The horse, as the main source of local transportation in early Western culture was quickly replaced when a faster and more convenient mode of transportation was made available.

Now, after its 125-year reign; the automobile does not want to exit its dominance as the primary source for Western society’s transportation. Why? There is nothing to take its place.

Several years ago, in the city where the author lives, the city and the regional transportation agency implemented a plan to create two new bus lines. The plan included a questionnaire for the public, to promote the project. In a personal conversation with the city’s transportation director, a friend of the author, he shared that the conclusion of the questionnaire revealed: “People will get rid of their cars, when hell freezes over.” Nonetheless, the city moved forward with their bus plan.

The expectation from the government’s public transportation agencies is to follow and maintain the status-quo. In their defense of following procedure, there is no alternative for the increasing population other than building more roads for the automobile centric land-use design.

Bureaucracy lacks the ability for creativity. There can be no expectation for a new mode of transportation emanating from government sources. Meanwhile, society demands a new mode of transportation. Time demands new technology for transportation. Something better than a car. Something more convenient. Something faster, less expensive, more efficient, safer, and lastly; sustainable.

Where is the solution? In researching transportation possibilities with a different perspective. Current transportation technologies use propulsion as the motion. Is there another methodology? How does a surfboard work? Should there be research to find a sustainable transportation solution by studying the most abundant source of energy in the universe? Can a vehicle be created that uses the attractive force of gravity? This is impossible without looking for consideration. To use gravity, a better understanding of gravity has to be found.

Gravity and the path of particle movement

What is gravity? The dictionary describes it as the force of attraction by which terrestrial bodies tend to fall toward the center of the earth. Scientific academia describes the principles and laws of what gravity does, yet the definition lacks an explanation of gravity’s origin as to why it does what it does.

What is known of gravity taught in academia is that gravitational forces grow into exponentially larger fields by kinetic energy. This is describing an action through organically combining larger body mass. Newton’s accepted gravity equation is: F = Gm₁m₂/r², says the gravitational force between two objects is proportional to the mass of each, and inversely proportional to the distance between them (G is the gravitational constant). Kinetic energy is not directly considered in the formula but, is a measurable influence to the speed of attraction to distances between two objects.

Still, this explains what gravity does but, it doesn’t provide the answer of what gravity is. The currently accepted status of gravity finds it as a weak force that affects body mass and is a separate force from the stronger atomic forces. 

In following this logic, it brings a question. Is gravity a product of mass, as described by academia science, or is gravity a process of subatomic matter?

The answer should be found by taking a deep look into the realm of theoretical physics. In looking with a different perspective, we can begin by looking at gravity as the process of Einstein’s theory of relativity and all matter in our galaxy traveling at the speed of light.

This can change our perspective of particle mass. With everything moving at light speed, everything is moving too fast to comprehend or perceive even a glimpse of what it’s composed of. How can we get a fixed look at the movement of light? View it as patterns of wave flow. With this perspective, let’s look into the path of particle movement. 

From: https://www.cattcc.org/physics : In understanding magnetics: magnetism is the action of stray electrons in ferrous materials. Then, how can atoms of non-ferrous composition hold electromagnetic properties, since it is the scientific claim that magnetism is an action of ferromagnetism? Since science has established magnetic action as ferromagnetic, how are non-magnetic properties able to exist as subatomic properties and yet lose their magnetic existence in large quantities of element mass that aren't ferrous?

There are questions which science hasn't answered. Here's another question: do gravitational properties only exist in large quantities? This has an answer. Gravity is a process of subatomic movement.

There is a new theory of gravity. Here is part of this newly proposed theory on particle movement that coincides with gravity. There is a path to all matter. The path is analogous to a ribbon in an elliptical Mobius strip with twists in the ribbon. But, this elliptical ribbon with its defined twists is stretched out to a linear path of mass in sync: traveling at the speed of light. The angular momentum of the twists at that speed; is gravity.