The future of transportation floats

The current autonomous vehicle technology uses several sensor methodologies. Tremendous effort is going into the development and implementation of autonomous, or “self-driving” vehicles. Arguing the merits of the direction for this technology is futile. Big-tech industry lobbyists have deeper pockets than anyone. There is no debate.

Here are three paragraphs pertinent to this topic from https://www.digikey.com/en/articles/the-five-senses-of-sensors---sound

Ultrasound is often used in range finding – commonly referred to as SONAR (sound navigation and ranging). Similar to RADAR (radio detection and ranging), an ultrasonic pulse is generated in a specific direction. If an object is in the path of the pulse, part or all of the pulse is reflected back to the transmitter as an echo. Measuring the difference between pulse transmission and echo indicates the distance of the object. Measurement is affected by salinity and temperature when measuring SONAR pulses in water and is used when distances are short and the accuracy of the distance measurement is desired to be greater.

Ultrasonic sensors are used to detect the existence of objects (digital) and distance (analog) in factory automation and processing. Sound is better for this application than light because sound is not affected by reflectivity, translucence, or color.
 
The Honeywell 94X Series Ultrasonic Distance Sensors, for example, offer enhanced sensing range capability. The non-contact distance sensing is used for non-invasive measurement. Its reduced sensitivity to light intensity, reflectivity, and opacity of a target offers flexibility and greater accuracy. With a sensing distance of up to 19.65 feet, it detects over a longer distance than other method so there is no need for close proximity to a target. Applications include level measurement, presence/absence detection, and measurement of distance.

There is a tremendous argument to be made as to how this technology is tied to automobiles. There is horrible dis-association of computer technology wizards; from land-use development and its design. They are distinctly different industries. There are no similarities. The people working in the land-use planning industry are not trained to build computer hardware and code its software. It’s equally illegitimate that computer programmers are unskilled to build apparatus that interact with the multi-platform transportation integration of land-use. There are two totally separate issues in play here. One: cities with the transit-oriented land-use design are not designed to accommodate automobiles. Secondly: even in the automobile centric land-use designed areas, automobiles are unsustainable.

This argument of advancing autonomous vehicles, is that it fully supports the vehicle’s technology. The argument against autonomous vehicles simply opposes the unsustainable nature of the transportation vehicles. 

Here’s an interesting concept. To those who find truth in the Bible; by using a scientific perspective, it could be claimed that this autonomous technology is found in Ezekiel. This opens an even larger door to the advancement of autonomous technology. By looking at a previous blogpost: What Ezekiel Saw, here is an excerpt: (13)In the midst of the living creatures was the appearance of glowing coals of fire, or of torches. Fire moved back and forth between the living creatures; it was bright, and lightning flashed out of it. (14)The creatures were darting back and forth as quickly as flashes of lightning.

Following that, there is a mention of the craft’s movement: “Wherever the spirit would go… without turning as they moved” is a possible example of neural oscillation operational control. The common perception is a spirit. Spirit, however, is completely undefined. This could happen in a spirit, as a dream. An actual event Ezekiel would have possibly been shown as something different, it is undefined.

The concept of spinning wheels is pretty much a given for those who understand principles for an alternative to combustion propulsion. The transportation industry‘s current methodology is predominantly chemical explosion for propulsion. Electric is a good source offering greater motor efficiency than chemical explosion. Space transportation technology research includes nuclear fission; offering an even more colossal scale of chemical explosion, producing centrifugal energy for propulsion. 

A wheel within a wheel is a Biblical blueprint for floatation vehicles. In the 2,500 years since Ezekiel no one has been able to figure out how to make it work. Nonetheless, it’s still written there. 

The blog page “Building Whirling Wheels” has another perspective for flight. The interesting thing about these and Otis Carr’s ship is the possibility of neural operational controls. This is the ultimate of self-driving vehicles.

In all the known and available documented information about Otis Carr’s ship, there is no available information written about how his operational controls operated. There is speculation that points to assume the craft may have been operated by neural oscillations.

In a forthcoming book about building sustainable transportation alternatives, there’s a lot of information about Otis Carr. In both the sixth and eleventh chapter are discussions about the operational controls that Otis Carr used on his craft. (The following paragraphs are from this book)

Otis Carr describes the device with three-sections. Its upper and lower outer shells spin in the opposite direction of each other. The third section is held inside the two outer spinning shells in a neutral position. The theoretical concept is that these rotating spheres generate an independent inertia field. How is it controlled? 

The neutral inner section of the craft housed its crew and operational control. The only account of its operation was explained by one of the technicians 50 years after the event of its first and only flight. In his account, he verbally expressed his “not knowing” exactly how it worked. “It had a laser light pointing through the large crystal-like ball in the middle” were the words of Ralph Ring. 

There are two directions in considering this technology: light frequency modulation and signal interpretation. This is all speculation but, this is what theories are.

Light is interpreted by observation. The hue of light observation is perceived with perception of its placement to observation. Why? Because light is really fast. Its interpretation is regulated by its speed and angle of the observation. Can we consider that Otis Carr’s globe in the control area was a transceiver? Or was its function singular as either a receiver or transmitter? Did the control mechanism receive neural oscillations and transmit a control signal to regulate spin of the outer shell?

Light cannot penetrate a solid surface, it is assumed that neural oscillations can.

Nikola Tesla was deep into psychic phenomena. This would have involved the psychic attributes of oscillation in crystal structures, including solid crystal spheres.

Keep in mind that Nikola Tesla’s discoveries of invention include the fundamentals of modern wifi technology. Tesla’s experimentations of neural oscillations utilizing a crystal ball would be apropos for a control switch. 

Nikola Tesla experimented with wave control and found that sonic vibration resulted in atomic-level disruption. Tesla’s experimentation to build an AC generator resulted in atomic disruption to the point of lateral matter transfer, i.e., a minor localized earthquake. This leads to the conclusion that there can be a manipulation of kinetic energy generated by frequency wave motion. This, however, does not correlate as to placing matter in movement to its desired placement. Or, could this be accomplished in a simple switch? 

What effect can thoughts generate within an independent inertia field in motion? Can these thought waves be mechanically or electronically received by an electronic or operational device to guide kinetic force and control an inertia field to a specific target?

It’s the perceived opinion that Otis Carr’s instruction for the crew to concentrate on the color aqua blue, indicates the use of light variation as a neural oscillation transmitted as a variable light-wave pattern for a control switch mechanism. Perhaps it controlled a calibrated switch for speed of their rotation. Possibly the pitch or yah of the vehicle

.

Again, this is speculative but seems valid.

Light would have had to have the ability to be received as a switch signal to the outer hull portion of the ship. A magnetic wave control signal would possibly have had interference within the strong magnetic fields. This begs the argument, if an electromagnetic signal wave wouldn’t pass through the magnetic fields of the spinning structure. Also, light doesn’t have the ability to pass through a solid structure.

The point of using a light wave to carry the control signal would be that light can pass through a magnetic field, whereas an electromagnetic pulse would be susceptible to interference. 

Using the concept of simplicity, what is the best way to control light? With color. The power of concentration of several people produces a stronger neural signal than a single thought. An attempt to send a thought wave as a specific color would be the simplest of manipulating a neural control switch. Again, this would provide switch control of a spinning magnetic field but, not a solid surface.

There are many aspects of new and disruptive technology involved in manipulating gravity as a source for transportation motion. Thought control is the ultimate of self-driving transportation technology.