The purpose of space exploration is to find habitable planets

photo credits: NASA/Duda

Legitimacy of space exploration requires exceptionally fast speed. The fastest speed attained by current space technology has been attained by the Parker Solar Probe. Its speed reached over 400,000 miles per hour. In terms of space exploration, that’s slower than crawling.

The ultimate purpose for space exploration is to find habitable planets for human life.

Exoplanets

Exoplanets represent the ultimate goal for space flight.

As described in the blogpost: ‘What Can Be Expected by Exploring Space’, the blogpost explains NASA’s intent with missions that have sent telescope probes to seek out livable places. NASA’s missions include: Kepler, K2, LBTI, JWST, TESS, Hubble, Spitzer, and Roman Space Telescope. These exploratory telescope missions have accumulated a list of over 5,000 possible planetary bodies capable of human habitability. The NASA Exoplanet Catalog is continuously updated, as a catalog of possible habitable planetary bodies.

NASA’s planetary telescope missions suggest that Kepler-69c is the closest planet with the possibility to maintain life. It’s a super-Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of a star like our sun. But it’s located about twenty-seven hundred light-years from Earth, in the constellation Cygnus. This, of course means that getting there traveling at light speed would take 2,700 years.

The fastest speed human technology has thus far attained is 0.000037279123279345 lightspeed. Multiplying 0.000037279123279345 per second, times 34,000,000 seconds per year, times 2700 years, the Parker Solar Probe could reach Kepler-69c in 636,533,574,170 years.

Warp speed

Is there a fast way to travel in space? Is there any legitimacy to warp drive for space travel?

Warp Drive is a fictional concept from Star Trek. Warp speed doesn’t exist in the current world of physics. In the early 1990s an astrophysicist, by the name of Michael Alcubierre, wrote a paper about modifying the geometry of space. His theory postulated a principle that would allow traveling faster than light. Alcubierre’s theory proposes a geometric assumption that if all of spacetime is expanding, then it must be able to contract. The Alcubierre Drive is based on a small region of space which he referred to as a warp bubble.

The easiest way to understand the warp bubble is to visualize all of spacetime as a trampoline. Then put a bowling ball on the trampoline. The dip in the trampoline is like a specific region of spacetime. Any large mass, like a sun or a planet, applies a dip to the fabric of spacetime. Alcubierre’s concept is to create an expansion of space behind a spaceship (representing what the bowling ball does to the trampoline) and an opposite contraction of space in front of the ship (representing the dip to the trampoline). This is Alcubierre’s warp bubble.

Ultra-fast space flight

Can the Alcubierre concept of a space warp be affected by the small mass of a space craft? Theoretically, the fabric of spacetime could be affected by an impact of gravitational influence. How? Holding to the perspective that gravity is the angular momentum of particle mass; a vehicle utilizing its forward motion as rotational spin, influenced by compression of magnetic fields, is additionally influenced by electromagnetic pulses that provide motion of energy oscillations. 

Necessity for ultra-fast speed in space

Every space mission necessitates a goal. What does a viable human mission require in order to reach the closest habitable exoplanet?

Reaching the closest habitual planet, according to NASA, is twenty-seven hundred light years from Earth. That’s 14,112,000,000,000,000 (fourteen quadrillion, one hundred twelve trillion) miles away.

Light travels at 186,000 one hundred eighty-six thousand miles per second. There are 31,536,000 seconds per year. Traveling at lightspeed is 5,865,696,000,000 (five trillion, eight hundred sixty-five billion, six hundred ninety-six million) miles per year (figures are approximate).

The trip to the closest habitable exoplanet would take 2,700 years to reach, traveling at the speed of light.

Following Einstein’s famous mathematical statement in his Theory of Relativity: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. Multiplying the speed of light squared, without being multiplied by mass, is 34,596,000,000 (thirty-four billion, five-hundred ninety-six million) miles per second. Times 31,536,000 seconds per year, says that traveling at lightspeed squared, the miles traveled in a year is 1,091,019,456,000,000,000 (one quintillion, ninety-one quadrillion, nineteen trillion, four hundred fifty-six billion) miles per year. 

Mathematically, this indicates that traveling at the speed of lightspeed squared, reaching the closest planet that could possibly maintain life, would be reached in about eight months.

How close is ultra-fast technology

Current research and development technology considers faster than lightspeed flight impossible. The current procedure for space flight technology is based on chemical explosions fixed in 25,000 miles per hour launch speeds. This explosion technology is inconsiderate to basic subatomic physics. The basic motion of subatomic motion for explosions is a release of energy in 360 degrees. This merely states that the space flight of a rocket’s trajectory with capturing one degree its fuel’s energy release, is extremely inefficient.

How is it possible to capture an efficient energy for ultra-fast space flight speeds? It’s extremely clear that the speeds reached by the Parker Solar Probe were attained by the manipulation of gravity. It’s also clear that the attractive force of gravity is greater than the propelling force of exploding chemicals to attain fast speeds for space flight.

There are several CATTCC blogposts that talk about directions of possible ultra-fast space flight technology. Here is an excerpt from Otis Carr and Other Methodologies:

The judgement of physics research requires an analysis of what works. Regarding Otis Carr, there is controversy. Then, there is the technology of David Hamel. There is technology from John Searl. And the uninterpreted 2,500-year-old technology that Ezekiel mentioned. Two of the most gifted geniuses of modern times were Nikola Tesla and Viktor Schauberger, who were also embroiled in controversy. In the process of physics research to find solutions: is it more productive to focus on physics or the psychological validation of personalities? 

What is the commonality of David Hamel, John Searl, Ezekiel, Otis Carr, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, and others pursuing discovery of new transportation? The common quest is for the manipulation of gravity, electrogravitics, magnetism, and spin. And, what’s the government’s approach to space flight technology? Explosions. Yet, mankind’s fastest speed is by the manipulation of gravity.

The future of transportation floats. Its method for motion is the manipulation of gravity. As stated many times throughout these blogposts, chemical explosions for rocket propulsion are horrendously inefficient. Reaching fast space flight speeds is by using a different methodology than inefficient explosion propulsion. The solution to fast space flight speeds, as well as short distance ground level transportation methodologies, is by levitation.

Beyond the complexities involved in building a craft capable of exceptionally fast speeds, are two imperative considerations: inertia and vehicle control. Without the component of direct propulsion, how is a craft’s control possible? Contemporary physics declares that incredibly fast speed would create unacceptable g-force loads for human existence. 

Is there a format for ultra-fast space flight?

Before there is a format, there has to be a design. Prior to a design, interest in study, discovery and understanding is needed. The possibilities for discovery are as endless as the imagination can conceive.