Philosophy, societal dilemma, and transportation

photo credit: pexels.com

The practicality for a new mode of transportation is a result of social demand, this demand makes new types of transportation inevitable. How is this societal demand different than trends and fashion, which are a temporary mood of social conduct? The general public is often compared to a herd of sheep. People follow trends, it makes a thing popular. This isn’t written as a derogatory statement to provoke insult, every human on the planet is a member of the general public.

There is a question: what happens when there is no interest for a new mode of transportation? Although there is a demand to have a suitable mode of transportation to match society’s technological advances of the past 50 years, the public only produces expectation. The demand for change is detached from initiation by followers.

Is this a philosopher’s welcome to the world of pessimists? Not at all. It’s merely the way things are, if any change is to take place, it has to be initiated by those who have an idea about alternatives. Optimism is a choice, and yet there is a fear: nobody likes being wrong. Since so few people understand the symbiotic correlation between transportation and urban growth; the general public expects someone else to make societal course changes. The phrase, “Build it and they will come” is a popular movie line quote from many years ago; which appropriately shows the public attitude. Public includes government.

Society’s voice is a demand for more efficient short-distance transportation. This affects their everyday lifestyle. The transportation industry is relatively absent of funding availability for researching new modes of transportation. As a matter of fact, a new mode of transportation would render their industry obsolete. This means funding of transportation advances into researching new modes of transportation away from the automobile is detrimental to the auto industry and the entire economic structure of Western Society growth. While this prevalent attitude hampers research exploration, the blaring squeal of social demand for transportation’s change, provides motivation. It has to be recognized that market demand stimulates creativity. With this underlying motivation, money has a way of making things happen quicker.

The advance of technology to culture brings the phenomena of social media. Most of the social media chatter shows an inadequacy to generate interest about transportation advances for the creation of a new mode of transportation. The general response for mentioning transportation or the need for sustainable urban growth in a conversation: its boring. This topic produces very little entertainment value for amusement.

In today’s era of virtually unlimited information access, everyone is a genius, or so conveys the opportunity. Yet, with this unlimited knowledge, entire generations are perplexed by the engineering designs of a mere can opener.

Alas, Atlas shrugged.

There is nothing gained by expounding on futility. What stride can be made to discover a brand-new mode of short-distance transportation? One of the things to be recognized is that the social demand for transportation advances includes the cry of social concerns for sustainable urban growth. Its relevancy outweighs the fact of this being a topic without heighten amusement value.

Western society was built by the private sector. Transportation changes in building a new mode of transportation will be by the private sector. Challenges of invention include the social ambivalence with its lack of support. This doesn’t halt invention, just seems to make it move slower.

New innovation in transportation

Innovation for invention requires direction. The direction of CATTCC research is theoretical physics to provide the breakthroughs for new modes of transportation. This includes developing ultra-fast speeds for space travel and short-distance travel. Both include the manipulation of gravity.

Short-distance travel

What is the direction for exploring short-distance travel? Levitation. In a practical sense, this includes the manipulation of gravity. However, long-distance space travel requires a totally different application for using gravity.

In the blogpost, Developing the Theory for Levitation, the response is addressed to the question: what is levitation? Levitation is explained as an action of rapid oscillating motion. Even as an action of what appears as standing still, relativity is in a flow of motion. Inasmuch as a waterfall appears as a steady flow, it is a group of individual moving droplets engaged in Earth’s continual gravitational flow of motion.

How does gravitational motion relate to levitation? Levitation is the oscillation of molecules. It is sort of an amplification of gravity’s angular momentum. A resonance of molecular action within a field.

There are other aspects to short-distance transportation with the use of gravity. Earth’s atmosphere is filled with particles of mass, albeit gases. How can these particles be applied to levitation? The only answer is with knowing the simplicity of nature. Although nature is simplistic, its intricacies are extremely complex, not complicated. Viktor Schauberger discovered that nature is centripetal. Its motion is counterclockwise.

In the blogpost, Earth’s Electrostatic Charge; it suggests that the connection of Earth’s internal magnetic core, and its electromagnetically charged atmosphere, provide components necessary to be used for a magnetic action. Clearly, this addresses the acknowledgment that Earth’s composition is comprised of ferrous elements and magnetic action. All magnets affect ferrous elements. The presents of an electromagnetic field surrounding Earth is the corresponding reaction to many forms of Earth’s internal magnetic and electromagnetic action.

This raises the plausibility for vehicle designs that levitate.

Having the knowledge from Schauberger, that nature is filled with patterns of flow with currents and eddy’s, this also applies to magnetic currents and flow. It indicates magnetic flow similar to streams, rivers, and the wind. This suggests magnetic intensities to be consistent along certain pathways.

Several blogposts have examined other areas for potential floatation vehicle solutions. The consistent methodology found in CATTCC research is with levitation. The blogpost: Using Air for Levitation explores this concept. It makes the statement: Earth’s electrostatic field is identified as a potential source for magnetic action. Magnets repel and attract. Earth’s core is magnetic. This magnetic action has the ability to repel and attract. Grebennikov’s levitating device utilizes the CSE as a negative charge. Against Earth’s positive electrostatic charge, Grebennikov’s levitating device has attraction potential.

Viktor Grebennikov is said to have built a floatation device. He was a Russian entomologist, and artist; who discovered the Cavity Structures Effect (CSE) in the 1980s. His theory for CSE’s was developed from discoveries of bug wings and wasp nests. He discovered these CSE’s are voids. In the blogpost: Levitation: Solve for a+b it describes these voids as a negative field.

There are several CATTCC blogposts examining his proposed technology. These writings show viable possibilities for utilizing Grebennikov’s technology to explore building a levitating vehicle device.

Conclusion

The honest way to accurately describe society’s behavior is determined by one’s philosophical perspective. Patterns of action that are classified by chart numbering are predetermined by those assembling the chart groups. To a certain degree, there are indeed similarities, however, of the 8 billion people currently living on Earth, each person has a unique fingerprint, their own favorite color, and thoughts that no one else can know.

So it is also in determining what choices a person makes in their freedom for spiritual theology. Conditioning a person for lifestyle choice is selected by social behavior. How is this a part of transportation? Land-use design plays a large role in determining social condition.