As technology increases, so does societal demand for new transportation

Where can society grow without new transportation? Where can new transportation alternatives take society?

There are two directions current society can take

The future as seen by generations past, sought a very bright future drawn with vivid colors; flying vehicles, exploring space and inhabiting other planets. The colonizing of other planets was with a spirit of adventure and exploration. The future in transportation was an optimistic and exciting goal to attain. 

The other direction for a future is with a negative option. This negative option is Hollywood’s current cultural portrayal of the future. It pictures a dystopian police state that controls everyone’s movement. This is a bleak look at a dark and evil place. The self-elevation in today’s culture is a moral deprivation that stimulates the disease of narcissism. The ‘me first’ attitude is a direct conflict to America’s Christian foundation which brought America to help others. Oddly enough, this also maintains transportation’s status-quo.

Transportation is not concerned with theological or philosophical rants. Transportation’s only concern is providing mobility. What methodology can provide a sustainable new mode of transportation? 

Necessity for sustainable transportation

Building a transportation product. When building a product that has never been built, what’s the process? Well, let’s see… there’s: what is it, what does it look like, how does it work, and what does it do? Ok, let’s make it a bit more complex; it does whatever it does using a new theory for gravity that’s also brand new. That’s at least a starting place.

So, the device floats. It’s absent of moving parts and moves without friction.

In the study to discover what the device is, where can we look to find new innovations for transportation? The search finds yesterday’s science. There are a few articles about secret Nazi developments that disappeared during the close of WWII. The most significant name is Viktor Schauberger.

There are varied opinions and speculations about Viktor Schauberger’s work. Some speculation is that the tornado-like vortex produced magnetic effects said to cause levitation. This seems there were two different technologies; 'Repulsator' and the other a 'Repulsine', reflecting their forces of recoil. It’s notable to point out that both models were made of copper. There are a few diagrams to be found of the Repulsine models A and B, however, the Repulsator seems to be the test model that uncontrollably crashed into the ceiling and ripped itself apart. This test model has no known design specs.

As innovation is built by experimentation, here is a question. Since magnets are molecular combinations of electron structure, what would the result be in using neodymium as a metal component, or as a polymer to such a structure? Would a spinning magnetic field produce a charge and to what effect?

In searching for innovative scientific achievement, we find it in the past. These great observational geniuses: Nikola Tesla and Viktor Schauberger are pillars of this science. Both were drawn to the same conclusion: to use nature. Their achievements were foundational for our modern look at transportation.

The most relevant piece to extract from all the Nazi “secrets” is this: “At the same time the scientist VIKTOR SCHAUBERGER worked on a similar project. Johannes Kepler whose ideas Schauberger followed had knowledge of the secret teachings of Pythagoras that had been adopted and kept secret by the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. It was the knowledge of IMPLOSION (in this case the utilization of the potential of the inner worlds in the outer world). Hitler knew - as did the Thule and Vril people - that the divine principle was always constructive. A technology however that is based on explosion and therefore is destructive runs against the divine principle. Thus they wanted to create a technology based on IMPLOSION. Schauberger's theory of oscillation (principle of the overtone sequence, monochord) takes up the knowledge of Implosion. To put it simply: IMPLOSION instead of EXPLOSION! Following the energy paths of the monochord and the implosion technology one reaches the realm of antimatter and thus the cancellation of gravity.” 

What have we learned so far? The importance of centripetal motion.

The intent of research in many cases is to look for a specific thing; to validate a perspective. Aeronautic design engineers are trained in air flow dynamics, lift percentages, fuel consumption to load rates, chart schematics of metal fatigue from thermodynamic stress, drafting and the types of other scientific attributes associated with flying an airplane. The concepts of theoretical physics design relating to gravity, electrogravitics and inertia fields is a different field of science. Astrophysics is a closer field of science to gravity and inertia fields than aeronautics.

The work performed from postwar research in the US has produced an outpouring of centrifugal based energy reaction for all Western Society modes of transportation.

“Comprehend and copy nature” is the measuring tool for applying new design concepts for innovative transportation alternatives. By setting this perspective as parameters for design ideas, new levels for results will follow. 

What direction does the Viktor Schauberger philosophy of science take us? 

While combining the scientific philosophies of Tesla and Schauberger, let’s look again at Otis Carr’s craft. When studying Otis Carr’s craft, or for that matter the circular spin motion for most electric generating devices, there is no emphasis whether the spin design is centripetal or centrifugal motion. The general characteristic for mechanical design is centrifugal in its outer push, like the Rotor “puke machine” ride at the county fairs. A centripetal spin would require an intentional impeller design, considered an unnecessary component to an electric motor whose design application is spin rotation of a magnetic field. 

What difference would a centripetal design make to Otis Carr’s design? According to Schauberger, a lower thermodynamic stress level. The faster the spin, the lower the temperature. 

Prior to focusing on Otis Carr’s craft, let’s visit John Searl and his technology. As with Otis Carr’s craft, the saucer-shaped, outer spheres oppose each other. The sphere in the center of the vehicle houses the operational controls. Upon paying attention to the wisdom of Viktor Schauberger, design of the outer sphere is critical. Any craft launched will be initiated to Earth’s planetary surface. Water is a major component to Earth’s surface and its atmosphere. The outer shell of a vehicle design is dependent upon its relationship with the atmosphere. 

It's important to notice that the claims from John Searl and his Levity Discs show consistency to the necessary role of centripetal motion for a high-speed travel apparatus. 

Using this perspective, what can be seen with Otis Carr’s craft, or this type of transportation apparatus? Scales on the outer shell are a necessary component to manipulate a predictable frequency range and a centripetal motion for low-speed atmospheric movement of the apparatus.   

Would this provide the ability for gravitational wave pulse manipulation? To merely capture gravitational pulses is a matter of tuning into the proper frequency of a large celestial body. And again, knowing the path of particle movement provides a different perspective to find the way to manipulate gravity for transportation. 

Instead of merely speculating possibilities with ideas for low-speed surface transportation vehicles, let’s look at what it would take to replace the horribly fuel wasting rocket technology. Otis Carr built an amazing device. It was a technology initiated by Nikola Tesla and inspired by Albert Einstein. 

Physics for sustainable transportation is not practiced in today’s transportation

Today's transportation utilizes chemical explosions as its source of propulsion. Explosions are centrifugal force, which is a destructive force. 



CATTCC’s perception is that the future of transportation floats. What floats? Levitation. Magnets. The process of magnetic motion can be explained as molecular combinations of electron structure, or phrased another way; it is the orbits of electrons in selected elements, as they are structured to interact with other elements to form more complex molecules. Magnetic energy is greater than gravity. For a transportation device, we’re looking for a floatation apparatus that can accommodate travel. Boats float based on the principles of liquid. Balloons float based on similar principles of gasses. Levitation has to be a related similarity to the principles of floatation but, how?