulated home reduces the need for excessive heating or cooling, thereby conserving energy.

Install New Windows and Doors

Energy-efficient windows and doors can significantly reduce your home's energy consumption. By minimizing heat transfer and preventing cooling loss, Attainable Home points out that these features make your home even more sustainable . Not only will you cut down on energy consumption, but you'll also enjoy a more comfortable living environment.

Use a Home Maintenance and Repair App

Using a home repair app is of paramount importance in today's fast-paced digital age. These apps provide homeowners with a convenient and efficient way to address maintenance and repair issues in their homes. They offer a centralized platform where users can easily access a network of trustworthy repair technicians, request quotes, schedule appointments, and track progress.

The real value lies in the time and money-saving benefits they bring, as homeowners can quickly find reputable service providers, compare prices, and ensure the job is done correctly. Additionally, these apps often provide user reviews and ratings, fostering trust and transparency in the service industry. Overall, home repair apps streamline the process, empower homeowners, and contribute to the overall well-being and maintenance of their homes.

Invest in a Smart Thermostat

A smart thermostat is a significant addition to any eco-friendly smart home. By efficiently regulating temperatures, these devices save energy and optimize comfort. Many models, such as the Nest, offer eco-mode settings, which take some of the guesswork out of adjusting your thermostat, contributing to a more sustainable lifestyle.

Go Low Energy with Lighting

Lighting is another area where you can make sustainable choices. Opt for low-energy lighting options, such as LED bulbs, to significantly reduce electricity usage and cut down on your energy bills. These lights offer a two-fold advantage: they last longer and consume less energy than traditional bulbs.

Choose Recycled Materials

In your journey toward crafting an eco-friendly home, an impactful step is the inclusion of recycled materials in your construction or renovation endeavors . This conscious choice not only adds an element of sustainability to your dwelling but also aids in minimizing waste, fostering a cleaner and healthier environment. By doing so, you actively participate in driving the building industry to a more sustainable future, contributing to a global cause while creating a home that stands as a testament to eco-conscious living.

Get Smart with Your Sprinkler

Water conservation is a critical aspect of sustainability. If watering your lawn is a must, consider installing a smart sprinkler system that adjusts watering schedules based on weather conditions. This smart technology prevents over-watering, conserving water resources, and helping homeowners maintain a lush, green yard.

Go Paperless

Digitize your paper use to conserve resources and create a more sustainable home environment. This can be as simple as digitizing files and documents whenever possible. To do this, use a PDF maker, which is an online tool that supports the conversion of various files into PDFs; click to learn more . This approach not only reduces your paper consumption but also helps to organize your files digitally.

Purchasing a new construction home is the first step toward creating an eco-friendly smart home. In addition, by incorporating the steps discussed above, you can transform your home into an eco-friendly sanctuary that benefits both the environment and your overall quality of life, including using a home maintenance and repair app. It's time to make a change. It’s time to embrace sustainability and smart living in every facet of your home.

The Center for Advanced Transportation Technology and Climate Choice (CATTCC) provides a platform of concerns about our environment, specifically related to transportation. Contact us today to learn more !

Reanalyzing the Pages

Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:55:45 GMT

Discovering the technologies for the future of transportation

This is blogpost one hundred. In the myriad of blogposts, lots of information has been accumulated; many new ideas have emerged. As the questions accumulate, answers grow and knowledge builds.

The natural human behavior patterns are such that people avoid what they’re unfamiliar with. The subject of building a brand-new mode of transportation built from principles found on the razor’s edge of fringe science; tends to remove high level interest. Attitudes and behavior pattens of Western Society are accustomed to instant production. Public interest is a product of results: rather than pursuing research of unanswered questions. Participation will occur when a viable transportation product is in the market place.

The product

There are two directions in design pursuit. Short distance and long distance. Short distance is for surface travel. Long distance is for space travel. Both designs manipulate gravity but, in different ways. These are two separate areas of transportation and involve two separate areas of technology. Both devices provide brand-new modes of transportation. Both technologies have to have a different source of fuel than chemical explosion propulsion. A ground level short distance vehicle has to be more convenient, faster, less expensive, and safer than a car. An efficient space vehicle’s travel must create a surrounding energy field and it has to travel at least one tenth the speed of light.

Short distance travel

The world already has efficient mass transit capabilities. The efficiency of magnetic levitation (maglev) is a proven technology. These advanced designed systems, however, are realistically 200-year-old train technology. This type of system design is only appropriate for transit-oriented land-use design. Advances to interact with the automobile centric land-use design and provide an alternative to the automobile require a more convenient conveyance than a car. Maglev technology requires a dedicated ferrous element guideway; incompatible to the automobile centric land-use design.

From egg cartons, to bug shells and levitation

The more opportune technology for ground level transportation affecting gravitational fields is found in the mystery of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). CSEs were discovered by Viktor Grebennikov, a naturalist and professional entomologist. His unique perspective brought insight and understanding to CSEs and chitin shells. Based on this discovery, he used bionic principles to design and build an anti-gravitational platform to stand on with a brace attached to his back and poles in the front to control movement. The platform to stand on was comprised of bug shells; chitin. The effect of movement, based on the CSE of bee hives and wasp nests hovered in flights up to 25 km/min.

The conclusion is that CSE has a physical reaction. Inasmuch as this CSE field has an effect on biological entities and a gravitational influence, so do crystallization patterns in having an electromagnetic effect on electronics.

Control mechanism

Amongst the other technologies on the razor’s edge of fringe science, comes a theory about a conveyance’s operational control . This involves another relatively unknown phenomenon of psychokinesis. Psychokinesis leads to theorize a process that enables neural oscillations to interact with an electromagnetic or electrogravitics response. The implication of significance to this technology application is that is similar to an audio or infrared sensor. The neural oscillations generated by a psychokinetic wave is capable to transcend the influence of electromagnetic fields. As displayed in Otis Carr’s craft, the psychokinetic waves are transmitted as neural oscillations of hues, and theoretically interpreted to be received as an optical switch. By perceiving the Nikola Tesla influence in Otis Carr’s invention, theoretically, the psychokinetic oscillations can be focused to transmit a specific color. By focusing on the optical visualization (hue), the mind can concentrate on that visual input of any specific color. This automatic reaction is then generated as a neural oscillation of that visualization. As an example, a room filled with blue light sends the blue light to the neural optic center in the brain as blue light. This is simply a psychokinetic process of functionality.

In other considerations of the psychokinetic aspect, and having an impact to gravity; gives remarkable continuity to explaining why Peter was able to walk on water . Adding the component of Cavity Structures Effect (CSE), this brings incredible possibility for insight to a new mode of short distance transportation and operational control for ships traveling in space.

How powerful, or how are these neural oscillations generated and received? The question can be put into terms of tracking the tone modulations of a cell phone. Human senses are unable to detect a phone’s electromagnetic signal of 800 – 2400 megahertz . That electromagnetic wave is about one foot in length. The distance of a single wave of light is approximately .00004 centimeters. Brain waves are between 1 and 100 hertz (cycles per second). Audible sound ranges to the human ear are from roughly 20 hz to 20k hz. What prevents brain waves from being heard? Can neural oscillations, or psychokinesis, overpower gravity? How can these neural oscillations be amplified? Is there a way to amplify these waves? Or is there a way to develop a stronger psychokinetic power? There can be understanding of awareness, however, a wave is merely functionality or measurement of something that exists. This is comparable to prayer or using affirmation mantras. Any person can choose to ignore them or use them.

The focus of these blogposts are relevant to the development of advanced transportation, the philosophy of theology is a different topic. For this discussion, psychokinesis relates to an operational control mechanism for a conveyance.

Long distance, space travel

Examples for attaining a viable space travel vehicle, reveals three primary consistencies. The similarities are a wheel within a wheel, spin, and magnetics. These fundamental components for building a device have similar relevance. Spin motion is centripetal. Magnetic fields are toroidal. This coincides with the important factor of measuring time: https://www.cattcc.org/how-to-gauge-time .

As shared in the blogpost https://www.cattcc.org/validating-the-purpose it’s noticed that similar actions are sited in the craft technology from Viktor Schauberger, Otis Carr, John Searl, and David Hamel. Interestingly, the only space travel technology seeking a different function is to create a gravity field generator and then surfing that gravity wave. Since this is an analytic overview of the previous blogposts, a lot of information went towards research in pursuing a gravity generator. To clarify, the gravity generator is considered a device that produces a negative toroidal field. In light of the other possibilities to attain an independent inertia field by other means, pursuing the creation of a gravity generator seems like an unnecessary direction.

What are the goals, what’s the purpose of these blogposts? To discover and develop a new mode for transportation. There has to be a product to manufacture, something people are able to use as a convenient conveyance.

Chitin and Grits

Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:52:39 GMT

Building a floating solution to ground level transportation

Chitin and grits is word play for humor. Chitlin is sausage and grits come from the garden. Chitin is from bugs but brings potential to raise the level of sustainability. Maybe this is only humorous in the south where the pronunciation is different. Science is better with humor.

Adding humor to the serious condition in necessity of building a ground level transportation solution provides a smidgen of practical relief. This article is about reexamining Viktor Grebennikov’s discovery claim into the possibility of building a floating transportation device.

Viktor Grebennikov was a naturalist and professional entomologist. He was known for his discovery of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). This expertise gave him an interesting perspective, which led to his other discoveries; the focus of attention here. Society’s transportation emergency requires an immediate solution of finding efficient mythologies for transportation. Using an entomologist’s perspective in researching transportation is taking the fringe science legitimacy to the next level of absurdity when the doors of tradition and the pessimists’ acceptance are closed tight.

Psychokinesis

The psychokinetic aspect, having an impact to gravity, gives remarkable continuity to explaining why Peter was able to walk on water . Adding the component of Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) brings incredible possibility for insight to a new mode of short distance transportation.

In the realm of psychokinesis; here are a few questions.

One, this is in regards to when a person sees someone else yawn, it creates a sense of yearning to yawn. The question is: does yawning in front of a person who is blind, does the blind person react by having the yearning to yawn also. Here is another question regarding the reaction of a blind person. When someone smiles, other people react by smiling. Does a blind person also react with a smile?

The question then, is in relation to emotions. Are emotional reactions psychokinetic? And how much of emotions are psychokinetic?

Brain waves are between 1 and 100 hertz (cycles per second). Audible sound ranges to the human ear are from roughly 20 hz to 20k hz. What prevents brain waves from being heard?

Is there a way to grow or develop a stronger psychokinetic power? There can be understanding of awareness, however, a wave is merely functionality or measurement of something that exists. This is comparable to prayer or using affirmation mantras. Any person can choose to ignore them or use them.

The focus of these articles are relevant to the development of advanced transportation, the philosophy of theology is a different topic. For this discussion, psychokinesis relates to an operational control mechanism. In a previous article , this topic was regarding discoveries by Viktor Grebennikov.

Product development

What technology did Viktor Grebennikov discover? Cavity Structures Effect (CSE), from bug wings and egg cartons to levitation. In addition to discovering CSEs, he built a platform to stand on with a brace attached to his back and poles in the front to control movement. The platform to stand on was comprised of bug shells; chitin. The effect of movement, based on the CSE of bee hives and wasp nests.

It seems appropriate to include some of the original works to understand Viktor Grebennidov’s perception. Here is a list of experiment directions: FROM THE NOTEBOOK OF A NATURALIST :

Artificial honeycomb --- Take a dozen and a half papier-mâché supermarket egg case (30-egg variety), tie them up or glue them together (one on top of another) in such a way as to join the "teeth" to one another rather than to the hollows.

You will have large cells similar to the multi-cellular combs of a certain "paper" wasp but, much bigger. Affix the whole set of cells (they can be enclosed in a case) over the head of a person sitting in a chair with the bottom "comb" about 10-20 cm above the head. Let the person sit there for 10-15 min. The "unnatural", unusual transformation of the spatial shape formed by the set can be picked up even by the palm of your hand. Experiment with sprouting seeds, or breeding microorganisms and insects under the "macrocomb" and compare the results with those of identical experiments conducted at least 2 m away from the comb. Repeat each pair of experiments several times.

Iron comb --- Test the impact of common kitchen shredders piled up one on top of another with their wire-edges down in a similar way, with the small hole shredders at the bottom and the large hole ones at the top.

Paper Combs --- Cut apart 6 sheets of office paper lengthwise and fold each of them like a bellows so, that you get 10 edges and 20 planes on each. Squeeze the bellows so that the sheets are square now, rather then rectangular and glue them on top of one another, turning each consecutive sheet horizontally 30 degrees clockwise against the bottom one. Then glue together (preferably out of dark paper) a conical, multi-layered "flower" with a few dozen petals and fluff up the petals. Test the emanators by holding your palm above the "flower" and underneath the suspended bellows. Place the bellows and then the flower above the head of a sitting person and record his/her sensations.

Plastic Foam --- We are used to the fact that this excellent thermal insulator "reflects" the warmth of the hand even at a distance. But, even if you cover it with dark paper, cardboard, or a tin plate, it will still do the same. This happens due to the work of multiple vesicular cavities of the material producing the CSE. Foam rubber. It is widely known that a person used to sleeping on let's say a cotton wool mattress doesn't sleep well at first on a rubber foam one, or else is unable to sleep at all. This is a typical manifestation of the CSE. The organism eventually adapts itself to this new bed.

Mushroom CSE --- A hunter once told me that he warms his hands up in winter on bracket-fungi. Let us recall that the underside of this tree fungi is full of fine spore tubes. What the hunter felt was not warmth but, a typical CSE.

Moving combs --- Make a wooden top and drill several holes about a pencil size through it.

Their CSE field perception significantly increases when the top is spinning. This is easily perceived by the palm of the hand and it is due to the fact that the cavities must be numerically multiplying in space.

Flower CSE --- An "unnatural" position of such a seemingly common and pleasant object as a living flower can also change its properties. Place a bunch of several dozen bell-shaped flowers (like tulips, primroses, lilies or bell-flowers) upside down above the head of a sitting person. Enclose the flowers in a plastic bag in order to prevent the impact of their smell. Write to me about your results.

Wind-fallen trees: One of my test subjects, a geographer, told me about experiencing the effect of one of my "grids". He said that he once had a similar sensation many years ago, when he was passing a wind-fallen section of a forest. His head, ears, mouth and the entire body felt something particularly unpleasant and it had felt the same as what he felt under my grid. This means that the abruptly disrupted shape of the normal multi-cavity space of the forest emanated CSE waves for some time, which were unpleasant to humans.

Before the rain: Run cold water through the shower and slowly move your hand toward the stream of the droplets from the side. Most people feel "warmth" from the shower. In reality, this is the CSE reinforced by the motion of ever new elements of the "multi-layered" grid of water drops and gaps between them. After practicing in the bathroom, try to pick up an even stronger CSE from fountains and waterfalls. A shroud of a distant rainfall creates a powerful CSE field, which has its impact on a large area, even when the atmospheric pressure is high at your location. Have you ever felt sleepy before the rain? Even in enclosed premises? The CSE cannot be screened off.

Book CSE --- Take a thick, preferably well-read book and stand it upright on the edge of a desk with its back facing the direction of the sun (north at night). Open the book and fluff up its pages as evenly as possible. You should be able to pick up some of the sensations mentioned in this chapter with your palm, tongue, or back of your head in a few minutes (the CSE does not appear immediately and it doesn't disappear immediately either). This "stream" can be picked up at a 2-3 meters' distance after some practice. It is also easy to verify that the "book CSE" is also non-screenable. You can ask someone to stand between your hand and the book.

Large Cones with an artificial comb filling and three magnets at the back --- Two similar cones were positioned against each other with respect to the sun, one in Isilkul and the other one near Novosibirsk. They were thrown appart and demolished on the moring of April 23, 1991. The one in Novosibirsk was unfolded and pressed into the wall of an underground hiding place and its magnets disappeared. Some residents of an Omsk apartment experienced a series of strangest "poltergeists" (see Vechernii Omsk from April 26. and Omsk and Moscow TV broadcasts) at the same moment. The same paper called the device in the picture "Grebenikov's hyperboloid on August 5, 1991. exactly because of this "coincidence". One of the "beams" of the upright electronic waves between the two conical structures may have actually been formed precisely there, on the river Irtysh embankment in Omsk.

Medium Cones --- Insert a dozen plastic household funnels tightly into each other and fix the structure on any support with the nozzles turned toward the sun. Cover the bell end of the top funnel with a net or light blue cloth (so that the tested subjects do not anticipate heat).

Small Cone --- Roll up tightly two unusable rolls of film. Tie them up with a string and press a bell-shaped cavity in the middle of the top roll. CSE emanations can be easily picked up by the palm of your hand, particularly in the counter-solar position. You will get interesting sensations if you press this "micro-cone" to your forehead.

Victor Grebennikov is known to many as the discoverer of the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE). But very few people are familiar with his other discovery, the one that also borrows from nature and its innermost secrets. He discovered antigravitational effects of the chitin shell of certain insects in 1988. The most impressive incidental phenomenon discovered was a partial invisibility and/or of distorted perception of material objects entering the zone of compensated gravity. Based on this discovery, he used bionic principles to design and build an "anti-gravitational" platform for hovering flights at the speeds of up to 25 km/min. This CSE has a physical reaction. Inasmuch as this CSE field has an effect on biological entities and a gravitational influence, so do crystallization patterns have an electromagnetic effect on electronics.

As an example, to how Viktor discovered the impact of CSE fields, here is his explanation: An old wasp nest works quite differently, even though the size and shape of its cells is very close to those of the honey bees. The important difference between the two is that the wasp honeycomb material, unlike that of honey bee wax, is more crumbly and micro porous. It is paper like. (By the way, it's wasps, who invented paper, rather than people. Wasps scrape old wood fiber, mix it with their sticky saliva and let it dry out.) Walls of the wasp honeycomb are much thinner than those of bees and their cell size and pattern is also different. The nest itself is like a multi-layered, loosely wrapped paper outer shell. I've had reports of highly unpleasant effects of a few wasp nests in an attic. Besides that, most multiple cell devices and objects with a manifested CSE field have a far from beneficial effect on humans in the first few minutes. Honey bee combs are a rare exception. I have often observed the bumblebees living in our Isilkul flat in the 1960s. A young bumble bee did not take the trouble to remember the entrance to the hive and it would spend hours wandering around the windows of our house and of a similar looking house nearby on its first trip out of the hive. It would give up on its poor visual memory in the evening and it would land on the brick wall precisely outside the hive and it would try to break right through the wall. Now, how did the insect know that its home nest was right there, four meters away from the entrance to the attic and a meter and a half below, behind the thick, half meter wall? I was lost at the time in conjectures but now I know exactly why the bumble bee behaved in that manner. It is an amazing find, wouldn't you agree? Now let us remember the experiment in which hunter wasps returned not only to a given location but, even to an entirely different location to where the lump of soil with their nest had been moved. I do not doubt that they were able to find it because of the wave emitter created by their nest cavities.

There was yet another mystery to be revealed to me by my insect friends. It has turned out that flowers also use similar powerful and unstoppable wave emitter besides their color, odor and nectar in order to attract their pollinators. I have discovered it with a drawing charcoal, a burnt twig by passing it over large, bell-shaped flowers (tulips, lilies, amaryllises, mallows or pumpkins). I could feel "braking" of this detector already at quite a distance from the flower. I have learned to find a flower in a dark room standing one or two meters away from it with this detector but, only if it had not been moved. If it were moved, i would detect a "false target", the "ghost" field left in its old location, the residual "phantom" I have already mentioned. I do not possess any super sensory abilities, and any person would be able to do the same after some training. One could use a 10 cm long piece of a yellow sorghum stem instead of a charcoal rod, or a short pencil whose rear end should be facing the flower. Some people would be able to feel the flower (a "warm", "cold", or "shivering" sensation emanating from it) with their bare hands, tongues, or even faces. As many experiments demonstrated, children and adolescents are particularly sensitive to these waves of matter.

When it comes to the bees, which nest underground, their "knowledge" of the CSE is vital to them. First of all, it enables the builder of a new gallery to stay away from the neighboring nests. Otherwise, the entire bee city all cut through with intersecting holes would simply collapse. Secondly, plant roots cannot be allowed to grow down into the galleries and honeycombs and indeed the roots stop growing any further a few centimeters away from the honeycomb of tunnels and chambers and start growing aside, feeling that nests are near.

The flying platform

But I have no wings. I stand suspended in the air supported in my flight by a little flat, rectangular platform, which is slightly bigger than the seat of a chair. It has a pole with two handles onto which I hold and with whose help I navigate this device. Is this some science fiction? I wouldn't say so. The interrupted manuscript of this book had lied abandoned for two whole years because our generous, ancient nature had given me another something and again through my insect friends. As usual, it did it elegantly and inconspicuously, yet swiftly and convincingly. The thrill of discovery would not let go of me for two years, even though it seemed to me that I was mastering it at a break-neck speed. But it always happens this way. When your work is new and interesting, the time flies by at double its normal speed. The eye of the lake is already much closer. I can clearly see the highway beyond by now and the match boxes have grown wheels on them. The highway is about 8km away from the railway running parallel to it and if I look closer, I can see the power line poles on the light gray moat of the railway. It is time to turn some 20 degrees to the left. I can't be seen from the ground and not just because of the distance. I cast almost no shadow even in a very low flight. Yet, as I found out later, people sometimes see something where I am in the sky. I appear to them either as a light sphere, a disk, or something like a slanted cloud with sharp edges, which moves strangely according to them, not exactly the way a real cloud would. One person has observed a "flat, non-transparent square, about one hectare in size". Could it have been the optically enlarged little platform of my device? Most people see nothing at all though and I am quite pleased with it for the time being. I can't be too careful! Besides, I still haven't determined what my visibility or invisibility depended on. I must confess that I consciously avoid people when in flight and that I, for this very purpose, bypass all cities and towns and try to pass even the cross roads and footpaths at increased speed after making sure there is no one there.

… Real flying is not so much pleasure as it is work, sometimes very hard and dangerous at that. One has to stand, not hover, with both hands always busy. There is a borderline a few centimeters away separating "this" space from "that" on the outside. The border is invisible but quite treacherous. My contraption is still rather clumsy and resembles perhaps a hospital scale. But this is only the beginning! By the way, besides the camera, I have experiernced sometimes trouble with my watch and possibly also with the calendar. While descending onto a familiar glade, I would occasionally find it slightly "out of season", with about a two-week deviation but, I had nothing to check it against. Thus, it may be possible to fly not just in space but also, or so it seems, in time. I cannot make the latter claim with a 100% guarantee, except perhaps that in flight, particularly at its beginning, a watch runs eratically, now too slow and then too fast. But, the watch is at its accurate time and speed at the end of the excursions.

Nevertheless, this is one of the reasons why I stay away from people during my journeys. If time manipulation is involved alongside the manipulation of gravitation, I might, perhaps, accidentally disrupt cause-and-effect of relations and someone might get hurt. This is where my fears were coming from. Insects captured "there" disappear from my test tubes, boxes and other receptacles. They disappear mostly without a trace. Once I had a test tube crushed to tiny bits in my pocket, another time there was an oval hole in the tube glass with brown, as though chitin colored edges as you can see in the picture [above]. I did feel a kind of burning or an electric shock inside my pocket on many occasions, perhaps at the moment of my prisoner's disappearance. I found the captured insect in my test tube only once, but it wasn't the adult ichneumon with white rings on its feelers, but its chrysalis, i.e. its earlier stage. It was alive and it moved its belly when touched but, much to my dismay, it has died a week later.

I placed the small, concave chitin plate on the microscope stage in order to again examine its strangely star-shaped cells under strong magnification. I again admired this masterpiece jewelwork of nature. I was about to place a second identical plate with the same unusual cell structure on its underside almost purposelesly on top of the first one. But then!

You can imagine what I felt at that moment. When I came to my senses, I tied a few panels together with a wire and it wasn't an easy thing to do. I succeeded only when I positioned them vertically. What I got was a multi-layered chitin block and I placed it on the desk. Even a relatively large object, such as a thumbtack, would not fall on it. Something pushed it up and aside. When I attached the tack on top of the "block", I witnessed incredible, impossible things. The tack would dissapear from sight for a few moments. That was when I have realized that this was no "beacon," but something entirely different.

And I became again so excited that all the objects around me became foggy and shaky. I managed to pull myself together with huge effort in a couple of hours and I continued working.

This is how it all started. Of course, much still remains to be understood, verified, and tested. I will certainly tell my readers about the finer details of my machine, about its propulsion principles, about distances, heights, speeds, equipment and all the rest but, in my next book.

These quotes of Viktor Grebennikov’s writings have been included to provide the most accurate insight to his perspective. This discovery provides possibility towards efficient short distance floatation transportation.

Twist Levitation Technology

Thu, 07 Dec 2023 04:20:21 GMT

An experiment showing a new type of levitation

The Spanish news site La Vanguardia recently posted an interesting article about a new type of maglev (magnetic levitation) transportation technology. The article hosts an intriguing and curious picture from a very creative artist. There appears to be a gap between the artist’s rendering and the article’s content which focuses on the link to APS Physics (American Physical Society).

The experiment shows a new type of levitation implemented by rotating a magnet. The principle is simple. The result is interesting. By spinning one magnet horizontally, the other levitating magnet is perpendicular.

The principle is simple, and the media article is vague. The artist’s rendering is the still the most fascinating piece of the article. What technology application does the rendering represent? Or was the rendering an intuitive vision?

The picture provides exciting intrigue. Can the technology bring protentional maglev technology expansion? The bigger question to ask is: who is working towards developing a working prototype and is this a worthwhile technology to pursue? Can this type of technology be produced in a guideway in an efficient manner? The technology is intriguing.

What other types of maglev technology could the artist’s rendering be a reference to?

Maglev history

One of the best and most informingly accurate articles ever written about maglev is found in this link which explains the history of James Powell and the Danby - Powell maglev:

Maglev promised to be a much faster alternative to regular trains because there was no contact, and therefore no friction, between the carriages and the tracks. No friction also meant a far smoother ride than in conventional trains. In the first years after the paper’s publication, modest amounts of US federal funds were put into maglev research. But progress soon ground to a halt. The Gerald Ford administration of the mid-1970s decided to cut funding for high-speed initiatives and instead focus on improving America’s existing railroads and mass transit systems.

To the frustration of Powell and Danby, development of maglev in the US came to a near-standstill for more than a decade. In the late 1980s, hopes were briefly restored when the pair found a powerful ally in Senator Daniel Moynihan of New York, who, in a 1989 essay for Scientific American, predicted that “[maglev] will define the coming century much as the railroad defined the last one, and the automobile and airplane have defined this one.” Moynihan shepherded a bill through Congress authorizing $725 million for the development of a maglev prototype. But the funds were never appropriated by the relevant committee, which was chaired by Robert Carr, a representative from Michigan with links to the automobile industry. Since then, funding for a US maglev has been piecemeal, and Powell and Danby’s continuous efforts have seemed quixotic at times.

The Gerald Ford administration of the mid-1970s decided to cut funding for high-speed initiatives and instead focus on improving America’s existing railroads and mass transit systems.

Upon reading the near decade old article, its closing sentence begs for an analytical comment. Politics has a pattern: preserve the status-quo.

Political procedure

To those interested in conspiracy theories , Gerald Ford was an unelected President. Appointed to Vice President, eight months later became President. Prior to being appointed to Vice President, he’d worked closely with the FBI as a member of the very controversial Warren Commission.

Political procedure is maintained by entrenched lobbyists to enforce status-quo policy. This perpetuates oil interests and most importantly; transportation road infrastructure. There is a strong unwillingness to relinquish its position.

To validate James Powell’s frustration, the political climate is to maintain the status-quo at whatever the cost. Officials in elected offices are limited to conditions of compliance managed by lifetime non-elected employees. This is merely the process of government.

Maglev implementation

The initial article of Twist Levitation provides a glimpse of transportation technology potential. It’s also a reminder that the Danby and Powell’s maglev technology, patented in 1968, neglects being implemented in the US. Meanwhile Japan is implementing Danby and Powell’s fourth generation development technology.

Japan’s Chuo Shinkansen began design and testing in the 1970s. Work to build its system as the fastest train in the world began in 2010. Its initial system is to construct the line between Tokyo and Nagoya , with plans for extension to Osaka . The line is expected to connect Tokyo and Nagoya in 40 minutes, and eventually Tokyo and Osaka in 67 minutes, running at a maximum speed of 505 km/h (314 mph). About 90% of the 286-kilometer (178 mi) line to Nagoya will be tunnels. Due to environmental and social delays, the predicted completion date has been repeatedly postposed. The currently scheduled completion date for the Tokyo to Nagoya line is in 2030

China began building maglev transit systems in 2001 and became the world’s first commercial maglev system. It was completed in 2003 and began commercial operation in 2004. The 19-mile run from the Shanghai Airport to downtown Pudong takes eight minutes, its speed reaches 268 mph.

China is the world’s leader for technology advances in transportation. It has completed testing their sixth maglev train technology system. The significance of this test was its speed, making it the fastest train in the world at 1000 km/h (621 mph).

Transportation’s future

Science has a saying: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. What’s the reaction to confining energy? The reaction is synonymous to compressing the air and fuel mixture in a combustion engine. The longer Western civilization withholds and restricts the natural progression of transportation, the bigger the explosion will be to bypass its current methodology. This leads to the question: what’s next for transportation?

What’s next in transportation technology? At some point the dinosaurs cease to exist. Political procedure shifts towards modern convenience, pushed by social demand. At some point, civilization will embrace the race to space and new frontiers of exploration. This absolutely mandates efficient energy and the extinction of rocket technology.

Variations of maglev technology provide an excellent transition in efficient energy use from train and streetcar technology for transit-oriented land-use design. Available alternative transportation options with the ability to replace the convenience of the automobile for the automobile centric land-use design are still missing.

The spin magnet technology provides an ability for a stationary object to hold a spinning magnet. Is an inversion process possible? Could it be engineered for a spinning object to hold an object at rest? And how could the outer section be free to allow spin?

IVO Quantum Drive news article

Tue, 05 Dec 2023 21:46:05 GMT

Another news article regarding new trends in space travel technology

This is another news article relating to a previous blogpost regarding current trends exploring new technologies in space travel. One of those blogposts identified ion drive technology . It explains ion drive as an ion thruster, or ion engine, as a form of electric propulsion intended for spacecraft propulsion . That technology creates thrust as a process of electricity by accelerating ions .

This blogpost is about quantum drive. Recent media headlines used the company’s project name as an interpretation to the concept of quantum drive. The company’s technology uses a different concept than the science fiction term. Quantum drive is different than ion drive. The purpose of this blogpost article is for clarification. The theory of Quantum Drive applies an operational concept in a manner similar to the Biefeld-Brown Effect technology. The Biefeld-Brown Effect encases the vehicle in a magnetic like state which creates an attractive force on the leading edge and a propulsive force on the trailing edge. T. Townsend Brown referred to this technological process as electrogravitics.

The IVO Quantum Drive is the designated company name. The name Quantum Drive is a popular term in science fiction for Warp Drive.

The Warp Drive concept relates to a 1994 paper by Mexican theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre. The theory of Alcubierre drive theory states that if spacetime is contracted in front of a spacecraft then the trailing space behind the craft is expanded. Therefore, a wave in spacetime has been created. A spacecraft, within this bubble, can theoretically transpose this warp in spacetime to move along this wave. The Alcubierre drive transposes time in this wave shift.

The IVO Quantum Drive is very different than the concept of Alcubierre drive. The IVO Quantum Drive is an all-electric propulsion system for satellites.

Media headlines are misleading. The recent headline from The Independent, touted its Tuesday 21 November 2023 headline to read: SpaceX launches ‘zero fuel’ engine into space . Does this headline indicate that SpaceX used ‘zero fuel’ for its most recent launch? The launch of SpaceX Falcon 9 was on November 11, 2023. Incidentally, the Transporter-9 mission was a different ship than the experimental SpaceX Starship, serial #10 launched Nov 18, 2023,

One of the payloads of the Transporter-9 mission was to launch the IVO Quantum Drive satellite.

The applied theory of quantum drive was implemented into application by IVO, Ltd. From the website: universetoday ; provides a clear explanation for the IVO Quantum Drive: On June 10th, 2023, an all-electrical propulsion system for satellites (the IVO Quantum Drive ) will fly to space for the first time. The system was built by North Dakota-based wireless power company IVO, Ltd. , and will serve as a testbed for an alternative theory of inertia that could have applications for propulsion. The engine will launch atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket as part of a dedicated rideshare ( Transporter 8 ) hosted by commercial partner Rogue Space Systems . If the technology is validated, the Quantum Drive could trigger a revolution in commercial space and beyond. And if not, then we can relax knowing that the laws of physics are still the laws of physics!

Founded in 2017 by Richard Mansell , Ken Mansell, Daniel Telehey , and Matthew Silbernagel, IVO was launched to address the major issues facing technology and innovation today. To this end, IVO has focused on developing wireless energy transmission solutions using a technology known as Capacitive Based Aerial Transmission (CBAT). This flexible, scalable technology allows manufacturers to reduce their battery size by up to 50% and is on track to disrupt the green energy industry.

In 2021, IVO began to develop a new all-electrical propulsion system that leveraged an alternate theory about inertia. Known as the IVO Quantum Drive, this proposed system relies on the theory of Quantized Inertia (QI), a controversial idea that many physicists view as a fringe theory.

Popularmechanics.com, ran another Quantized Inertia (QI) article. Apparently, headlines are written by a different group of people: trained in marketing to attract readers, instead of knowledgeable scientists. ‘Defies Newton’s laws’, is a stretch but, apropos to a preconceived perception of artistic imagination based on absence of physics principles.

This proposed technology is a big step for space flight.

University of Plymouth physicist Mike McCulloch sees applications of QI theory , as an avenue to develop EmDrive .

Although this blogpost is a news article, it does relate to the current events of space travel and it does indicate the space industry’s recognition that improvements are necessary.

Operational Control

Sun, 03 Dec 2023 06:48:33 GMT

Pursuing the course of scientific exploration for transportation

Fringe science operates on the razor’s edge between credibility and incredible breakthrough. Finding answers for a brand-new mode of efficient space travel requires searching in unknown places as a focal imperative.

The logical trend of fringe technology in transportation leans heavily towards the study of efficient energy and excessive speed. The 360-degree energy release in chemical explosions account for the majority of space flight technology. With this primary source as a vehicle’s propulsion, there is phenomenally more energy waste than efficient energy use.

The first step in research is looking at history

In recent history, there are few examples of efficient energy being used in a transportation device. Three of the four example were test models, the Haunebu , Levity Disc , and the Hamel Device ; and reportedly flew without having a control mechanism. The fourth device was Otis Carr’s. It was the only one to have included an operational control mechanism on its maiden voyage.

Other than Otis Carr, little has been explored to implement neural oscillations in transportation technology. Beyond Otis Carr, one of the other sources for developing this technology towards building advanced transportation methodologies is from Viktor S. Grebennikov. His research followed an unusual path. Explaining his work, the website states: If the correct scientific research problem of the human weight anomalies in various psychophysiological states was put and the equipment of dynamic monitoring of weight was created, we have received the quite objective information on this unusual phenomenon.

Psychokinesis

The operational controls of Otis Carr’s ship used a control mechanism that enabled a process which is seen as having been developed with a heavy influence from Nikola Tesla. Telsa’s process of wifi technology is an enablement of electromagnetics to effect electronics switching.

Psychokinesis is a process that enables neural oscillation to interact with an electromagnetic or electrogravitics response.

Angstroms

Angstroms are a measurement that allows a detection analysis of planetary composition, primarily used in astrophysics. This detection process is used to measure a wave signal pattern of specific elements. An interaction between psychophysiological patterns (neural oscillations) interacting with angstrom patterns of elements, is an ongoing occurrence. This provides context for further study.

Matching wave patterns

Colored light travels at different speeds. When this light travels at different speed, it creates a different wavelength, or angstrom value.

Viktor Grebennikov

From the earlier link : But very few people are familiar with his other discovery, the one that also borrows from Nature and its innermost secrets. He has discovered antigravitational effects of the chitin shell of certain insects back in 1988 but, the most impressive concomitant phenomenon he has discovered at the same time was that of complete or partial invisibility and/or of distorted perception of material objects entering the zone of compensated gravity.

(From Mirriam-Webster.com ; Chitin - a horny polysaccharide (C ₈ H ₁₃ NO ₅ ) _n that forms part of the hard outer integument especially of insects, arachnids, and crustaceans)

Bio-gravitational effects are a wide spectrum of natural phenomena, apparently not confined to just a few species of insects. There is much empirical data to support the possibility of a lowered weight or complete levitation of material objects as a result of directed psycho-physical human action (psychokinesis) e. g. levitation of yogi practicing transcendental meditation according to the Maharishi method. There are known cases of mediums levitating during spiritistic sessions. However, it would be a mistake to think that such abilities are only found in people who are gifted by nature. I am convinced that these abilities are an understudied biological regularity. As is known, human weight significantly drops in the state of somnambulistic automatism (sleepwalking). Average 80-90 kg sleepwalkers are able to tread on thin planks, or step on people sleeping next to them without causing the latter any physical discomfort other than fright during their nocturnal journeys. Some clinical cases of non-spasmodic epileptic fits often result in a short-term reversible transformation of personality (people in such state are commonly referred to as "possessed"), whereby a skinny, exhausted girl or a ten year old boy may acquire the physical prowess of a trained athlete. This psychological phenomenon is currently known as the multiple personality syndrome, because it significantly differs from the classical complex of epileptic symptoms. Such clinical cases are well known and well documented. However, phenomena accompanied by a change in the weight of humans or of material objects are not confined to functional pathologies of the organism. Healthy people in the state of acute psychological stress caused by a life threatening situation or an overpowering motivation to achieve a vitally important goal have the ability to spontaneously overcome obstacles insurmountable in their normal condition. People in such situations are able to lift enormous weights etc. These phenomena are commonly explained by an extreme mobilization of muscular strength, but precise calculations do not agree with such hypotheses. Apparently, athletes (high jumpers, weightlifters, runners) have particularly developed bio-antigravitational mechanisms.

This psychokinetic aspect, having an impact to gravity, gives remarkable continuity to explaining why Peter was able to walk on water . Adding the component of Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) brings incredible possibility for insight to a new mode of short distance transportation.

With the advent of pursuing operational control to space flight operational control brings light to finding ground level floatation for transportation’s future.

Inertia and Neural Control

Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:11:33 GMT

Two components are required for advanced transportation

With speeds beyond the limitation of aeronautics, the effects of centrifugal force in Earth’s gravity are devastating. Precautions against massive g-forces are resolved within an independent inertia field. The independent inertia fields, however, are theoretical.

Inertia

The law of inertia states:

Objects at rest tend to stay at rest
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion at the same speed and direction
Objects may change their motion only if influenced by an unbalanced force

Inertia of a moving car applies not only to the vehicle, but to everything inside it. Through the process of propulsion, inertia allows a car to move until some other force (e.g., the brakes, road conditions, an obstruction) slows or stops it. When a car is traveling at 60 mph and impacts a stationary object; the car has stopped but the contents freely moving inside continue moving at 60 mph because of inertia.

A previous blogpost asked an important question. How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? The answer goes to explain the design of Otis Carr’s ship. It’s theoretically possible for Otis Carr’s ship to have maintained an independent inertia field within the ship’s control section. The two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. Theoretically, this gives the ship an independent inertia field ability to travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

Another example of a craft with an independent inertia field is in Ezekiel’s vision . Ezekiel Chapter 10 explains the craft in vague detail, interpreted from known technology 2,500 years ago. Here are verses 9 through 13: ( 9 )Then I looked and saw four wheels beside the cherubim, one wheel beside each cherub. And the wheels gleamed like a beryl stone. ( 10 )As for their appearance, all four had the same form, like a wheel within a wheel. ( 11 )When they moved, they would go in any of the four directions, without turning as they moved. For wherever the head faced, the cherubim would go in that direction, without turning as they moved.

( 12 )Their entire bodies, including their backs, hands, and wings, were full of eyes all around, as were their four wheels. ( 13 )I heard the wheels being called “the whirling wheels.”

Using the perspective of these wheels being vehicles, it validates a craft having the ability of levitation and independent inertia. This also gives merit to the consistency of wheel within a wheel and spin as a necessary component to this new transportation technology.

The concept proposed by David Hamel is also interesting. There are many pieces, how it all fits together and becomes operational functioning, remains as the missing component. His technology is comprised with three layers of spinning components.

The other two: Viktor Schauberger and John Searl are also simplistic in design. As with John Searl’s levitation disc, it is intensely precise and complex apparatus with a simplistic technological functioning design.

Again, the consistency in all these devices have the similarity of spin, magnets, and the whirling of wheels within wheels. This is the environment for an independent inertia field.

There’s more information in another CATTCC blogpost in the section about inertia.

Neural control

The only Neural controls spoken of as a practical function for operational control of a ship are found in Otis Carr’s ship. This technological context is consistent with Nikola Tesla’s influence.

Another section from the earlier blogpost link is an excerpt from Otis T. Carr’s ‘Inner Dimensions of Mystery’ :

Knowing that the human heart brain tissue sends more signals to the brain than the actual brain in your head sends to your heart, all we have to do to control this craft is send the control signal of pure love from the heart to flood the brain so that we can consciously project through the pineal gland and the destination. Mr. Carr built this as an inter-dimensional teleportation craft, this concept voids time and shows it for the man-made conception it is. Both the heart and the pineal gland hold the very magnetic fields in place needed to interact with the energy of the craft.

Being a true disciple of the Great Master Adept of the Art, Nikola, Mr. Carr had the most beautiful of mentors.

To those without the esoteric understanding, the paragraph explicitly refers to the operational controls of Otis Carr’s ship. His claim is that the operational control of the craft is controlled by the message of the heart, interpreted by the magnetic fields held within the pineal gland. This is a waveform, generated by concentration. This interacts with the craft’s energy for its directional operation. This indicates the isolation of frequency tone that can be interpreted. The intent is for this frequency to be used as an operational control. It has to be transmitted and received; to correspond as a signal switch.

How did Otis Carr use neural control for his ship’s operational controls?

As if space flight, simply by magnet spin and nature's centripetal pattern entering it into an independent inertia field isn’t revolutionary enough, the ship apparently used neural operational controls. This isn’t even advanced enough to be a controversial area of physics. This exploration of technology doesn’t even exist in Neurophysics .

The ship’s diagrams are available online, as a crafter’s model. But there's no written account of the actual spacecraft or an original description of how it works. When we look into the crafter’s model, it depicts a single spin section. Additionally, there are no control mechanisms, no diagrams, no descriptions.

Otis Carr describes the device with three-sections. Its upper and lower outer shells spin in the opposite direction of each other. The third section is held inside the two outer spinning shells in a neutral position. The theoretical concept is that these rotating spheres generate an independent inertia field. How is it controlled?

Nikola Tesla was deep into psychic phenomena. This would have involved the psychic attributes of oscillation in crystal structures, including solid crystal spheres.

Keep in mind that Nikola Tesla’s discoveries of invention include the fundamentals of modern wifi technology. Providing Otis Carr did indeed have a protégé relationship with Nikola Tesla, Tesla’s experimentations of neural oscillations utilizing a crystal ball would be apropos for a control switch.

Nikola Tesla experimented with wave control and found that sonic vibration resulted in atomic-level disruption. Tesla’s experimentation to build an AC generator resulted in subatomic disruption to the point of lateral matter transfer, i.e., a minor localized earthquake. This leads to the conclusion that there can be a manipulation of kinetic energy generated by frequency wave motion. This, however, does not correlate as to placing matter in movement to its desired placement. It might, however, accomplish the task of a simple switch.

The operational control of a neural switch is hypothetically possible. The direction Otis Carr pursued for neural control was transmitted by brain wave frequency, measured by the frequency of hue.

Operational controls from the interior of Otis Carr’s ship are isolated within a strong magnetic field. Electromagnetic signals are likely restricted from free travel beyond that electromagnetic field. Additionally, a wire carrying a signal would be impossible to traverse through the spinning devices.

How can a control signal transpose those two restrictions?

Thought waves are neural oscillations

What effect can thoughts generate within an independent inertia field in motion? Can these thought waves be mechanically or electronically received by an electronic or operational device to guide kinetic force and control an inertia field to a specific target? This is one of the marvels that Otis Carr resolved in the late 1950s which remains veiled.

Vehicle Technology

Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:26:07 GMT

To define a gravitational vehicle design, it has to have a proposed technology

To the question; how can gravity be used for transportation? One possibility is by creating a defined gravity field that causes wave action, then surfing that wave. This, however, requires creating the technology and designing a gravity generator based on that unknown technology.

Gravity and the manipulation of gravity waves

Establishing the technology of creating a gravity wave generator begins with defining gravity. There are several blogposts that explain a new theory of what gravity is. The postulation that gravity is angular momentum of particle mass along its path at light speed, provides the basis for a gravity generator. The other necessary piece is the measurement of time .

Other examples

From the website 1Library.net is a synopsis of the book: ‘Brighter Than A Thousand Suns’ which provides the following:

Another highly-advanced group was led by Dr. Viktor Schauberger, who worked in Austria at the Kertl factory in Vienna. Schauberger's incredible craft allegedly utilized a tornado-like vortex which produced magnetic effects said to cause levitation. Two Schauberger models, both made of copper, were said to have been built with one of them successfully test flown. The story goes that it flew so well, in fact, that it impacted the inside roof of the hangar and was destroyed.

The SS which was apparently overseeing this and all German saucer research, allegedly stopped further experimentation after accident, dismissed Schauberger, and took all of his work and wizardry to some other location for further development. After the war, Schauberger was lured to the US by an alleged CIA front company and was then duped into signing a contract in English (he knew only German) giving the company all rights and title to his inventions, concepts, and designs. He was then returned to Austria...and died five days later

From an article in journalnews.com about John Searl:

Searl has since claimed that he and his colleagues subsequently built over 50 versions of his “levity disc,” of various sizes, and learned how to control them. He claims that persecution by the authorities resulted in wrongful imprisonment and the destruction of most of his work, so he had to start all over again. He states that in the early 1970s, one of his craft flew around the world several times without being detected.

Unfortunately, due to a lack of any scientific and physical evidence, his invention is considered vague by many people. Besides, the existence of perpetual motion machines is in principle ruled out by the first law of thermodynamics.

More information about John Searl’s Searl Effect Generator is found in medium.com .

From rimstar.org is an article about David Hamel:

Photo of David Hamel's original spaceship. This is the one that actually flew. Unfortunately, its takeoff was unexpected and it flew off, never to be seen again. It was a first stage only.

Floating and levitation

Floating necessitates a balance of weight within a particular environment. A helium filled balloon will float in the lower atmosphere due to heavier atomic weights of atmospheric gases. Discovering a methodology of floatation as our intent, is to effect matter at the subatomic level.

A reference to the term anti-gravity is an inaccurate term. It might be more appropriately referred to as interdimensional, inasmuch as the manipulation of gravity has to be at the subatomic level.

Gravity

Both floatation and levitation are influenced by gravity. What is gravity ? The simple quick answer is: it’s the greatest and most abundant force in the universe. A deeper explanation to the question necessitates an expanded foundation to the answer.

In building upon the foundation for an answer, it’s necessary to consider Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Gravity, along will all matter, relates to light speed. As such, it has to be applied to Einstein’s theory of relativity. The context of mass times the speed of light, states that: fundamental to our existence is the realization of us traveling through the universe at the speed of light. Einstein's statement clearly says that energy is what squares light speed in relation to mass.

How can this be simplified into an easily perceived understanding? Emotions direct thought. Often, misconceptions are prevalent and accepted as fact. Look at the correlation to understanding of how people perceive relativity according to our eyesight. Simply put, all images we see are inverted to the retina. The reality is: everything we see is upside down from how we observe them. Our feet cling to the ground and our bodies stretch outward; away from the planet surface.

Again, in asking the question about what gravity is, the answer has to ask another question: is gravity a product of mass or is it a process of subatomic matter?

Finding this answer took many years prior to CATTCC’s transportation research. This search into theoretical particle physics brought a theory as to the path of particle mass. It postulates: the path of particle mass has a specific pattern. From this theory came the discovery of gravitational action which coincides with Einstein’s theory that our galaxy is traveling through the universe at the speed of light.

This new theory for gravity postulates: gravity is angular momentum in the path of particle motion in accordance with Einstein's theory of relativity. His explanation of relativity being energy equal to mass times the speed of light squared shows perception of relativity: mass is traveling at the speed of light.

How is an understanding of gravity relevant to transportation and a design proposal to a new type of vehicle technology? It has to do with the manipulation of gravity. By understanding what gravity is; it provides greater knowledge towards being able to manipulate its motion.

The first step is perspective. It has to be recognized that all matter is traveling as a wave pattern. Our eyes are unable to view all aspects of things.

As 2 Corinthians 4: 18 states: We are not looking at the things being seen, but the things not being seen. For the things being seen are temporary, but the things not being seen are eternal. From a scientific perspective, this verse clearly states that the eyes are unable to view time as a whole. Only fragments at a very limited angle. So, 16 billion eyes from 8 billion people are viewing different perspectives at the same time. All unable to perceive the flow of the galaxy’s traveling at light speed. The only point being; gravity is unseen. It is a subatomic motion, rather than a process of mass.

Conclusion

In relating all this to designing an efficient vehicle technology capable of space flight, the quest is ongoing. Viktor Schauberger, Otis Carr, John Searl, and David Hamel provided examples. The basis of vehicle design is based on the manipulation of wave flow in gravity motion.

Validating the Purpose

future.transit@gmail.com — Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:26:50 GMT

There are many aspects to developing a brand-new form of transportation.

In affirming with a self-analysis survey: who is the audience to these blogposts? Is this audience intentional to discover new methodologies for transportation? Or by happenstance? Is the content enough to stimulate curiosity?

A writer is supposed to know their audience and write to them. However, this site is about research. Most of the writing is from inspired messages. Inspiration is in the hands of an artist, as an interpretation.

Who’s to say what type of audience is interested in working towards a sustainable future? There are no guidelines but, it affects everyone.

The intent of CATTCC is to help in developing a product as a result from the inspired messages. Does a writer build things? Builders can write. Does an audience participate?

So, to this self-analysis survey; most of the blogposts are merely compiling thoughts in the research process. It should be either interesting or entertaining for an audience. The level of scientific intrigue is a bit beyond normal conversation. It’s in the definition of inspiration.

Innovation applies inspiration. In today’s transportation unsustainability tragedy, implementation of inspiration is imminent.

What does this audience gain from reading? Relevance. It can be emotional or scientific. Otherwise, it is wasted effort for the writer and the audience. There is an objective to CATTCC and these blogposts.

Validating the purpose

In recognizing the purpose of these blogpost writings, they solve a problem. Combustion energy is massively inefficient. Arriving after a problem, are solutions.

In determining possible solutions, the CATTCC team recognizes and studies the scientific and deeply wise thoughts of philosophic geniuses throughout history.

At the top of the list of profound scientific statement in all of history relating to transportation is: “Comprehend and copy nature.”

Among the other favorite quotes from Viktor Schauberger :

“I think it would have been much better if Newton had contemplated how the apple got up there in the first place!”

“In every case do the opposite to whatever technology does today. Then you will always be on the right track.”

“Implosion is no invention in the conventional sense, but rather the renaissance of ancient knowledge, lost over the course of time.”

“You must look at the processes of motion in the macrocosmos and microcosmos accurately, and copy them!”

“If I am a fool then it is no misfortune, for then only one more fool will wander this Earth. Amongst the millions of mentally deranged it would barely be noticed. But what if I am not a fool, and that science itself has erred? Then the tragedy is incalculable!”

To the product

The examples show three primary similarities. Wheel within a wheel, spin, and magnetics are the fundamental components for building a device. Spin motion is centripetal. Magnetic fields are toroidal.

In the illustration of Ezekiel’s vision, what was the configuration of a wheel within a wheel? It can be surmised that a magnet placement in one of the wheels, created a toroidal field that effected the opposing wheel.

Similar action is sited in the craft technology from Viktor Schauberger, Otis Carr, John Searl, and David Hamel. Interestingly, the only technology seeking a different function is to create a gravity field generator.

Research is the process of discovering answers.

The commonality with all five examples is that each one, theoretically, produces an independent inertia field. Identifying a vehicle’s independent inertia field is an important component to vehicle design.

Inertia

Explaining inertia is best found in fs.blog describing inertia:

The German astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) coined the word “inertia.” The etymology (linguistic history) of the term is telling. Kepler obtained it from the Latin for “unskillfulness, ignorance; inactivity or idleness.” True to its origin, inertia keeps us in bed on a lazy Sunday morning (we need to apply activation energy to overcome this state).

Inertia refers to resistance to change — in particular, resistance to changes in motion. Inertia may manifest in physical objects or in the minds of people.

How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? As described in the design of Otis Carr’s ship, the two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. This involves inertia. Since inertia can be loosely described as the active force of momentum, the interaction with opposing rotational actions of Otis Carr’s two outer spheres is equalized. The result effectively cancels their spin inertia to the interior sphere. The importance is that the ship, theoretically, can travel withing Earth’s gravitational field and the ship’s passengers are only subject to a neutral field. Hypothetically, the vehicle can travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

Control

With any vehicle, control is essential. The illustrations described with Viktor Schauberger, John Searl, and David Hamel’s crafts, their experiments engaged spin rose into the air, and disappeared. They had no control mechanism.

The control mechanism in Otis Carr’s craft is still an unknown technology that has distinct similarities to Nikola Tesla designs.

In examining the details of Otis Carr’s history, he repeatedly had references to William Russell’s book: ‘Universal Law, Natural Science and Philosophy’. Carr often claimed that it’s necessary to go beyond three-dimensional thinking. There is an esoteric meaning when Mr. Carr says to use fifth dimensional understanding to perceive what the book is referencing. This is a seemingly impossible task.

Otis T. Carr’s ‘Inner Dimensions of Mystery’. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/64641928/otc-x1-manuscript ,

One of the extreme points of interest in his book is this:

Simply put, as the natural flow of life is that our heart and this planet are aligned can and do have a huge influence over one another, Mr. Carr built a scale working replica of this very planet. Knowing that the human heart brain tissue sends more signals to the brain than the actual brain in your head sends to your heart, all we have to do to control this craft is send the control signal of pure love from the heart to flood the brain so that we can consciously project through the pineal gland and the destination. Mr. Carr built this as an inter-dimensional teleportation craft, this concept voids time and shows it for the man-made conception it is. Both the heart and the pineal gland hold the very magnetic fields in place needed to interact with the energy of the craft.

Being a true disciple of the Great Master Adept of the Art, Nikola, Mr. Carr had the most beautiful of mentors.

This opens the door to a new realm of technology. Neural oscillation signaling.

Futility of Sustainability

Sat, 18 Nov 2023 21:18:01 GMT

Let's question the title of why there's futility found in sustainability

What are the fences that block natures sustainability?

The dictionary describes interest as a feeling that accompanies or causes special attention to something or someone. People are drawn by emotion and are attracted to things they like. Okay, very understandable.

What’s the attraction for sustainability? State governments have caused disservice towards sustainability; it banned plastic grocery bags and plastic straws. And yet, the banned plastic grocery bags are filled with food goods wrapped in plastic containers. Businesses are forced to ban plastic straws but, the drinks are served in plastic cups. People can’t take such blatant fraud seriously. This causes people to interpret sustainability as another political lie.

Interest is a feeling. Sustainability has become an emotionally soured controversial word. Why bother with it? It isn’t fun to talk about. Lots of people feel the world is going to end and Jesus Christ is going to return soon anyway, what’s the point of getting involved?

And yet, here we are. There are a bunch of reasons why it seems like a waste of time to be concerned about sustainability. What about sustainable urban growth? Directly or indirectly, everyone participates in urban growth because of the community where they live. Urban growth is a complex and overwhelming topic but, also relevant. Can people be involved in things they have little control about? How much does urban growth matter? Is Earth headed full speed into obliteration as politicians and the media scream?

When termites begin chewing on the foundation of a house, its foundation becomes unsustainable. Can anything be done about it?

There’s an approach science uses in the statement: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. People are filled with emotion. From the aspect that feelings draw interest, what can people find of interest to sustainability? Some people over-react into hysterical emotional panic. Others ignore it.

It’s important to point out that plastic bags have little, if any, effect to sustainability. The emotional charge of protecting Earth from devastation by using a paper bag to carry groceries, is at most a sad commentary of political rhetoric.

Finding solutions

In terms of sustainability, everyone uses transportation. Poor third world societies walk. Large cities use public transit. Western Society drives automobiles.

Adding value to being sustainable was pointed out in 1987 by the UN’s Brundtland Report . This report established the definition of sustainability. It explains it as having environmental, economic, and social effects. There is no mention of plastic grocery bags or banning straws.

How can people be participatory in adding value to their lives with sustainable living? In an honest approach: it has more to do with individuality than most people assume. Common sense plays a huge role. It means being healthy. Eat good food, drink untreated water, and get exercise. Grow a garden and talk to people with a cognizance of nature’s spirit. Simplicity reduces stress and improves life quality.

Again, is the question; what’s the futility in relation to sustainability? It’s looking out the restaurant window to a busy street. Western Society is built upon the automobile centric land-use design . With all urban growth based upon the automobile, it renders Western Society unsustainable.

The design of urban growth is dependent upon its primary source of transportation. The automobile is unsustainable. A legislative push about plastic grocery bags is symptomatic of complete incoherence. Since transportation is the foundation to all urban growth, the basis of Western Society is unsustainability. It means that environmentally, economically, and socially; Western society is due for some changes.

Environmentally, the depletion of oil deposits is part of a larger concern. Actions from catatonic minded rioting protesters; lack understanding to the basis of urban growth. Legislative leaders have a totally different motivation. Oil is a hydrocarbon: produced by Earth’s constant motion of the undulating land tide from the ocean waves as the reaction from the Sun and Moon’s motion.

Sustainable transportation is the mission of CATTCC. Discovering new frontiers in theoretical physics is fun for some people. Figuring out how to apply Einstein’s Theory of Relativity is exciting. Finding an explanation of what gravity is , provides insight in how to apply its function to build a transportation vehicle. This endeavor has value towards sustainability.

Viktor Schauberger phrased it best: “comprehend and copy nature”. All modern transportation uses propulsion. Nature moves with centripetal motion. Propulsion of modern transportation relies on the use of centrifugal force. The outward motion of chemical explosions is destructive. One of the first steps towards sustainability is with the use of efficient energy for transportation.

As found on the CATTCC information page , the new paradigm in technology is transportation.

Proposing gravity as a source of motion for transportation becomes viable with a new perspective that explains what gravity is. With society demanding that methodologies of transportation improve, it provides the motivation to find these new methodologies. It opens the door as the next step for intellectual evolution of technology to transportation.

Current modes of transportation have caused a mess. The entirety of Western Civilization revolves around the automobile. Although Western Society began its growth with train technology, and its pattern of real estate development was transit oriented, it has evolved into an automobile centric pattern of growth. As Western Society replaced its source of transportation from trains and streetcars to the automobile, it became dependent upon the proliferation of unsustainability. The automobile is wholly unsustainable; economically, environmentally, and socially. Building an entire society upon this unsustainable foundation becomes problematic.

As to the futility with unsustainability, it’s imperative to discover and build a sustainable methodology of transportation. Developing a methodology of transportation utilizing a new perspective of gravity as the source of movement, provides a valid solution.

Please, support the efforts of CATTCC .

The Vehicle

Wed, 15 Nov 2023 23:43:43 GMT

There are several applications in building sustainable transportation

Thus far, there are several pieces in building a sustainable transportation vehicle that seem to set the parameters. Next is establishing technology, vehicle design, and operation. The technology is multifaceted. The considerations and components are: gravity, centripetal force, spin, momentum, magnetism, possibly high voltage electricity with the Biefeld-Brown Effect, toroidal fields, multi-point Mobius, oscillating variables, in addition to a few other things still being researched.

According to Ezekiel, the vehicle to be built was described 2500 years ago. A wheel within a wheel. It uses spin. It’s able to go in any direction without turning. So, a wheel within a wheel is a valid direction to pursue. It’s assumed that the point of action is spin. The other assumption is that it operates with a reciprocal oscillation to each other’s toroidal field. A reciprocating oscillation action (interpreted as eyes in the wheels) would be with each ‘spoke’ of a wheel projecting a positive or negative field with the reciprocating action being the opposite field reaction in the opposite wheel.

The other curious aspect of difference between the craft in Ezekiel’s vision and what today’s society assumes how a ‘flying saucer” is suppose to fly; is its position. Today’s version is a relatively flat vehicle in a horizonal position. What Ezekiel’s vision revealed is vertical. In the true aspect of gravity, a vertical position would have more of a gravitational impact. Momentum of spin would have a greater impact of gravitational pull in a vertical position, to Earth’s attractive force.

What might appear in these blogposts as constant criticism of rocket technology is meant to point out that chemical explosions are a very inefficient source of energy to be used for rocket technology. Rockets are propelled vertically for a very good reason. The reason is gravity. Airplanes use aerodynamics of lift to fly in the gases of atmosphere.

Weight is irrelevant

Weight is a vital component to the aerodynamics of airplane and rocket flight. Weight is irrelevant in a field where gravity is absent.

The purpose of a rocket’s vertical ascending direction is essential to counteract gravitational pull.

Other considerations are the four examples of vehicles that are said to have actually taken flight. Otis Carr’s vehicle is said to have transposed into different dimension. The other three are said to have spun off during testing, to disappear from sight. Those are Viktor Schauberger’s Repulsator , John Searl’s Levity Disc , and the first stage of David Hamel’s craft . The commonality to all these were an engineering configuration of wheels within wheels, magnets and spin. The successful achievement of flight was the manipulation of gravity in a manner that provided floatation. In all cases, circumstances prevented replication.

What was it that worked to launch these vehicles into flight? Again, it was their commonalities of a wheel within a wheel, magnets and spin. Evidently, the engineering aspect of operational control is secondary to launch capability. And, of course, operational control is imperative.

The timestamp could be a beneficial component of measurement, for operational control.

Another consideration is the material used. It seems an important aspect is electrogravitics. Since it is considered a nonexistent field of science, this entire essay may be irrelevant to the opinion of scientific academia. Nonetheless, it is extremely relevant to discover a source of efficient transportation that is sustainable. Both electromagnetism and electrogravitics are descriptions of subatomic motion. They both describe electron action. And, electrons are reactionary to the nucleus movement. Magnetism involves ferrous elements. Electrogravitics is seen in nonferrous elements.

This brings a huge consideration to building any vehicle type device. Granite or marble, or silicone component is vital as electrogravitic in their molecular configuration.

It is, then, important to have ferrous components, and nonferrous components.

One clarification of distinction in using the term of building a gravity generator is to create a gravitational field that is void of gravity. This clarification is to agree with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity that the Milky Way Galaxy is traveling at light speed; providing the explanation of gravity to be angular motion in the path of particle movement. It is surmised that such a field can be manipulated by configuring a device to produce a toroidal field that creates a gravitational void.

To create a field void of gravity requires some sort of gravity field generator. Since gravity is found in the path of subatomic particle motion, a gravity field is a subatomic motion. The postulation of gravity as a particle’s angular momentum suggests that gravity does not produce a gravitational field. How does the functionality of gravity waves effect the concept of gravity? From the aspect of physics: all things in nature flow in synchronous motion. Gravity is a motion; all motion has frequency as its pattern. This indicates that a gravity wave is the synchronous action of mass in motion.

What action can cause a field to be void of gravity?

Electromagnetism is a process associated with magnetic action in ferrous elements. What are the similarities of electromagnetism and electrogravitics? Since magnets involve the molecular combination of electron structure of outer shell electrons, then conversely; electrogravitics and gravitational influence should allow a manipulation to molecular structure of non-ferrous solids. Potentially; molecular combinations of metalloids such as silicone and germanium should be appropriate for structural compliance to generate a gravity field. Is there potential for granite, marble and other rock of non-ferrous elements suitable?

Gravity waves

There is an ongoing deep-space search for the existence of gravity waves. The goal of the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA) is to detect and characterize the low-frequency gravitational wave s through timing a global array of approximately 100 millisecond pulsars using the largest radio telescopes in the world. Their work is measuring the discovery that these gravitational waves cause changes in the travel times of pulses between pulsars and the Earth, detectable as perturbations in pulsar time-of-arrival measurements.

Gravity

A point of importance in addressing the creation of being able to manipulate gravity waves is holding a clear understanding of exactly what gravity is. Issac Newton wrote the gravitational laws, which is the application of gravity. These laws were established 400 years ago. Referring to what gravity is, however, has little, if any, interpretation of its action. The is similar to noticeable changes to a person’s actions on the ground in relation to those actions being different while riding on a train.

Creating a gravitational field that produces an absence of gravity, removes the nature of its centrifugal force. Doing so removes heat buildup within that field.

In comparing electricity to gravity in context of a gravity generator, what is the source of electricity?

Energy is the force that is applied for squaring that mass times the speed of light. Would it, then, be possible to find the reverse quotient?

The source that compiles electricity is tantamount to the same source that provides gravitational movement: the speed at relativity.

From behind the CATTCC paywall: https://www.cattcc.org/physics

At the atomic and subatomic levels, particles have movement. These minute particles are not stationary. This movement of particles relates to the presence of mass traveling at light speed. Gravity follows the unified path of particle movement. Gravity is the twist in the path of angular momentum, a harmonic motion. Building a gravity engine relies on surfing of that movement. Since particles are extremely tiny, a gravity engine must be built upon the resonance of gravitational wave motion to initiate movement of an engine. In knowing this path and manipulating its path, like surfing, utilizing the motion of angular momentum has potential.

Here is part of this newly proposed theory on particle movement. There is a path to all matter. The path is analogous to a ribbon in an elliptical Mobius strip with twists in the ribbon. But, this elliptical ribbon with its defined twists is stretched out to a linear path in sync traveling with the speed of light. The angular momentum of the twists at that speed; is gravity.

The point of this conversation is to design and build a new mode of transportation. The significance of knowing this pattern of gravity is in manipulating the wave pattern for traveling along that frequency; surfing gravity waves.

What does the vehicle design look like? It's still in process of design development. Fundamentally, its design was explained 2,500 years ago.