Compiling the pieces for a gravity generator

Theoretical physics

As stated in previous blogposts, the gravitational field of a gravity motor is toroidal. This is consistent with electromagnetic fields. Its rotational action is consistent with nature, which reveals itself as centripetal motion. For a gravity generator to affect a larger or lesser gravitational field it would necessitate a larger or lesser gravitation toroidal field to be produced. Intuitively, more complex toroidal fields are found in heavier elements.

In conceptualizing a toroidal field, one could surmise that the inward motion is centripetal, yet, as the motion passes the inward action, its outward action is centrifugal. And, yes, it is.

The motion of the proposed gravity generator follows the path of gravity; found as the path of particle motion. This path is seen two dimensionally as toroidal, three dimensionally it can be described as a multisided Mobius that holds toroidal attributes. The distinction between the two is that the linear Mobius pattern holds the inward centripetal movement. The twist in its pattern causes a continual inward centripetal action. 

The gravity generator

The purpose of a gravity generator is to produce a unique gravitational field. The concept of its design is to manipulate the linear motion of particle movement as it travels through space at light speed. It’s theorized that this can be measured as a frequency pattern. The movement is very fast, its motion is very minute. The frequency of a particle is consistent with its orbital circumference. Molecules build upon the toroidal fields of an element’s particles. A gravity generator would be based upon the interaction of orbital frequencies in molecular bodies as these fields travel at the speed of light; in sync with all matter.

Expanding on the purpose of a gravity generator, is its ability of engaging a device to a state of levitation. From “Grabbing the Future”: Levitation as a component of gravity is rational approach. We’ll study an apparatus. We begin with agreeing that gravity is linear spin motion. Now the question, what could cause the lifting motion?

By applying principles of electromagnetism to electrogravitics, what do we find? What do we know about magnetism? It’s the molecular combinations of electron structure in ferrous elements. The same has to be equal to all elements with electrogravitics being legitimate; in replacing electromagnetism as the principle subatomic motion. So, applying a gravitational force, or being more precise: applying an electrogravitational force to molecular combinations of other elements; should cause a floatation reaction. Is this a true statement?

Analyzing other CATTCC blogposts regarding the proposed gravity generator, the blogpost What and How refers to spin and levitation. The theory of operation for a gravity generator: is to generate dual oscillations of centripetal motion in synchronous wave motion. Theoretically, this duality action in a gravity generator produces a negative field (vacuum) which acts as a pulling motion. Potentially, the operation draws a momentum pulse near light speed. This is similar in concept to Tesla’s Reciprocating Engine. As stated, it is somewhat similar in concept. A gravity motor has to be absent of moving parts. Light speed is too fast for mechanical movement. 

Space is ether

More from other blogposts, Viktor Schauberger stated that heat is gravity intense. Space is cold, absent of mass, and without gravity. With gravity as angular momentum on the path of particle mass motion at the speed of light, how does a collection of molecules maintain its cohesion in the void of space? The void of space merely freezes movement.

This brings to mind, Einstein’s mathematical statement from his Theory of Relativity. It shows that Energy is equal to Mass times the Speed of Light Squared. Removing the energy component from Einstein’s equation shows that mass times the speed of light, is a constant.

As Nikola Tesla said of Einstein, when he presented his Theory of Relatively; that proposed the void of space was a vacuum: the presents of ether is universal. Einstein amended his theory to accommodate Tesla’s accuracy, that indeed; space is not a vacuum. In analyzing Einstein’s hypothesis of relativity, ether represents the speed of mass traveling through the universe at light speed. Absolute zero freezes particle motion, however, its mass continues in unison within the galaxy’s movement.

Gravity generator

In compiling what has been previously mentioned, where does this place the status of the gravity generator? The action of its gravitational field is similar to an induced toroidal field. The surrounding area is affected with the dense presents of cold. Levitation is the product of electrogravitic interaction. The big question is: how?

Answers are important.

Inasmuch as magnets operate in a vacuum, it shows that the subatomic action of ferrous elements is a universal constant. The mass in celestial bodies maintain gravitational fields which adhere to Newton’s laws, as does all mass. The absence of gravity in space is due to the absence of the movement of mass at absolute zero. It’s like saying: momentum is constant without resistance or influence of an opposing force.

Back to the question: how does levitation become the product of electrogravitics interaction with a gravity generator? Directional spin motion. The intentional spin direction of motion is produced by a device in the multi-mobius movement.

An pulse regulator can generate a pulse at light speed without mechanical movement.

Levitation is interpreted as surfing gravity waves. This is conceptually provided by the Biefeld-Brown Effect. 

Electricity generators place an electrical conductor into a magnetic field. For a gravity generator; intuitively, it requires spin and magnets. Spin may be induced by an electric charge.

Other pieces

From; To the Drawing Board: The purpose of a gravity generator is for efficient transportation. For the purpose of transportation, it’s assumed that the gravity generator has, or induces, linear movement. This presumption leads to engineering methodology with a similar to a type of linear induction motor (LIM) or linear synchronous motor (LSM). This consideration of engineering oscillatory motion, is like the Bible says: a wheel within a wheel.

Is this part of the oscillating methodology?

According to Otis Carr, the craft he built; spun at over 600 rotations per minute. For a large craft, that’s a very fast speed. The Rotor, the fairground’s puke machine, spun at 33 rpm. It spun fast enough to stick kids to its wall. Julio Gobbi suggested a spin rate of 214,000 rpm would enable a craft to be freed from Earth’s gravitational influence. A craft spinning 214,000 would generate an extremely damaging g-force.

Any high-speed rotating motion requires its spin to be centripetal. The only imaginable solution to this extreme spin speed would be for a craft to be aligned with the path of particle mass and follow the linear path of particle motion.

Can a transportation device be built using spin as the principal methodology for gravitational independence? The question is asked with the assumption that it is possible. The question from the previous paragraph: is it possible to build a transportation device that can spin at 214,000rpm rotations?

Still compiling the pieces to make it work.