The misinterpretation of Einstein's famous formula

This post is going to be a bit different; the author’s name is changed for this post to use the reference “I”. This is due to a seminar I attended to enroll into a keynote speaker’s bureau. The reason for mentioning this; it’s part of an identification process. For the purpose of this post, it needs to be mentioned.

My name is JP Sweeney, those who haven’t yet heard about me: I am a disrupter of gravity. I’m here to upset the proverbial apple cart about what science knows about gravity. Instead of a being some sort of boastful proclamation, this is merely one of those rare instances where some common bloke makes a significant discover. The discovery? The explanation of what gravity is.

What is gravity? Sir Isaac Newton established the principal laws of gravity 400 years ago. Albert Einstein originated his Theory of Relativity 100 years ago. To have me among those two towers of genius is laughable; all I have done is find an answer to a question I’d asked. In looking at the question, all I did was to notice that Einstein’s theory of relativity holds the answer.

Why is my name important? It isn’t. But, since people associate an event to a particular person, I just happen to be a man who found the answer to a question: “What is gravity?” And now, my name is identified to the event as: the one disrupting gravity.

The answer, however, does create an unintentional and complete disruption to science. The scientific standard for gravity for the past 400 years is an equation of its action. This lacks the explanation of where gravity comes from to explain what it is.

What gravity is

Here is my discovery. Again, this isn’t about me. It’s merely what I found.

In the search for utilizing gravity as a source of transportation motion, I’d asked a serious question that had to be answered. Is gravity a product of mass or is it a product of subatomic motion?

Over the past 400 years, gravity has been affirmed to be a product of mass. Many scientific laws and discoveries are attributed to gravity. Long range space flights have been calculated using the laws formulated on gravitational laws.

To alleviate a misconception, my finding of what gravity is, in no way is a proclamation suggesting that Newton was wrong. My discovery is only an explanation of where gravity comes from.

Although academia science teaches how to construct mathematical equations based on the principles of gravitational law, it does not know what gravity is. Science practices gravity as the accumulation of mass rather than a product of subatomic motion. Conversely, the body of theoretical particle physics practices gravity as a product of subatomic motion and has chosen gravitons and gluons to represent gravity. The body of theoretical physics still lacks a full explanation of what gravity is.

Theoretical physics

In theoretical physics, the search for small particle makeup is like a puzzle. How do the pieces fit together? And, what are the pieces? One of the fundamental aspects of theoretical particle physics is the ongoing questions that asks how things are stuck together and don’t fall apart?

Common sense and practicality are a necessary component for a hypothesis keeping subatomic particles to stay intact. Academia has assigned its name gluons and gravitons. Color, flavor, up and down are names assigned to provide an explanation to stationary positions of movement. 

In conjunction with gravity, the primary analysis for motion is the accepted standard set over 100 years ago by Albert Einstein. His theory of relativity is certainly one of the most popular formulas of physics: E=MC². The analysis of this formula is often misinterpreted. The interpretation is most often assumed it is a reference to energy. The formula is Einstein’s theory of relativity. What Einstein states, is his analysis of what relativity is. Perhaps his formula might be shown as R (for relativity) = E=MC², or the Theory of Relativity is E=MC². Even more so to E=MC², is that it has to be pointed out that Mass is multiplied by the speed of light (MC). Energy is the square to the speed of light.   

The importance of this is the interpretation of what the formula says regarding Mass at light speed. His theory makes the claim: our relativity shows that everything; all matter, is traveling through space at the speed of light. Light travels at 186,000 per second; times 186,000 per second, is even faster. The statement: energy equals mass times the speed of light squared says that the action of energy is an action that exceeds the non-perceived consistency of motion.

An example of this is to visualize standing on a moving train. Everything inside the train does not appear to be moving. And yet, it is.

Einstein’s theory of relativity makes the statement that all thing relative to our perspective is moving at light speed. By his interpretation of saying that energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared, it says what we see as energy is a force that is twice the speed of light. So, that means: really fast. It also means we’re unable to see electricity move.

Additionally, Einstein’s mathematical statement applies to all physics. Literally, it means that all laws of physics are fundamentally incorrect. To clarify: it’s like the example of standing on a train, everything is the same but, the entire platform is moving. This is a fundamental change, or a patterned inconsistency.

This is disruptive.