On the cattcc.org website is a page about space flight. Here is a question, when will mankind be able to fly as a normal practice, in space?

The tv show Star Trek is more than 60 years old. The ideas of space flight were around prior to that tv show. The question here is to provoke a deeper question: what happened that halted space exploration for the past 50 years?

There was a movement in the 70s and shuffled into the 80s that pushed a mindset that it was more important to pour money into social programs instead of “wasting money” towards space exploration. Rather than making a critique of social spending programs, this writing is to focus on ways to make space exploration attainable.

The private sector is allowed to spend money on performance values. The private sector tends to take risks. This indicates that space exploration is more likely to find ways that enable practicality for new methodologies of space travel within the private sector, than traditional government funded agencies which seem to have lost the ability of innovation and ingenuity.

Government supported research in academia is seeking ion propulsion technology. The reception from space flight determined enthusiasts and entrepreneurs is cold and unimpressed. The private sector is raising its voice to discover a more tangible technology.

One of the largest contributors to modern technology is from the past: Nikola Tesla. It’s taken many years but, there is a growing number of people who recognize the phenomenal achievements of Nikola Tesla.

As a tribute to the smartest man the author of this blog ever met, was a nuclear physicist who worked for the DOE. His genius was in his ability to articulate simple explanations to complex things. And yet, for those who can sit to watch grass grow, they are the only ones to receive the simplistic message and understanding of how nature moves.

Nikola Tesla and several of his contemporaries of the early to mid-1900s, worked on alternative methodologies from the chemical explosion-based propulsion transportation mechanisms

.

There is a growing number of scientific minded enthusiasts seeking sustainable transportation alternatives for space travel. There are many forgotten technologies in science that Nikola Tesla and his contemporaries worked on that are being revisited. The field of electrogravitics is very intriguing. This combines electricity, magnetics and gravity. Mixing these with gyroscopic principles of spin and independent inertia fields, it provides an entire pallet of provocative parts to use in the probability realm for space flight.

When innovation and ingenuity are matched with enthusiasm as motivation, boredom of bureaucracy has no standing.

Transportation is indeed the next paradigm for technology expansion. Expect the field of electrogravitcs to become the next field of scientific exploration.

Electrogravitics is explained as being similar to electromagnetics but, instead of subatomic particles being magnetic, its principle is the attractive force of gravity.

This principle is based on Einstein’s Theory of Relativity wherein it is explained as light squared. This indicates that, mass in the equation travels a linear path at the speed of light. It also indicates that gravity is the angular momentum of a particle along that linear path, like a twist in a ribbon, traveling at light speed.

As T. Townsend Brown worked on his studies of electrogravitics, the Biefeld-Brown Effect was established. This principle is a key component in discovering attraction-based travel.

The fundamental practice in the establishment of space travel is chemical explosion propulsion technology. With attraction-based travel, there is no thermodynamic loss. John Searl discovered that the faster his apparatus spun, the colder it became.

Deep space travel carries temperatures near absolute zero. Life doesn’t happen at absolute zero because nothing moves. Early rocket flights into deep space carried a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, or RTG. This provides long term electrical power as well as being a heat source for a living environment.

There is another extremely important life sustaining component vital to space travel which is completely ignored. Since this is a CATTCC blog, the many years spent in urban growth planning and design industry brought about the forgotten, yet, one of the important aspects of urban growth which is ignored in development design. It’s the same ignored issue as what is ignored in current space flight: dirt.

In the field of theoretical physics regarding the makeup of matter, a major amount of argument is spent regarding magnetism. Electromagnetic fields are commonly accepted as surrounding Earth, regarding this; there is little to no argument to oppose this understanding. With this agreement of understanding, what is the ingredient necessary to hold a magnetic field? Ferrous material. And that is the main component of dirt.

Dirt allows plant growth in an urban development. Plants provide nutrients to sustain life. As such, this is an absolute necessity for any long-term space flight where life is to be sustained.

In an analysis of current urban land-use design, the contemporary building designs tend to eliminate the context of nature with plastic design statements. The sole purpose of faux rock designs made of fiberglass and polyethylene; premanufactured to design specifics, is to increase builder’s profitability. When this same environmental mindset of eliminating dirt, is engineered as a priority to eliminate weight and compressing size constraints for any long-range space travel, priorities need to be recalibrated

.   

Dirt provides nutrients and magnetic fields necessary for life. Nature with gardens are necessary. This applies to urban growth design and space travel.