There are many aspects to developing a brand-new form of transportation. 

In affirming with a self-analysis survey: who is the audience to these blogposts? Is this audience intentional to discover new methodologies for transportation? Or by happenstance? Is the content enough to stimulate curiosity? 

A writer is supposed to know their audience and write to them. However, this site is about research. Most of the writing is from inspired messages. Inspiration is in the hands of an artist, as an interpretation.

Who’s to say what type of audience is interested in working towards a sustainable future? There are no guidelines but, it affects everyone.

The intent of CATTCC is to help in developing a product as a result from the inspired messages. Does a writer build things? Builders can write. Does an audience participate?

So, to this self-analysis survey; most of the blogposts are merely compiling thoughts in the research process. It should be either interesting or entertaining for an audience. The level of scientific intrigue is a bit beyond normal conversation. It’s in the definition of inspiration.

Innovation applies inspiration. In today’s transportation unsustainability tragedy, implementation of inspiration is imminent.

What does this audience gain from reading? Relevance. It can be emotional or scientific. Otherwise, it is wasted effort for the writer and the audience. There is an objective to CATTCC and these blogposts.

Validating the purpose

In recognizing the purpose of these blogpost writings, they solve a problem. Combustion energy is massively inefficient. Arriving after a problem, are solutions.

In determining possible solutions, the CATTCC team recognizes and studies the scientific and deeply wise thoughts of philosophic geniuses throughout history.

At the top of the list of profound scientific statement in all of history relating to transportation is: “Comprehend and copy nature.”

Among the other favorite quotes from Viktor Schauberger:

“I think it would have been much better if Newton had contemplated how the apple got up there in the first place!”

“In every case do the opposite to whatever technology does today. Then you will always be on the right track.”

“Implosion is no invention in the conventional sense, but rather the renaissance of ancient knowledge, lost over the course of time.”

“You must look at the processes of motion in the macrocosmos and microcosmos accurately, and copy them!”

“If I am a fool then it is no misfortune, for then only one more fool will wander this Earth. Amongst the millions of mentally deranged it would barely be noticed. But what if I am not a fool, and that science itself has erred? Then the tragedy is incalculable!”

To the product

The examples show three primary similarities. Wheel within a wheel, spin, and magnetics are the fundamental components for building a device. Spin motion is centripetal. Magnetic fields are toroidal.

In the illustration of Ezekiel’s vision, what was the configuration of a wheel within a wheel? It can be surmised that a magnet placement in one of the wheels, created a toroidal field that effected the opposing wheel.

Similar action is sited in the craft technology from Viktor Schauberger, Otis Carr, John Searl, and David Hamel. Interestingly, the only technology seeking a different function is to create a gravity field generator.

Research is the process of discovering answers.

The commonality with all five examples is that each one, theoretically, produces an independent inertia field. Identifying a vehicle’s independent inertia field is an important component to vehicle design.

Inertia

Explaining inertia is best found in fs.blog describing inertia:  

The German astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) coined the word “inertia.” The etymology (linguistic history) of the term is telling. Kepler obtained it from the Latin for “unskillfulness, ignorance; inactivity or idleness.” True to its origin, inertia keeps us in bed on a lazy Sunday morning (we need to apply activation energy to overcome this state).

Inertia refers to resistance to change — in particular, resistance to changes in motion. Inertia may manifest in physical objects or in the minds of people.

How is the creation of an independent inertia field important to vehicle design? As described in the design of Otis Carr’s ship, the two outer spheres of his craft spun in opposite directions. The inner sphere remained in a neutral position. This involves inertia. Since inertia can be loosely described as the active force of momentum, the interaction with opposing rotational actions of Otis Carr’s two outer spheres is equalized. The result effectively cancels their spin inertia to the interior sphere. The importance is that the ship, theoretically, can travel withing Earth’s gravitational field and the ship’s passengers are only subject to a neutral field. Hypothetically, the vehicle can travel at a very fast speed in Earth’s atmosphere and make an instant ninety-degree turn; without a g-force reaction to passengers.

Control

With any vehicle, control is essential. The illustrations described with Viktor Schauberger, John Searl, and David Hamel’s crafts, their experiments engaged spin rose into the air, and disappeared. They had no control mechanism.

The control mechanism in Otis Carr’s craft is still an unknown technology that has distinct similarities to Nikola Tesla designs.

In examining the details of Otis Carr’s history, he repeatedly had references to William Russell’s book: ‘Universal Law, Natural Science and Philosophy’. Carr often claimed that it’s necessary to go beyond three-dimensional thinking. There is an esoteric meaning when Mr. Carr says to use fifth dimensional understanding to perceive what the book is referencing. This is a seemingly impossible task.

Otis T. Carr’s ‘Inner Dimensions of Mystery’. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/64641928/otc-x1-manuscript,

One of the extreme points of interest in his book is this:

Simply put, as the natural flow of life is that our heart and this planet are aligned can and do have a huge influence over one another, Mr. Carr built a scale working replica of this very planet. Knowing that the human heart brain tissue sends more signals to the brain than the actual brain in your head sends to your heart, all we have to do to control this craft is send the control signal of pure love from the heart to flood the brain so that we can consciously project through the pineal gland and the destination. Mr. Carr built this as an inter-dimensional teleportation craft, this concept voids time and shows it for the man-made conception it is. Both the heart and the pineal gland hold the very magnetic fields in place needed to interact with the energy of the craft.

Being a true disciple of the Great Master Adept of the Art, Nikola, Mr. Carr had the most beautiful of mentors.

To those without the esoteric understanding, the paragraph explicitly refers to the operational controls of Otis Carr’s ship. His claim is that the operational control of the craft is controlled by the message of the heart, interpreted by the magnetic fields held within the pineal gland. This is a waveform, generated by concentration. This interacts with the craft’s energy for its directional operation. This indicates the isolation of frequency tone that can be interpreted. The intent is for this frequency to be used as an operational control. It has to be transmitted and received; to correspond as a signal switch.

This opens the door to a new realm of technology. Neural oscillation signaling.