Building a brand-new mode of transportation

In building a new mode of transportation, can the same technology be used for short distances and long distances? The two are totally separate types of transportation. It could be considered the same as getting on a plane to go a half-mile to the grocery store.

Current public transportation necessitates what the transportation planning industry refers to as: ‘the last mile dilemma’. In general practice with public transit, a sizeable walking distance is required for passengers to arrive at a public transportation loading station. This includes both passenger departure and passenger arrival.

The automobile, within its automobile centric land-use design, alleviates this issue.

Any new technology mode of transportation has to address and overcome the ‘last mile dilemma’.

So, there are several considerations of importance to developing a new mode of transportation. From the aspect of energy efficiency, friction is the by far the biggest contributor to ineffective energy use. 

Cars or rockets?

To build a new mode of transportation, a decision has to be made. Is it most important to replace cars? Or is it more important to replace rockets?

Logically, it is logistically easier to replace rockets because there are fewer rockets than cars. Being able to offer ultra-fast speed capability, to people involved in the space travel industry; would be seen as an advantage to space travel.

Providing an automobile alternative would be perceived as a threat to the auto industry.

The most efficient transportation technology currently available is with public transit and magnetic levitation (maglev) technology. This doesn’t provide an alternative to the automobile and its automobile centric land-use, however, it is a very efficient form of transportation for transit oriented land-use designs.

Maglev technology at ground surface follows a guideway and travels in increments at the speed of sound. Inside a near vacuum tube the speed is Mach multiples. The target speed of space flight is light speed. Ground level transportation relies on aeronautics and drag coefficients. Space flight is a new frontier of physics, limitations of guideway restrictions are removed.

The most efficient energy use of current short distance travel is walking or a bicycle.

So, CATTCC research focuses on long distance travel.

Building technology to replace rockets

How is a new mode of transportation designed that can replace rocket technology? Welcome to the fun room. This is where creativity meets innovation.

We started with a blank paper, then filled it with a list of requirements:

Has to go really fast

Efficient energy use

Independent inertia

Zero energy waste

No exploding fuel as propulsion

Follow nature

A power source

Control mechanism

Whatever else…

Then a list of how to attain these things:

Gravity

Magnetism

Electrogravitics

Electricity

Toroidal fields

Neural oscillations

Then the list was narrowed to finding answers to what we’re working with:

What makes a magnet work

What is gravity

Spin rate to escape Earth gravity

How to operate controlling mechanisms

Detailing these components is what the CATTCC research involves. Here is a taste of what the research entails for three of these things.

Magnets –

What makes magnets attract? Molecular combination of electron structure. So, that’s the simple quick answer. In the more detailed answer, elements with an odd number of electrons in the orbit of their outer shell present a tendency of imbalance. Neodymium, however, is one of the strongest of magnetic raw earth elements when combined with other elements, yet, independently has a balanced flow of electron shells. The process of magnetism is a theory that the odd number of electrons causes an unbalanced orbital structure. This unbalanced motion provides the environment for the odd number of electrons to be attracted to and attach themselves to other elements within molecular structure. When combined with other elements, even Neodymium can find a molecular structure to have strong magnetic tendencies. These molecular structures of combined metaled elements, such as nickel, chromium or, something else; elements with the attractive magnetic tendencies: are attracted to ferrous materials. Ferrous materials are elements or molecules possessing iron qualities.

Gravity –

The first question about gravity is to identify what it is. Is gravity a subatomic action or is it a process in the accumulation of mass?

The accepted opinion of scientific academia in theoretical physics, relating to the makeup of matter, leads to the belief that all particles are actions of electromagnetism. This opinion causes the belief of gravity to be a process in the accumulation of mass.

As just stated above with the analysis of magnets: magnetism is the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. Then, how can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties, since magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism? Since science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetism, how are magnetic properties able to exist in subatomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous? 

Gravity is fundamental to all movement; It’s the most abundant force in the universe. Yet, in this study of gravity that it can only be a process. This signifies it has to be a process within subatomic structure. There are questions that science hasn't answered. Here's another question: do gravitational properties only exist in large quantities? This has an answer. Gravity is a process of subatomic movement. Movement is motion.

According to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, everything within our dimensions of perception is moving at the speed of light. This viewpoint opens a new contemplative understanding to what gravity is.

In theoretical physics there is a concept called the string theory. CATTCC, in agreement with this theory, also agrees with a new postulation that theorizes a specific path of particle movement. This new theory provides an explanation for gravity.

At the atomic and subatomic levels, particles have movement. These minute particles are not stationary. This movement of particles relates to the presence of mass traveling at light speed. As such, the path of particle movement travels in a linear path: instead of elliptical. This linear path of particle movement follows the unified path of particle motion. This new theory identifies gravity as the twist in the path of angular momentum. This flow of motion is harmonic in nature. A unified gravitational force.

Gravity is similar to a wave in the ocean. Waves are frequency motion, a process of movement. Water is the source for the ocean. Mass is the source of the waves. 

The purpose of explaining this exercise is to suggest possibilities of a gravity engine as a source for transportation motion. Kind of like building a board to surf ocean waves. Since particles are extremely tiny, a gravity engine must be built upon the resonance of gravitational wave motion to initiate movement for an engine to do work.

By understanding the path of particle motion, being able to manipulate this path is comparable to surfing gravitational waves.

Spin –

A flying craft using spin as a source of momentum has to exceed the gravitational pull of Earth’s rotation to overcome Earth’s gravitational force (Newton’s constant: F = G × (m₁ × m₂) / r² ). The force of the vehicle has to exceed the force Earth has against its movement.

https://earthsky.org/earth/why-cant-we-feel-earths-spin/

Earth spins on its axis once in every 24-hour day. At Earth’s equator, the speed of Earth’s spin is about 1,000 miles per hour (1,600 km per hour). 

https://www.newscientist.com/question/fast-earth-spin/

However, this speed of rotation isn’t consistent across the planet. As you move north or south, the circumference of Earth gets smaller, so the speed of spin reduces until it reaches its slowest at both poles. And all of this is nothing compared with the 107,000 kilometres per hour at which Earth orbits the sun.

thoughtco.com› speed-of-the-earth-1435093

February 13, 2018 - That discovery led scientists to finally be able to answer the long-held question of why there was drift in the first place. Having dry or wet years in Eurasia has caused the wobble to the east or west. In addition to the rotational speed of Earth spinning on its axis, the planet is also speeding at about 66,660 miles per hour (107.278.87 km/h) in its revolution around the sun once every 365.2425 days. 

hypertextbook.com› facts › 2002 › JasonAtkins.shtml

It takes the Earth approximately 23 hours, 56 minutes and 4.09 seconds to make one complete revolution (360 degrees). This length of time is known as a sidereal day. The Earth rotates at a moderate angular velocity of 7.2921159 × 10−5 radians/second. Venus has the slowest angular velocity (2.99 × 10−7rad/sec) and Jupiter has the fastest (1.76 × 10−4rad/sec).

Spin; Earth has a counter-clockwise rotational spin (as viewed from Polaris). At the equator, the distance traveled is approximately 1,000 Miles per Hour = 1,466 Feet per Second.

Looking down from above the north pole of the Sun, it shows that the Sun rotates counterclockwise, the Earth orbits the Sun counterclockwise, the Moon orbits the Earth counterclockwise and both the Earth and Moon rotate counterclockwise about their axes.

Gravity and spin are related. As described previously in CATTCC information, gravity is angular momentum of particle movement. The relational counter-clockwise motion of planetary bodies in our solar system has a direct correlation to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity which postulates all things of our relative dimensional perception are traveling through the universe at the speed of light.

All things within our perception are in motion. That motion is traveling at light speed. At this speed, all particle mass is in linear motion. Gravitational spin produces a linear trajectory of angular motion. This perceived wobbling motion which remains consistent with planetary bodies in space displays a pattern of a twist to a linear trajectory.