Finding the priorities to advance transportation

photo credits: freepik.com

What happened to the enthusiasm and expectation of flying cars, depicted by futuristic concepts during the 1940s, 50s, and 60’s?

The concept of having flying cars has been thwarted by the financial interests of the automobile industry, the oil industry, and all the affiliate industries. Maintaining the road infrastructure is the government’s obligation in catering to the political function of bureaucratic procedure. Allowing new modes of transportation is perceived as threat to the financial health of keeping the status-quo.

All roads throughout the US are government funded. Eliminating this policy would cause massive amounts of income loss to very large conglomerates who receive $billions each year in government contracts to continue this procedure.

In the early 2000s, a study was done which found it would cost over $17trillion to rebuild the entire US road infrastructure. However, a normally used US concrete freeway has a life expectancy of 15 years; until it has deteriorated to the point of needing major repair. Asphalt freeways have a life expectancy of 7 to 10 years. All roads and bridges need to be constantly maintained, repaired and rebuilt.

The cost of building freeways and roads plus the annual costs of maintaining these roads is a burden paid by tax dollars. The manufactures of the devices used to operate on these roads pay nothing towards building or maintenance. Conversely, railroad companies are fully responsible for every aspect of rights-of-ways, rail line, vehicle (train) purchase, fuel, maintenance and insurance liability.

There is no burden to automobile manufacturers for ANY use of their automobile. They pay no cost for where the vehicles are driven, no cost of its maintenance, no cost for its fuel, and no cost for a vehicle’s damage or property damage for the damage a vehicle causes. The vehicle manufactures, fuel suppliers, affiliate industries, and affiliated road builders have no liability.

The automobile industry, oil industry, and all related industries to automobile transportation have every reason to assure their political lobbyists continue their profitability in the manner it has created over the past 90 years of political lobby maneuvering. Additionally, the automobile affiliate industries maintain their cultural market control by spending $billions to advertise their products; and are fully embraced by the supportive media recipients to propagate a positive outlook towards their products.

This presents a serious challenge against the introduction of new transportation methodologies.

Where do new discoveries in transportation come from?

For new concepts of space exploration, the traditional method for space technology advances come from aeronautic engineers and designers to continue protocol in propulsion driven motion. Rocket engineers build the next generation of bigger rockets and tweak exploding bigger bomb blasts.

Cars and trucks follow this same industry procedure seeking to minimize thermodynamic loss in a never-ending battle to fight friction.

New discoveries are impossible by fostering exhausted protocol

Want to find answers? Find out where the energy of explosions emanate from. Examining why a particle’s centrifugal frequency expands is a different field of study than that of aeronautics technology and design engineers. The mystery of theoretical physics of particle mass and string theory are unfamiliar to wing designers who are experienced in laws of material thickness tolerances, air pressure and load lift rates. And yet, discoveries to alternative forms of motion for transportation will only be found in searching new theories of perspective relating to subatomic particle physics.

One of the best examples to the incomprehension in traditional procedure of aeronautic engineering verses a practitioner in the observation of nature with theoretical physics application, is in this short account about Viktor Schauberger. His intuitive perspective was unaccepted by the tradition of insistence from the protocol of aeronautics. The politics of war eliminated his genius achievements: the 'Repulsator' and the other, a 'Repulsine' (A and B models), reflecting their forces of recoil. From the blogpost, https://www.cattcc.org/vehicle-technology:

Other examples 

There are other possibilities for building a space flight vehicle designs that manipulate gravity. There are claims of test model flying saucer shaped vehicles rising into the sky and disappearing. Listed here are three accounts, one each from Viktor Schauberger, John Searl, and David Hamel.

 From the website 1Library.net is a synopsis of the book: ‘Brighter Than A Thousand Suns’ which provides the following:

“Another highly-advanced group was led by Dr. Viktor Schauberger, who worked in Austria at the Kertl factory in Vienna. Schauberger's incredible craft allegedly utilized a tornado-like vortex which produced magnetic effects said to cause levitation. Two Schauberger models, both made of copper, were said to have been built with one of them successfully test flown. The story goes that it flew so well, in fact, that it impacted the inside roof of the hangar and was destroyed.

“The SS which was apparently overseeing this and all German saucer research, allegedly stopped further experimentation after accident, dismissed Schauberger, and took all of his work and wizardry to some other location for further development. After the war, Schauberger was lured to the US by an alleged CIA front company and was then duped into signing a contract in English (he knew only German) giving the company all rights and title to his inventions, concepts, and designs. He was then returned to Austria...and died five days later.”

The point being addressed is that people who do not comprehend something are incapable of finding solutions they can’t see. Solutions are discovered by those with ideas from an aberrant perspective. Finding solutions to efficient energy use for transportation, require a deep dive into theoretical physics and a new perspective.

The advantage of classical physics theory is its relationship with cause and effect

Philosophy is subjective to personal perspective. There’s a plethora of philosophical perspective which perceives the proper procedure for modern physics; its pursuit is a fascination with the destructive nature of cyclotrons and linear accelerators. This same philosophical opinion views the procedure of accelerating particles into an oblivion impact, as profitable.

A minority opinion holds an opposing view that the philosophy of classical physics, to study its ebb and flow, is more significant. The objective of classical physics seeks perception into comprehending the building blocks of matter. The perception of life is its structure of expansion. Philosophically, the modern approach in physics shows itself as a search of destruction and separation.

The succession of life reveals that seeds grow and flowers bloom. The destructive path of matter separation eliminates the things that are germane to life. Nikola Tesla’s discoveries laid the foundation to a lot of modern technology. His work was based in classical physics. The philosophy of his work proffered that all matter flows in the aether of motion, whereas the modern scientific approach presents itself in the pursuit of disassociation that the process of life lies within the aether. 

The priorities to advance transportation are technologies which create efficient short-distance methodologies: new modes of transport. The automobile is a 100-year-old technology, meaning it is fundamentally neither advanced nor efficient. The solution to meet society’s technologically advanced demands are in developing methods of efficient energy use. These technologies being environmentally, economically, and socially sustainable.

There’s a myriad of CATTCC blogposts presenting concepts for gravity manipulation and levitation; presenting transportation solutions.

The challenge to new concepts and ideas is the intangible ability for immediate physical implementation of a theoretical concept. In other words: ideas and concepts have to be developed into functional products. Another challenge with new concepts is lack of marketing funds to encourage research interest. This absence of monetary ability restricts experimentation.

Human psychology resists change



Would the automobile and oil industry be interested in funding a transportation mechanism that would effectively abolish their business income? Would the aerospace industry be excited about eliminating their livelihood of building and maintaining propulsion-based technology?

Today’s technologically advanced society has outgrown its 100-year-old transportation system technologies. There are two areas demanding new modes of transport: short-distance and long-distance travel. Short-distance travel within metropolitan areas for the future will employ a multitude of tunneling infrastructure. The long-distance travel in space will use gravity based technology for greater speeds.