How does lifestyle change sustainability?

When does lifestyle become important to sustainability? The most accurate answer is that sustainability is a fixed scientific response to a condition.

Every element to an unsustainable environmental situation is fixed in its action. As with the automobile, there is no individual lifestyle change that can atone for the automobile’s unsustainable nature. For California’s aggressive environmental legislation to pass a law that outlaws use of plastic grocery bags, and to outlaw the use of plastic straws: are childish attempts to contain unsustainability. These actions have little significance of environmental impact in the arena of Western society’s automobile centric land-use design.

CATTCC is a membership organization built upon the importance of a foundational issue: transportation. Patterns of urban growth are based upon the area’s transportation. Transportation is not a philosophy. Transportation is not a theology. Transportation is not a political narrative. Sustainability is absolutely dependent upon transportation.

The social response to political demeanor often presents itself with hostility, chaos, and conflict towards its sociopolitical opposition. Sustainability is dependent upon transportation. There is a noticeable social insistence to infer castigations towards anyone who questions the euphorically ambiguous idealism associated with the political euphemistic term: green. There is no argument, however, to the claim that transportation is the foundation to all urban growth. Sustainability is dependent upon transportation.

An individual’s lifestyle choice is an attitude of independent selection. Social actions can be influenced by media coercion of governmental dictates. The advances in of technological achievement bring rise to the control of governmental determination. Freedom of independent choice once enjoyed by Western Society is becoming unsustainable

. 

Social selection of lifestyle choice is irrelevant to transportation, yet; transportation forms land-use patterns that condition lifestyle determination. This intensifies the call for a brand-new mode of transportation. A cry for a form of transportation able to meet the transportation design aspects of other forms of land-use and, most importantly; transit oriented and automobile centric land-use design.

Space travel

Deep-space travel may require many lifestyle-type selectors for long term closed-space interaction. Philosophy and personal character, spiritual; theological; and religious belief, lifestyle, favorite color, taste-buds, favorite and least favorite smells, eyesight, sound level tolerances, physical condition and compatibility with other people are all considerations of importance in selecting a flight crew for deep space travel.

Stress of confined spaces would seem of paramount concern for deep-space travel. Flights having a specific arrival time would be far less stressful than an exploratory mission lasting days or months. The vastness of space with the immense distances between planetary bodies would tend to give the appearance of standing still while looking out the spacecraft’s window. 

Most relevant to all concerns in this post is the embodiment of having the spacecraft window to look out of.

The common theme throughout all these blog posts are in drawing attention to how to build a new mode of transportation. In previous articles we established that building a new design for space travel is most practical.

What parameters provide sustainable transportation alternatives? The immediate likelihood for innovation leads us to space flight technology. One is investigating ways to increase magnetic output from toroidal fields and multisided Mobius type designs. Magnetic fields follow a "right hand rule", to pursue a toroidal field in a multi-sided Mobius type design presents a ‘non-sequitur’ which need understanding. In regards to the physics of toroidal magnetic fields, searching the unknown makes innovation exciting when answers are discovered.