Study in short distance transportation designs

In the previous blogpost: Short Distance Transportation was another look at Viktor Grebennikov’s cavity structures effect (CSE). With a deeper investigation to Viktor Grebennikov’s work, it’s reasonable to study the composition of wasp nests and bee hives. This blogpost is a continuation regarding the composition of CSE structures.

Chitin

Chitin is a polymerization. Quoted is a paragraph from the previous blogpost: Viewing a CSE at the subatomic level, what does it show? It’s a crystal shape that emits a specific frequency. This is common to crystalline structures. In comparing this view to electromagnetic fields on a subatomic level, an electromagnetic field is specific to a ferrous reaction from an electric/magnetic charge. The crystalline structure is a passive frequency generator. A magnet is a molecular combination of electron structures that cause/provide ferrous reaction of attraction or repulsion due to element electron’s action.

As Viktor Schauberger says: comprehend and copy nature. To discover nature’s process of levitation, it requires the study of magnet action and in this example: CSEs. The CSEs are prevalent in wasps’ nests and bee hives. Their composition is a polymer crystallization. What’s the frequency range of this crystallization? How does the composition of this structure impact its frequency?   

In describing chitin, here is a direct quote from Wikipedia:

1. The transition between glucose and N-Acetylglucosamine 
2. The polymerization of N-Acetylglucosamine to chitin 
3. The polymerization of glucose to cellulose.

Glucose

Glucose changes depending on what form it takes, glucose is the basis of both chitin and cellulose and the only difference between the two types is what form glucose takes in each polymer. When it becomes chitin it changes to N-Acetylglucosamine which then gets polymerized into chitin. Glucose remains in the same when it becomes cellulose and only needs to get polymerized to become cellulose.

Cellulose 

The structure of cellulose is chained together glucose molecules all joined through a dehydration reaction to form a chain. Cellulose form chains that when combined form up to microfibrils that then form microfibrils that form cellulose fibers that then form up to form cell walls. The properties of cellulose depends on its chain length or degree of polymerization. The polymerization in bacteria is more pure than those found in plants and for that reason it has a higher water content and higher tensile strength along with it.

Chitin 

Chitins structure is similar to celluloses structure except for at the second carbon where instead of another OH (hydroxyl) there is a NHCOCH3, the monomer is called N-Acetylglucosamine. Chitin starts with the N-Acetylglucosamine molecules that when chained together become an chitin chains that form into chitin nanofibrils that are combined with the protein for that respective structure type that then form into mineralized protein plains, that are then twisted to form a more compact protein plane that then are stacked together to form multilayer cuticles. Pure chitlin is a clear flexible substance and needs to be mixed with different proteins to form the structure found in other creatures. Chitin is combined with calcium carbonate when it is within crustacean shells and is combined with sclerotin to form cuticles. Chitin is used by several species most notably fungi and insects.   

The key seems to be calcium carbonite in its intermixing polymer shell. The buildup of this protein component is through the heat process of calories. In other words, a slow process. This building process activates centripetal structural crystallization of nature. Its CSE is nature’s electrogravitic manufacturing process. It also makes reference to sclerotin: “Chitin is combined with calcium carbonate when it is within crustacean shells and is combined with sclerotin to form cuticles.” The sclerotin is found as a natural occurrence within bugs’ growth as a phenol secretion.

Bug wings and CSE

In looking at microscopic portions of bug wings, it displays flattened elongated structures, similar to the elongated sections of a wasps’ nest or beehive. When relating these geometric bug structures to wasps’ nests, there is an association to a relationship with the CSE. The assumption is that this CSE structure produces a frequency. 

This picture shows a definite atmospheric reaction.

There are several questions that call for answers. How does this frequency produce energy patterns that enable the platform to levitate? The frequency response isn’t within the audible the sound spectrum. Is it interaction with atmospheric pressure as an aerodynamic action? Is it an ion reaction? This is something of nature. A sort of reaction to CSE compression? Wings of an airplane lift due to the vacuum created above the wing. Does a CSE field compression create a similar vacuum to create lift?    The gases in the air shows an intensified CSE field. So, there is a CSE field; what aspect of a crystallization frequency provides an apparatus to allow a levitation motion? How does a crystal frequency generate a CSE field to interact with atmospheric gases? 

Placing your feet on two flat and narrow boards and pointing downward at the top of a mountain creates a tremendous velocity while gliding on the surface of snow. The atmosphere is a gaseous fluid. It does seem plausible for a device to interact with air and manipulate movement through the air.

The most intriguing aspect of Viktor Grebennikov’s levitating device is that it’s presumably passive. This technique for transportation is rendered by industry experts as impossible. Like skiing or hang gliding, or sailing, or surfing is also impossible?

There are several previous blogposts that discuss surfing gravity waves. The blogpost:  https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-surfboard The tangibility of such would require an apparatus that produces the amplification of a gravity wave; then a means of riding it.

https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-motor With a gravity generator, we’re looking to capture and manipulate gravitational fields. Its operation would capture the linear motion of particle movement as it travels through space at light speed. This is found in a frequency pattern. The movement is very fast, its motion is very minute.

The frequency of a particle is consistent with its orbital diameter. Molecules build upon the toroidal fields of an element’s particles. A gravity generator would be based upon the orbital frequencies of molecular bodies as these fields travel at the speed of light, in sync with all matter.

https://www.cattcc.org/gravity-waves How does the functionality of gravity waves effect the concept of gravity? From the aspect of physics: all things in nature flow in synchronous motion. Gravity is a motion; all motion has frequency as its pattern.

Excerpts from the book, ‘Rising From Unsustainable’:

Surfing Gravitational Wave Pulse Resonance

The concept of gravitational wave pulse manipulation is unknown. In searching the term wave pulse, answers are found as physics questions. The concept of gravity wave pulse manipulation is yet to be understood, nor even explored. What does it require to explore this realm of technology?

These three blogpost excerpts bring a unifying concept to attention. The CSE fields holding a similar concept for short distance transportation in associating the CSE field to that of a gravity wave, wherein the levitating platform acts as a type of surfboard.



There is much to be contemplated in Viktor Grebennikov’s claim to have built a levitating device. The significance remains in replicating his device into an apparatus that is applicable to serve as brand-new mode of transportation.