Moon Colony Transportation and New Physics
Moon Colony Transportation and Physics for New Transportation
photo credits: freepic/pixel labs
What kind of vehicle can be used for transportation on the moon? The initial size of a moon or Mars colony would be the size of a large building. Distances traveled in such a facility would be within walking distance but, with minimal gravity. The most appropriate device needed for any ground use transportation would be for building and material handling, with a forklift. Outside the living compound, exploration would necessitate a transportation vehicle. NASA’s moon rover and Mars rover are designed for this task.
As such facilities grow, what type of planetary surface transportation is needed? A vehicle using a combustible type of engine using chemical explosions as an energy source for propulsion has an extremely limited use. Vehicles with friction-based movement using an electric power source are unsustainable for long term use.
What sort of sustainable transportation device could be considered? Would Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating platform work on the moon? Is there enough electromagnetic content in the moon’s atmosphere to provide voltage? An atmosphere without enough voltage to power a strong magnetic field would be inadequate to power a vehicle. Since levitation is mass accumulation vibration, the moon has a lesser density atmosphere than Earth and is lacking the gaseous particles to accumulate large quantities of mass for vibrational effects.
Vibration reflects sound. Without an atmosphere there is no sound.
Here is an AI answer regarding a question of sound on the moon. “No, there is no sound on the Moon in the traditional sense because its atmosphere is so thin (a near-vacuum) that it lacks the medium required for sound waves to travel through the air. Unlike on Earth, where sound propagates via air molecules, sound cannot travel through the vacuum of space or the lunar exosphere, meaning astronauts cannot hear voices or explosions from a distance without equipment.
“However, sound can be transmitted through solid materials on the Moon's surface, such as the ground or spacesuits. For instance, astronauts on the Apollo missions could hear the vibrations of a hammer striking the lunar surface because the sound traveled through their boots and suits directly to their ears. Similarly, when spent rocket stages crashed into the Moon, they generated seismic vibrations that lasted for over an hour, causing the Moon to "ring like a bell" due to its dry, rigid interior, though these waves were detected by seismometers rather than heard by human ears in the air.”
Since sound is able to be transmitted through solid materials, does this provide enough mass vibration to accumulate levitation? Of course not, levitation is a floating action with an object in the air.
Rather than inventing a vehicle that eliminates use of the wheel for an extremely low number of users, creating an undiscovered short distance technology for a zero-atmosphere levitation vehicle based on concepts of gravity manipulation would be an inappropriate effort.
Where is the appropriate effort desperately needed for change in transportation?
Transportation demand to alleviate today’s traffic
One only needs to be on a slow crowded freeway to discover the crucial demand to improve transportation. In analyzing the problems with traffic, it has to be recognized that all urban growth is built upon an area’s primary source of transportation. Affecting the improvement to Western Civilization’s transportation, requires an accompanying change in its urban design.
Enabling sustainable urban design requires a brand-new mode of transportation: sustainable transportation. This involves replacing the unsustainability of Western Society’s automobile, as its primary source of transportation. There’s a market demand from today’s culture to replace its transportation system that began 125 years ago. Modern society calls for a convenient, fast, economic, and efficient mode of advanced transportation technology.
New transportation designs
Developing a design with a brand-new concept of transportation opens a new era for technology innovation. This technology search is a dive into deep physics with a relationship between the invisible motion of sound, gravity, and the flow of particles. This investigation encompasses more than transportation technology of short-distance or long-distance travel. It includes a relationship of a waves and particle mass. This probe into the edge of theoretical physics seeks to add perspective, rather than challenging the context of agreed opinion. The task is for new perceptions in physics in its relationship with transportation.
The dive into theoretical physics
Changing transportation from today’s use, obligates brand-new perspectives that are currently unknown. This can only be attained by searching the unknown. Today’s standard procedure for transportation is the pursuit to add technology onto what already exists. An example was adding a radio to a car’s interior to make the ride more pleasant. Existing transportation technology pursues propulsion, aerodynamic engineering, and computerized operation. This only promotes the fundamentals of 100- to 200-year-old technologies.
Foundational changes in transportation necessitate study into primary perceptions of physics at the fundamental levels.
This is a long segment. This answer takes a journey further into science, along the narrow path in theoretical physics to follow the motion of particle mass. The path leads to a ravine which questions the accuracy of scientific opinion, elucidates a variation of perspective, and explores fringes of the unknown.
Historical academicians
Many centuries ago, the scientific stance of Earth was confirmed as flat and the heavens rotated around it. In 500 BCE, Pythagoras proposed a spherical Earth based on philosophical and aesthetic reasoning rather than empirical evidence. By the 3rd century BCE, the educated scholars had established that a round Earth is a scientific fact, with Eratosthenes providing the first accurate empirical confirmation.
The point being: scholarly scientific opinion is susceptible of being a perception contrary to fact. This is to say: although unified opinion insists on scientific absolutes, it took the world’s greatest minds 200 years to agree that the Earth is round.
Today’s academia makes claim that particles and waves are dissimilar.
Differentiation of a wave and a particle
In his 1924 PhD thesis, French physicist Louis-Victor-Pierre-Raymond, 7th duc de Broglie, theorized the de Broglie wave.
His thesis postulated a wave nature of electrons which suggests that all matter has wave properties. His concept, known as the de Broglie hypothesis explains wave-particle duality, as both a particle and a wave. This theory addresses the core of quantum mechanics. De Broglie was awarded the 1929 Nobel Prize for Physics for his discoveries, yet, modern physics discounts this perspective.
In a related CATTCC article, Deep Dive into Quantum Physics, the work of John Worrell Keely (1827–1898) is mentioned. His work was in relation to wave flow. Extending this philosophic practice was the controversial work of Walter Russell (1871-1963). His work parallels the unified field theory, with light.
In studying theory of classical physics, the work of John Worrell Keely, regarding sympathetic streams in the ratio 3:6:9, are among investigation. His work is based on this principle: “Those whose relative frequencies are 3:9, are mutually attractive, while those having the relation of 6:9, are mutually repellant.” The website https://svpwiki.com/369 is an exploration of his findings.
In mathematical exploration of these relationships, is it a valid premise to use base three, six, or nine? Most likely base 9 to correspond with the path of particle mass in its full rotation.
In following that study is a theory stating that the balanced flow of particle mass is based on the fundamental shape of a rotating tetrahedron as motion.
In accordance to Einstein’s postulation that all mater is flowing at light speed: all elements flow. All molecular combinations flow. That is to say: all matter has frequency. When an ampere of electrical energy flows, everything within that wave path is subjected to light speed squared. Static electricity is a collection of potential energy that is undirected, its flow is an electromagnetic centrifugal reaction. This is what Keely refers to as a 6:9 frequency.
The central theme here is the exploration into the path of particle mass for the purpose of replicating its motion to allow an engagement of synchronization with a vehicle to flow in that same linear motion. This is in assumption to Einstein’s theory of relatively that all matter is traveling at light speed through the universe. Adding to this complexity is the fact that such a task implies a situation analogous to standing on a train with two trains traveling parallel with each other and both trains traveling at the same speed. The point of the analogy is a question in finding the launch point of how to jump from one train to the other train; the speed and direction have to match.
Einstein’s famous quote claims that energy (E) equals mass (M) times the speed of light (C) squared. With that being correct, matching the direction and pattern of flow of the constant (MC) would allow the manipulation with the flow and direction of energy. Enabling this motion with a vehicle would expand the context of nanoscience computation of quantum physics to lightspeed travel. The flow of energy has to match the flow of mass.
The flow of particle mass
As a postulation to the path of particle motion, the three-dimensional path of particle mass is described as an eight-pointed mobius. The Keely base 9 frequency (6:9) being the negative (electron motion) frequency, engages a momentum point; triggering movement of the inner (opposite) charge (proton). This action is the gravitational process to the linear motion of angular momentum of mass traveling at light speed.
This proposes shows that particles travel in wave motion. It also validates the CATTCC position: Gravity is a subatomic action; a process of motion. It is the angular momentum of a particle’s frequency pattern in the flow of mass. This is instrumental in CATTCC’s mission of researching new methodologies for transportation.
One key point of transportation interest is that Otis Carr used the Nikola Tesla’s influence of Utron as the square, circle, cone; for movement in a centripetal motion for his ship to spin. Along this principle, it recognizes that all matter moves in a unified motion. A molecule follows the same pattern. In this perspective.
Conclusion
Does all this clarify the differentiation between a wave and a particle? The answers are dependent upon one’s perspective.
To the academically trained and practicing physicists, the answers are based on mathematics and cyclotron bombardment to obliterate particle mass: while snapping pictures at the moment of disintegration.
Some philosophers of physics with empirical reasoning; conceptualize particle mass as waves traveling as frequency.



