What's needed to discover a new mode of transportation?

In the search to find a new perspective for efficient motion, what’s needed? Participation. The goal of CATTCC research is to recognize the simplicity in motion and to amplify it for a vehicle.

The primary analysis for motion is the accepted standard set over 100 years ago by Albert Einstein. His theory of relativity is certainly one of the most popular formulas of physics: E=MC². The analysis of this formula is often misinterpreted. The interpretation is most often assumed it is a reference to energy. The formula is Einstein’s theory of relativity. What Einstein states is his analysis of what relativity is. Perhaps his formula might be shown as R (for relativity) = E=MC², or the Theory of Relativity is E=MC². The importance of this is the interpretation of what the formula says. His theory makes the claim: our relativity shows that everything; all matter is traveling through space at the speed of light. Light travels at 186,000 per second, times 186,000 per second is even faster. The statement: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared says that the action of energy is an action that exceeds the non-perceived consistency of motion.

An example of this is to visualize standing on a moving train. Everything inside the train does not appear to be moving. And yet, it is.

Einstein’s theory of relativity makes the statement that all thing relative to our perspective is moving at light speed. By his interpretation of saying that energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared, it says what we see as energy is a force that is twice the speed of light. So, that means: really fast. It also means we’re unable to see electricity move.

Additionally, the statement, also applies to all physics. Literally, it means that all laws of physics are fundamentally incorrect. To clarify: it’s like the example of standing on a train, everything is the same but, the entire platform is moving. This is a fundamental change, or a patterned inconsistency.

What this all points to is gravity

In theoretical physics, the search for small particle makeup is like a puzzle. How do the pieces fit together? And, what are the pieces? One of the fundamental aspects of theoretical particle physics is the ongoing questions that asks how things are stuck together and don’t fall apart?

A notable technique in finding answers to theoretical particle physics is in the procedure of discovery. It seems somewhat comparable with driving two cars at full speed and smashing them into each other while taking pictures at the point of impact to see what breaks. It’s always amusing when a new sliver of broken piece is identified, the discoverer is celebrated and awarded its name.

There is consistency to the pattern of atom smashing. The bigger the collider, new names are grown. From elements and molecules to electrons traveling around a nucleus. Then came the discovery that the nucleus has protons and neutrons. This has grown to a consensus with neutrinos, bosons, leptons, quarks, hadrons, mesons, baryons, and a handful of terms relating to color and flavor, up, down, charm, strange, and gauge.

Amongst the terms of common sense and practicality is the necessity for a hypothesis keeping subatomic particles to stay intact. Academia has assigned its name gluons and gravitons.

In the search for utilizing gravity as a source of transportation motion, a serious question has to be answered. Is gravity a product of mass or is it a product of subatomic motion?

Over the past 400 years, gravity has been affirmed to be a product of mass. Many scientific laws and discoveries are attributed to gravity. Long range space flights have been calculated using the laws formulated on gravitational laws.

Although academia knows how to construct mathematical equations based on the principles of gravitational law, it does not know what gravity is. Academia practices gravity as the accumulation of mass rather than a product of subatomic motion. Conversely, the body of theoretical particle physics practices gravity as a product of subatomic motion and has chosen gravitons and gluons to represent gravity.

Both institutions; the science of theoretical physics and academia, are unable to explain a definition of what gravity is. Can legitimate answers regarding thoughtful contemplation come from outside the bounds of scientific academia?

CATTCC subscribes to the new theory of gravity which identifies it as the angular momentum of particle motion. This explanation of what gravity is, coincides with Einstein’s theory of relativity that all matter is traveling at the speed of light. This new theory identifies gravity as a linear motion. When particle mass is seen as string theory, proposed by Italian physicist Gabriele Veneziano in the late 1960s, it provides a possible validation to describe gravity. The theory postulates that all matter is linear in its movement. As such, gravity, is in a constant state of linear motions as a string. The path of motion is a specific path. This path consists of twists. Each twist represents a duration of time measured in light speed. The path is a specific cycle consisting of an exact number of twists. The motion of these twists is its angular motion of gravity.

What CATTCC has discovered is a theoretical explanation of what gravity is. It is the angular momentum of particle mass as it travels in a specific linear path at light speed.

The CATTCC mission is to utilize this motion in a manner that allows an apparatus to surf this motion as a method of transportation motion.

Perception is like a road map. It takes the follower to a predetermined place. There is a consistent persistency with people to perceive the future of transportation as driverless cars or flying drone type helicopter vehicles. Those aren’t the future, it’s what’s available in today.

CATTCC has a saying: the future of transportation floats, its source for motion is with the manipulation of gravity.