Researching and finding answers for levitation

Levitating vehicle

What are all the possible aspects involved with levitation? First is electromagnetics. Then, electrogravitics, gravitational influence, psychokinetics, vacuums, CSEs, crystals, polymerization, the Schumann resonance, magnetosphere, ions, chitin, de Broglie waves, mass frequency vibration, dimensional transfer and then whatever else can be found. 

Thus far, studies show that levitation is an accumulation of electrons’ frequency vibration.  From the past few articles about levitation, it becomes clear that research needs to go back to the work of Viktor Grebennikov’s Cavity Structures Effect (CSE).

One of the most relevant articles not yet mentioned is information relating to CSEs in the article “Cavity Structural Effect” by Ville Piippola at Aetherforce.energy:   

The nature of the CSE

There have been many hypotheses about the physical nature of the CSE, but there is one theory that deserves greater attention. It was developed earlier by Valery F. Zolotariov (1931-2000), Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and it is now experimentally confirmed.

As a result of a long collaborative research Grebennikov and Zolotariov (1987) describe the discovery as “previously unknown phenomena of interaction between multi cavity structures and living systems, in which de Broglie waves associated with motion of electron flows in the solid walls of cavities create, by interference, a macroscopic field of multi cavity structures, which causes changes in the functional state of living objects located in this field”.

A particular point of interest in the research collaboration of Grebennikov and Zolotariov, is their finding of connection to de Broglie waves.

The CSE is caused by the interaction between de Broglie waves and biological systems. Cavities within the solid body are de Broglie wave resonators; they are a source of standing de Broglie waves (longitudinal waves). The rhythmical location of cavities leads to a reinforcement of the effect.

According to B. N. Rodimov (1976, as cited by Frolov, 2001) the walls of multi cavity structures can be considered as the boundaries of the potential electron’s box. The group movement of electrons leads to a system of standing de Broglie waves, which have classic frequencies.

The classic frequencies are f = nh/4mL2, where n is an integer number, L is the circumference of cavity in centimeters, and m is the effective mass of the electron. As an example, the classic frequency for 4.9 mm (side to side) diameter honey bee comb cell is calculated. The effective mass of an electron in beeswax is a bit hard to calculate, and therefore, in the calculation the free electron rest mass is used.

f = 1 · 6.626 · 10-34kgm2s-2 / 4 · 9.11 · 10-31kg · (1.7cm)2= 0.63 Hz

Further, Zolotariov gives a formula for the locations of de Broglie wave maximums: D = 2L(N+1)2K, where L is the circumference of the tube, N is the harmonic number of the wave, and K is the number of the anti-node/maximum.

This article by Ville Piippola is by far the most informative source of mathematical evidence to support CSEs. In relation to the theory for the path of particle mass, this article pointing out the de Broglie waves is also very supportive. The thing to point out is what a de Broglie wave is. The relationship in the theory of de Broglie waves is consistent with the new gravity theory; being angular momentum in the linear path of particle mass traveling at light speed. 

In a future blogpost article, the de Broglie waves will be a topic, including a short history of Louis-Victor de Broglie.

Beyond the article by Ville Piippola, are a few Youtube videos relating to CSEs. This is an interesting experiment relating to CSEs.

Here is another video by the Limitless Research channel. This is an important video, in that this is produced to debunk the fraud aspects of levitation.

Another article link; it requires an email subscription to download the free information about Viktor Grebennikov’s discoveries, from academia.edu. 

And finally: pdcoffee.com. This link is the key to all of Viktor Grebennikov’s research regarding his flying platform.

The details of Viktor Grebennikov flying platform is explained. 

Each number corresponds to a function detail.

The most important aspect to the levitating vehicle is shown here. This is the bottom portion of the flying platform.

Directly from the article:

Blinds (block-boards) The blinds’ design is a standard FAN made of flat long elements. There are four fans. Each of their four axles is fixed vertically at the platform’s corners. It can be seen in photographs. Even a picture by Grebennikov showing its device from below exists!

Two bolt heads can also be seen on the photographs, approximately in the center of each platform halves. This is a bonding of the distribution mechanism, which transfers effort from the “distributors” to a fan opening device. Each fan consists of nine plates. In order to make them strong, the plates are made of sheet metal. Micro-nets are stuck from the upper surface of each plate. On the one hand, the metal does not prevent nets from operating because the effect of cavitary structures cannot be screened and, on the other hand, protects them from mechanical influences such as influence of grass during landing. Holes in the plates, which can be seen, are not related to micro-cells. They are made only for lightening the metal plates’ weight. Do you see that it is difficult for Grebennikov to hold even a lightened version of his platform?

Antigravity effect (created due to the effect of cavitary structures) is produced by the cells but they need “fuel” in order to work with maximal efficiency.

Roughly speaking, the effect of cavitary structures works the following way: any material consists of particles vibrating by its own frequency (read Tesla’s cosmology, works of John Keely, Thomas Henry Morey, Wilhelm Reich and others). Due to such internal atomic vibrations, a stationary wave exists in the environment, around any object (and further, discrete “reflections” or maximums of such a wave).

Thus, a frequency and length of such vibration are unique for any material (according to Grebennikov, this is a “reflection of de Broglie waves). If we make a cavity, its walls will begin to “radiate” towards each other or under some angles. If a right size of such a cell will be found, waves’ maximums will sum up and a field will be strengthened in the given point of space (field antinode).

So, let us make conclusions. First, as many as possible surfaces are necessary for one cell (it may seem strange but a polygon with maximal quantity of sides, which can be used for filling a plane without gaps and fractally is a hexagon). Second, the less the size of each cell, the more quantity of surfaces, which we can have with the same volume. The more cells and, accordingly, the more surfaces, the stronger the effect of cavitary structures. Let us remark more that size of one cell is not arbitrary but divisible by wave “reflections” (maximums’ position), which, in their turn, depend on a used material. Wave “reflections” can be far from the surface as well as very close to it. Closer ones have stronger power.

So, we have a very fine net. By specifying a certain geometry of its cells (size and form of planes, angles between the planes), we concentrate our STATIC field (the material’s “radiation”) in certain points of space. However, we are interested, first of all, in force GRADIENT. The mentioned static field does not produce yield and confirms the law of energy conservation. We don’t have antigravity so far.

Then we use lepton theory of Isakov (remember that lepton, aether, and orgone are the same). We have to determine such a form of cells, which will allow having different field force: from avery low on the one side to a very high on another. The less distance to the cell material surface, the stronger wave “reflections” we have. We make a simple and logical conclusion that one side of the cell must be geometrically less than another. If an initial cell is cylindrical, we have a cone: if it is triangular or square, we have a pyramid with a triangular or square base. If we initially have a hexagonal cell, the pyramid will be hexagonal too.

It is necessary to tell about lepton explanation of gravity effect. This means that leptons fly all over space in all directions, chaotically. They pass through all bodies but still they transmit some (very small) part of their speed to these bodies. Now imagine two spheres. A lepton stream flying from one sphere to another passes through the first sphere, brakes and “irradiates” the second sphere less than the first one (the second sphere is in “lepton shadow” of the first one). And on the contrary. Thus, pressure from the direction of the internal space (between the spheres) will be less than the external pressure, which leads to attraction (i.e. pushing together) of two bodies. This effect is called gravity.

So, we need antigravity. There are leptons or aether everywhere in universe. If a device will be invented, which will be able to change leptons’ direction to the necessary one (create aether wind), our task will be solved. We already have such a device – this is our cell. A cell of the conic (or cuneiform) kind takes up a lepton stream from the horizontal direction (it will become obvious after we read Wilhelm Reich’s works in the attachment) and reapportion it to the vertical one: a small part of the stream goes in one direction while almost the whole stream goes in another. Of course, if the cell’s axis is placed vertically as in Grebennikov’s platform.

Now, if we place such a solid net consisting of the micro-cells under the platform (in a zone BETWEEN the bodies, i.e. between the Earth and the platform with a man) and orient it in such a way that “aether wind”, which is created by it, blows the platform from the bottom compensating insufficiency of lepton pressure (as described above), the platform and its passenger will become imponderable and fly up. Controlling a power of an aether stream and its directions (the blinds are used for this), we have the same rough material idea of force vector as in the case of jet streams. The only difference is that aether is so insensible for us that there are no strong air streams. At first sight, there is nothing! The platform just picks up speed and height without any sound, visual and other effects. Inertia force doesn’t influence a pilot. It is necessary to note that a head is heavier than legs while the legs, in their turn, are heavier than the platform – it is a gradient of the antigravity force!

It is interesting that it is possible to make symmetric cells (like usual honeycombs) instead of cuneiform ones. A half of this “aether wind” can blow in the ground – it’s all right. It is unreasonable: about a half of the power is lost (power, however, can be increased by decreasing cells’ size by 0.5) but, technologically, such nets are easier to build.

This is one of the most important articles relating to Viktor Grebennikov. The article continues on. It’s a fascinating and relevant 21 page pdf.